[00:00:01]
>> WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED.
[CALL TO ORDER]
WELCOME TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.WE ARE GATHERED AT 6101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD, AND THE TIME IS 6:31 P.M.
THE PLAN ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
TONIGHT, COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE SEAN MERRILL, WARREN RUSS, STEVE COHEN, BRITTANY COLBERG, MICHAEL HOWARD, TIFFANY WELLS.
I, JON KENDALL, IS YOUR CHAIR.
WE HAVE JONATHAN LETLER, JONATHAN HUBBARD, RO LANDRIA RUSSELL, SHAWN O' QUINN, ARIEL WINFREY, PAMELA DANIEL, ASA WOODBERRY, AND HOLLY MARTIN.
>> JOHN GILLETTE JUST WALKED IN.
>> I WAS GOING TO ASK, AND FROM FILE, WE HAVE JOHN GILLETTE.
FROM ENGINEERING, WE GOT TON FAHIMI.
>> FAIR ENOUGH, SO GOOD AT THAT NOW.
>> NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS CITIZEN INPUT.
IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THIS, THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME. PLEASE COMPLETE.
>> I THINK WE MISSED SOMEBODY. SORRY.
>> YOU'LL FORGIVE ME. IT DID NOT HAVE YOU ON HERE.
IS THAT CHRIS LEONARD? WHAT NAME?
THERE HE IS. FORGIVE ME, EDUARDO.
>> WE WERE PLAYING THE GUESSING GAME.
>> THANK YOU. YOU GET FULL CREDIT.
CITIZEN INPUT: IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME.
PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM.
PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED, SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE.
PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR THE APPLICANT PRESENT THIS EVENING.
TO ENSURE THERE IS ENOUGH TIME FOR ALL TO SPEAK, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH CASE YOU MAY HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 10 MINUTES.
PLEASE NOTE THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA, EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA.
WITH THAT, IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK DURING CITIZEN INPUT? IF NOT. NEXT IS ITEM 2.
[APPOINTMENTS]
CONSIDER AN ACT UPON ELECTION OF THE CHAIRPERSON, VICE CHAIRPERSON, AND SECRETARY OF THE PLAN ZONING COMMISSION.FOR THOSE THAT KNOW IS EACH YEAR WE START OVER, AND WE GET AN OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE FOR WITH REGARDS TO CHAIR, VICE CHAIR, AND SECRETARY.
I'VE BEEN VERY FORTUNATE TO SERVE AS YOUR CHAIR FOR THE LAST THREE YEARS.
AND IT'S ONE OF THOSE I'VE LEARNED, EVEN THOUGH I MIGHT BE THE MOST SENIOR PERSON HERE, IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT I NEED TO ALWAYS BE HERE.
I'VE LEARNED THAT THERE'S MAYBE A TRADITION, BUT I WOULD WANT YOU ALL TO KNOW THAT I'VE BEEN HONORED TO SERVE AS YOUR CHAIR.
I FEEL I'VE HAD A LOT OF GREAT SUPPORT.
BUT WITH THAT, I WOULDN'T SAY WANTING, BUT I'M READY TO ALLOW OTHERS, RATHER THAN FOCUS ON TRADITIONS AND SENIORITY, FOCUS ON VISION, AND WHAT'S BEST FOR FRISCO.
I'M NOT LOOKING FOR A REAPPOINTMENT.
I KNOW I'M GOING TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION FOR BRITTANY COLBERG.
I WOULD LOVE FOR YOU TO TAKE OVER.
THAT'S MY NOMINATION. ARE THERE ANYONE ELSE FOR NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR?
>> I'VE GOT A MOTION ALSO FOR SEAN, SO WE'LL GO FIRST.
SORRY ABOUT THAT, SO WE HAVE ONE NOMINATION FOR BRITTANY.
WE HAVE ONE NOMINATION FOR SEAN, AND WE HAVE ONE NOMINATION FOR STEVE.
CORRECT. BRITTANY. DO I HAVE A SECOND MOTION FOR BRITTANY AS CHAIR?
>> I WOULD JUST MAKE A MOTION FOR ALL THREE CANDIDATES AND THEN GO TO VOTING.
>> JUST GO ONE BY ONE AND VOTE.
FIRST OF ALL, DO I HAVE A VOTE FOR BRITTANY COLBERG AS OUR CHAIR?
>> THAT'S WHAT SHE WAS SAYING, I NOTED.
I MAKE A MOTION FOR BRITTANY AS CHAIR. DO I HAVE A SECOND?
>> SECOND. I'VE GOT A SECOND BY TIFFANY, AND THEN GO FOR A VOTE.
OR DO I WAIT TO DO THE REST, MAKE SURE THEY ALSO?
>> DO ALL THREE, AND THEN YOU HAVE THE VOTE.
TICK HAVE THE SONG, AND TO GO TO VOTE? YES.
>> BRITTNEY SHAWN AND STEVE, AND THERE'S SOMEBODY.
>> THERE'S ONE, SO LET ME STOP.
I'VE GOT A MOTION BY WARREN FOR SEAN.
>> I WILL BE STUPID, NOT THE SECOND, I GUESS.
>> SEAN HAS SECOND HIMSELF FOR CHAIR,
[00:05:02]
AND NOW I HAVE A MOTION FOR STEVE.DO I HAVE A SECOND FOR STEVE AS CHAIR?
