Deliberate the appointment, duties, and evaluation of members to the Planning and Zoning Commission.

[Council Subcommittee reports for current activities of the Legislative Committee, Governance Committee, Budget and Audit Committee, Frisco Square Management District, Dallas Regional Mobility Commission, North Central Texas Emergency Preparedness Committee, Frisco Veterans Advisory Committee, North Texas Commission, and Regional Transportation Council.]

DO WE HAVE ANY UPDATES? YES. THE BUDGET AND AUDIT COMMITTEE MET FOR THE FIRST TIME FOR THIS BUDGET CYCLE.

I CANNOT BELIEVE IT'S ALREADY TIME FOR THIS AGAIN.

[00:30:03]

SO WE GOT A VERY HIGH LEVEL OVERVIEW OF THINGS THAT ARE GOING TO BE COMING UP IN THE NEAR FUTURE.

COUNCIL WILL HAVE A FULL UPDATE AT OUR WORK SESSION NEXT WEEK.

SO MORE TO COME FOR ALL OF YOU NEXT WEEK. ANY OTHER UPDATES? THE FRISCO VETERANS ADVISORY COMMITTEE. WE JUST WANT TO REMIND EVERYBODY THAT THERE'S A QUARTERLY VETERANS SOCIAL ON THURSDAY THIS WEEK, THE 18TH AT THE RAILYARD STARTING AT 6 P.M.. SO WE HOPE ALL OF OUR VETERANS CAN COME OUT AND ENJOY THAT TIME.

AND THEN ALSO FRIDAY NIGHT WAS THE FINALS FOR THE YOUNG ENTREPRENEUR ACADEMY'S PITCH NATIONAL PITCH CONTEST HERE IN FRISCO FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER WITH A PARTNERSHIP WITH EDC AND THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.

AND THE WINNER I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU WERE DOING IT WHEN YOU WERE 12, BUT HE INVENTED THIS THING CALLED SENT POP.

AND EACH OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE ONE, AND IT RELEASES A SCENT TO GIVE YOU ENERGY OR FOCUS OR CALMNESS WAS THE ONES THAT WERE LEFT.

HE WAS SELLING OUT AT THE PITCH COMPETITION. SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE UP HERE SMELLING.

EVERYONE HAS. WE'RE ALL GOING TO BE SMELLING OUR SCENT POPS.

BUT IT'S REALLY GREAT TO SEE THAT WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT IS AN INITIATIVE OF THE, OF THE CITY AND HAVING ALL THOSE YOUNG ENTREPRENEURS AND CEOS HERE IN THE CITY WAS A REALLY GREAT THING TO SEE. AND I'LL JUST TELL YOU, I FELT VERY LACKING IN MY WHOLE LIFE AFTER LISTENING TO ALL THOSE YOUNG PEOPLE.

EVERYONE, EVERY ADULT IN THE ROOM DID. SO ANYWAY, ENJOY YOUR POPS COUNCIL.

AND I DO WANT TO PLUG ONE MORE THING ON THE THE VETERAN SOCIAL THIS THURSDAY.

IT IS ACTUALLY. IT WAS THE MAYOR'S IDEA TO START THESE SOCIALS AND THIS WILL BE.

SO IT'S ACTUALLY THE MAYOR'S VETERAN SOCIAL. AND THIS WILL BE THE LAST ONE WITH MAYOR CHENEY.

AND THEY'VE ALSO PARTNERED WITH MELODY OF HOPE.

AND FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE NOT FAMILIAR WITH THEM, THEY'RE A LOCAL NONPROFIT ENABLING MUSICIANS AND MAKING SURE THAT THEY HAVE ACCESS TO BE ABLE TO PERFORM. SO THEIR ANNIVERSARY IS GOING TO BE CO-HOSTED.

THEY'VE GOT SOME OF THEIR PERFORMERS, SO IT'LL BE AT FRISCO RAILYARD.

IT'S A LOT OF FUN. SO COME ON OUT. ALL RIGHT.

THAT'S A PERFECT SEGUE. I DID WANT TO MENTION THAT WE HAD AN ELECTION ON SATURDAY.

AND MARK HILL WAS ELECTED TO BE THE NEXT MAYOR.

[APPLAUSE] MARK IS HERE. SO LUCKILY FOR HIM, THIS MONTH IS ONE OF OUR RARE 5 TUESDAY MONTHS. SO HE'S GOING TO GET AN EXTRA WEEK OF REST.

AND HE WILL BE SWORN IN ON THE JULY 7TH MEETING, OUR FIRST COUNCIL MEETING IN JULY.

COUNCIL, ONCE WE HAVE CANVASED THE ELECTION, WE WILL ACTUALLY HAVE A WORK SESSION, WHICH MARK WILL ATTEND NEXT WEEK WHERE WE'LL WORK THROUGH SOME TRANSITION PLANS. BUT CONGRATULATIONS AND GOOD LUCK, MARK.

[APPLAUSE] OKAY. WITH THAT. THAT WILL TAKE US TO OUR CONSENT AGENDA. ITEMS PLACED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE IN NATURE AND ARE CONSIDERED NON-CONTROVERSIAL. THE

[CONSENT AGENDA]

CONSENT AGENDA CAN BE ACTED UPON IN ONE MOTION A MAJORITY OF THE COUNCIL IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE ANY ITEM FOR DISCUSSION AND SEPARATE ACTION.

COUNCIL MEMBERS MAY VOTE NAY ON ANY SINGLE ITEM WITHOUT COMMENT, AND MAY SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS AS PART OF THE OFFICIAL RECORD.

WE'VE ACTUALLY HAD ONE SPEAKER SIGN UP FOR ALL OF THE ITEMS BEFORE WE START PUBLIC INPUT.

I DO WANT TO READ BEFORE WE BEGIN PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS, I WANT TO BRIEFLY REVIEW EXPECTATIONS FOR SPEAKERS.

WE WELCOME DIFFERING VIEWPOINTS AND ENCOURAGE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION.

PUBLIC COMMENT IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE AGENDA ITEM UNDER DISCUSSION.

TO ENSURE A FAIR AND PRODUCTIVE MEETING, SPEAKERS SHOULD DIRECT THEIR COMMENTS TO THE AGENDA ITEM.

AVOID REPETITIVE REMARKS AND CONDUCT THEMSELVES IN A RESPECTFUL MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S RULES OF DECORUM.

THE PURPOSE OF PUBLIC COMMENT IS TO PROVIDE INPUT TO COUNCIL ON THE MATTER BEFORE US.

IT IS NOT INTENDED TO DISRUPT THE MEETING OR ADDRESS UNRELATED TOPICS.

IF A SPEAKER DEPARTS FROM THESE EXPECTATIONS, I WILL ASK THEM TO RETURN TO THE AGENDA ITEM.

FURTHER VIOLATIONS MAY RESULT IN THE SPEAKER FORFEITING THEIR TIME OR BEING ESCORTED OUT OF THE BUILDING.

OKAY. SO WITH THAT, FOR OUR CONSENT AGENDA, WE ARE GOING TO ASK THAT EVERYBODY TALK BEFORE WE GET STARTED.

SO WE AS I MENTIONED, WE HAVE ONE PERSON WHO HAS SIGNED UP MARK PALASCIANO.

