[00:00:03] WELCOME TO THE SPECIAL CALLED MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. [CALL TO ORDER] WE ARE GATHERED AT 6101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD AND THE TIME IS 5:19. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. TONIGHT THE COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE WARREN RUIZ, JON KENDALL, STEVE COHEN AND MYSELF, SEAN MERRELL. COMMISSIONERS TIFFANY WELLS AND MICHAEL HOWARD ARE ABSENT TONIGHT. REPRESENTING STAFF ARE JOHN LETTELLEIR, JONATHAN HUBBARD, ROLANDREA RUSSELL. JENNIFER MORGAN AND REPRESENTING LEGAL COUNSEL IS RYAN PITTMAN. TONIGHT, WE HAVE ONE ZONING RELATED PUBLIC HEARING ON THE AGENDA, AND I WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS. [Public Hearing - Zoning: Zoning of Property (Z26-0010)] THE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PRECEDED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST. THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED TEN MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION. FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DOWN THERE. IN THE END, THE CITY COUNCIL IS EXPECTED TO RESUME THEIR REGULAR MEETING IN THIS CHAMBER TONIGHT AT 6:30. IF THERE ARE ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITIONS. THE TIME LIMIT IS FIVE MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK. THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME IF A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO SPEAK. PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED, SO SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE. PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO THE MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR THE APPLICANT. PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED. AFTER ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES, IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO A FUTURE MEETING. PLEASE NOTE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES. FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL. THIS CASE WILL BE HEARD BY CITY COUNCIL FOLLOWING THE PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING TONIGHT. SO WE DID THE ROLL CALL. CITIZEN INPUT. IS ANYBODY HERE TO SPEAK FOR AN ITEM? NOT ON THE AGENDA. SEEING NONE, WE'LL MOVE TO THE REGULAR AGENDA. WE HAVE ONE ITEM TONIGHT. AGAIN, IT'S A PUBLIC HEARING. IT'S A ZONING ZONING OF PROPERTY Z26-0010. OWNER MULTIPLE OWNERS. FOR THAT. IF IT'S RIGHT BEFORE. I APOLOGIZE, BEFORE ITEM TWO. I'D LIKE TO REQUEST A CLOSED SESSION. MOTION TO RECEIVE A RECESS INTO CLOSED EXECUTIVE. WE DON'T NEED TO DO THAT. YEAH. WE'LL WAIT. SEE HOW IT PLAYS OUT. OKAY. SORRY ABOUT THAT. OKAY, OKAY. OKAY. SO JOHN LETTELLEIR, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ON THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY, THE CITY ANNEXED THE PROPERTY BACK IN 1999, AND THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THE APPLICANT ON THIS BOUGHT THE WHAT WAS LOT ONE THAT'S THE MOST NORTHERN LOT IN 2007 AND LOT TWO, WHICH WAS A SOUTHERN LOT BACK IN 2014. THERE'S BEEN DISCUSSION ABOUT THE TYPE OF USES OPERATING ON THE PROPERTY. AS SUCH, WE HAVE BEEN IN CONVERSATIONS WITH THE APPLICANT TO RESOLVE THE CHALLENGES THAT WE HAVE HAD ON THE PROPERTY AND FEEL LIKE WE HAVE REACHED AN AGREEMENT ON THIS, AND SO WE HAVE ADVERTISED THIS CASE FOR P&Z TO ACT ON IT TONIGHT. CITY COUNCIL WILL CONSIDER THE CASE AS WELL AS THE ORDINANCE FOLLOWING THIS MEETING TONIGHT. SO ON THIS WHAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING IS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OFFICE ONE TOWNHOME ZONING ON THIS PROPERTY. WITHIN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR WOULD BE AN ALLOWED USE ON THE PROPERTY. THE DEFINITION IS INCLUDED IN THE ORDINANCE. AND HERE'S WHAT WE'RE GETTING OUT OF THIS. CURRENTLY CARS ARE BEING PARKED ON VIOLA STREET. THAT IS THE RESIDENTIAL STREET THAT RUNS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THIS PROPERTY. BY APPROVING THIS, THEY AGREE TO HAVE ALL THAT PARKING