>> I'VE GOT A MOTION BY STEVE.
>> I'VE GOT A SECOND BY TIFFANY.
>> HOW CAN SHE SECOND TWO PEOPLE?
CAN YOU SECOND BECAUSE THAT'D BE TWO DIFFERENT VOTES?
>> VOTE. IT'S NOT TECHNICALLY A VOTES TO MAKE.
>> YOU'RE JUST MAKING A MOTION AT THIS POINT.
NOW YOU'RE JUST GOING TO ACT ON THE CAST YOUR VOTES.
>> BE PATIENT WITH US. WE JUST DO THIS ONCE A YEAR. WE'RE NOT EXPERTS.
[LAUGHTER] NOW WE'LL GO THROUGH AND GO IN THAT ORDER AND FOR VOTES.
>> YES, AND YOU ONLY GET ONE VOTE AT THIS POINT.
>> WE HAD A MOTION FOR BRITTANY AND A SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> THERE'S FOUR, SO FOUR FOR BRITTANY FOR CHAIR, AND NOW WE CAN'T VOTE AGAIN.
BUT WE HAD A NOMINATION FOR SEAN.
>> THREE, AND THEN BECAUSE THOSE ARE VOTES, I WOULD SAY WE VOTE FOR YOU, BUT YOU'VE USED A VOTE.
BRITTANY FOUR, THREE BECOMES OUR CHAIR.
THEN I ACTUALLY STEPPED DOWN. THAT'S THE PROCESS.
I WOULD CONTINUE, BUT CONGRATULATIONS. YOU'LL BE AWESOME.
THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH. I REALLY APPRECIATE THAT, AND I ALSO WANT TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR AMAZING LEADERSHIP.
JOHN, THERE IS SOMETHING ABOUT YOU THAT IS JUST A HUMILITY AND ALSO A STRENGTH THAT IS VERY HONORING TO WALK ALONGSIDE.
I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR ALL OF YOUR YEARS OF COMMITMENT IN THIS.
I HAVE LEARNED SO MUCH, AND I HAVE VERY BIG SHOES TO FILL, AND I JUST WANT TO SAY WE'RE ALL FANS OF JON KENDALL.
>> VERY SWEET. I APPRECIATE IT. A WONDERFUL.
>> NO, YOU CAN JUST SIT THERE.
I CAN TAKE OVER IF YOU LIKE, BUT I LIKE YOU CAN STAY THERE. ALL RIGHT. OKAY.
>> [LAUGHTER] LET'S GO INTO VICE CHAIR.
I KNOW I HAVE A NOMINATION FOR TIFFANY WELLS.
I THINK TIFFANY BRINGS SUCH AN EXPERIENCE WITH BEING BEFORE ON THE PLANNING SIDE OF THINGS AND JUST YOUR LEADERSHIP, AND THINK YOU BRING SOMETHING VERY SPECIAL TO THE TABLE.
I WOULD LOVE TO NOMINATE YOU AS VICE CHAIR.
DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS?
>> I'D LIKE TO NOMINATE SEAN FOR VICE CHAIR?
>> PERFECT. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS?
>> DO YOU NEED A MOTION FOR TIFFANY OR YOU?
>> NO. I DON'T THINK SO. I THINK WE JUST NEED NOMINATION NAMES, AND THEN WE'LL GO TO MOTION, AM I CORRECT?
>> YES. JUST HAVE THE NOMINATION AND THEN JUST MAKE A SECOND. GOOD SELECTION.
>> ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? THEN WE NEED TO GO TO VOTE, CORRECT? I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO VOTE FOR TIFFANY AS VICE CHAIR. DO I HAVE A SECOND?
>> THEN WE'LL GO AHEAD AND MOVE.
>> YOU HAVE TWO NOMINATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE, TIFFANY SEAN, AND SO IF THAT IS, CLOSE THE NOMINATIONS AND THEN JUST GO FOR THE VOTE.
>> PERFECT, SO THEN WE'LL CLOSE NOMINATIONS, AND THEN WE'LL MAKE A MOTION.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO VOTE FOR TIFFANY AS VICE CHAIR. DO I HAVE A SECOND?
>> THEN DO WE NEED TO GO AHEAD AND PUT ON RECORD FOR A SECOND IN A VOTE? OR DO YOU?
>> NO, GO AHEAD AND JUST DO THAT.
>> THEN DO WE HAVE SOMEBODY THAT LIKE TO MAKE A NOMINATION FOR SEAN?
>> THEN ALL IN FAVOR FOR SEAN AS VIE CHAIR.
>> WE HAVE TWO D OF POINTLESS, ISN'T IT?
>> THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING WHERE THE PROCESS IS.
WE HAVE TWO DO THAT'S SEAN AND STEVE.
[00:10:01]
I WOULD LOVE TO SEE YOU AS SECRETARY AND CONTINUE ON A LEADERSHIP, JOHN, IF YOU WOULD SO WISH.
>> IF THAT'S WHAT WE WANT, I'M HAPPY TO SERVE HOWEVER YOU'LL WANT TO.
>> I WOULD LIKE TO NOMINATE JOHN.
DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS?
>> I'LL NOMINATE MYSELF FOR SECRETARY.
>> WE HAVE A NOMINATION FOR STEVE.
ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? THEN WE'LL GO TO VOTE. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO NOMINATE JON KENDALL AS SECRETARY ANY SECONDS?
>> SECOND FROM TIFFANY, AND THEN WE'LL GO AHEAD AND SAY WHO HAS A MOTION FOR STEVE?
>> I THINK WE HAVE TO OPEN AND THEN HAVE A MOTION IN THE SECOND.
>> SECOND ON STEVE. PERFECT TIFFANY. WE HAVE A SECOND ON STEVE.
>> THEN LET'S VOTE FOR JON KENDALL, THEN, FIRST FOR SECRETARY.
>> WE HAVE THREE, AND THEN NOW WE'LL MAKE A MOTION FOR EXCUSE ME.
YES. WE THEN VOTE FOR SORRY, FOR STEVE, FOR SECRETARY.
ALL IN FAVOR? ONE, TWO, THREE. YOU'RE THE TYPEBAKER.
>> I REALLY DON'T THINK YOU CAN ABSTAIN, SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO VOTE.
>> I'LL VOTE NO FOR BOTH OF THEM.
>> THEN IF CAN I NOMINATE SOMEONE ELSE IF IT'S A TIE?
>> WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS UNTIL IT'S DECIDED.
>> I WAS ASKED, CAN I NOMINATE SOMEONE ELSE? I NOMINATE IF IT'S A TIE, I NOMINATE MICHAEL HOWARD AS SECRETARY.
>> DO WE JUST GO TO OUR SAME PATTERN AND GO STRAIGHT TO A MOTION OR DO WE NEED A SECOND THAT I'M JUST MAKING SURE WE'RE FOLLOWING PROTOCOL WE'LL NEED A SECOND FOR THAT?
>> I HAVE A MOTION TO NOMINATE MICHAEL HOWARD AS SECRETARY.
>> I'LL SECOND IT JUST SO WE CAN VOTE, SO I'LL SECOND THAT.
I'M SO SORRY. I WAS THINKING YOU DID THE MOTION.
>> AS I MAKE A MOTION TO NOMINATE.
>> I MAKE A MOTION FOR MICHAEL HOWARD AS SECRETARY.
>> I'LL SECOND IT. [LAUGHTER] IT'S NOT USUALLY THIS CONFUSING UP HERE, SO APOLOGIES, THANKS FOR EVERYBODY BEING PATIENT AS WE WORK THROUGH THE DETAILS TO DO IT CORRECTLY.
NOW, I'D LIKE TO THEN TAKE A VOTE.
>> I WANT TO NOMINATE SEAN FOR SECRETARY.
>> DO WE HAVE WE NEED A SECOND THAT? OR WE JUST NEED TO GO STRAIGHT TO.
>> SECOND TO THE FIRST ONE. WE NEED A SECOND THIS ONE.
>> WE HAVE A SECOND FOR THE NOMINATION FOR SEAN AS SECRETARY?
>> NOW, THEN DO WE GO TO THE VOTE? JUST TO MAKE SURE WE DON'T NEED TO THEN FINISH OUT THE PRIOR VOTING.
WE'RE JUST GOING TO NOW HAVE TWO NEW VOTES, CORRECT? I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE GOT EVERYTHING RIGHT, SO ALL IN FAVOR FOR THOSE THAT WANT TO VOTE FOR MICHAEL HOWARD FOR SECRETARY? AYE.
>> HE'S BEING HUMBLE. THAT'S THREE.
THEN THOSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO VOTE FOR SEAN FOR SECRETARY.
WELL, CONGRATULATIONS. YES, FOUR.
[00:15:02]
CONGRATULATIONS.THAT WAS, AGAIN, VERY UNIQUE FOR HOW WE WORKED THAT OUT.
THANKS FOR EVERYONE BEING PATIENT THROUGH IT ALL. NOW WE HAVE.
>> WE COULD PROBABLY STAY THIS.
>> NO, STAY WHERE YOU ARE, AND WE'LL CHANGE EVERYTHING UP FOR THE NEXT MEETING.
>> THAT SOUNDS GOOD. WELL, CONGRATULATIONS TO TIFFANY AS OUR VICE CHAIR.
AGAIN, FOR EVERYONE WORKING IT OUT.
AS WE WENT THROUGH SOME NEW DETAILS.
THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
>> I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE SEPTEMBER 23 MEETING.
>> SECOND BY SEAN. ALL IN FAVOR? VOTE PASSES 6-0.
[CONSENT AGENDA]
THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND NON CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS. ANY COMMISSION MEMBER MAKING SUCH REQUEST PRIOR TO A MOTION, AND VOTE ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY.ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH A MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION.
WE HAVE ITEMS 4 THROUGH 17 THIS EVENING.
ARE THERE ANY THAT NEED TO BE PULLED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION?
WELL, FOR THE RECORD, SEAN WILL NEED TO RECUSE HIMSELF FOR A MOMENT FOR THOSE.
>> WHAT DO WE WANT TO VOTE FOR?
>> THAT'S FINE. THEN DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS NUMBER 1 THROUGH 3?
>> SORRY. IT'S FIVE. [OVERLAPPING]
>> HOW NICE IS THAT? [OVERLAPPING] ALWAYS GOING TO HAVE TO DO QUICK MATH.
>> FIVE THROUGH NINE, 11 AND 13 THROUGH 17.