SO HOW DO YOU GUYS WANT TO DO THIS? AND SO I'M GOING TO SPEAK ON EVERY AGENDA ITEM. DO WE WANT TO RESTART THE CLOCK? EVERY TIME YOU WANT ME TO TELL YOU WHAT NUMBER I'M ON. YOUR TIME HAS STARTED. OKAY. WELL, BEFORE I SPEAK, I WANT TO LET YOU KNOW I'M GOING TO KEEP SPEAKING ON EVERY AGENDA ITEM UNTIL YOU PUT THE OPEN, OPEN ITEMS BACK ON. SO ITEM NUMBER 12. FINAL WARNING. NUMBER 12. I'M OPPOSED TO THIS AGENDA ITEM.

I DO NOT THINK AN EXTRA $92,000 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED FOR AN ALTERNATE PIPELINE ROUTE.

[00:35:01]

THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED IN THE ORIGINAL QUOTE. THIS AGREEMENT ALREADY FUNDS $1,030,400, AND I'D LIKE TO SEE THE FINER DETAILS OF THIS QUOTE.

I'D LIKE TO ENSURE THAT INDIANS ON H-1B VISAS HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES.

THAT'S YOUR LAST WARNING. I'M ON THE AGENDA TOPIC. YOU'RE NOT. THAT'S YOUR FINAL WARNING. THIS IS ON THE AGENDA TOPIC. YOU WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE. I'M SPEAKING ON THE AGENDA TOPIC 12. DOES THIS COMPANY SUPPORT EQUALITY AND HAVE TRANSGENDERS ON THE PAYROLL? OKAY, WE'RE GOING TO PAUSE WHILE THE SPEAKER, THE DISRUPTER, IS REMOVED FROM THE MEETING. THANK YOU. SO YOU'RE GOING TO REMOVE ME FROM THE MEETING? ALL RIGHT. DON'T WORRY, GUYS. I'LL LEAVE.

[APPLAUSE] OKAY. COUNCIL. I'LL LOOK FOR A MOTION FOR ITEMS 11 THROUGH 25.

SO MOVED. MOTION BY LAURA. SECOND. SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. MOTION PASSES 5-0. THAT WILL MOVE US TO OUR REGULAR AGENDA.

[Public Hearing: A request for a Specific Use Permit for a Commercial Antenna and/or Antenna Support Structure on a portion of one lot on 0.6± acre on the south side of Fields Parkway, 1,150± west of Teel Parkway, and to consider to direct Staff to prepare an Ordinance of the same. Zoned Agricultural. Neighborhood #51. Specific Use Permit Case No. SUP26-0001. Applicant: Diamond Towers V, LLC. (Development Services/JH)]

ITEM 26 IS A PUBLIC HEARING, A REQUEST FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR COMMERCIAL ANTENNA AND OR ANTENNA SUPPORT STRUCTURE ON A PORTION OF ONE LOT ON 0.6 ACRES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FIELDS PARKWAY, 1150FT WEST OF PARKWAY, AND TO CONSIDER TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE OF THE SAME ZONED AGRICULTURAL NEIGHBORHOOD.

NUMBER 51 SPECIFIC USE PERMIT CASE NUMBER SUP26-0001.

APPLICANT IS DIAMOND TOWERS V LLC. THANK YOU.

MAYOR COUNCIL JONATHAN HUBBARD, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.

AS NOTED, THIS IS A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR AN ANTENNA OR ANTENNA SUPPORT STRUCTURE.

THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A 145 FOOT TALL NON-STEALTH TOWER ON THE PANTHER CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROPERTY, WHICH IS ONE OF THE PROPERTIES THAT IS PART OF THE MARKETING AGREEMENT THAT THE CITY HAS WITH DIAMOND TOWERS 5 THAT CITY COUNCIL APPROVED IN JANUARY OF LAST YEAR.

THE PROPOSED TOWER IS JUST SHY OF 600FT SOUTH OF FIELDS PARKWAY AND BEHIND THE ORNAMENTAL METAL FENCE THAT SURROUNDS THE TREATMENT FACILITY. ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED WITH AN 8 FOOT MASONRY SCREENING WALL AND SHRUBS SIX FEET IN HEIGHT AT THE TIME OF PLANTING.

AS NOTED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT, THIS SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST DOES COMPLY WITH ALL OF THE CRITERIA USED IN EVALUATING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST. THE ONE ITEM THAT I SPECIFICALLY WANT TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION IS THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL OF THE SETBACKS FROM EACH OF THE PROPERTY LINES.

SPECIFICALLY, THERE'S JUST OVER 1200FT FROM THE PROPOSED TOWER TO THE NEAREST RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, TO THE WEST AND TO THE SOUTH, SPECIFICALLY, THAT PROPERTY TO THE WEST.

THERE IS ALSO A 100 FOOT EASEMENT THAT HAS 100 FOOT TALL POWER LINES IN IT.

ONE OF THE REASONS WHY THE PROPOSED NON-STEALTH ANTENNA IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE PROPERTY.

COUNCIL. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. TO OPEN UP PUBLIC HEARING.

MOTION BY LAURA. SECOND. SECOND BY ANGELIA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. PASSES 5 0. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. IS THERE ANYONE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE. MOVE TO CLOSE MOTION BY LAURA. SECOND BY AN.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. THAT PASSES 5-0. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.

COUNCIL. WHAT QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS DO YOU HAVE? JUST A QUICK QUESTION.

SO WILL THIS HELP TO IMPROVE CELL PHONE SERVICE, ESPECIALLY IN THAT AREA LIKE THE ROCK HILL AND.

YEAH. OKAY. SO THAT IS MUCH NEEDED. AND IF YOU CAN JUST PROVIDE A LITTLE BIT OF CONTEXT OF WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR US TO GET THAT KIND OF COVERAGE. SURE. SO THERE ARE A NUMBER, IT'S DEFINITELY A GROUP EFFORT RANGING FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, CMO WORKING TO IMPROVE CELL COVERAGE ACROSS THE CITY, NOT ONLY FOR OUR RESIDENTS, BUT ALSO FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES FOR OUR INSPECTORS THAT MAY BE OUT IN THE FIELD MAKING SURE THAT THEIR TABLETS HAVE ADEQUATE SERVICE TO DO THEIR INSPECTIONS AND SUCH.

SO IN ADDITION TO THIS MARKING AGREEMENT WITH DIAMOND TOWERS FOR CERTAIN SITES STAFF, THIS, THIS GROUP OF US HAS ALSO ACTIVELY MET WITH SOME OF THE MAJOR CARRIERS TO REVIEW THEIR COVERAGE MAPS TO ENSURE THAT, YOU KNOW, WE ARE STRATEGICALLY PLACING THESE IN AREAS WHERE, WHERE COVERAGE IS NEEDED.

AND THIS IS, THIS IS ONE OF THOSE LOCATIONS. THANK YOU SO MUCH.

AND THANK YOU FOR ALL THE HARD WORK ON THIS. YEAH, I DO WANT TO GIVE STAFF CREDIT.

WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS FOR MANY, MANY YEARS BECAUSE WE HEAR FROM OUR RESIDENTS EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY DROP A CALL IN FRISCO THAT WE GET A NOTE ABOUT IT.

[00:40:04]

AND SO YOU KNOW, IT'S BEEN STAFF HAS WORKED REALLY HARD ON A COUPLE DIFFERENT ANGLES.

