May 13, 2025 Frisco - Planning and Zoning Commission

WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED. WE'D LIKE TO WELCOME EVERYONE TO THE REGULAR MEETING FOR THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

[00:00:08]

THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY CITY COUNCIL.

TONIGHT, COMMISSIONERS IN PRESENCE ARE TIFFANY WELLS, BRITTANY KOHLBERG, STEVE COHEN, WARREN RUIZ, SEAN MERRILL AND I, JON KENDALL IS YOUR CHAIR REPRESENTING STAFF? WE HAVE JONATHAN HUBBARD, ROLLANDIA RUSSELL, DANIEL PONDER, SEAN O'QUINN AND HOLLY MARTIN FROM ENGINEERING.

WE'VE GOT JOEL FITTS AND RICARDO ORDONEZ AND THAT IS JUST HAD A SPECIAL GUEST JOIN US.

NO, NO, NO. AND WE HAVE JOHN GILLETTE. WONDERFUL.

NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS CITIZEN INPUT. IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME.

[CITIZEN INPUT]

PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE. PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR THE APPLICANT PRESENT THIS EVENING TO ENSURE THAT THERE'S ENOUGH TIME FOR ALL TO SPEAK.

PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES, UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH CASE YOU MAY HAVE A MAXIMUM OF TEN MINUTES. PLEASE NOTE THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT ON ITEMS NOT POSTED ON THE AGENDA, EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, OR TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, OR TO INDICATE THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA.

WITH THAT, IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK DURING THE CITIZEN INPUT? ALL RIGHT. WE'LL GO TO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA, WHICH IS APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES.

[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

I'VE GOT A MOTION BY BRITTANY. SECOND, SECOND BY SEAN.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

WE HAVE AN ADDITIONAL APPROVAL OF MINUTES. ITEM THREE.

MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE WORK SESSION. MINUTES FROM THE APRIL 22ND.

I'VE GOT A MOTION BY TIFFANY. SECOND. SECOND BY SEAN.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

NEXT IS THE CONSENT AGENDA. THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS CONSIST OF ROUTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS.

[CONSENT AGENDA]

WE HAVE ITEMS FOUR THROUGH 17 THIS EVENING. ARE THERE ANY THAT NEED TO BE PULLED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION? FIVE AND 12. THAT'S RIGHT. THAT FIVE AND 12 RECUSE MYSELF.

ALL RIGHT. SO BEFORE THAT, DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS FOUR, SIX THROUGH 11 AND 13 THROUGH 17? SO MOVED I'VE GOT A MOTION BY BRITTANY, SECOND BY SEAN.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

LET'S GIVE A MOMENT FOR SEAN [INAUDIBLE]. ALL RIGHT.

ITEMS FIVE AND 12 ON THE CONSENT AGENDA WILL DO THEM TOGETHER.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OR ENTERTAIN A MOTION? MOVE TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS NUMBER FIVE AND NUMBER 12.

I'VE GOT A MOTION BY BRITTANY. SECOND, SECOND BY TIFFANY.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FOUR ZERO.

STEVE COHEN IS GOING TO GRAB OUR FRIEND SEAN WITH THAT.

TONIGHT, WE HAVE THREE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA, AND I WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS.

EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PERCEIVED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST.

THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED TEN MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION, FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION. THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT. IF THERE ARE ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITIONS.

PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS, OTHER THAN TO STATE THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS THAT THE TIME LIMIT IS FIVE MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK.

THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME IF A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO SPEAK.

PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED AFTER ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.

THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE, AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES IT IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO A FUTURE MEETING.

AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT.

PLEASE NOTE THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES UNLESS THE COMMISSION DISAPPROVES THE CASE, AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL THE DISAPPROVAL. FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY CITY COUNCIL.

YOU'RE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT YOUR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AS TO WHEN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY CITY COUNCIL.