STAFF, PARKING, ANY VEHICLES BEING WORKED ON, ALL WILL BE ON THE SITE OF LOT ONE. ALSO IS THE INSTALLATION OF A EIGHT FOOT MASONRY WALL ALONG LOT ONE. THERE'S NO SCREENING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING AGRICULTURAL. SO THEY'LL BE REQUIRED TO DO THE 18 EIGHT FOOT TALL MASONRY WALL AND FOLLOW THE ZONING ORDINANCE. [00:05:05] AS FAR AS SCREENING, EXCEPT FOR THE AREA WHERE THERE'S A BUILDING, A METAL BUILDING THAT EXISTS ON THE EASTERN LOT LINE THERE, THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO PUT A BUILDING IN THERE, BUT ONCE THE BUILDING IS REMOVED, THERE WILL BE REQUIRED TO INSTALL THE MASONRY WALL AND SO FORTH ON THE PROPERTY. IF THEY CAN, IF THEY INTEND TO EXPAND THE AUTOMOTIVE USE IT'S PROVIDED FOR, YOU'LL SEE THE FINAL PLAT ON AUGUST THE 11TH OF LOT ONE CANNOT BE LARGER THAN 0.8 ACRES. AND SO THE FINAL PLAT SHOWN THAT WILL BE BEFORE YOU IN A MONTH'S TIME. AND SO IT CANNOT EXTEND BEYOND THAT EXTENSION OUTSIDE OF THAT AREA. IF EVER THEY WANT TO BUILD A NEW BUILDING, THEN BOTH BUILDINGS WOULD NEED TO BE REMOVED. AND IF BUILDING ONE, WHICH IS THE ONE, THE BUILDING CLOSEST TO FM. 423 THEY WANT TO EXPAND THAT, THEN BUILDING TWO THE METAL BUILDING ON THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE MUST BE REMOVED FIRST BEFORE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS ISSUED FOR IT. WE ALSO HAVE THE REQUIREMENT OF DOING THE 25 FOOT LANDSCAPE EDGE ALONG 423 SIDEWALK AND SUCH FOR LOT ONE. LOT TWO, THE SCREENING FOR LOT TWO, JUST LIKE ANY OTHER DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF FRISCO, WILL, THAT WILL HAPPEN WHEN LOT TWO IS UNDER DEVELOPMENT. SO WE'RE ONLY TALKING ABOUT THE SCREENING WALL ON LOT ONE FOR RIGHT NOW. ALSO INCLUDED IS WHENEVER SOMEBODY DEVELOPS LOT TWO, AND IF IT DOES DEVELOP AS COMMERCIAL, YOU'LL SEE IN YOUR PACKET THE DRIVE THAT COMES OUT IN THE MOST SOUTHERN PORTION DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE MEDIAN OPENING THAT WAS INSTALLED BY TEXDOT. AND SO THEY WOULD HAVE TO MAKE THAT ADJUSTMENT. AND WHOEVER DEVELOPS THAT WILL NEED TO MAKE ANY OF THE NECESSARY RELOCATION OF UTILITIES OR WHATNOT. BUT THE CITY, AS THEY DO ON ALL DEVELOPMENT CASES, WILL HELP FACILITATE THE TEXDOT PERMIT, WHICH IS REQUIRED. SO TXDOT AND OUR ENGINEERING STAFF WORKS TOGETHER IN A TIMELY STATE ROADWAY. SO THAT'S A BRIEF OVERVIEW. WE DID POST ZONING SIGNS. WE DID NOTIFY AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. AND SO OUR RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL. AND YOU HAVE THE RECOMMENDATION BEFORE YOU. MR. CHAIR, I WOULD JUST ADD TO WHAT JOHN SUMMARIZED THERE THAT THE APPLICANT ON THIS CASE IS THE CITY OF FRISCO. THE PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE AGREED TO THE FORM OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE, A COPY OF WHICH OR THE COPY OF WHICH IS BEFORE YOU AT YOUR PLACE ON THE DAIS HERE TONIGHT. THANK YOU, MR. PITTMAN. THAT'S ALL. I'LL MAKE A MOTION. A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM TWO. MOTION BY JOHN. SECOND. SECOND BY STEVE. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? PUBLIC HEARING IS OPEN. SEEING NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY STEVE. SECOND. SECOND BY WARREN. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ALL OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FOUR NOTHING. I DO GET THE VOTE. CORRECT? YES, YES. FOUR NOTHING. YOU HAVE TO. YEP. I'LL GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM TWO AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. MOTION TO APPROVE BY JOHN. SECOND. SECOND BY WARREN. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ALL OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. FOUR TO NOTHING. THAT WAS EASY. ALRIGHTY. NEXT IS TO ADJOURN. MOVE TO ADJOURN. MOTION BY WARREN. SECOND. SECOND BY STEVE. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ALL OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES. FOUR NOTHING. THANK YOU FOR OUR SHORT MEETING. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.