1 BEING WE DON'T JUST WANT ANTENNAS ALL OVER OUR CITY.

THE ESTHETICS OF FRISCO IS REALLY, REALLY IMPORTANT TO THE CITY OF FRISCO.

AND SO WE DEVELOPED A WHOLE POLICY FOR STEALTH ANTENNAS.

SOME OF THEM YOU MAY NOT EVEN REALIZE THAT THEY ARE ANTENNA COULD BE A FLAGPOLE, COULD BE A CLOCK STRUCTURE, COULD BE OTHER DIFFERENT KINDS OF THINGS THAT WE WORK WITH THEM TO BE CREATIVE, TO MAINTAIN FRISCO ESTHETIC, BUT ALSO FIND STRATEGIC AREAS ESPECIALLY IN GROWING AREAS LIKE THIS ONE WHERE THEY CAN USE CITY PROPERTY AND OTHER RESOURCES TO INSTALL ANTENNAS.

SO WE'VE HEARD LOUD AND CLEAR FROM OUR RESIDENTS, WE'RE KNOWN AS AN INNOVATIVE CITY.

AND I THINK ANGELIA WOULD SAY WE'RE NOT INNOVATIVE IF SOMEONE DROPS THEIR, THEIR ZOOM CALL WHILE DRIVING DOWN THE TOLLWAY.

SO COUNCIL, WHAT OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS DO YOU HAVE? MOVE TO APPROVE MOTION BY LAURA, SECOND BY BURT.

ALL IN FAVOR? PASSES 5 0. ITEM 27 IS A PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST TO CONSIDER POSSIBLE AMENDMENTS TO ZONING ORDINANCE,

[Public Hearing: A request to consider possible amendments to Zoning Ordinance Subsection 3.02, Use Chart, and Subsection 7.01, Terms and Words Defined, and to consider to direct Staff to prepare an Ordinance of the same. Zoning Case No. ZA26-0004. Applicant: City of Frisco. (Development Services/RR)]

SUBSECTION 3.02. USE CHART AND SUBSECTION 7.01 TERMS AND WORDS DEFINED AND TO CONSIDER TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE OF THE SAME ZONING.

CASE NUMBER ZA26-0004. APPLICANT IS CITY OF FRISCO.

THANK YOU. STAFF IS PROPOSING THE ADDITION OF COLUMBARIUM AS A LAND USE WITHIN THE ZONING ORDINANCE.

THE ZONING ORDINANCE CURRENTLY HAS CEMETERY OR MAUSOLEUM BUT DOES NOT REFERENCE COLUMBARIUM.

COLUMBARIUM BEING A STRUCTURE SIMILAR TO THIS OR THIS, WHERE THE ASHES ARE PLACED OF THE FOR THE INTERN ENTERING OF THE DEAD. SO CURRENTLY.

TODAY THE CEMETERY OR MAUSOLEUM REQUIRE APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING WITH THE ADDITION OF THE COLUMBARIUM TO MAKE THIS A CONDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARD.

SO FOR ANY STAND ALONE PROPERTY WHERE ONE OF THESE WOULD BE THE PRIMARY USE, THEY WOULD STILL BE REQUIRED TO GO THROUGH THE SUP PROCESS.

HOWEVER, IF THIS IS A SECONDARY USE WITH A CHURCH, TEMPLE OR OTHER PLACE OF WORSHIP, THE USE WOULD BE ALLOWED BY.

RIGHT. AND TO CLARIFY THAT, I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE UNDERSTAND THAT IF A PROPERTY HAPPENED TO BE OWNED BY A CHURCH OR A TEMPLE OR A PLACE OF WORSHIP, BUT THEY DIDN'T ACTUALLY HAVE A FACILITY ON THAT PROPERTY, THIS WOULD STILL BE CONSIDERED THE PRIMARY USE AND REQUIRE THE SUP.

IT WOULDN'T BE UNTIL THEY ACTUALLY BUILT A FACILITY, BUILT A BUILDING WHERE IT WOULD BE ALLOWED BY RIGHT.

SECOND BY ANN. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. THAT PASSES 5-0.

PUBLIC HEARING. OH, SORRY. I HAVEN'T FIGURED OUT THE VOICE YET.

EVERY TIME SECOND BY BRITNEY. ALL IN FAVOR? PASSES 5 0.

PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. IS THERE ANYONE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE. MOVE TO CLOSE. MOTION BY LAURA. SECOND BY ANGELIA.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. THAT PASSES 5-0. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.

COUNCIL. WHAT QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS DO YOU HAVE? YEAH, JONATHAN, I'VE GOT A COUPLE BASED ON SOMETHING THAT YOU JUST SAID.

SO WHEN I FIRST READ THIS, I WAS THINKING THAT THIS WAS JUST FOR CEMETERIES OR MAUSOLEUMS, BUT YOU JUST SAID ANY PLACE OF WORSHIP. SO ANY TEMPLE, ANY CHURCH COULD THEN ERECT SOMETHING LIKE THIS IN THEIR PARKING LOT AND NOT REQUIRE A SPECIAL USE. SO THE ANY PLACE OF WORSHIP? YES.

MOSQUE, TEMPLE CHURCH COULD ERECT A CEMETERY, MAUSOLEUM, A COLUMBARIUM ON THEIR PROPERTY BY RIGHT.

THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE SITE PLAN PROCESS, AND THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO HAVE ADEQUATE PARKING AND OPEN SPACE.

BUT YOU ARE CORRECT, IT WOULD NOT REQUIRE AN SUP.

OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? SO JONATHAN, THIS IS A THIS IS A STANDALONE. CAN YOU KIND OF EXPLAIN EXACTLY. SO THERE'S ONE SO OFTEN, YOU KNOW, YOU SOMETIMES SEE THINGS LIKE THIS. THE THIS IS MORE OF THE MAUSOLEUM WHERE THIS IS INTERIOR WHERE, YOU KNOW, THE WAY I UNDERSTAND IT, INSTEAD OF, YOU KNOW, HAVING THE BODY IN THE GROUND, THEY CHOOSE TO HAVE THE BODY IN ONE OF THESE WALLS IN THE MAUSOLEUM.

THE COLUMBARIUM IS JUST THE ASHES. SO, YOU KNOW, YOU POTENTIALLY MAY PLACE THE URN YOU KNOW, IN A STRUCTURE LIKE THIS. SO THEY ARE, THEY ARE SIGNIFICANTLY SMALLER FROM DIFFERENT PLACES OF WORSHIP THAT WE HAVE

[00:45:03]

SPOKEN WITH THAT ARE PROPOSING STRUCTURES LIKE THIS.

THEY'RE PROPOSING, YOU KNOW, MAYBE LIKE WITHIN A SMALL GARDEN OR ALONG ALONG A SIDEWALK, SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

IS IT LIKE A LOCK BOX? I MEAN, ARE THOSE IS IT LOCKED OR.

I'M JUST. YES, THEY ARE SEALED. OKAY, SO THE CHURCH OR PRESUMABLY THE THE RELIGIOUS ESTABLISHMENT WOULD BE THE OWNER OF OF OF THIS OF. CORRECT. THAT IS CORRECT.