>> SECOND BY STEVE. ALL IN FAVOR?
NOW, SEAN WILL RECUSE HIMSELF.
>> YOU REALLY MADE THAT EASY, HOLLY.
>> DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 4,
[Conveyance Plat: Frisco MarketCenter, Block A, Lots 23 & 24 (CP25-0022)]
[Open Space Plan & Preliminary Site Plan: Hall Office Park, Phase B2, Block A, Lot 1 & Hall Office Park, Phase B3, Block A, Lot 1 (OS25-0067 & PSP25-0039)]
[Open Space Plan & Site Plan: Cobb Business Park Addition, Block A, Lot 1 (OS25-0070 & SP25-0096)]
10, AND 12?>> SECOND BY MICHAEL. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 5-0.
I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT SOUNDS LIKE.
I GUESS WE SHOULD GET BACK SEAN.
>> WE SHOULD KEEP HIM OUT THERE? NOT FOR PUNISHMENT, BUT BECAUSE HE'LL ALSO RECUSE HIMSELF FOR OUR REGULAR AGENDA ITEM.
HE'S GOING TO CAMP OUTSIDE FOR A LITTLE BIT.
IT'LL BE FINE. THE WEATHER'S NICE.
TONIGHT, WE HAVE SIX PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA, AND I WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS.
EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PRECEDED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST.
THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED 10 MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION.
FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.
ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER'S CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT.
IF THERE ARE ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITION.
PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS.
THE TIME LIMIT IS 5 MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK.
THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME IF A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO SPEAK.
PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED.
AFTER ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THIS CASE WILL BE CLOSED, AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE, AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO A FUTURE MEETING.
AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT.
PLEASE NOTE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES.
UNLESS THE COMMISSION DISAPPROVES THE CASE AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL THE DISAPPROVAL, FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AS TO WHEN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
OUR FIRST PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS NUMBER 18,
[Public Hearing - Replat: Prestmont Center, Block A, Lot 5 (RP25-0010)]
PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT PRESS MONT CENTER, BLOCK A LOT 5 RP 25-0010.OWNERS AS-137 FRISCO RANCH LP, AND AS-137 FRISCO RANCH PHASE 2 LP.
>> THANK YOU, CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THE ITEM THAT WAS JUST READ INTO RECORD WAS ORIGINALLY DISAPPROVED BY THE P&D COMMISSION BACK ON AUGUST 26? THE APPLICANT HAS SINCE RESUBMITTED FOR A DISAPPROVAL REVIEW.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT IS TO COMBINE TWO LOTS AND TO
[00:20:03]
ABANDON AND DEDICATE EASEMENTS NECESSARY FOR DEVELOPMENT.THIS PLAT CONFORMS TO SP 23115 THAT STAFF APPROVED BACK IN AUGUST 1 OF LAST YEAR.
STAFF RECOMMENDS FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
>> PERFECT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF RIGHT NOW? IS THE APPLICANT HERE? DO THEY WISH TO SPEAK OR SHOULD WE OPEN PUBLIC HEARING?
>> MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING?
>> MOTION BY SHAWN. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS OR I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION?
>> I MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 18 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.
SECOND BY WARREN. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 5 0.
THANK YOU. AND IF WE CAN GET SEAN BACK.
>> JASPER, THE RECORD, SEAN HAS RETURNED. WELCOME BACK.
ITEM NUMBER 19, PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT PRESTWICK GROVE,
[Public Hearing - Replat: Prestwick Grove (RP25-0017)]
RP 25-0017, OWNER TOLL, SOUTHWEST, LLC.>> THANK YOU, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THE ITEM NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE.
>> MOTION TO REMOVE THE ITEM FROM THE TABLE?
>> SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> MOTION PASSES 6-0. THANK YOU.
>> THIS ITEM WAS TABLED AT THE SEPTEMBER 23RD MEETING TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TIME TO WORK THROUGH STAFF'S OUTSTANDING COMMENTS.
SINCE THAT TIME, THEY HAVE RESUBMITTED, AND WE ARE RECOMMENDING THE REPLAT BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING FOR APPROVAL.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT IS TO ADJUST THE LOT LINE OF AN HOA LOT THAT WAS PLATTED AS A PREVIOUS PHASE TO THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE SOUTH IN ORDER FOR ONE OF THEIR PROPOSED LOTS TO HAVE FRONTAGE.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
>> ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WISH TO SPEAK? OUR PUBLIC HEARING IS STILL OPEN.
IF THERE IS ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK FOR ITEM NUMBER 19, NOW WOULD BE THE TIME.
>> SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING?
>> SECOND BY, IS THAT SEAN OR WARREN?
>> SECOND BY STEVE. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> MOTION APPROVED, PASSES 6-0.
[Public Hearing - Replat: Frisco Original Donation, Block 59, Lot 13 (RP25-0019)]
PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT, FRISCO ORIGINAL DONATION, BLOCK 59, LOT 13, RP 25-0019.OWNERS, ABIGAIL AND MAXWELL PUTNAM.
>> THANK YOU, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THE ITEM THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD IS BEFORE YOU ALL TODAY FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING ONE LOT OUT OF TWO.
CURRENTLY, THE LOT DOES NOT MEET OUR STANDARDS WITH THE LOT LINE GOING DOWN THE BUILDING.
WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
>> ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? IS THE APPLICANT HERE WHERE THEY LIKE TO SPEAK?
>> MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 20?
>> SECOND BY STEVE. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> SEEING NO ONE HERE. MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS OR I CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION?
>> I MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 20 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.
>> SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR?
[Public Hearing - Replat: Frisco Ranch Estates, Block B, Lot 1(RP25-0020)]
PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT, FRISCO RANCH ESTATES BLOCK B, LOT 1, RP 25-0020.>> THANK YOU. WELL, GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THE ITEM THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD FOR YOU TODAY IS HERE FOR APPROVAL.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT IS TO DEDICATE NEW EASEMENTS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT.
[00:25:03]
WITH THAT, I AM HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS.>> FABULOUS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? IS THE APPLICANT HERE? WOULD THEY LIKE TO SPEAK?
>> MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING?
>> SECOND BY STEVE. ALL IN FAVOR?
WE HAVE SOMEONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, AND IF YOU CAN DO YOU HAVE A BLUE SPEAKER CAR IN YOUR HAND? I CAN'T QUITE SEE.
>> I'M SORRY. HOLLY. [INAUDIBLE]
IF YOU CAN PLEASE STEP UP TO THE MICROPHONE, GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, AND AFTERWARDS, IF YOU CAN PLEASE FILL OUT A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND HAND IT OVER TO OUR LOVELY HOLLY MARTIN.
>> HAPPY TO. MY NAME IS DANIEL TODY.
I LIVE IN ONE OF THE LOTS JUST EAST OF WHAT'S BEING REPLATED.
WHAT ARE THEY REPLATING THAT ON? WHAT ARE THEY DOING TO THAT?
>> IF YOU'LL BE ABLE TO GO AHEAD AND ASK US YOUR QUESTIONS, WE WON'T BE ABLE TO BUT WE'LL BE ABLE TO WRITE THINGS DOWN AND MAKE SURE THAT WE ADDRESS THEM AFTERWARDS. IT'S JUST SO [OVERLAPPING]
>> BECAUSE NONE OF THE INFORMATION ON THE WEBSITE OR THE CAR SAID WHAT THEY WERE DOING WITH THAT, BECAUSE WE'VE HAD A BIT OF A CONTENTION WITH THEM OVER THE YEARS.
THIS PRIOR BODY BASICALLY LET A SPECIAL USE PERMIT INTO A RESIDENTIAL AREA.
WE FINALLY CAME TO AN AGREEMENT.
WE WANT TO KNOW WHAT THEY PLAN TO REPLAT ON THAT, BECAUSE THERE ARE COVENANTS THAT COVER THAT LOT FROM, I THINK IT'S THE 1960S THAT HAVE GONE FORWARD AND BEEN AMENDED AND BEEN, EXCUSE ME, PASSED AND REAPPLIED.
THEY ARE WITH I BELIEVE THE COLLIN COUNTY WHATEVER THAT THEY ARE SET UP AS.
THAT'S ALL I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IS WHAT THEY ARE PLANNING TO DO, BECAUSE NONE OF THAT INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
>> PERFECT. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
DO WE HAVE SOME QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
>> YOU HAVE THE BLUE SPEAKER CARD FOR YOU?
>> MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> THANK YOU, SO SORRY TO INTERRUPT THAT. MOTION BY JOHN?
>> OH, YES. PLEASE. SORRY. I WAS NOT TRYING TO CUT ANYONE OFF.
>> IT'S OKAY. IF YOU WANT TO GO AHEAD AND SPEAK AND THEN YOU CAN FILL THE BLUE CARD AFTERWARDS, TOTALLY FINE.
AGAIN, IF YOU JUST DON'T MIND GIVING US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
>> SURE. MY NAME IS MICHAEL WESTFALL WITH WESTFALL ENGINEERING.
I'M THE CIVIL ENGINEER ON THE PROJECT.
JUST FOR CLARITY, THE FINAL PLAT IS JUST THE FINAL PROCESS OF WHAT HAD ALREADY BEEN APPROVED IN THE CIVIL DRAWINGS.
THERE WAS NO CHANGES BEING PROPOSED TO THE PROJECT.
IT WAS JUST, THE PROJECT'S BEEN FINISHED WITH CONSTRUCTION, AND NOW WE'RE LOOKING TO FINALIZE THE EASEMENTS.
BUT NO CHANGES ARE BEING PROPOSED AT ALL.
>> FANTASTIC. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
IF YOU DON'T MIND JUST FILLING OUT THAT BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND THEN TURNING IN TO HOLLY?
>> IF NOT, OTHERS, I MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOTION BY JOHN? SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR?
DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF NOW THAT WE HAD THAT GENTLEMAN ASK SOME FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS, WHICH MIGHT HAVE BEEN ANSWERED BY OUR ENGINEER.
>> I HAVE ONE QUESTION FOR JOHN LETLER.
CAN YOU JUST REMIND US THE HISTORY OF THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION WAS VOTED DOWN BY P&Z, IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, AND VOTED APPROVED BY COUNSEL.
AM I REMEMBERING THAT CORRECTLY?
>> I DON'T REMEMBER THE VOTE AT P&Z.
WE HAVE CHANGED OUR ORDINANCES SINCE THEN.
