[00:00:01] ALL RIGHT. WELCOME TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. [CALL TO ORDER] WE ARE GATHERED AT 6101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD, AND THE TIME IS 6:30 P.M.. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. TONIGHT, COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE WARREN RUIZ, MICHAEL HOWARD, SEAN MERRELL, JON KENDALL AND STEVE CONE. MY NAME IS TIFFANY WELLS. I'M REPRESENTING STAFF. WE HAVE JONATHAN HUBBARD, ROLANDREA RUSSELL, SEAN O'QUINN, ASA WOODBURY. PLEASE FORGIVE ME IF I BUTCHER YOUR NAME. WE HAVE KATHLEEN, VENEZUELA, JENNIFER, JENNIFER MORGAN JOE FITTS AND RICARDO ORDONEZ AND ALSO FROM LEGAL, WE HAVE RYAN PITTMAN OH, AND JOHN GILLETT WALKED IN. SO ANYBODY I MISSED. ALL RIGHT. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS CITIZEN INPUT. IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME. PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM PRIOR TO PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. OUR MEETING ARE ARE RECORDED SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE. PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR ANY APPLICANTS PRESENT THIS EVENING TO ENSURE THERE IS ENOUGH TIME TO FOR ALL TO SPEAK, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF 5 MINUTES UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR IN WHICH. IN WHICH CASE YOU MAY HAVE A MAXIMUM OF TEN MINUTES. PLEASE NOTE THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA, EXCEPT FOR TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY AND RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA. IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON CITIZEN'S INPUT? ARE Y'ALL HERE FOR CITIZEN'S INPUT OR PARTICULAR CASE? ARE YOU HERE FOR NUMBER 9? OKAY. SO WE'LL WE'LL DEAL WITH NUMBER 9 WHEN WE GET TO NUMBER 9. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. NEXT. NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. [APPROVAL OF MINUTES] WE HAVE 2 MINUTES TO APPROVE A REGULAR IN A WORK SESSION. I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE THE REGULAR MINUTE. THE MEETING, THE MEETING MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING ON APRIL 14TH. I HAVE A MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND. SECOND BY STEVE. OKAY, STEVE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SEEING NONE. MOTION PASSES 6-0. MOTION TO APPROVE THE MEETING. MINUTES FROM THE WORK SESSION FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON APRIL 14TH. OKAY. MOTION BY. BY SEAN. SECOND. OKAY. SECOND BY JOHN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 6-0. NEXT IS THE CONSENT AGENDA. [CONSENT AGENDA] THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS. ANY COMMISSION MEMBER MAKING SUCH REQUEST PRIOR TO A MOTION AND VOTE ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY. ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH A MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION. WE HAVE ITEMS 4 THROUGH 21 THIS EVENING. THIS EVENING, AND WE'RE GOING TO PULL ITEMS 4, 9 AND 13. ANY OTHER. OKAY. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS 5 THROUGH 8, 10 THROUGH 12 AND 14 THROUGH 21. OKAY. HAVE A MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND. SECOND BY JOHN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? OKAY. MOTION PASSES 6 0. I WILL RECUSE MYSELF FROM ITEM NUMBER 4. [Conveyance Plat: Railhead, Phase 1, Block A, Lots 9, 10, & 14 (CP26-0008)] AND 9. AND 9. AND 9. SO LET THE RECORD SHOW THAT SEAN MERRELL IS LEAVING THE DIOCESE FOR ITEMS NUMBER 4 AND 9. ITEM NUMBER. YOU MIGHT WANT TO. YEAH, YOU MIGHT WANT TO GO THAT WAY. LET'S GIVE SEAN A MOMENT TO LEAVE OUT. OKAY. ITEM NUMBER 4 CONVEYANCE PLAT RAILHEAD PHASE 1 BLOCK A, LOTS 9, 10 AND 14. [00:05:04] CP26-0008. OWNER SADDLEBRED LDT.[INAUDIBLE] IF THERE'S NO THING, I MAKE A MOSTION TO APPROVE ITEM 4 ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. OKAY. I HAVE A MOTION BY JOHN. SECOND. SECOND BY MICHAEL. THAT WAS YOU, MICHAEL. OKAY. SECOND BY MICHAEL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 5-0. OKAY. NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER 9. [Open Space Plan & Preliminary Site Plan: FM423 Lonestar Addition, Block A, Lots 1-6 (OS26-0018 & PSP26-0009)] IT IS OPEN SPACE PLANNING PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN FM 2.3, FM 4. 2.3. LONE STAR EDITION. BLOCK A LOTS 1 THROUGH 6. OS26-0018 AND PSP26-0009. OWNER GITA MANDIR INC AND FM 423 LONE STAR COMMERCIAL LLC. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. SO THE ITEM THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LONE LONE STAR RANCH PARKWAY AND FM. 423. SO THE OPEN SPACE PLAN AND THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN IS BEFORE YOU ALL FOR APPROVAL THIS EVENING, THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING THE REQUIRED 10% OPEN SPACE THAT IS CENTRALLY LOCATED TO THE SITE, AND THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN DOES COMPLY WITH ALL CITY STANDARDS AND ORDINANCES. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. DO WE HAVE A. OH IS THE APPLICANT HERE FOR NUMBER 9? OH, THAT'S THE APPLICANT. OKAY. DO YOU. OH, OKAY. DO. DO EITHER EITHER ONE OF Y'ALL WISH TO SPEAK RIGHT NOW OR. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN? IT IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING. OKAY. SPEAKER CARDS. DON'T WE? YES. THE SPEAKERS WHO HAVE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THAT ITEM WOULD HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, EVEN THOUGH IT'S NOT. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 9. SECOND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 5-0. SO WE'RE IN PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 9, JOHN. I'M JUST SCOOTING OVER SO I CAN BE ON A TIMER AND AND JUST A REMINDER WHILE HE CALLS OUT THE NAMES YOU DO GET 5 MINUTES TO SPEAK PER PERSON, SO. ALL RIGHT. AND I'LL DO MY BEST TO READ YOUR HANDWRITING AND SEE HOW. SO AT FIRST WE'LL HAVE DAVID FREEMAN. AND WHEN YOU COME UP, YOU CAN SAY YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND JUST BEHIND THEM TO BE READY, JOHN. IF YOU'LL JUST COME, BE READY TO COME AFTER HIM. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS DAVE FRIEDMAN. I LIVE AT 4212 LIVE SPRINGS ROAD, DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE FIELD BEING DISCUSSED IN ITEM 9. FIRST, I'D RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THIS ITEM BE TABLED TONIGHT SO THAT WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO MOVE FORWARD AND GAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND IDEALLY, HAVE CONVERSATIONS WITH THE APPLICANT TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT ON SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS. EXCUSE ME. FIRST, I WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE HEIGHT AND PROXIMITY TO RESIDENTIAL HOMES. THIS SITE IS SIGNIFICANTLY LESS THAN 200FT AWAY FROM A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. FRISCO STANDARDS GENERALLY CAP HEIGHT AT 40FT, AND THE TEMPLE IN THIS SITE PLAN IS LISTED AS 39FT 9 INCHES. BUT WE BELIEVE THAT THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY ARCHITECTURAL OR DECORATIVE ELEMENTS ABOVE THAT ROOF LINE. OVER THE LAST SEVERAL DAYS, I'VE RESEARCHED 13 MAJOR RELIGIOUS FACILITIES ACROSS FRISCO, INCLUDING CHURCHES, TEMPLES, AND MOSQUES. COMPARING BOTH HEIGHT AND DISTANCE FROM NEARBY HOMES, WHAT I FOUND IS THAT TALLER STRUCTURES IN FRISCO ARE TYPICALLY HEAVILY BUFFERED FROM RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. FOR EXAMPLE, ELEVATE LIFE CHURCH REACHES APPROXIMATELY 