SO I AM, I AM BY NO MEANS AN EXPERT IN, IN COLUMBARIUMS. BUT MY IN-LAWS DO OWN A NUMBER OF FUNERAL HOMES ACROSS ARKANSAS AND AND YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU ARE IN, YOU KNOW, BURIED IN THE GROUND, THE CASKET IS IN A VAULT YOU KNOW, A SEALED VAULT.

SO THESE 2 ARE SEALED COMPARTMENTS. SO IT'S NOT LIKE SOMEONE COULD WALK UP THERE WITH A A LOCKBOX KEY AND AND OPEN LIKE THAT. NO. YEAH. THANK YOU. SO, JONATHAN, I WAS JUST GOOGLING WHAT COMMON RELIGIONS, YOU KNOW, ACCEPT CREMATION FOR THEIR DEAD. AND A COUPLE OF THE RELIGIONS THAT POPPED UP ARE SOME THAT I KNOW THAT ARE IN LIKE, THEY HAVE RELIGIOUS FACILITIES INSIDE, LIKE A STRIP CENTER INSIDE A RETAIL STRIP CENTER.

SO WHAT I'M HEARING IS THAT THIS COULD BE ERECTED IN THE PARKING LOT AS LONG AS THEY OWN IT.

SO FOR A PLACE OF WORSHIP, FOR EXAMPLE, IF THE PLACE OF WORSHIP WERE YOU KNOW, THE, THE PROPERTY OWNER. AGAIN, IT WOULD BE SUBJECT TO COMPLYING WITH ALL, ALL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

SO WHEN YOU SAY THEY COULD, THEY COULD JUST PUT IT OUT IN THE PARKING LOT.

YOU KNOW, WITH, WITHOUT A PLAN, IT'S, IT'S SOMEWHAT DIFFICULT TO, TO ANSWER THAT.

BUT, YOU KNOW, THEY WOULD STILL BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH WITH PARKING AND LANDSCAPE AND OPEN SPACE AND FACADE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.

AGAIN, WE DON'T WE DON'T SEE THEM JUST POPPING UP IN A, IN A PARKING LOT.

YEAH, BUT I DO, BUT I DO UNDERSTAND YOUR CONCERN, BUT IT IS FAIR TO SAY THAT SOME PLACES OF WORSHIP ARE OPERATING IN IN STRIP CENTERS.

SO WHY WOULDN'T WE DO A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR BOTH A PRIMARY AND A SECONDARY USE? SO UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY ARE MORE OF AN ACCESSORY TYPE USE TO PLACES OF WORSHIP, THAT THAT IS WHERE WE SAID, YOU KNOW, TO, TO ALLOW THOSE FACILITIES.

YOU KNOW, IT'S PART OF THEIR KIND OF GENERAL WORKING OR KIND OF BUSINESS MODEL.

THE EXAMPLE THAT THAT I USED WHEN WE WERE GOING THROUGH THIS PROCESS IS A HELIPAD.

SO FOR EXAMPLE, A HELIPAD OR A HELIPORT THAT'S STANDING ALONE ON ITS OWN PROPERTY REQUIRES APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT.

HOWEVER, IF IT IS PART OF A HOSPITAL, IT'S JUST PERMITTED BY RIGHT.

IT'S JUST PART OF IT'S PART OF THEIR OPERATIONS.

SO, YOU KNOW, IN, IN, IN OUR RESEARCH OF, OF CITING THESE IN THE CITY AND AGAIN, IN SPEAKING WITH A PARTICULAR RELIGIOUS RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION. IT WAS JUST PART OF THEIR, YOU KNOW, I HATE TO SAY BUSINESS MODEL FOR, FOR A RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION, BUT. YEAH, I DON'T HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH THIS BEING IN CEMETERIES AND MAUSOLEUMS. I HAVE CONCERNS WITH THIS GOING IN ANY POTENTIAL RELIGIOUS LOCATION WITHOUT A SPECIAL USE PERMIT.

ASK A QUESTION ON THE BACKSTORY OF THIS. SO THE.

SORRY, COULD YOU TURN ON YOUR MICROPHONE? OH, I THOUGHT IT WAS ON.

THERE WE GO. FOR FOR IF WE DID HAVE A MAUSOLEUM OR A CEMETERY, NORMALLY, WOULD THAT PLACE OF WORSHIP NEED TO APPLY FOR AN SUP OR WAS THAT ALWAYS THE CASE FOR BY.

RIGHT. AND WE'RE JUST ADDING THE COLUMBARIUM.

SO TODAY THE. CEMETERY AND MAUSOLEUM REQUIRE APPROVAL OF AN SUP.

SO WE HAD ORIGINALLY GONE DOWN THE PATH OF, YOU KNOW, HAVING COLUMBARIUM AS A SEPARATE LAND USE SEPARATE FROM CEMETERY OR MAUSOLEUM. BUT WHEN WE REALLY STARTED LOOKING AT THE DEFINITIONS AND WHAT IT IS YOU KNOW, WE THOUGHT IT POTENTIALLY MADE MORE SENSE TO JUST COMBINE THEM ALL.

STILL REQUIRING THE SUP. BUT AGAIN, IF IT WERE ASSOCIATED WITH A CHURCH, A PLACE OF WORSHIP BEING PERMITTED BY

[00:50:03]

RIGHT. I ALSO DO WANT TO NOTE THAT THIS WAS DISCUSSED AT LENGTH WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.

KEEPING IN MIND YOU KNOW, AND THE FEDERAL ACT THAT DOES PROTECT RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS REGARDING WHETHER OR NOT AN SUP IS POTENTIALLY APPROPRIATE WHEN THE USES ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE PLACES.

I HAVE A QUESTION. AND THIS IS PIGGYBACKING OFF OF COUNCILWOMAN COMMENTS ON THIS.

WHAT SORT OF SPAN OF CONTROL DO WE HAVE TO ENSURE THAT HEALTH AND SAFETY STANDARDS ARE BEING FOLLOWED? SO IN MY BRIEF GOOGLING OF THIS, BECAUSE I HAD TO LOOK UP COLUMBARIUM, NEVER HEARD THAT WORD BEFORE UNTIL THIS AGENDA.

WHAT HAPPENS IN THE CASE OF A FLOOD OR A STORM OR SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES? AND I GET IT, IT CREMATED MATERIAL AND STUFF, BUT IT'S STILL LOVED ONES AND IT'S STILL, YOU KNOW, POTENTIAL HEALTH HAZARDS, ETC.. WHAT'S SPAN OF CONTROL WOULD THE CITY HAVE? LOOK, I'M NOT NOT TO RUN AFOUL OF [INAUDIBLE] AND ALL THAT, BUT LET'S TAKE THAT OUT OF THE EQUATION JUST PURELY FROM A SAFETY AND HEALTH PERSPECTIVE.

WHAT COULD WE DO TO ENSURE THAT WE HAVE SAFEGUARDS? SO TO COUNCILWOMAN ROMMEL'S POINT, IT'S NOT BEING BUILT IN A PARKING LOT OR NECESSARILY WHERE A SEMI TRUCK COULD HIT IT.

OKAY, LET ME ONE, I KNOW ABOUT THIS FOR THE FIRST TIME I'VE HEARD ABOUT THESE WAS ABOUT 10 YEARS AGO.

AND SO WHERE ARE THESE AGAIN LOCATED? CHURCHES ARE DOING THAT AS PART OF THEIR OUTREACH.