YOU GOT FEDERAL LAW IN THIS MATTER, RLUIPA, WHICH IS RELIGIOUS, LAND USE, OR INDIVIDUAL PERSONAL ACT, SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES, WHERE YOU CANNOT TREAT THE CHURCH DIFFERENT THAN OTHER LAND USES PERMITTED IN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.
EXAMPLE. YOU GOT A CHURCH? COUNTRY CLUB IS ALLOWED.
YOU GOT A SCHOOL? THAT'S ALLOWED IN SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICTS.
THAT DID NOT FLY IN WELL, THAT FLEW IN THE FACE BY REQUIRING THE SUP.
WE AMENDED THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND STATING THAT AS LONG AS THE CHURCH FRONTS ON A COLLECTOR SIZED STREET, THE SUP WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED.
THIS FRONTS ON NORTH COUNTY IS A COLLECTOR STREET.
AS A GENTLEMAN MENTIONED ABOUT COVENANTS, THOSE ARE PRIVATE DEED RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE HANDLED IN A CIVIL MATTER.
IT DOES NOT APPLY TO THE CITY.
YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ENFORCING THE CITY ORDINANCES, NOT DEED RESTRICTIONS.
>> THANK YOU FOR THAT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, [OVERLAPPING]
>> I JUST WANT TO FOLLOW ON WITH THAT. MY RECOLLECTION WAS THAT IT DID GET DENIED AT P&Z, BUT WITHOUT LOOKING AT THE RECORDS,
[00:30:02]
FOR SURE, I CAN'T CONFIRM THAT.THAT'S HOW I REMEMBER THIS CASE GOING THROUGH P&Z, AND THEN IT WENT UP TO COUNCIL AND GOT APPROVED THERE.
>> I WILL TELL YOU, THE STAFF MEMBER MADE AN ERROR ON THAT.
>> MY QUESTION IS, I FORGOT THE ENGINEER'S NAME, BUT HE STATED THAT THIS IS A FINAL PLAT, BUT THE HEADING ON IT SAYS REPLAT.
WHY WOULD IT SAY REPLAT IF IT'S A FINAL PLAT?
ONCE YOU HAD A PROPERTY PLATTED, WHAT YOU DO AFTER THAT? UNLESS YOU REPLAT IT, THE ONLY TIME YOU CAN GO BACK AND DO A FINAL PLAT IF YOU VACATE THE PLAT, SO THIS IS A REPLAT.
I'LL SAY ONE OTHER THING ON THE CARD, THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN AN EMAIL ADDRESS TO GO TO FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.
>> ON THAT, WE PUT THAT ON WHEN WE DO SENDING OUT POSTCARDS, GO THERE, YOU CAN FIND OUT THE PLANNER TO FOLLOW UP TO GET ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
>> YEAH, SO I'M NOT DONE. I'M STILL TRYING TO UNDERSTAND HOW IS IT THAT THE ENGINEER OF RECORD BELIEVES THAT THIS HEARING IS FOR A FINAL PLAT? HE'S THE ONE THAT HAS SUBMITTED THE DOCUMENT, BUT OUR DOCUMENTATION SAYS REPLAT.
I'M NOT UNDERSTANDING THE DISCREPANCY.
>> LET'S BRING HIM UP AND ASK HIM IF HE MISSPOKE.
>> YOU CAN DO THAT. YOU CAN ASK AN AUDIENCE MEMBER.
>> DO YOU MIND COMING BACK UP TO THE PODIUM, PLEASE, JUST FOR US TO ASK A CLARIFYING QUESTION? THANK YOU. I'M SO SORRY, I DIDN'T GET YOUR NAME ORIGINALLY.
>> YES. I MISSPOKE, IT'S A REPLAT.
IT HAD ALREADY BEEN A FINAL PLAT, AND IT'S A REPLAT HEADING IN THE EASEMENTS FROM THE DEVELOPER.
>> YOU WANT TO TURN YOUR MICROPHONE BACK ON?
>> WE'RE NOW GOING TO PLAY JEOPARDY MUSIC.
>> WE MAY JUST HAVE YOU SIT THERE FOR ONE SECOND.
>> YES. IF YOU DON'T MIND JUST HAVING A SEAT RIGHT THERE, JUST TO MAKE SURE THERE AREN'T ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR YOU WHILE MR. LITTLER IS VERIFYING SOMETHING.
>> NO, IT SAYS REPLAT IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF THE PLAT DOCUMENT THAT'S IN YOUR PACKAGE.
>> IT SOUNDS LIKE WE'VE GOTTEN OUR ANSWER THAT IT IS A REPLAT.
>> THANK YOU FOR INDULGING ME.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
>> MOVE TO APPROVE THIS REPLAT?
>> SECOND BY JOHN. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> PERFECT. FOR THE RECORD, SEAN IS GOING TO RECUSE HIMSELF FOR ITEM NUMBER 22.
[Public Hearing - Replat: Hall Park, Phase C1, Block A, Lots 1 & 2; Hall Park, Phase C2, Block A, Lot 1; Hall Park, Phase C4, Block A, Lot 1; Hall Park, Phase C5, Block A, Lots 3 & 4 (RP25-0023)]
WE HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT.HALL PARK, PHASE C1, BLOCK A, LOTS 1 AND 2.