100FT BUT SITS ROUGHLY 400FT FROM THE NEAREST HOME. GRACE AVENUE UMC IS APPROXIMATELY 80FT TALL, BUT 366FT AWAY. PRESTON TRAIL IS ONLY 57FT TALL AND 640FT AWAY FROM THE NEAREST RESIDENCE, AND SAINT FRANCIS OF ASSISI IS APPROXIMATELY 82FT TALL AND OVER 1000FT FROM HOMES, WITH ONE NOTABLE EXCEPTION. RELIGIOUS FACILITIES LOCATED CLOSE TO HOMES GENERALLY REMAIN MUCH LOWER IN HEIGHT. [00:10:01] THE PROPOSED TEMPLE WOULD PLACE A LARGE RELIGIOUS STRUCTURE JUST OVER 100FT FROM EXISTING HOMES ALONG LIVE SPRING ROADS, LIVE SPRINGS ROAD AND LONE FALCON. BASED ON THE PRECEDENTS THAT I REVIEWED ACROSS FRISCO, IT MAKES IT ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT THAT ANY DOMES, SPIRES, OR VERTICAL ARCHITECTURE FEATURES REMAIN MODEST AND CLEARLY WITHIN THE INTENT OF THE 40 FOOT RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY STANDARD. I'M RESPECTFULLY ASKING THAT THE COMMISSION STRICTLY ENFORCES A 40 FOOT MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR THE ABSOLUTE HIGHEST POINT OF ANY STRUCTURE, INCLUDING DOMES, SPIRES AND ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES. SECOND, REGARDING SCREENING AND PARKING LOT IMPACTS, THE SITE PLAN SHOWS ROUGHLY A 60 FOOT WIDE DOUBLE ROW PARKING AREA DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE PARK. TO THE PROPERTY LINES, THERE'S THE WALL, THERE'S A LANDSCAPE BUFFER, AND THEN A ROW OF PARKING. THIS CREATES ONGOING CONCERNS REGARDING VEHICLE NOISE, HEADLIGHTS AND PRIVACY. THE PROPOSED TYPE B1 BUFFER WITH THREE INCH CANOPY TREES IS INSUFFICIENT FOR A PROJECT OF THIS SCALE ADJACENT TO EXISTING HOMES. DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREES LOSE THEIR LEAVES FOR MUCH OF THE YEAR, REDUCING BOTH VISUAL SCREENING AND NOISE MITIGATION. SO I'M ASKING THE COMMISSION TO REQUIRE A 4 INCH MINIMUM CALIPER EVERGREEN TREES TO CREATE A DENSE, YEAR ROUND VISUAL AND SOUND BUFFER BETWEEN THE PARKING LOT AND ADJACENT RESIDENCES. THE THIRD ISSUE IS REGARDING TRAFFIC AND PUBLIC SAFETY. BOTH FM 423 AND LONE STAR RANCH PARKWAY ARE 45 MILE PER HOUR CORRIDORS. THE PROPOSED DESIGN INCLUDES 5 SEPARATE ACCESS POINTS, INCLUDING A CUT THROUGH CONNECTION ONTO AMBERLY PLACE WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE AMBERLY PLACE CONNECTION BE DENIED TO PROTECT NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY AND REDUCE CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC NEAR HOMES AND CHILDREN. IF IT IS APPROVED, THE DEVELOPER SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO FUND TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES AND NO THROUGH TRAFFIC SIGNAGE. I'M ALSO REQUESTING CONSOLIDATION OF THE ACCESS POINTS ALONG THE MAIN ROADS TO REDUCE TRAFFIC CONFLICT POINTS. FINALLY, BECAUSE THE LIGHTING REPORT DOESN'T COME UNTIL THE BUILDING PERMIT AND DRAINAGE PLANS WEREN'T INCLUDED IN THE PUBLIC PACKET, I'M ASKING THAT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BE REQUIRED BEFORE ANY APPROVAL. FULLY SHIELDED DOWNWARD FACING LIGHTING WITH 0 SPILLOVER INTO ADJACENT HOMES. A THIRD PARTY DRAINAGE STUDY TO ENSURE NO RUNOFF IMPACTS NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES, AND A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIRING DAILY CLEANUP AND ACTIVE COORDINATION WITH ADJACENT RESIDENTS. I ALSO REQUEST THE DEVELOPER BE REQUIRED TO MEET DIRECTLY WITH THE RESIDENTS OF THE LONE STAR RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL, SO THAT HOMEOWNERS CAN PROPERLY UNDERSTAND AND DISCUSS THE LONG TERM IMPACTS OF THIS PROJECT. I DO WANT TO EMPHASIZE THAT I'M NOT OPPOSED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY, NOR THE USES THAT ARE STATED. THIS IS SIMPLY AN ATTEMPT TO MAINTAIN COMPATIBILITY WITH THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD. THE FUNCTIONS ARE PERFECTLY FINE. THE BUILDINGS ARE FINE. WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE PRESERVE THE SAFETY. WE PRESERVE THE ESTHETIC OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHILE STILL ALLOWING THIS TO BE BUILT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. HE'S GOING. JOHN SIMMONS, IF YOU'D BE READY TO COME NEXT. YEAH. SO MY NAME IS JONATHAN SUDAK ON 4035 AMBERLY PLACE. AND I'M NOT GOING TO HAVE AS THOROUGH AS ONE AS DAVE THERE, BUT DID KIND OF WANT TO DOUBLE CLICK ON ONE OF THE POINTS THAT HE MADE AROUND THE SAFETY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO WE LIVE RIGHT ON THE CUL DE SAC, RIGHT NEXT TO THE SITE PROPERTY LINE OF THE PROPOSED SITE. AND HONESTLY, WOULD REALLY LIKE YOU TO CONSIDER NOT ALLOWING THAT SITE ACCESS OR THAT ACCESS POINT, YOU KNOW, BETWEEN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE PROPERTY. THERE'S A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT BUILDINGS PLANNED TO GO IN THERE, RIGHT? ONE OF WHICH IS SOMEWHAT CONCERNING TO ME IS THE GAS STATION. WE KNOW THAT, YOU KNOW, GAS STATIONS TEND TO HAVE HIGHER RISK OF THEFT, CRIME, VIOLENT CRIME. IN FACT, I'VE PERSONALLY WITNESSED SEVERAL THEFTS AND ROBBERIES AND ONE VIOLENT CRIME AT THE CIRCLE K JUST SOUTH ON 423 AT THAT CIRCLE K, YOU KNOW, SOUTH OVER THE BRIDGE. SO THAT SAID, YOU KNOW, MY MAIN CONCERN BEING THE FATHER OF 2 KIDS IS THE SAFETY OF NOT ONLY MY KIDS, BUT THE KIDS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT CUL DE SAC IS A STAPLE. KIDS PLAY CRICKET, WE FLY KITES, THEY RIDE BIKES LIKE THAT'S THE HANGOUT SPOT. AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO WANT CARS. YOU KNOW, A LOT OF CARS COMING THROUGH. AND I JUST REALLY, REALLY, REALLY WOULD LIKE YOU TO CONSIDER NOT ALLOWING THAT, YOU KNOW, THAT ACCESS POINT. YOU KNOW, AS FAR AS THE CROW FLIES, THAT GAS STATION'S ABOUT 6, 700FT FROM MY DAUGHTER'S BEDROOM WINDOW. AND I THINK THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY WOULD SLEEP A LOT BETTER AT NIGHT. JUST KNOWING THAT THAT WAS COMPLETELY CLOSED OFF AND THERE WAS NO ACCESS BETWEEN THE 2 PROPERTIES. SO THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. JOHN SIMMONS. JOHN SIMMONS HERE. AND JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. AND SIMON. OH. SIMON. YEAH. IT'S OKAY. I'M SORRY. THANK YOU. AND THEN AFTER THAT WILL BE KEVIN WARD. 4236 LIVE SPRINGS ROAD. REALLY RIGHT DOWN THE ALLEY FROM THIS PROPOSED SITE. [00:15:03] I WAS REALLY ACTUALLY GOING TO COME AND LISTEN, GATHER SOME INFORMATION, BUT I WAS COMPELLED TO FILL OUT A BLUE CARD, SO I'LL GIVE YOU MY OPINION. I'M OPPOSED TO THE DEVELOPMENT IN THE ASPECTS OF THE WAYS THAT YOU GUYS ARE TRYING TO DO IT. AND I KNOW IN THIS NATION DRIVEN BY CAPITALISM, WE SEE AN OPEN LOT AND SOMEONE THINKS, HOW CAN I BUY THAT AND DEVELOP IT AND MAKE SOME MONEY ON IT? AND I THINK THE SPOT WOULD BE BETTER SERVED IF IT WERE TURNED INTO A PARK. THE CLOSEST PARK TO THAT AREA IS BETWEEN A HALF MILE AND A MILE AWAY, AND THERE IS A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT WALK IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, WALK THEIR DOGS, WALK THEIR KIDS, KIDS, BIKING, AND I THINK IT WOULD BE SERVED BETTER SERVED AS A PARK. THE GEESE COME IN EVERY YEAR AND THEY LAND IN THAT PARTICULAR SPOT TO, TO REST. THAT'S ALSO SOMETHING THAT WOULD GO AWAY WITH ALL THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND WHAT YOU'RE WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED TO BRING TO COME IN THERE. I THINK COULD BE SERVED BY OTHER LOCATIONS THAT ARE VERY CLOSE TO THE MEDICAL BUILDINGS, RIGHT DOWN FROM WHERE THE VOTE HAPPENS RIGHT BEHIND THE WALGREENS. THERE'S A LOT OF BUILDINGS THERE. I KNOW OF A DOCTOR THAT LEFT THAT AREA THAT COULD BE SERVED AS A MEDICAL BUILDING. NO ONE NEEDS ANOTHER CONVENIENCE STORE, CERTAINLY WITH A GAS STATION AND WITH THE PRICE OF GAS. I DON'T THINK ANYONE'S LOOKING FORWARD TO THAT RIGHT NOW ANYWAY. THERE ARE A LOT OF RESTAURANTS RIGHT DOWN BY THE TOM THUMB AS WELL AS ONES THAT HAVE DRIVE-THRUS AS A POPEYE'S. THERE'S A CANE'S, THERE'S A MCDONALD'S, THERE'S A WENDY'S. I'M SURE THEY'RE NOT LOOKING FORWARD TO ANY COMPETITION THERE. AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE MUSEUM IS, BUT THE SIZE OF THE LOT, EVERY MUSEUM I'VE BEEN TO IS GOING TO TAKE UP A LOT MORE SPACE THAN THAT. SO I PROPOSE NOT DEVELOPING IN THAT WAY, TURN IT INTO A PARK, SOMETHING THAT WILL SERVE THE COMMUNITY AND SERVE THE PEOPLE, IN MY OPINION, HUMBLE OPINION, BETTER. THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE CARLY ,[INAUDIBLE] AFTER COMING AFTER KEVIN WARD. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS KEVIN WARD AND I LIVE AT 4277 CHANTILLY, WHICH IS IN THE PRESERVE, THE NEIGHBORHOOD ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT. AND I'M HERE TO VOICE SOME CONCERNS THAT I HAVE ABOUT THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN, AND THOSE PARTICULARLY REVOLVE AROUND THE POSSIBLE EFFECTS TO TRAFFIC SAFETY, PRIVACY AND THE SCALE CONCERNS OF THE OF THE GENERAL PROJECT. FIRST, THE PROPOSED FULL ENTRANCE AND EXIT ONTO AMBERLY PLACE, WHICH IS, AS NOTED, A QUIET RESIDENTIAL CUL DE SAC THAT A LOT OF CHILDREN PLAY ON. WE'VE HOSTED OUR NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK PARTIES THERE MULTIPLE TIMES. OPENING THAT UP TO THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL OBVIOUSLY INCREASE TRAFFIC, EXPOSE IT TO COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC, WHICH IS WHICH THE STREETS WERE NOT DESIGNED TO HANDLE. AND OBVIOUSLY IT'LL POSE A SAFETY RISK TO THE CHILDREN THAT THAT RIDE THEIR BIKES AND LIKE TO PLAY IN THAT AREA. ANOTHER CONCERN IS THE POSSIBLE PARKING SPILLOVER. THE TEMPLE HAPPENS TO BE CLOSEST TO THE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE IS SOME PARKING THERE, BUT WE DO RUN THE RISK OF GENERATING SPILLOVER PARKING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD DURING ESPECIALLY DEMAND HIGH DEMAND TIMES DURING FESTIVALS AND EVENTS. AND THEN AS IT RELATES TO THE PROPOSED TEMPLE, AS MENTIONED, IT'S CURRENTLY PROPOSED TO BE 40FT TALL, A 2 STORY TEMPLE WHICH IS OUT OF SCALE FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THAT ARE NEARBY. AND AS MENTIONED, THAT 40FT DOESN'T NECESSARILY TAKE INTO ACCOUNT MAYBE SOME OF THE DECORATIVE SPIRES AND OTHER THINGS THAT MIGHT BE ON TOP OF THAT, WHICH WOULD NEGATIVELY CAUSE VISUAL IMPACTS FURTHER. SO IF THE COUNCIL CHOOSES TO MOVE FORWARD, THERE'S A FEW CONDITIONS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SUBMIT FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. 1ST OF ALL, RESTRICT THE AMBERLY PLACE ACCESS TO EMERGENCY VEHICLES ONLY AND TO ROUTE ALL PRIMARY INGRESS AND EGRESS. THAT SHOULD BE GOING THROUGH 423 AND DIRECTLY ONTO LONE STAR RANCH PARKWAY. 2ND, I THINK A NEW TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE UNDERTAKEN SPECIFICALLY LOOKING AT NEIGHBORHOOD CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC AND WHAT THAT MIGHT LOOK, LOOK LIKE DURING PEAK TEMPLE EVENTS AND FESTIVALS. 3RD, THERE SHOULD WE SHOULD ENSURE THAT THERE'S SUFFICIENT ONSITE PARKING WITH SURPLUS CAPACITY FOR HIGH DEMAND DAYS PLUS TRAFFIC CONTROL DURING MAJOR EVENTS. 4TH, THE TEMPLE. WE SHOULD STEP THAT BACK FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, RESIDENTIAL, RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINES. PUT THAT CLOSER TO 423 REDUCE ITS HEIGHT NEAR HOMES AND PROVIDE ENHANCED BUFFERING WITH STRICT LIGHTING CONTROLS. LASTLY, I THINK WE I HAVE NOT YET SEEN A DETAILED ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AND WHAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD VIEW SHEDS WILL LOOK LIKE. I THINK THOSE NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR ANALYSIS PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL. AND THEN I WOULD JUST SAY TO THE DEVELOPERS, YOU KNOW, WE'RE A QUITE DIVERSE AND WELCOMING NEIGHBORHOOD, [00:20:03] BUT AS FAR AS I'M AWARE, THERE'S BEEN NO PRIOR DIALOG WITH US AS RESIDENTS OR WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVES CONCERNING THE PLANS. MANY OF US JUST RECENTLY LEARNED OF THESE PLANS. SO MOVING FORWARD, WE'D ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPERS TO ENGAGE WITH US. YOU'LL BE JOINING OUR COMMUNITY. SO LIKE, LET'S WORK TOGETHER TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS TO THE COMMISSIONERS. I BELIEVE THAT THIS PROJECT SHOULD ONLY MOVE FORWARD WITH THE STRONG CONDITIONS THAT A PREVIOUS OUTLINED TO PROTECT THE NEIGHBORHOOD, SAFETY, CHARACTER AND QUALITY OF OUR LIFE THERE. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. AND AFTER THAT, JESSICA WEI. HI, MY NAME IS CARLY SUDAK AND I, ALONG WITH MY FAMILY, RESIDE AT 4035 AMBERLY PLACE, WHICH IS THE HOUSE IN THE CUL DE SAC THAT SITS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE OPEN FIELD AT THE CORNER OF FM 423 AND LONE STAR RANCH PARKWAY. WE HAVE LIVED HERE FOR 10 YEARS, AND WE HAVE ALWAYS KNOWN THAT THAT LAND WOULD EVENTUALLY BE BUILT AND CHANGED. BUT WHEN I, ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE LONE STAR RANCH COMMUNITY, LEARNED ONLY 3 DAYS AGO THAT 9 BUILDINGS, INCLUDING A GAS STATION, DRIVE THRU RESTAURANTS AND A TEMPLE, WERE POTENTIALLY BEING BUILT ON THAT OPEN LAND. I SUDDENLY KNEW THAT LIFE IN OUR QUIET LITTLE CUL DE SAC WOULD POTENTIALLY NEVER BE THE SAME. WITH 9 BUILDINGS PLANNED FOR THIS LOT, I WORRY ABOUT THE INCREASED TRAFFIC THAT WILL SUDDENLY SURROUND OUR OTHERWISE QUIET NEIGHBORHOOD AND REQUEST THAT THE COMMISSION DENY ANY CUT THRUS OR ACCESS OR ENTRY POINTS TO OR FROM THE AMBERLY PLACE CUL DE SAC. MY KIDS LEARNED HOW TO RIDE THEIR BIKES WITHOUT TRAINING WHEELS IN THIS CUL DE SAC, AND THEY, ALONG WITH MANY OTHER KIDS FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD, OFTEN ENJOY ROLLER SKATING, DRIVING REMOTE CONTROL CARS, FLYING KITES, AND PLAYING CRICKET IN THIS CUL DE SAC. IT IS EVEN USED AS A COMMUNITY GATHERING SPACE, HAVING MANY TIMES BEEN USED AS A NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK PARTY LOCATION. I WANT TO ENSURE OUR CUL DE SAC REMAINS A SAFE PLACE FOR THE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. BUT IF THE CITY ALLOWS ACCESS TO THIS NEW DEVELOPMENT THROUGH OUR STREET, IT WILL NO LONGER BE SAFE. THE TRAFFIC AND CONSTANT COMING AND GOING OF CARS WILL NOW POSE AN INCREASED THREAT. THERE'S AN INCREASED RISK OF GETTING HIT BY A CAR, BUT NOW THERE'S ALSO THE INCREASED RISK OF CRIME. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CRIME AND CONVENIENCE STORES AND GAS STATIONS HAS LONG BEEN WELL ESTABLISHED, AS THESE TYPES OF ESTABLISHMENTS ARE AMONG THE TOP LOCATIONS FOR VIOLENT CRIMES AND THEFT, AND HAVING A CUT THROUGH FROM THIS RETAIL DEVELOPMENT TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ONLY MAKES IT EASIER FOR VAGRANTS AND CRIMINALS TO ACCESS OUR HOMES, ESPECIALLY THE ONES LIVING OR LINING THE OUTSKIRTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. I ALSO HAVE CONCERNS AROUND HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS AND OVERALL ESTHETIC GUIDELINES THAT WILL BE ENFORCED ON THE BUILDINGS, SPECIFICALLY THE TEMPLE AND STATUES. GIVEN THE FIELD IN QUESTION IS ZONED RETAIL, I WOULD HOPE AND EXPECT THAT MAXIMUM TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHTS, INCLUDING DECORATIVE STRUCTURES ABOVE THE ROOFLINE, WILL NOT EXCEED THE LIMIT OF 40FT. I ALSO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING ACCESS TO THE LIFT STATION. THE SCREENING MASONRY WALL THAT WILL BE BUILT IN LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. PLANS SHOW ONLY LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AND ADDED TREES ON THE INSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT, BUT I WOULD HOPE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER COULD BE ADDED ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WALL SIDE THAT FACES OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AS WELL. FURTHERMORE, THIS AREA IS LOCATED ON THE EDGES OF LAKE LEWISVILLE, WHERE THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS IS ACTIVELY MANAGING NATIVE HABITATS. HAVING LIVED NEXT TO THIS OPEN FIELD FOR 10 YEARS, I HAVE WITNESSED ALL KINDS OF WILDLIFE MAKE USE OF THAT LAND AND THE TREES THAT SURROUND IT. I HAVE SEEN GREAT HORNED OWLS, DEER, BOBCATS, HAWKS IN TWICE A YEAR. MIGRATORY GEESE FLOCK TO THIS FIELD LIKE CLOCKWORK. I AM CURIOUS IF STUDIES HAVE BEEN CONDUCTED TO UNDERSTAND THE LONG TERM IMPACT ON THE NATURAL WILDLIFE IN THIS AREA. I, LIKE OTHERS, AM JUST REQUESTING THAT YOU PULL THESE PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS FROM TONIGHT'S CONSENT AGENDA SO THAT WE CAN ALLOW FOR MORE PROPER INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. JESSICA. SHE'S ON HER WAY UP. I HAVE ANDREW, FORGIVE ME NOT READING YOUR CURSIVE, SUSIE. OKAY. THANK YOU. YOU'LL BE UP NEXT. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND SERVICE TO OUR COMMUNITY. MY NAME IS JESSICA WANG [INAUDIBLE]. I'M A RESIDENT OF 720 TELEMARK TRAIL IN THE PRESERVE AND LONE STAR RANCH, WHICH IS DIRECTLY IMPACTED BY AGENDA NUMBER 9. WHILE I UNDERSTAND DEVELOPMENT IN THIS PLOT OF LAND IS INEVITABLE, I AM ESPECIALLY CONCERNED ABOUT THIS PROPOSED PLAN. MY CONCERN FALLS INTO SEVERAL KEY AREAS. FIRST, COMPATIBILITY AND SCALE. THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHTS AND OVERALL INTENSITY DO NOT FIT THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE AREA AND WOULD DIRECTLY IMPACT NEARBY HOMEOWNERS. SECOND, TRAFFIC AND SAFETY CONGESTION ALREADY EXISTS ALONG FM 423 AND LONE STAR RANCH PARKWAY. RESIDENTS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT INCREASED TRAFFIC CUT THROUGH DRIVING INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND SAFETY RISKS NEAR RESIDENTIAL STREETS, [00:25:06] ESPECIALLY AROUND AMBERLY PLACE. AS WE ALREADY KNOW, THAT'S THE ACCESS POINT IN THE PLAN. THIRD OPERATIONAL IMPACTS. RESIDENTS ARE WORRIED ABOUT NOISES FROM DELIVERY TRUCK TRASH COLLECTION, TRAFFIC EVENTS AND LATE NIGHT ACTIVITIES. AS I UNDERSTAND, THERE IS AN EVENT HALL AND HOTEL OR SOME KIND OF ROOMS THERE. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS INCLUDING PARKING OVERLOAD, LITTER, CONSTRUCTION DISRUPTION, DRAINAGE AND RUNOFF ISSUES, LOSS OF PRIVACY AND THE CLOSE PROXIMITY OF GAS PUMPS TO NEARBY HOMES. ANOTHER MAJOR CONCERN IS LIGHTING. EXCESSIVE NIGHTLIGHT LIGHTING WILL NEGATIVELY AFFECT NEARBY HOMES, WILDLIFE AND NATURAL CHARACTER OF THE AREA. FINALLY, I WANT TO EMPHASIZE THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS. THIS PROJECT IS TO. WETLANDS AND ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS LAND. RESIDENTS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT IMPACT TO WETLANDS, WILDLIFE HABITATS, CONSERVATION EFFORTS AND ONE OF THE FEW REMAINING NATURAL CORRIDORS IN THE PORT OF FRISCO. WE RESPECTFULLY ASK THAT RESIDENTS CONCERNED TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY AND CAREFULLY CONSIDERED BEFORE ANY APPROVALS MOVE FORWARD. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANDREW IS COMING UP. I BELIEVE IT SAYS JING CHEN. YOU'LL BE NEXT. HELLO. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS ANDREW [INAUDIBLE]. I LIVE AT 720 TELEMARK TRAIL IN THE PRESERVED NEIGHBORHOOD OF LONE STAR RANCH. I'M ALSO AN HOA BOARD MEMBER SERVING AS SECRETARY. I CANNOT SPEAK TO THIS PROJECT AS A BOARD MEMBER. HOWEVER, I WISH TO SPEAK TO IT AS A HOMEOWNER THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED BY THIS PROJECT. FIRST OFF, I RESPECTFULLY ASK, AS ONE OF MY FELLOW HOMEOWNERS DID, TO ASK THAT THIS ISSUE BE TABLED FOR A LATER DATE, SO THAT THE RESIDENTS OF THE PRESERVE AND LONE STAR RANCH CAN BE MORE FULLY MADE AWARE OF WHAT THIS PROJECT ENTAILS. THERE ARE MULTIPLE LAYERS OF RESEARCH AND REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION THAT WE'RE ASKING FOR THAT WE HAVE NOT HAD TIME TO GO OVER OR GET. AS MOST OF US WERE ONLY MADE AWARE OF THIS PROJECT ON FRIDAY, AS THAT'S WHEN I WAS MADE AWARE OF IT. AS SUCH, I WISH TO APOLOGIZE UP FRONT IF ANYTHING I MENTION IS ERRONEOUS IN MY UNDERSTANDING. SINCERELY. THIS COMES JUST FROM A LACK OF TIME ON MY PART TO DO APPROPRIATE RESEARCH AS WE WERE MADE AWARE OF IT AT A LATE DATE. MY FIRST THOUGHT ON THIS PROJECT IS JUST ANECDOTAL. I HAVE DRIVEN PAST THIS PLOT FOR ALMOST 10 YEARS WHEN I SAW THE PROPOSAL. I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT WHAT IS PROPOSED CAN FIT ALONG WITH ADEQUATE PARKING IN SUCH A SPACE, PARTICULARLY STRUCTURES MEANT TO HOUSE GROUPS OF PEOPLE AT ONE TIME. I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE ARE FORMULAS FOR SUCH WITH PARKING, BUT I HAVE SEEN MULTIPLE AREAS OF FRISCO OVER TIME THAT LACK ADEQUATE PARKING. WHEN SUCH AN EVENT. WHEN A LARGE EVENT OCCURS, SUCH AS WOULD OCCUR WITH ANY RELIGIOUS STRUCTURE, BE IT A TEMPLE, SYNAGOGUE OR CHURCH. I AM CONCERNED WITH THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDINGS. I WOULD REQUEST THAT ALL STRUCTURES ON THIS SITE BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF ONE STORY, TO PROTECT NEIGHBORHOOD PRIVACY AS WELL. I WONDER HOW TALL IS THE DOME AND THE TOP OF THE PROPOSED TEMPLE ALLOWED TO BE? THIS CAN AFFECT HOMEOWNER VIEWS AND HOMEOWNER ENJOYMENT OF THEIR PROPERTY. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SEE A SERIOUS PROPOSAL FOR BUFFERING AND SCREENING WITH TREES OR A WALL. OR BOTH. AGAIN, THIS GOES TO THE ABILITY FOR THE HOMEOWNERS TO ENJOY THEIR PROPERTY. NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC SAFETY. I REQUEST THAT THE COMMISSION DENY ANY CUT THRUS ONTO AMBERLY PLACE. NOW I UNDERSTAND THE CUT THRUS ARE USUALLY GRANTED, BUT AGAIN, WITH SUCH STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY, THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR SEVERE TRAFFIC SAFETY ISSUES WITHIN THE COMMUNITY THAT YOU WOULD NOT GET WITH A SIMPLE STRIP MALL. WE HAVE YOUNG CHILDREN IN OUR AREA AS WELL AS YOUNG DRIVERS. A SERIOUS INCREASE IN TRAFFIC OR WITH LARGE EVENTS. NONRESIDENTS PARKING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD CAUSE SEVERE SAFETY ISSUES SUCH AS FIRE TRUCKS TRYING TO GET DOWN THE STREETS OR AMBULANCES TRYING TO GET THROUGH. AND AS WELL. I JUST REALIZED WHEN SOMEONE MENTIONED CRIME, THERE IS A POTENTIAL WITH CONVENIENCE STORES THERE, AN INCREASE IN CRIME. AS A RETIRED POLICE OFFICER FROM NEW YORK STATE, I'M WELL AWARE OF THE CRIME ISSUES THAT CAN BE CAUSED BY CONVENIENCE STORES NOISE RESTRICTIONS. I WOULD REQUEST THAT ALL DELIVERIES AND TRASH PICKS BE RESTRICTED TO THE HOURS OF 8 TO 6. THIS WOULD HELP IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD BECAUSE SOMETHING LIKE 7 TO 7 WOULD JUST. THAT'S TOO EARLY AND TOO LATE FOR PEOPLE LIVING CLOSE BY TO THE AREA. [00:30:01] LIGHTING PROTECTION. I REQUESTED ALL LIGHTING BE FULLY SHIELDED AND DOWNWARD FACING WITH 0 SPILLOVER INTO RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS. AGAIN, THIS GOES TO THE ENJOYMENT OF THE PROPERTY BY THE HOMEOWNERS. I REQUEST A THIRD PARTY DRAINAGE STUDY TO ENSURE NO RUNOFF ISSUES FOR HOMES ON LIVE SPRING ROAD. I REQUEST DAILY SITE CLEANUP SPECIFICALLY ALONG THE NEIGHBORHOOD BOUNDARY. I ALSO, I REQUEST THAT THE DEVELOPER BE REQUIRED TO MEET WITH THE RESIDENTS VIA THE LONE STAR RANCH HOA BEFORE FINAL PLANS ARE APPROVED. THIS GOES TO BEING A GOOD NEIGHBOR. WE UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR THIS, BUT TO ALLEVIATE ANXIETY AND BE TRANSPARENT, WE FEEL THAT THIS IS ESSENTIAL. WE ALSO WOULD REQUEST THE STAFF REPORT, TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND LIGHTING PLAN FOR THIS FILING. THIS IS SOME OF THE ISSUES I SPOKE BEFORE ABOUT NOT HAVING ENOUGH INFORMATION AS OF THIS MEETING. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO ASK IF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NEED TO BE APPRIZED OF THIS PROJECT, AS IT BORDERS WETLANDS CONTROLLED BY THEM. HAS ANY STUDY OR REQUEST FOR STUDY BEEN MADE TO THEM? I WISH TO STATE IN CLOSING THAT WE ARE NOT OPPOSED TO DEVELOPMENT. YOU HAVE 30S LEFT. I'M FINISHING UP. WELL, IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN MORE BENEFICIAL FOR THE COMMUNITY TO HAVE ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL IN THIS AREA. WE UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS A NONSTARTER WITH THE CURRENT OWNERSHIP AND ZONING. HOWEVER, THE CITY MUST NOT ONLY BE STEWARDS OF DEVELOPMENT, BUT PROTECTORS AND DEFENDERS OF THE CURRENT HOMEOWNER TAXPAYERS OF FRISCO. THIS PROJECT THREATENS TO OVERWHELM THE AREA OF THE PRESERVE AND LONE STAR RANCH, BUT ALSO AFFECT THE OTHER AREAS OF LONE STAR RANCH, AS WELL AS NEIGHBORING HOMES AND NEIGHBORHOODS. I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. MY NAME IS XIN CHEN. I LIVE AT 4126 CHANTILLY LANE. YOU CAN SEE MY HOUSE IN ONE OF THE BUILDING PICTURES RIGHT AT THE END OF THE CORNER BETWEEN CHANTILLY AND LONGFORGAN. SO I FOUND THIS INFORMATION ABOUT THE FONTS ON THE BUILDING PLAN. YESTERDAY WHEN I WALKED WITH A FRIEND. SO REALLY, BY COINCIDENCE, SEVERAL YEARS AGO WHEN SHADRACH HOMES TRIED TO BUILD SOME TOWNHOMES, I THINK ALL THE COMMUNITY RESIDENTS RECEIVED DETAILED INFORMATION AHEAD OF TIME AND ASKED FOR INPUT. THIS TIME I'M SURE THE MATERIALS IS. MATERIALS ARE AVAILABLE ON SOME WEBSITE, BUT WE DON'T CHECK THERE EVERY DAY. RIGHT? SO THIS REALLY FEELS LIKE AN AMBUSH. JUST TRY TO SNEAK PAST THE BUILDING PLOT. WE REALLY DO NEED MORE INFORMATION AT THE TIME TO ASSESS THIS INFORMATION. MY WIFE TALKED TO A FEW NEIGHBORS TODAY. NONE OF THEM HAVE EVEN HEARD OF THAT. SO THERE ARE A LOT OF RESIDENTS IN THAT BLOCK DON'T EVEN KNOW. AS OF RIGHT NOW, A TEMPLE AND SOME STORES GAS STATION WILL BE BUILT VERY CLOSE TO THEM. WHEN I LOOK AT THE PICTURES OF THEIR BUILDING PLAN, MY FIRST REACTION IS THERE'S NO WAY THEY HAVE ENOUGH PARKING PLACE FOR TEMPLE. IF YOU CAN, I PRETTY MUCH CAN COUNT THEIR PARKING SPACES THERE. NOW, IN TEXAS, THERE IS NO LAW OR REGULATION AGAINST PARKING ON STREET THAT BLOCKS MAILBOX. THAT'S JUST FOR EXAMPLE, RIGHT? SO ANY OVERFLOW PARKING CAN CAUSE SIGNIFICANT DAMAGES TO THE RESIDENTS FOR MISSING IMPORTANT EMAILS, DOCUMENTS, PASSPORT, MEDICINES, AND LIKE THE PREVIOUS SPEAKERS STATED, CUTTING THROUGH TRAFFIC ALSO CAUSES A LOT OF NOISES AND DANGER TO KIDS AT PLAY. AND AS A TEMPLE. I'M NOT FAMILIAR. I'M A CHRISTIAN. I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE INDIAN TEMPLES, HOW THEY PRACTICE. WILL THERE BE MUSIC PLAYED THROUGH THE DAY, HOW THE LIGHTING GOES? ALSO, HOW TALL THE REAL BUILDING IS. THE ROOF IS 40FT HIGH, BUT THAT DOESN'T LIMIT THE TOTAL HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING. RIGHT? AND THE OTHER ANY NOISE CONTROL. SO ALL THOSE INFORMATIONS, A LOT OF US HAVE NO IDEA. WE DON'T KNOW. AT LEAST AT THE MINIMUM, WE SHOULD BE GIVEN THE COMPLETE INFORMATION AND GIVEN SOME TIME TO REVIEW TO ASSESS THE IMPACT. I'M NOT AS ARTICULATE AND KNOWLEDGEABLE AS PREVIOUS SPEAKERS, SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND WE HAVE FORGIVE. YU YANG. THANK YOU FOR YOU. GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. [00:35:08] MY NAME IS YU YANG JIAO. I LIVE AT 792 TELEMARK TRAIL AND IN THE PRESERVED SUBDIVISION. I WAS NOT PREPARED TO SPEAK, BUT I FEEL LIKE I THINK EVERYONE TALKING ABOUT SAFETY AND SAFETY CONCERN, THE TRAFFIC CONCERN. THAT'S ALSO MY CONCERN. BUT NOBODY TALKING ABOUT RELIGION. I KNOW IT'S A SENSITIVE TOPIC AND YOU KNOW, WE ARE A BIG COMMUNITY. WE HAVE CHRISTIAN, WE HAVE INDIAN. WE ALSO HAVE, YOU KNOW, MUSLIM, WE HAVE OTHER RELIGIONS. WE TOLERATE EVERYTHING. WE RESPECT EACH OTHER. SO LIKE THEY HAVE THEIR TRADITION. I LIKE TO CELEBRATE WITH THEM. BUT MY MAIN CONCERN IS THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING BECAUSE FROM THE VIDEO FROM THE WEBSITE, IT FEELS LIKE ABOUT 100FT TALL. THAT MEANS IF I WALK AROUND IN MY SUBDIVISION AND I HAVE TO FORCE TO FACING SOME RELIGION, I'M NOT IN. I MEAN, THERE ARE ALSO SOME OTHER FAMILIES, THEIR WINDOWS DIRECTLY FACING TO THAT FIGURE. AND IF THAT FIGURE IS NOT THAT HIGH, IT'S JUST THE TEMPLE. WE CAN TOTALLY TOLERATE THAT. WE RESPECT ALL THE RELIGIONS. I MEAN, MYSELF, I RESPECT ALL THE RELIGIONS, BUT I DON'T WANT LIKE, I HOPE THE OTHER RELIGION ALSO RESPECT THE PEOPLE NOT THERE IN THAT RELIGION. AND THAT'S MY CONCERN. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. WE HAD 3 THAT DIDN'T WANT TO SPEAK BUT WERE OPPOSED TO IT. DAN, TRISHA AND BRIAN, JUST FOR THE RECORD. OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK THAT HADN'T? AND AFTER YOU FINISH, YOU CAN COME UP. AFTER YOU'VE FINISHED SPEAKING, JUST MAKE SURE THAT YOU FILL OUT A BLUE SPEAKER CARD OVER THERE AND GIVE IT TO JENNIFER ON THE END. YEAH. GOOD EVENING ALL. MY NAME IS CHANA. I LIVE ON A 555 LONE FALCON LANE, WHICH IS LIKE THE STREET THAT IS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY. LIKE SOME OF MY OTHER NEIGHBORS HERE. AND I SHARE SOME OF THE SIMILAR CONCERNS WITH OTHER SPEAKERS. HERE IS WHERE WHEN WE ACTUALLY SIGNED THIS HOUSE ALMOST ABOUT 11 YEARS AGO, I ACTUALLY SPENT QUITE A BIT OF TIME TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING TO COME RIGHT BEHIND MY HOUSE. THIS IS LIKE LITERALLY ON MY BACKYARD. AND WELL, WE CAN'T REALLY RESTRICT THE DEVELOPMENT. WE ALL GET THAT. BUT WHAT WE WANT IS SOMEWHAT ISOLATED FROM THE COMMUNITY WE ARE USED TO, AND KIND OF NOT CONVERT THIS INTO LIKE A SEMI COMMERCIAL WITH A LOT OF TRAFFIC, A LOT OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY, RETAIL ACTIVITY, AND TRY TO BE AS ISOLATED AS POSSIBLE. SO ESPECIALLY WE ARE MORE CONCERNED THE HOUSES BY THE NEIGHBORS WE LIVE ON THE STREET. EXACTLY. ADJACENT TO THIS IS WHERE THERE IS A THE PLAN SHOWS A PROPOSED OPENING FROM LITERALLY FROM OUR CUL DE SAC TO THE PROPERTY. AND IF THERE IS ANY WAY WE CAN ACTUALLY BLOCK THAT COMPLETELY. SO BY EITHER ADJUSTING THE SIZE OF THE WALL OR EXTENDING THE MASONRY WALL ALL THE WAY THROUGH AMBERLY PLACE. SO THAT WAY THESE 2 PROPERTIES KIND OF SHOW COMPLETELY ISOLATED. SO THAT'S ONE OF OUR REQUESTS, AMONG OTHER THINGS. I HAVE NOT REALLY WE HAVE NOT REALLY LOOKED INTO MUCH ABOUT THE OTHER IMPACTS BEING SO IN PROXIMITY, SO CLOSE. SO WE ALSO REQUEST THAT ADDITIONAL REVIEWS AND ALSO TIME BE GIVEN FOR US. SO WE CAN ACTUALLY HAVE THAT DIALOG AND TAKE MORE TIME BEFORE MAKING THESE DECISIONS. AND I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU. AND DON'T FORGET EXCUSE ME TO FILL OUT A BLUE SPEAKER CARD. AND DANIEL WILL HAVE YOU COME UP AND SPEAK. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS DAN ELMER. I LIVE AT 5589 BROOK HILL LANE IN LONE STAR RANCH. I WASN'T INTENDING ON SPEAKING. I KIND OF SUBMITTED MY THOUGHTS ALREADY ON THIS TOPIC. I JUST HAVE AN OBSERVATION. FRISCO HAS BEEN A VISIONARY CITY. I THINK WE'RE EMBARKING AND WALKING INTO A TERRITORY WHERE IT'S NOT BEEN SO VISIONARY, AND WHERE THERE'S SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES IN OUR CODE AND OUR ORDINANCES. MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONCERNS OF A LOT OF THE RESIDENTS IS THAT, AND I AGREE WITH, WITH SOME OF THEM. HERE'S THE REALITY. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS GOING TO GET DONE. AND THE CUT THROUGH TO AMBERLY PLACE WITH THE USE OF THIS NATURE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. [00:40:06] AND SO WHEN I'M MOVING INTO A NEIGHBORHOOD IN OTHER COMMUNITIES IN NORTH TEXAS AND IN OTHER STATES, AS A RESIDENT, I HAVE A RIGHT TO ENJOY MY PROPERTY TO THE SAME LEVEL OF UTILITY WHEN I WHEN I PURCHASE IT AS WHEN 10 YEARS GO BY. AND WHAT THAT CONCEPT DOES IS IT GIVES DEFERENCE TO THE RESIDENTS WHO DRIVE THE COMMUNITY. MY UNDERSTANDING OF THIS DEVELOPMENT AND OF THE REQUIREMENTS OR THE ALLOWANCES, THE ENTITLEMENTS IN CITY ORDINANCE IS THAT THE BUILDING HEIGHT IS WITH WITH DOMES AND SPIRES IS SUPPOSED TO BE LIMITED TO 40FT. AND THEN FOR EVERY FOOT THAT THE DOME OR THE SPIRE GOES ABOVE 40FT. THERE IS AN INCREASE TO THE SETBACK OF ONE FOOT REQUIRED. WELL, IN A SCENARIO LIKE THIS, WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT FROM THE RENDERINGS, WHAT LOOKS LIKE A 90 TO 100 FOOT ELEVATION OVERALL, THAT MITIGATION IS WOEFULLY INADEQUATE, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU'RE 100FT FROM A RESIDENTIAL AREA. THAT REALLY THE ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN IS COMPLETELY INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. WHEN YOU KIND OF THINK ABOUT SOME OF THE OTHER PLACES OF WORSHIP THAT ARE MENTIONED THROUGHOUT FRISCO ELEVATE LIFE. YOU HAVE MORE BUFFER. YOU ALSO HAVE ARCHITECTURE THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND THE HOMES. YOU HAVE GATEWAY CHURCH ON LEGACY. IT BLENDS IN. YOU CAN DRIVE PAST GATEWAY CHURCH AND NOT EVEN NOTICE THAT IT'S THERE. I THINK THERE'S, THERE'S ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED HERE AS A CITY, AND I THINK WE OUGHT TO OPEN UP OUR ORDINANCES AND REALIZE THAT WE'RE AT THE LAST 12 TO 15% OF DEVELOPMENT. AND THERE'S MORE OF THESE SCENARIOS THAT WILL COME UP. BUT THERE'S NOBODY WHO BOUGHT A HOME IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD NEXT TO RETAIL ZONING, THINKING THAT ONE DAY THERE MIGHT BE A CUT THROUGH TO A BUILDING THAT LOOKS LIKE A STADIUM INTO THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD. AND I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT'S WORTH TAKING SERIOUSLY. I DO THINK WE OUGHT TO OPEN UP OUR ORDINANCES IN PLACE. MORE STRICT RESTRICTIONS ON THINGS LIKE BUILDING HEIGHT REQUIRE SUBSTANTIALLY LARGER SETBACKS WHEN THERE ARE. I JUST CANDIDLY, I VIEW THIS AS A VARIANCE TO THE HEIGHT REQUIREMENT, EVEN THOUGH MY UNDERSTANDING IS IT WOULD TECHNICALLY BE ALLOWED. I THINK WE OUGHT TO LOOK AT THAT. AND I THINK ON A SITE PLAN LIKE THIS, IT'S IT WOULD IT WOULD NOT BE DEFENSIBLE TO APPROVE A SITE PLAN WITH AN ACCESS POINT INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO THAT'S MY THOUGHTS. I APPRECIATE THE TIME. AND I KNOW YOU ALL HAVE TO MAKE SOME HARD DECISIONS. AND, AND THERE'S LOTS OF MATTERS AT PLAY FIRST AMENDMENT THINGS, RELIGIOUS THINGS. THIS IS A TOUGH ONE, BUT I APPRECIATE YOU ALL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I HAVE DEEPAK, AND IF YOU WANT IF YOU WANT TO START FILLING OUT A. THANK YOU, EVERYBODY FOR GIVING A CHANCE TO SPEAK ABOUT THE TOPIC. I LIVE IN LONE FALCON LANE, WHICH IS VERY ADJACENT TO THE. IT'S A PERPENDICULAR TO THE PROJECT PROPOSED. YEAH, I DON'T WANT TO BORE YOU GUYS BECAUSE A LOT OF SPEAKERS SAID WHAT I WANTED TO SAY. I HAVE 2 THINGS WHICH I WANT TO KEEP IN MIND AND THEN LET YOU GUYS KNOW. AWARE OF WHAT WE AS A COMMUNITY WERE THINKING. SO AS A DAD OF 2 KIDS, THE CUL DE SAC, AS ONE OF OUR NEIGHBORS SAID, IS VERY QUIET CUL DE SAC. ALL MY KIDS LEARNED CYCLING THERE, BIKING THERE. AND YOU KNOW, THEY DO ROLLER CLAYS AND ALL. SO THERE IS A ACCESS POINT RIGHT TO THAT CUL DE SAC, WHICH PREVENTS THE COMMUNITY TO BE MUCH QUIETER. AND. AND THE KIDS WHO LEARNED BIKING THERE IN THE CUL DE SAC ARE GOING TO BECOME DRIVERS NOW. SO THEY'LL START LEARNING OR AT LEAST START DRIVING. AS NEW DRIVERS AND A LOT OF TRAFFIC COMING INTO THAT ACCESS POINT WOULD RISK THEM AS WELL. AT THE SAME TIME, IF THERE IS A PROVISION TO INCREASE THE HEIGHT OF THE WALL SO THAT IT CAN BE ISOLATED FROM OUR COMMUNITY TOWARDS THE PROPOSED PROPERTY, IT WILL CREATE MORE, AS EVERYBODY ELSE SAID, THAT QUIETER PLACE, AND THEN WE'LL HAVE OUR PRIVACY AND THE PROPERTY CAN HAVE WHATEVER THEY WANT TO. THE ADDITIONAL POINT WAS ABOUT THE PROPOSED GAS STATION. AS ANDREW SAID, THERE IS A CRIME POSSIBILITY THE ACCESS FROM THE OUTSIDE MIGHT BE IN AND OUT, BUT ANYTHING WHICH IS GOING FROM THE COMMUNITY, IF YOU RESTRICT THAT, I HIGHLY APPRECIATE IT AND THANKS FOR YOUR TIME AND APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. CAN YOU JUST GO AHEAD AND SAY YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND SHE'LL HANG. I'M HEATHER REED. I'M AT 4067 AMBERLY PLACE. SO WE'RE THE ONLY 2 HOUSES RIGHT THERE IN THE CUL DE SAC AND BASICALLY LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE HAS STATED. BUT OBVIOUSLY IF YOU KNOW, YOU BUY A HOUSE IN A CUL DE SAC, YOU BUY IT FOR A REASON. IT'S VERY DESIRABLE. AND THIS IS, IT'S LITERALLY RIGHT IN FRONT OF US. SOME OF MY QUESTIONS WERE IN THE THING THAT WE HAVE ALL GOTTEN JUST IN THE LAST 2 DAYS. [00:45:07] IT SHOWS 100 FOOT STATUES OF WOMEN. I DON'T, NOT 100% SURE. LIKE EVERYBODY'S TALKED ABOUT WITH THE ARCHITECTURE AND EVERYTHING, YOU KNOW, MAYBE MAKE THE ARCHITECTURE TO MATCH THE CITY OF FRISCO BECAUSE THIS DOES STAND OUT. LIKE EVERYBODY'S SAID, LIKE A LOT OF CHURCHES BLEND IN. THIS IS DEFINITELY MORE OF A STAND OUT, WHICH ALONG WITH THE PARKING, EVERY OTHER CHURCH THAT YOU DRIVE BY HAS TREMENDOUS PARKING BECAUSE IT IS A BIG MASS GATHERING. THERE'S NO WAY THERE'S PARKING WITH THAT MANY BUILDINGS AND RESTAURANTS AND EVERYTHING. I DO HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE VIEW. WHAT IS GOING TO BE BLOCKED? BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS THERE. IS IT A BUILDING ENTRIES OR NOT? BUILDING A WALL. THERE'S JUST LOTS OF CONFUSION ON EVERYTHING. 1 OF THE YOUTUBE VIDEO SHOWS BED. IS THERE HOUSING IN THIS THING? WE DON'T EVEN KNOW. AND SO OUR MAIN CONCERN I KNOW US ON AMBERLY PLACE IS THE VIEW BECAUSE IT'S DIRECTLY IN OUR FRONT YARD. AND ALSO TO CLOSE THE CUL DE SAC. I KNOW I HAVE CHILDREN, THEIR DOGS THAT WE LET IN AND OUT. AND SO, YOU KNOW, WE JUST WOULD REALLY ASK TO REQUEST THAT THE CUL DE SAC IS NOT AN ENTRANCE. AT LEAST THAT'S BASICALLY WHAT I HAVE IN THE WILDLIFE IS A HUGE THING. I KNOW IN A LOT OF TIMES WE GO OUT THERE, WE WATCH THE GEESE, WE VIDEO THEM BOBCATS, EVERYTHING. AND IT'S REALLY NICE. IT'S PEACEFUL. LIKE I SAID, I KNOW THIS IS GOING TO BE BUILT OUT, BUT HOPEFULLY THERE CAN BE A FEW REVISIONS IN THIS. SO THAT'S BASICALLY IT AND EVERYTHING THAT EVERYBODY ELSE SAID. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WANT TO SPEAK? DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION. MOTION TO CLOSE. PUBLIC HEARING. I HAVE A MOTION BY JOHN. SECOND. SECOND BY WARREN. ALL THOSE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 5-0. DO ANYBODY HAVE QUESTIONS THAT THEY OR COMMENTS. I MEAN I'LL KIND OF JUMP IN AND I'M I APPRECIATE EVERYONE COMING OUT AND JUST GIVE IT SHORT. I'M GOING TO GET I MEAN I HAVE TO FOLLOW COMMISSIONERS. I'M GOING TO MAKE A MOTION. IS THIS IS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. THE REASON WHY IT'S ON THE CONSENT AGENDA IS IT IS ENTITLED TO THAT. AND IT MEETS ALL THE CITY STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. WE AS A BOARD MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO GO TO CITY COUNCIL, AND THEN CITY COUNCIL VOTES TO IT. AND SO THOSE ARE USUALLY WHERE TO GO. I'VE BEEN ON THIS PLANNING AND ZONING FOR 9 YEARS. THIS IS PROBABLY THE SECOND TIME WE'VE PULLED SOMETHING OFF CONSENT AGENDA AND NEVER HAD A PUBLIC HEARING. WE DON'T DO THAT BECAUSE IT'S IT'S CONSENT AGENDA. THEY BY RIGHT HAVE THAT. AND I REALIZE THERE'S SOME CONCERNS, BUT THEY HAVE MET. THEY HAVE THE ZONING. THEY'VE MET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS THE CITY REQUIRES OF THEM. SO WITH THAT, I WOULD MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL. ASK A QUESTION THOUGH. YEAH. GO AHEAD. YEAH. RYAN, CAN WE JUST ASK A COUPLE QUESTIONS OF STAFF JUST TO KIND OF BECAUSE THEY'RE FRESH ON, ON EVERYONE'S MIND? I CONCUR WITH WHAT WHAT JOHN JUST SAID AS FAR AS THIS BEING A CONSENT AGENDA ITEM. AND THIS IS MORE OF A DOES IT A BINARY BLACK AND WHITE. DOES THIS MEET CODE ORDINANCES, ETC.. STAFF HAS CHECKED IT THOROUGHLY AND THEY WOULD NOT SEND IT TO US IF IT DID NOT COMPLY 100%. WITH THAT SAID, JONATHAN, IS THERE ANY VARIANCES IN THE SITE PLAN THAT IS DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WOULD BE NORMALLY ALLOWED? NO. ARE THERE ANY HEIGHT VARIANCES ABOVE 40FT FOR ANY OF THE BUILDINGS? NO. SO IT IS IMPORTANT TO STATE THAT THIS IS A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN. SO THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN BEING THE FIRST STEP IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. IN THE DATA SUMMARY TABLE AND ON THE PLAN THE HEIGHT IS LISTED AT 38FT 9 INCHES, WHICH COMPLIES WITH THE MAXIMUM 40FT THAT IS PERMITTED IN THE RETAIL DISTRICT. HOWEVER, IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT SHOULD THE BUILDING HEIGHT INCREASE. SO, FOR EXAMPLE, YOU'VE HEARD SEVERAL INDIVIDUALS SPEAK THIS EVENING REGARDING THE POTENTIAL FOR SPIRES, CUPOLAS, ORNAMENTAL FEATURES TO POTENTIALLY BE INCORPORATED INTO THIS BUILDING, WHICH POTENTIALLY COULD EXCEED THAT 40FT HEIGHT WHICH IS PERMITTED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE SETBACK IS INCREASED BY 2 FEET FOR EVERY ONE FOOT, THAT THAT ORNAMENTAL FEATURE EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM [00:50:06] BUILDING HEIGHT. SO IF THE BUILDING HEIGHT INCREASES, IF THE BUILDING WERE TO GET ANY CLOSER TO RESIDENTIAL, WHEN A SITE PLAN IS SUBMITTED, THAT SITE PLAN WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL. BUT AGAIN, THAT SITE PLAN, ASSUMING IT MEETS ALL DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS, IT TOO WOULD BE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA LIKE THIS PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN IS TONIGHT. THANK YOU FOR THAT, JONATHAN. SO JUST TO CLARIFY, WE ARE NOT APPROVING ANYTHING TONIGHT THAT CURRENTLY EXCEEDS THE 40 FOOT LIMIT. THAT IS CORRECT. THIS IS JUST THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN. FACADE PLANS OR BUILDING ELEVATIONS THAT GET INTO THOSE DETAILS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE SITE PLAN. BUT AGAIN, THIS IS JUST A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AND WE ARE NOT APPROVING ANYTHING OVER 40FT. OKAY. IF I CAN ASK A QUESTION ON TRAFFIC, IS THERE ANYTHING ABOUT THIS REQUEST THAT WOULD REQUIRE A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS? SO YES, IT DID. AND WE DID HAVE THEM CONDUCT A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. OKAY. AND IF RESIDENTS WANT TO SEE THAT TIA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, WHAT'S THE EASIEST WAY FOR THEM TO VIEW THAT. CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. SO THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO CONTACT THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AND ENTER A PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST. OKAY. AND THEN THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO GET ACCESS TO THAT. YES. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. THAT'S ALL I HAD QUESTION WISE. I FEEL FOR THE RESIDENTS THAT CAME OUT TONIGHT. I UNDERSTAND THE THE DIFFICULTY OF OUR ORDINANCES AND WHAT COMPLIES AND THEN WHAT COMES DOWN THE PIPE. AND I APPRECIATE YOU GUYS COMING OUT AND SHARING THIS. AND I HOPE THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING OF YOUR CONVERSATIONS WITH THE DEVELOPER AND WITH CITY STAFF, JUST TO GET A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF EXACTLY WHAT IS POSSIBLE THERE. THEY CAN ALL REACH OUT TO CITY STAFF FOR ANY INFORMATION. YES, JONATHAN. I DO JUST WANT TO GO AHEAD AND POINT OUT YOU KNOW, WE HEARD SEVERAL RESIDENTS THIS EVENING SPEAK REGARDING WHEN THEY WERE MADE AWARE OF THIS. THIS IS AGAIN, AS YOU ALL HAVE POINTED OUT, THIS IS A CONSENT AGENDA ITEM. SO THERE IS NO LEGAL REQUIREMENT FOR NOTICES TO BE SENT AND ZONING SIGNS TO BE POSTED. ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE. HOWEVER, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA OR ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS ARE POSTED 3 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. SO, FOR EXAMPLE, THIS AGENDA FOR TONIGHT'S MEETING WAS POSTED LAST WEDNESDAY, SO ANYONE CAN ALWAYS VISIT THE CITY'S WEBSITE TO ACCESS ANY PUBLIC MEETINGS. OR, AS YOU SAID, REACH OUT TO STAFF TO LEARN THE STATUS OF A PROJECT. OKAY. CAN I ASK JONATHAN? ALSO, OUR STANDARD PRACTICES REGARDING TABLING ISSUES IS WHEN USUALLY SOMETHING NEW COMES UP OR THERE'S AN ISSUE OR AN ITEM THAT EITHER UNEXPECTED OR POTENTIAL FOR SOMETHING TO CHANGE A TABLE WOULD OCCUR. SO THERE'S A STANDARD TABLE WOULD SERVE IF WE COULD SAY, HEY, THEY ASKED FOR A VARIANCE AND WE DON'T WANT TO GIVE THEM VARIANCE. THEY'RE MEETING ALL CITY REQUIREMENTS. SO A TABLE WOULDN'T HAVE ANYTHING CHANGE. WE'RE VOTING TONIGHT ON MEETING. LIKE YOU SAY NOTHING OVER 40FT. A TABLE DOESN'T MOVE ANYTHING. THE CONVERSATION BETWEEN NOW AND CITY COUNCIL, ALL THOSE CONVERSATIONS CAN STILL HAPPEN, BUT A TABLE DOESN'T CHANGE ANYTHING. CORRECT. IF THIS WERE TO BE TABLED THIS EVENING THE APPLICANT WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO MAKE ANY CHANGES AS THE PLAN DOES COMPLY WITH ALL CITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. YES. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT FOR US. IF NOTHING ELSE, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 9 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. I HAVE A I HAVE A MOTION BY JOHN, SECOND BY BY WARREN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 5-0. ALL RIGHT. AND AS YOU LEAVE THE MEETING, CAN YOU PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT YOU KEEP THE VOLUME DOWN BECAUSE WE STILL HAVE TO HANDLE OTHER BUSINESS THAT'S ON THE AGENDA. AND LET THE RECORD SHOW THAT SEAN MERRELL IS BACK. OKAY. GIVE ME [00:55:06] JUST A MINUTE. ALL RIGHT. NEXT WE HAVE ITEM 13, FINAL PLAT PARK 25, [Final Plat: Park 25, Block C, Lots 1 & 10 (FP26-0007)] BLOCK C, LOTS 1 AND 10. FP26-0007 OWNERS STAR BUSINESS PARK LLC. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 13 AS RECOMMENDED IN THE CONSENT AGENDA. SECOND. MOTION BY JOHN. SECOND BY WARREN. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. AYE. ALL OPPOSED? PLEASE. PLEASE GO. MOTION. OKAY. NO PROBLEM. I MADE A MOTION JON KENDALL FOR ITEM 13 TO BE APPROVED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. SECOND. MOTION BY JOHN, SECOND BY WARREN. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ALL OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES. 5. NOTHING. DO YOU WANT ME BACK IN? YES. WHICH DID SHE GO? OVER THERE. THE RECORD SHOW TIFFANY HAS RETURNED TO THE DAIS. OKAY, NOW ON NEXT, WE'RE AT PUBLIC HEARING. TONIGHT, WE HAVE 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA, [Public Hearing - Replat: Frisco Original Donation, Block A, Lot 1 (RP26-0008)] AND I WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS. EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PRECEDED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST. THE APPLICANT IS PERMITTED TEN MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION. FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT. IF THERE ARE ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITION. PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS, OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS. THE TIME LIMIT IS 5 MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK. THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME IF A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO SPEAK. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED AFTER ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES, IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO A FUTURE MEETING. AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT. PLEASE NOTE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES UNLESS THE COMMISSION DISAPPROVES THE CASE AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL THE DISAPPROVAL. FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE SERVICES STAFF AS TO WHEN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY CITY COUNCIL. SO ITEM NUMBER 22, WHICH IS A REPLAY OF FRISCO ORIGINAL DONATION BLOCK A LOT 1RP26-0008. OWNER IS CANTEX ASH LLC. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. SO THE ITEM THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD IS BEFORE YOU ALL THIS EVENING REQUESTING A 30 DAY EXTENSION AND TO BE MOVED TO THE JANUARY 9TH, 2026 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING FOR DECISION. DID YOU SAY JANUARY 9TH? SORRY, LET'S NOT GO BACK IN TIME. JUNE 9TH, 2026. AND SO THE RECOMMENDATION BEFORE YOU ALL THIS EVENING IS TO APPROVE THE 30 DAY EXTENSION AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THE ITEM TO THE JUNE 9TH MEETING. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? OKAY. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 22. I HAVE A MOTION BY JOHN SECOND. SECOND BY SEAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. ALL THOSE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 6-0. SO WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING. SO MY NEXT MOTION NEEDS TO BE TO KEEP THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. SO WHOEVER MAKES THAT AND CONTINUE TO ASK IF ANYONE'S HERE TO SPEAK. IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE IT. OH IS ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK? I JUST ASSUMED NOBODY WAS HERE. OKAY. NO ONE'S HERE. BUT WE'LL STILL HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING AT THE NEXT MEETING. [01:00:02] I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THIS ITEM TO THE JUNE 9TH, 2026 MEETING. OKAY. I OKAY. I HAVE A MOTION BY JOHN. SECOND. SECOND BY STEVE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SEEING NONE. MOTION PASSES 6-0. ITEM NUMBER 23, 10355, ROGERS ROAD. [Public Hearing - Zoning: 10355 Rogers Road (Z26-0006)] Z26-0006. OWNERS CHAD AND CHRISTINA BETTIS, THE REVOCABLE TRUST. THANK YOU. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THIS PROPERTY FROM AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL ESTATE TO ACCOMMODATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. THE PROPOSED ZONING IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL ZONING. TO DATE, STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY PROJECT INPUT FORMS ON THIS REQUEST. YOU DO HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL THIS EVENING AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. I HAVE A QUESTION. I'M CONFUSED WHEN I SEE THE SITE MAP FOR THIS. IT ALREADY APPEARS TO BE A RESIDENTIAL. IT'S A REBUILD. THEY'RE GOING TO TEAR IT DOWN AND DO A NEW HOME. OKAY, SO IN ORDER TO DO THAT, THEY GOT TO PROPERLY. YEAH. IT'S BEEN YEAH, IT'S BEEN DEMOED. AND THERE WILL BE A NEW HOME CONSTRUCTED ON IT. ALL RIGHTY. UNDERSTOOD. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE FOR THE PROPERTY? OKAY. I DON'T SEE THEM. OKAY. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. HAVE A MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND. SECOND BY JOHN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 6-0. WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK? SEEING NONE. MOTION TO CLOSE. PUBLIC HEARING. HAVE A MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND. SECOND BY JOHN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 6-0. THE CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING. ANY QUESTIONS? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS TO STAFF ON. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 23 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. OKAY. I HAVE A MOTION BY JOHN. SECOND. SECOND BY MICHAEL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 6-0. OKAY. NEXT IS ITEM 24. RESULTS FROM THE MAY 5TH, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. [Results of the May 5, 2026, City Council meeting.] THANK YOU. CITY COUNCIL DID APPROVE THE ORDINANCE BY A VOTE OF 44 TO 0 FOR THE ZONING UP ON PGA AND COIT. THAT'S THAT PROPERTY THAT WAS IN THE ETJ BROUGHT INTO THE CITY. SO GOING FROM AG TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, SINGLE FAMILY 7. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS? OKAY. ITEM NUMBER 25 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE DISCUSSIONS. [Schedule of future discussion items.] BEFORE YOU GO, JONATHAN, I JUST WANT TO SAY THIS. I KNOW WE MISSING 1 PERSON. BRITTANY. I WANT TO CONGRATULATE BRITTANY ON BECOMING THE NEWLY ELECTED COUNCIL PERSON. I KNOW WE DIDN'T GET TO OFFICIALLY GIVE HER A SEND OFF BECAUSE EVERYTHING HAPPENED SO QUICK. SO I KNOW ME AND THE GUYS ARE EXCITED FOR WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO DO. SO CONGRATULATIONS, BRITTANY. SHE I THINK SHE WILL HAVE SOMETHING NEXT TUESDAY DURING HER SWEARING IN. YES. YEAH. CELEBRATE HER. I JUST WANTED TO TELL YOU FROM FROM US. CONGRATULATIONS. SO BIG CONGRATS. SHE'S MOVED ON TO BIGGER AND BETTER THINGS. THAT'S RIGHT. ALL RIGHT, JONATHAN, YOU COULD GO AHEAD WITH THE NEXT ITEM. WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT OUR SECOND MEETING IN MAY. YES. SO I KNOW JENNIFER HAS OR AND OR LORI HAVE HAVE REACHED OUT TO YOU ALL TO CONSIDER A SPECIAL MEETING TO SCHEDULE A NEW MEETING BECAUSE IT DOESN'T SOUND LIKE WE WILL HAVE QUORUM FOR OUR MAY 26TH MEETING. SO CERTAINLY MORE TO COME ON THAT. SO DO WE NEED TO TAKE ANY ACTION IN REGARDS TO NOW? THERE'S NOTHING, NOTHING ON THE AGENDA THIS EVENING FOR THAT. SO IT'S JUST JUST AN UPDATE. OKAY. GOT IT. SO JUST REMEMBER THAT AT THE SECOND MEETING. THIS IS WHERE WARREN COMES IN WELL, I WAS CURIOUS ABOUT WHEN WHEN DOES THE ELECTION OF CITY COUNCIL HAS TO APPOINT SOMEBODY TO FILL HER SEAT AS JUST A MEMBER, AND THEN WE'LL WE'LL VOTE ONCE THAT'S DONE. WHEN DOES THAT OCCUR? JONATHAN, DO YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION OR JUST JUST AT A FUTURE DATE? IT'S NOT WE DON'T HAVE THAT ON AN AGENDA RIGHT NOW. THAT WILL BE SOMETHING THAT JOHN AND I WILL DISCUSS AND IT'LL COME BACK ON A FUTURE MEETING. ANYTHING ELSE? MOVE TO ADJOURN. MOTION BY WARREN. SECOND. SECOND BY SEAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 6-0. WE ARE OFFICIALLY ADJOURNED AT 7:35. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.