AND WHERE THEY GET LOCATED IS UP ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING OR IT'S IN A KIND OF LIKE A MEDITATION GARDEN OR WHAT? SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THEY'RE NOT STICKING THESE OUT IN THE PARKING LOT BECAUSE THEY'RE HONORING THE DEAD.

AND SO IT GIVES A PLACE FOR FAMILY MEMBERS THAT ARE THERE AT THE CHURCH, A PLACE TO GO TO.

AND AS FAR AS FLOODS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, WELL, THIS IS BUILT ON PROPERTY.

IT CAN'T BE BUILT IN THE FLOODPLAIN. SO CEMETERIES AND WHATNOT ARE NOT BUILT IN THE FLOODPLAIN.

THEY GOT TO BE OUTSIDE OF THE FLOODPLAIN. AND OF COURSE THEY DO THE MAUSOLEUMS IN NEW ORLEANS ABOVE GROUND BECAUSE OF THE BEING BELOW THE SEAWALL, YOU KNOW, SEA LEVEL. SO NOW IF SOMEBODY DECIDES, IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT PUTTING OUT IN THE MIDDLE OF A PARKING LOT OF A COMMERCIAL CENTER, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE REFERRING TO THAT, BUT HERE'S ANOTHER THING WE HAD TO DISCUSS INTERNALLY.

WELL, SHOULD A CHURCH WANT TO PUT A CEMETERY ON THEIR PROPERTY, WELL, THAT WOULD BE PERMISSIBLE.

BUT THAT'S TAKING AWAY DEVELOPABLE AREA BECAUSE IF YOU GET IN THE TIME THAT WELL, WE NOW WANT TO EXPAND, YOU GOT TO GO THROUGH THIS WHOLE LEGAL PROCESS TO MOVE THOSE GRAVE SITES.

IF YOU PUT IT IN LIKE A COMMERCIAL PARKING LOT, YOU'RE ESTABLISHING A CEMETERY ON THAT PROPERTY.

AND SO IF THEY WANT TO DEVELOP, THAT ADDS ANOTHER LAYER OF COMPLEXITY TO REDEVELOPMENT.

SO I THINK IT BECOMES SELF CONTROLLING. I HAVE NOT HEARD THAT COMING UP AS A ISSUE.

AND IF IT DOES THAT'S SOMETHING WE'LL ADDRESS AT THIS TIME.

BUT AS THIS STARTED OUT, COLUMBARIUM HAS BEEN AN ACCESSORY USE TO THE CHURCH.

I THINK IT'S A GOOD USE TO HAVE AND THOUGHT BEST TO JUST ALLOW WHEN YOU DO HAVE A CHURCH ON THE PROPERTY, BUT IF IT'S VACANT PROPERTY, THEN WE WANT TO APPLY THIS SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THAT.

SO I HAVE A FOLLOW UP QUESTION TO THAT. ACTUALLY, JUST IF THERE'S A RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION THAT IS OPERATING ON A PIECE OF PROPERTY AND LET'S SAY THEY'RE RENTING ON THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY AND WOULD THIS SUPPLY IF SUPPOSE THAT YOU KNOW, THE OWNER OF THAT PROPERTY SAYS, OKAY, YOU CAN BUILD A COLUMBARIUM HERE.

NOW YOU HAVE A LOCATION WHERE ESSENTIALLY IT'S BECOME THE DEAD ARE INTERRED OR WHAT HAVE YOU.

IN THAT CASE, WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THAT PERSON WERE TO SELL THAT PROPERTY OR TRANSFER THAT PROPERTY? WOULD THAT KIND OF LOCK IN THAT BUSINESS FOR THAT PARTICULAR RENTER? HAS THE CITY THOUGHT ABOUT THAT? WELL, IT LOCKS IN THE USE, BUT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S ALWAYS A PROBABILITY SOMETHING COULD LIKE THAT HAPPEN.

IS IT LIKELY? PROBABLY NOT. IF I OWN A RETAIL CENTER AND SOMEBODY'S RENTING OUT TO A CHURCH ON A TEMPORARY BASIS AND THEY WANT TO DO ONE OF THESE, I'M GOING TO SAY, NO, I DON'T WANT THAT ON MY PROPERTY BECAUSE NOW IF I WANTED TO REDEVELOP, THIS IS ON THE PROPERTY, I HAVE TO CONTEND WITH IT.

SO CAN I JUST ASK A CLARIFYING QUESTION AS WELL? THE SCP WOULD STILL APPLY IF A TENANT OF A RETAIL CENTER WAS OPERATING A CHURCH OUT OF.

I VIEW THE CHURCH. IF THEY DON'T OWN THE PROPERTY, THEN THEY'RE LEASING THE PROPERTY.

SO THE SCP WOULD KICK IN. THEY HAVE TO OWN THE PROPERTY.

[00:55:05]

THEY HAVE TO BE THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY. SO KIND OF TO YOUR POINT, IN THAT CASE, THEN THE CHURCH WOULD EITHER HAVE TO BUY THE PROPERTY ALL, ALL OF THE PROPERTY OR NOT PUT A COLUMBARIUM THERE.

OKAY. AND THE OTHER THING, IF THEY'RE BUYING A PORTION OF A RETAIL CENTER GOING IN THERE AND THEY WANT TO DO THAT, THERE'S PROBABLY SOME COVENANTS ON THAT PROPERTY THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO WORK WITH THE LANDLORD AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES.

SO I THINK YOU HAVE OTHER LEVEL OF CONTROLS, BUT THIS IS NOT SOMETHING THAT'S HAPPENING IN ALL THE CHURCHES.

THAT'S, YOU KNOW, THIS WILL BE THE FIRST IN FRISCO.

IS THERE A SPACE LIMITATIONS? COULD YOU HAVE MULTIPLES OF THESE? YES. SO THERE'S NO THERE'S NO LIMITATION. IF ALL OF A SUDDEN NOW YOU HAVE, YOU KNOW, ACREAGE THAT A CHURCH OWNS, THEN THIS IS YOU'VE GOT MULTIPLE OF. I'M GOING TO SAY THIS INDUSTRY IS CHANGING UP QUITE A BIT.

I MEAN, THERE'S PEOPLE THAT HAVE THEIR BODIES BURIED WITH THE TREE.

AND SO THE BODY IS USED TO FERTILIZE THE TREE.

THERE'S A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT DIFFERENT THINGS.

I MEAN, CEMETERIES, THERE'S NOT AS MANY PEOPLE GO THROUGH CREMATION, A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS.

SO THIS IS JUST ONE OF MANY AVENUES THAT SOME PEOPLE CHOOSE FOR THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS.

AND IT'S GOING TO BE SELF CONTROLLING. IT'S ONLY SO MUCH YOU'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO ON THE PROPERTY.

BECAUSE THE OTHER THING, IF YOU GET WALLS. THE OTHER THING IS GOING TO HAVE TO TAKE A LOOK AT IS THAT INTERFERING WITH LIKE LAYING OUT THE FIRE HOSE DURING EMERGENCY ACCESS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? SO THERE'S OTHER THINGS THAT KICKS IN TO, YOU KNOW, I DON'T SEE MILES AND MILES OF THESE.

THANK YOU JIM. CAN I JUST ASK, HAS THERE BEEN SOMETHING THAT, LIKE, IS THERE CURRENTLY AN APPLICANT, SOMEBODY WHO HAS ASKED FOR THIS? OKAY. BECAUSE THIS IS NEW LANGUAGE.