HALL PARK, PHASE C2, BLOCK A, LOT 1, AND HALL PARK, PHASE C4, BLOCK A, LOT 1.
HALL PARK PHASE C5, BLOCK A, LOTS 3 AND 4.
RP 25-0023, OWNERS HP C4L1, LLC, HALL 2801 NETWORK ASSOCIATES, LTD, AND HALL 2601 NETWORK ASSOCIATES, LTD. THAT WAS A LOT OF LETTERS.
>> THANK YOU, CHAIR. MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THE ITEM THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD WAS SUBMITTED ON SEPTEMBER 15TH.
SINCE THEN, THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO HELP ADDRESS STAFF'S COMMENTS.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF A 30 DAY EXTENSION, CONTINUING THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND TABLED THE ITEM TO THE OCTOBER 28TH, 2025, PNC MEETING.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
>> ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? WHERE IS THE APPLICANT HERE? DO THEY WISH TO SPEAK? EVEN THOUGH THIS IS A REQUEST TO APPROVE A 30 DAY EXTENSION, WE WILL NEED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING.
>> SECOND BY STEVE. ALL IN FAVOR?
DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM NUMBER 22?
>> I WOULD LIKE TO MOTION ITEM 22 THAT WE CAN ACCEPT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR A 30 DAY EXTENSION.
CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO THE OCTOBER 28TH, 2025, MEETING.
>> SECOND BY STEVE. ALL IN FAVOR?
ITEM NUMBER 22 'S REQUEST TO EXTEND HAS BEEN APPROVED.
[00:35:02]
ITEM NUMBER 23. PUBLIC HEARING.YES. I'M SO SORRY. PLEASE GET SEAN. WE'LL WAIT JUST A MINUTE.
AS FOR THE RECORD, SEAN MERRILL IS BACK ON THE DIAS.
[Public Hearing - Zoning: Frisco Center Business Park (Z25-0004)]
PUBLIC HEARING ZONING FRISCO CENTER BUSINESS PARK Z 25-0004, OWNER FRISCO CENTER PROPERTIES.>> THANK YOU, CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THIS PROPERTY FROM INDUSTRIAL AND RETAIL TO OFFICE 2.
THIS PROPERTY IS NOT ADJACENT TO ANY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS, AND THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT NON-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AS WELL AS THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION OF BUSINESS PARK.
TO DATE, STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY PROJECT INPUT FORMS ON THIS REQUEST.
YOU'D HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL THIS EVENING AS OFFICE 2, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
>> ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF, OR IS THE APPLICANT HERE WOULD THEY WISH TO SPEAK?
>> I HAVE A TECHNICAL QUESTION FOR STAFF.
>> THIS IS UNLIMITED HEIGHT FOR OFFICE 2, CORRECT?
>> BUT CAN YOU JUST CLARIFY FOR THE RECORD THAT JUST BECAUSE IT'S UNLIMITED HEIGHT, THERE'S OTHER THINGS THAT WILL CONSTRAIN THE SITE TO WHERE THEY WILL PHYSICALLY LIMIT WHAT CAN BE BUILT THERE, HEIGHT WISE, IS THAT CORRECT?
THE OFFICE 2 ZONING DISTRICT DOES HAVE UNLIMITED HEIGHT.
HOWEVER, THERE IS A PROVISION WHERE YOU HAVE TO IMPLEMENT GREATER SETBACKS WHEN ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS, SO THAT'S WHY I MADE REFERENCE THAT IT IS NOT ADJACENT TO ANY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS.
AN APPLICANT DEVELOPING THIS SITE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH ALL OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS.
FOR EXAMPLE, PARKING, NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT HAS A 10% OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT, FACADE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, ETC.
FOR EXAMPLE, SOMEWHAT DIFFICULT BECAUSE THEY DID WANT TO GO 12 STORIES UP AND 12 STORIES DOWN WITH PARKING, NOT SAYING THEY COULDN'T.
BUT EVENTUALLY, PUSH COMES TO SHOVE WITH FINANCIALS.
YES, THERE ARE OTHER DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS THAT WOULD POTENTIALLY LIMIT IT.
>> THAT WOULD MAKE IT AT LEAST DIFFICULT.
IT WOULDN'T JUST BE AN EASY THING TO DO.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? DO YOU HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING?
>> SEE NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK. I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS, OR I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION?
>> MOVE TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 23 TO REZONE AS OFFICE 2.
>> SECOND BY SEAN. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 6-0.
CONGRATULATIONS. ITEM NUMBER 24.
[Review and act on the Planning & Zoning Commission annual City Council Report.]
REVIEW AND ACT ON THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ANNUAL CITY COUNCIL REPORT.DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR EDITS? I DO HAVE ONE COMMENT.
>> LET ME JUST ADD A FEW COMMENTS HERE.
THIS IS SOMETHING THAT THE COUNCIL HAS ASKED OF ALL THE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS TO DO THIS.
WE PROVIDED THE DRAFT IN HERE TO HELP YOU OUT INSTEAD OF HITTING YOU COLD WITH THIS, AND SO WE PUT TOGETHER THOUGHTS AND ANYTHING YOU WANT TO CHANGE ON THIS, SO FORTH.
JUST LET US KNOW AT THIS RIGHT NOW.