OKAY. AND THAT'S WHERE THIS ALL STARTED. ALL RIGHT.

AND JUST CLARIFYING, THE CHURCH OWNS THE LAND AND THEY DECIDE TO ERECT A GARDEN, PUT A COLUMBARIUM UP, WHATEVER. I AGREE THAT I THINK THAT BECAUSE THERE'S SO MANY RULES AROUND HONORING THE DEAD AND AND AROUND CREMATION AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT I THINK THAT IT KIND OF IS SELF MONITORING OR, YOU KNOW, IT KIND OF TAKES CARE OF ITSELF.

I JUST YEAH, I WAS JUST IMAGINING FIRST BAPTIST ON MAIN STREET HAVING A ROW OF COLUMBARIUM.

I DON'T THINK THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. WE JUST WANT A PARKING LOT.

BUT IT COULD WE OWN WE OWN ALL THAT LAND ANYWAY.

BUT BUT I AGREE WITH YOU, JOHN. I JUST WANTED TO CLEAR THAT UP.

IT HAS TO BE OWNED, AND I DON'T THINK IT WOULD HAPPEN IN A STRIP CENTER BECAUSE THEY'RE USUALLY LEASING THAT SPACE.

AND IT'S JUST NOT HONORING TO PUT SOMETHING IN A PARKING LOT OF THIS NATURE.

BUT IT WOULD STILL BE AN SUP THAT HAS TO COME BEFORE.

THE CITY HAS TO OWN THE PROPERTY. FOR THIS TO BE AN ACCESSORY USE THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED BY RIGHT, BUT THEY STILL WOULD HAVE TO SUBMIT A SITE PLAN, GO THROUGH THE REVIEW PROCESS TO MAKE SURE IT'S NOT GETTING PLACED ACROSS ANY EASEMENTS, BLOCKING ANY ACCESSIBILITY TO THE BUILDING AND SO FORTH.

SO YOU WOULD HAVE SOME LIMITED CONTROL OVER WHERE IT COMES.

I MEAN, I THINK THAT'S COUNCIL'S MAIN CONCERN IS THE SUP PROTECTS.

ONE OF ITS USES IS TO PROTECT PEOPLE FROM THEIR OWN BAD IDEAS.

RIGHT. AND WHEN YOU REMOVE IT, BUT YOU HAVE SOME STAFF LEVEL OF CONTROL.

IF ONE OF THOSE BAD IDEAS PRESENTS ITSELF, THAT.

TAKE CARE OF IT. AND IF THINGS CHANGE, WE CAN ALWAYS REVISIT.

MAYOR. OUR LOOP HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP A FEW TIMES. I'D LIKE TO HEAR FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY THEIR THOUGHTS.

DID I GET THAT IN EXECUTIVE SESSION? DO YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT? OKAY, THEN I WOULD MOVE TO THAT. WE ADJOURN FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION.

MOTION BY LAURA. SECOND BY BRITTANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. PASS 5-0. JUST GIVE US A FEW MINUTES. IT SHOULD BE QUICK.

OKAY. I'LL LOOK FOR A MOTION TO RECONVENE. MOTION BY LAURA SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. THAT PASSES 5-0. RECONVENED AT 8 P.M., AND WE GOT OUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED.

LAURA. ANYTHING ELSE? NO, THAT'S ALL FOR ME. WITH AFTER HAVING THAT CONVERSATION A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAIL AND UNDERSTANDING, I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THAT FOR ITEM NUMBER 27.

WE REMAIN THIS WITH AN SUP. SECOND. SO YOUR MOTION MOTION TO APPROVE SUBJECT CHANGING BOTH USES TO REQUIRE AN SUP. OKAY. MOTION BY LAURA.

GOOD. SECOND. SECOND BY BURT. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

[01:00:01]

THAT MOTION PASSES 5-0. THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR PATIENCE.

ITEM 28 IS A PUBLIC HEARING. A REQUEST TO REPEAL ORDINANCE NUMBER 2025-0735, CONSISTING OF 2,158.6 ACRES

[Public Hearing: A request to repeal Ordinance No. 2025-07-35 consisting of 2,158.6± acres on the northeast and northwest corners of Dallas Parkway and Panther Creek Parkway and on the southwest corner of Legacy Drive and University Drive “US Highway 380” (“Property”), to amend the Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 11-04-09, as amended), to rezone the Property as Planned Development-280, and to consider to direct Staff to prepare an Ordinance of the same. Zoned Planned Development-280. Neighborhood #3, #52, and #53. Zoning Case No. Z26-0001. Applicant: City of Frisco. (Development Services/JH)]

ON THE NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST CORNERS OF DALLAS PARKWAY AND PANTHER CREEK PARKWAY, AND ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LEGACY DRIVE AND UNIVERSITY DRIVE.

U.S. HIGHWAY 380 TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 11-04-09, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE THE PROPERTY AS PLANNED.

DEVELOPMENT 280 AND TO CONSIDER DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE OF THE SAME ZONING PLAN.

DEVELOPMENT 280 NEIGHBORHOOD NUMBER THREE, NUMBER 52 AND NUMBER 53.

ZONING CASE NUMBER Z26-0001, APPLICANT, CITY OF FRISCO.

AND I ACTUALLY HAVE A CLIENT CONFLICT ON THIS ITEM, SO I'VE FILLED MY PAPERWORK WITH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE, AND I'LL ALLOW ANGELIA TO HAVE FUN RUNNING THIS ITEM.

THANK YOU. JEFF. GO AHEAD JONATHAN. THANK YOU.

PLAN DEVELOPMENT 280 WAS ADOPTED IN APRIL OF 2020 AND AMENDED IN SEPTEMBER OF 2022 AND JULY 2025 TO PERMIT A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT ON THIS PROPERTY ACROSS NINE SUBDISTRICTS.

THE APPLICANT IS BACK BEFORE YOU ALL THIS EVENING TO REQUEST AN ADDITIONAL AMENDMENT, SPECIFICALLY STARTING WITH TABLE 4-2.

TABLE 4-2 IDENTIFIES THE MINIMUM DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE VARIOUS FIELDS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRODUCT TYPES.

SO CURRENTLY FIELDS RESIDENTIAL 3.A, 3.B, AND TOWNHOMES.

THOSE BEING THE 3 SMALLEST SINGLE FAMILY PRODUCT TYPES REQUIRE A REAR YARD SETBACK FOR THE MAIN STRUCTURE AND THE GARAGE PORTION OF THE HOUSE TO BE THE SAME. LIKE MANY RECENTLY ADOPTED PLAN DEVELOPMENTS, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A MODIFICATION TO ALLOW THE NON GARAGE PORTION OF THE HOUSE TO BE PULLED TO THREE FEET, WHILE THE GARAGE PORTION WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 3FT TO 10FT, OR A MINIMUM OF 20FT. SO WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS? IT ALLOWS THE LIVING SPACE TO BE PULLED FURTHER BACK.

SO YOU ARE CONTINUING TO GET THE SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT HOME BUILDERS ARE LOOKING TO GET ON THE LOTS, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, MAINTAINING THOSE DRIVEWAY LENGTHS TO ENSURE THAT THE CARS ARE NOT OVERHANGING INTO THE ALLEYS.