>> HOW COME WE DON'T FILL IN THE POSITIONS COLUMN? I FILL THAT OUT. THEN ALSO DIDN'T SOME OF THE BOARD MEMBERS ATTEND THE APA MEETING AS WELL?
>> THE POSITIONS WERE NOT FILLED IN BECAUSE WE DID NOT KNOW WHAT TO PUT UNTIL THE VOTES THIS EVENING.
NOW THAT WE KNOW WHAT HAPPENED THIS EVENING, WE WILL FILL THAT IN BEFORE THIS IS FORWARDED ONTO COUNCIL.
>> IT WOULD SEEM LIKE THIS IS A REPORT FOR WHAT HAPPENED LAST YEAR, SO TO ME I WOULD ASSUME PUT THE POSITIONS THAT WE WERE IN LAST YEAR.
THAT WOULD BE MY ASSUMPTION. BECAUSE WE'VE GOT OUR ATTENDANCE THERE AND EVERYTHING WE DID LAST YEAR ON HERE.
>> THE CURRENT MEMBERS WERE ON A LIST OF CURRENT POSITIONS AS OF TODAY.
THIS IS A REPORT THAT'S GETTING APPROVED TODAY.
>> DOES THAT MEAN JOHN, THAT LAST YEAR'S REPORT THEN REFLECTED WHO THE OFFICERS WERE?
>> I DON'T REMEMBER LAST YEAR'S REPORT.
[00:40:08]
>> ANY OTHER EDITS OR COMMENTS THAT NEED TO BE NOTED? I WAS JUST GOING TO COMMENT THAT WARREN STEVE AND BRITTNEY ARE THE TEACHER'S PETS BECAUSE WE HAVE 95% ATTENDANCE.
>> YOU ALL GET A GOLD [OVERLAPPING]
KENDALL MIGHT BE [OVERLAPPING]
>> I THOUGHT I CAME TO ALL THE MEETINGS.
>> IT DOES LOOK LIKE IT'S IN ORDER OF PLACE.
>> THE OTHER ONE COMMENT I HEARD WAS BY ADDING INTO BOTH THE STATE AND THEN THE NATIONAL APA CONFERENCE.
>> DO WE NEED TO MAKE A MOTION ABOUT THAT OR IS THAT [OVERLAPPING]
>> GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION OF THAT.
>> I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION TO ADD THE APA CONFERENCE [OVERLAPPING]
>> BOTH THE STATE AND NATIONAL.
>> SECOND BY JOHN. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 6-0 TO ADD THOSE COMMENTS INTO OUR ANNUAL REPORT.
>> IS THAT MOTION ALSO TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL REPORT WITH THOSE?
>> GOOD CATCH. TECHNICALLY SAY THAT?
>> WAS THAT THE MOTION [OVERLAPPING]
>> I'LL AMEND THE MOTION TO ADD THOSE.
>> PERFECT. THEN LET'S JUST MAKE SURE WE HAVE OUR VOTE TO APPROVE AND ADD THOSE AMENDMENTS THAT SEAN MENTIONED. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 6-0 TO ADD THE AMENDMENTS AND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL REPORT IS APPROVED.
FABULOUS. ITEM NUMBER 25 RESULTS OF THE OCTOBER 7TH, 2025 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
>> ITEM NUMBER 26, SCHEDULE OF FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS.
[Schedule of future discussion items.]
DO WE HAVE ANY ITEMS TO DISCUSS?>> ONE MEETING COMING UP, JOHN, CAN YOU CONFIRM THE DATE FOR THE CPAC MEETING THAT'S COMING UP?
JUST AS WE DID, WE STARTED THIS WITH THE 2006 PLAN, RECONVENING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
THEN STAFF IS MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE LIST OF REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION.
WE'LL TAKE THAT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THEIR ACTION.
WE'LL NOTE IF ANY OF THOSE ARE BUDGETED ITEMS, WHICH MEANS REQUIRE FUNDS TO DO.
THE REASON FOR DOING THAT IS TO NOTE THAT MONEY IS NEEDED, AND IF IT DOESN'T GET APPROVED BY COUNCIL, THOSE PROJECTS ARE NOT HAPPENING.
BUT BASED ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE, THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE MEETING, WILL PLACE THAT ON A FUTURE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, MOST LIKELY, THE FIRST MEETING IN NOVEMBER FOR [INAUDIBLE] ACTION, AND THEN WE'LL TAKE IT BEFORE CITY COUNCIL.
WE DO IT EARLY IN THE PROCESS BECAUSE WE START THE BUDGET PROCESS IN EARLY MARCH.
EVEN IF COUNCIL INDICATES APPROVAL AT THE END OF THE DAY, IS WHAT IT'S APPROVING THE BUDGET IS THE FINAL DECISION WHEN IT'S A BUDGETED ITEM.
WE GOT AWAY FROM THE PROCESS WHEN THE PANDEMIC HIT.
>> JOHN, THAT MEETINGS A PUBLIC.
IT WAS A PUBLIC MEETING. WE POSTED.
WE MET THE REQUIREMENT THREE FULL BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
IT WAS POSTED, I BELIEVE, TODAY.
>> WE ONLY HAVE ONE ITEM LEFT.
>> SECOND BY STEVE. ALL IN FAVOR.
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 6-0.
WE ARE NOW ADJOURNED AT 7:15 P M.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.