NEXT, LOOKING AT EXHIBIT P OF THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT, EXHIBIT P IS THE EXHIBIT WITHIN THE PD THAT GOVERNS THE PARKS AND TRAILS AS WELL AS THE PUBLIC PARKS.

SOME OF YOU MAY RECALL WHEN THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT WAS AMENDED IN JULY OF 2025.

THE PARK REQUIREMENT FOR MIDTOWN WEST WAS REMOVED AS OWNERSHIP DID HAVE SOME CONCERN REGARDING POTENTIAL PROTESTS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE THAT THEY WOULD THEN NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO CONTROL.

SO NOW THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REMOVE THE PUBLIC HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL IN THIS AREA HERE.

SO WITHIN THE MIDTOWN WEST SUBDISTRICT, THERE WILL CERTAINLY STILL BE SIDEWALKS, PLAZAS, GREEN SPACES, BUT ALL OF THOSE WILL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED.

AND THEN THERE WILL STILL BE PUBLIC HIKE AND BIKE TRAILS AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THAT SUBDISTRICT.

IT'S KIND OF HARD TO SEE HERE, BUT THERE ARE PURPLE AND GREEN LINES REPRESENTING PUBLIC HIKE AND BIKE TRAILS AROUND THAT SUBDISTRICT. SECOND, IS RELOCATING THE PARK WITHIN THE POINT EAST SUBDISTRICT TO ACCOMMODATE SOME DEVELOPMENT.

THERE ARE NO OTHER CHANGES THERE. THE APPLICANT WILL STILL BE MEETING ALL OF THE MINIMUM PARK SIZES, THE MINIMUM AGGREGATE LAND REQUIRED. IT'S JUST RELOCATING THAT PROPERTY OR SORRY, THAT PARK TO THE NORTH.

AND THEN LASTLY, JUST SOME CLARIFICATION ON RESPONSIBILITY ON THAT WEB TRAIL BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE CITY.

THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT HAS SIGNED OFF ON ALL OF THESE REQUESTS.

SO THIS IS WHAT A NEW CLEAN EXHIBIT P WOULD LOOK LIKE.

LASTLY, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO ADD SENIOR INDEPENDENT LIVING AND ASSISTED LIVING AS PERMITTED USES BY RIGHT IN THE FIELDS NORTH AND UNIVERSITY VILLAGE SUBDISTRICTS.

SO IN THE PD TODAY, SENIOR LIVING WOULD BE CLASSIFIED AS FIELDS URBAN LIVING, WHILE ASSISTED LIVING WOULD REQUIRE APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. SO IN ALLOWING THEM BY RIGHT, THE APPLICANT IS STILL STATING THAT THE SENIOR LIVING

[01:05:01]

UNITS WOULD COUNT AGAINST THE OVERALL MULTIFAMILY COUNT.

HOWEVER, THE ASSISTED LIVING UNITS WOULD NOT.

HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THIS EVENING. AND THIS ITEM IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL.

THANK YOU. COUNCIL. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

MOVE TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.

COUNCIL. ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? JONATHAN. WHY WOULD THE ASSISTED LIVING NOT COUNT TOWARDS THE MULTIFAMILY UNIT COUNT.

SO THE ASSISTED LIVING. SO UNDER THE PD TODAY.

ASSISTED LIVING WOULD NOT COUNT TOWARDS THE UNIT COUNT BECAUSE IT'S A ESSENTIALLY A DIFFERENT LAND USE THAT WOULD REQUIRE THEM TO COME THROUGH THE SUP PROCESS. SO KEEPING THAT SAME THOUGHT PROCESS, UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY WOULD REQUIRE AN SUP AND IT NOT COUNT BY ALLOWING THEM BY RIGHT THAT THEY, THEY WOULD NOT COUNT EITHER.

AND I DO WANT TO CLARIFY THAT THIS IS JUST FOR THE NORTH FIELDS.

AND SO THE NORTH FIELDS AND THE UNIVERSITY VILLAGE SUBDISTRICT.

SO IF THEY WERE TO COME BACK AND SAY, I WANT TO DO SENIOR LIVING IN ONE OF THE OTHERS OR ASSISTED LIVING.

THOSE SENIOR LIVING UNITS WOULD COUNT AS FIELDS URBAN LIVING COUNT AGAINST THE URBAN LIVING COUNT, AND THEN THEY WOULD ALSO BE REQUIRED TO GET AN SUP FOR ASSISTED LIVING UNITS.

SO WE'RE ONLY TALKING ABOUT THE TWO SUBDISTRICTS I'VE CIRCLED IN YELLOW.

THANK YOU SO. SO JONATHAN, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I'M TRACKING WITH ALL THE CHANGES THAT YOU JUST YOU JUST TALKED ABOUT.

SO WE TALKED ABOUT THE SETBACKS AND THE REASON FOR THE SETBACKS REALLY ARE TO BE IN ALIGNMENT WITH OTHER RESIDENTIAL TYPES.

WHAT WHAT WERE SOME OF THE OTHER REASONS FOR THE SETBACKS? SURE. SO THERE ARE OTHER RECENTLY ADOPTED PDS THAT DO ALLOW THE NON GARAGE PORTION OF THE HOME TO BE PULLED CLOSER TO THE REAR SETBACK LINE, BUT IT'S IMPORTANT THAT THE GARAGE PORTION OF THE HOME IS NOT PULLED AS CLOSE TO THAT REAR SETBACK, BECAUSE THEN YOU COULD POTENTIALLY HAVE OF CARS OVERHANGING INTO THE ALLEY.

SO IT'S IMPORTANT THAT THAT GARAGE PORTION IS STILL PULLED FURTHER INTO THE PROPERTY TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE THOSE DRIVEWAY LENGTHS.

SO THE WAY IT'S WRITTEN TODAY, IT'S JUST THE SETBACK IS THE SAME, YOU KNOW, SO YOU HAVE TO THINK BACK WHEN THE FIELDS PD WAS ORIGINALLY DONE BACK IN BACK IN 2020. YOU KNOW, IT WAS WRITTEN ACROSS 2100 ACRES TO, YOU KNOW, KIND OF ACCOMMODATE A NUMBER OF THINGS.

AND WHERE THE MARKET WAS AT THE TIME AS YOU KNOW, SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISIONS HAVE ADVANCED, HOME BUILDERS HAVE ADVANCED THEIR PRODUCT, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE LOOKING FOR THAT, THAT VARIATION IN THE REAR THAT THE PD DOES NOT ACCOMMODATE TODAY. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND THEN MY NEXT QUESTION IS SO WE'RE REMOVING THE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL.

SO WE ARE REMOVING THE PUBLIC HIKING BIKE TRAIL.

SO THIS AREA THAT IS CIRCLED HERE IN BLUE AND PURPLE.

IT'S JUST REMOVING THE PUBLIC HIKING BIKE TRAIL SO IT WILL NOT BE A DEDICATED TRAIL TO THE CITY.

NOW THE THE SIDEWALK WILL STILL BE THERE. THE PLAZAS WILL STILL BE THERE.

THE GREEN SPACE IT WILL ALL STILL BE THERE. IT WILL JUST BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED.

IT WILL NOT BE A PUBLIC TRAIL THAT IS, YOU KNOW, PART OF THE CITY'S HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL SYSTEM.

BUT AGAIN, THE SIDEWALKS, IT'S ALL IT'S GOING FROM PUBLIC TO PRIVATE.

THAT'S RIGHT. BUT IT'S NOT REDUCING THEIR GREEN SPACE.

CORRECT. THERE'S NO REDUCTION IN GREEN SPACE, SIDEWALKS, PLAZAS, ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE.

CORRECT. OKAY. AND WHERE THIS CONNECTS FROM THE PUBLIC INTO THE PRIVATE, THERE WILL STILL BE AN IMMEDIATE CONNECTION INTO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK.

THAT IS CORRECT. IT WON'T BE DISCONNECTED. THAT IS OUR MASTER PLAN.

CORRECT. THANK YOU. AND THEN MY FINAL QUESTION IS REGARDING THE SENIOR AND ASSISTED LIVING.

YOU'RE SAYING THERE'S NO INCREASE TO THE RESIDENTIAL UNIT COUNT OR.

THERE'S NO EITHER. SO THEY COULD COME IN AND DO ASSISTED LIVING.

AND THAT WOULD NOT COUNT TOWARDS THE OVERALL UNIT COUNT.

SO THAT COULD BE LOOKED AT AS AN INCREASE. BUT ANY SENIOR LIVING UNITS WOULD COUNT TOWARDS THEIR OVERALL MULTI-FAMILY.

AND AGAIN, YOU KNOW, THOUGHT PROCESS BEHIND THAT IS BECAUSE UNDER THE PD TODAY, ASSISTED LIVING REQUIRES APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE

[01:10:06]

PERMIT. AND IF THEY WERE TO GO THROUGH THAT SPECIFIC USE PERMIT AND HAVE IT APPROVED, IT'S ASSISTED LIVING IS LOOKED AT AS A DIFFERENT LAND USE, LISTED AS A DIFFERENT LAND USE IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE.

AND THEY DO NOT COUNT TOWARDS THE BUT IT'S NOT INCREASING THE NUMBER OF UNITS THAT ARE CURRENTLY ALLOWED UNDER THE PD.

CORRECT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. SO JUST TO FOLLOW UP ON THAT, BECAUSE THAT WAS KIND OF LIKE MY, MY QUESTION ALSO. SO IF AN ASSISTED LIVING UNIT IS PUT ON, SAY THAT NORTH SECTION OF THAT PROPERTY.

RIGHT. JUST WE'LL USE THAT AS AN EXAMPLE. DOES THAT CHANGE THE ZONING TO GO TO MULTIFAMILY OR INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF MULTIFAMILY? SO THAT WAS ESSENTIALLY ZONED FOR THAT USE ANYWAY.

BUT THE DEVELOPERS ESSENTIALLY ASKING FOR AN OPPORTUNITY TO EITHER GET SENIOR OR ASSISTED LIVING TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE PEOPLE WHO MAY BE PURCHASING.

CORRECT. THEY ALREADY HAVE MULTIFAMILY ENTITLEMENTS ON THAT SUB DISTRICT TODAY.

OKAY. SO IN A SENSE, THEY'RE ACTUALLY TRYING TO COME UP WITH THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY AND THE NEEDS OF THE RESIDENTS IN ADVANCE.

OKAY. THANK YOU. TO PIGGYBACK ON THAT, I THINK IT'S SO KEY HERE THAT WE HAVE A DIVERSE PRODUCT OPTION. AND AS FRISCO CONTINUES TO MATURE, NO PUN INTENDED, BUT THAT WE ARE MAKING SURE THAT WE HAVE A DIVERSE PRODUCT TO ALLOCATE FOR ALL OF THE PEOPLE WHO DON'T EVER WANT TO LEAVE FRISCO.

AS THEY GET OLDER TO HAVE OPPORTUNITIES HERE AS WELL.

SO I THINK THAT'S GREAT. SO GOOD JOB TO Y'ALL.

I ABSOLUTELY COULD NOT AGREE MORE WITH THE COUNCIL MEMBER.

YOU KNOW, THESE ARE THE KIND OF DEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE NOT ONLY THINKING ABOUT HOW TO PROVIDE A SERVICE, BUT ALSO HOW TO INTEGRATE WITH THE COMMUNITY AND HOW TO FURTHER AND FOSTER RELATIONSHIPS AND THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY, ESPECIALLY AS HOUSING DEMAND, HOUSING NEED IS INCREASING FOR ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF PEOPLE.

THIS IS EXTREMELY WELL THOUGHT OUT. AND THE FACT THAT THEY'RE THINKING ABOUT SENIOR CITIZENS AND THOSE WITH ASSIST NEEDS WITHOUT INCREASING THE MODEL WITH THE AMOUNT OF UNITS. THAT'S AWESOME. THANK YOU. COUNCIL READY TO TAKE A VOTE? MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

APPROVED. 5-0. THANK YOU. COME ON BACK. MAYOR.

CHENEY. YOU'RE GETTING GOOD AT THIS. THANK YOU.

OKAY. ITEM 29 IS CONSIDER AND ACT UPON THE APPOINTMENT OF AN INDIVIDUAL TO FILL A VACANCY FOR PLACE THREE IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

[Consider and act upon the appointment of an individual to fill a vacancy for Place 3 on the Planning and Zoning Commission and on the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee to complete an unexpired term ending on September 30, 2027. (CSO/JD)]

AND ON AND ON. THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO COMPLETE AN UNEXPIRED TERM ENDING SEPTEMBER 30TH, 2027. I THINK ARE WE TAKING NO ACTION? ARE WE TABLING NO ACTION? WE'RE TAKING NO ACTION ON THIS ITEM TONIGHT. THEN ITEM 30 IS CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION WITH CITY STAFF REGARDING ANY ACTIONS REQUIRED BY CITY STAFF AS A RESULT OF TONIGHT'S AGENDA.

[City Council discussion with City Staff concerning any actions required by City Staff as a result of any item on tonight's agenda.]

ANYONE. NOTE ANY ITEMS. ALL RIGHT. LAST ITEM IS GOVERNANCE MONITORING.

[Discussion on Governance Monitoring of present City Council Meeting.]

GOVERNANCE MONITORING. WE WE DID VERY WELL TONIGHT.

THIS IS MAYOR CHENEY OFFICIAL LAST COUNCIL MEETING.

I KNOW WE'RE GOING TO. [APPLAUSE] I KNOW WE'RE GOING TO RECOGNIZE HIM MORE FORMALLY IN JULY.

BUT MAYOR, ON BEHALF OF THIS COUNCIL, JUST. I COULD NOT THANK YOU MORE FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP.

I HAVE COME TO RELY ON IT. EVEN LITTLE THINGS LIKE, YOU KNOW, RUNNING THESE MEETINGS, THE MOMENT YOU STEP AWAY, I START TO FREEZE, THINKING, I'VE GOT TO HANDLE THIS.

BUT JUST AGAIN, JUST INCREDIBLE LEADERSHIP. YOU AND YOUR FAMILY HAVE ENDURED SO MUCH, AND YOUR FOOTPRINT IN THIS CITY IS INDELIBLE.

AND JUST ON BEHALF OF THIS COUNCIL, THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU'VE DONE FOR THIS CITY.

AND THANK YOU FOR THE LEADERSHIP AND DEVELOPMENT THAT YOU'VE PROVIDED TO ME AS A COUNCIL MEMBER. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.