WITH THAT ALL SAID, WE'RE GOING TO JUMP UP AND AS ONE OF THE STAFF ARE WALKING UP ITEM 18.

[Conveyance Plat: Preston Promenade, Block A, Lots 1-12 (CP25-0007)]

[00:05:02]

CP 25-0007. OWNERS. I THINK THIS IS NORTHEAST CORNER PRESTON.

PANTHER CREEK LIMITED, SUMMIT PRESTON LLC AND VICTRON STORAGE, LP.

THANK YOU, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

SO, THE ITEM THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD WAS INITIALLY SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ON MARCH 24TH, 2025. THE PLANNING AND ZONING DID APPROVE A 30 DAY EXTENSION ON APRIL 22ND.

SINCE THAT TIME, STAFF HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THE APPLICANT.

HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS.

SO, THIS EVENING WE RECOMMEND THIS APPROVAL FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. AND AS I READ IT, I APOLOGIZE.

WE ONLY HAVE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS. THIS ONE IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING.

CORRECT. BUT I WILL STILL OFFER IF THE APPLICANT'S HERE AND THEY WISH TO SPEAK.

OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF BEFORE WE ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON ITEM 18? I'LL MAKE A MOTION HERE. I MOVE TO DISAPPROVE ITEM NUMBER 18.

FOR THE REASONS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF'S REPORT AND DELEGATE TO STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT OF THE REASONS FOR THE DISAPPROVAL.

RECOMMENDATION BY STEVE. SECOND. A SECOND BY TIFFANY.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

ITEM 18 HAS BEEN DENIED. ITEM 19 PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT THE HILLS OF KINGWOOD.

[Public Hearing - Replat: The Hills of Kingswood, Phase 6A, Block D, Lot 50 (RP25-0008)]

THANK YOU, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT IS TO CREATE ONE LOT.

THE PROPOSED LOT MEETS THE SINGLE FAMILY SEVEN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

STAFF RECOMMENDS FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED. THANK YOU.

AS THE APPLICANT HERE. AND DO THEY WISH TO SPEAK? IF NOT, DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED.

MOTION BY BRITTANY, SECOND BY SEAN. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. WE'RE IN PUBLIC.

HEARING FOR ITEM 19. SEEING NONE. MOVE TO CLOSE.

PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

PUBLIC HEARING PORTION IS NOW CLOSED. I'LL MAKE A MOTION.

MOVE TO APPROVE AGENDA. ITEM NUMBER 19 IS SUBMITTED BY STAFF.

I'VE GOT A MOTION BY BRITTANY. SECOND, SECOND BY TIFFANY.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

CONGRATULATIONS, KEITH AND KRISTA. I THINK GREWCOCK, THANK YOU FOR CORRECTING ME.

ITEM 20 PUBLIC HEARING SPECIFIC USE PERMIT ONE PIG TRAP.

[Public Hearing - Specific Use Permit: DT-1 Pig Trap (SUP24-0016)]

COMMISSIONERS. THIS ITEM NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. SO MOVED.

MOTION BY BRITTANY. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

THIS HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. ALL YOURS.

THIS ITEM WAS TABLED IN. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CONTINUED AT THE APRIL 8TH, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.

THE APPLICANT CONTINUES TO WORK WITH STAFF AND REQUEST TABLING THIS ITEM.

STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THE ITEM TO THE MAY 27TH, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. ALL RIGHT TO THE MAY 27TH AND REFRESH ME IF I REMEMBER RIGHT.

THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS ALREADY OPEN CURRENTLY. CORRECT. ALL RIGHT. THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT. I'D STILL ASK FOR FORMALITY.

IF THE APPLICANT IS HERE AND THEY WISH TO SPEAK.

OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE HERE? YEAH. ALL RIGHT.

WE DON'T NEED AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING, BUT. AND WE'RE NOT LOOKING TO CLOSE IT. BUT IF THERE'S NO QUESTIONS, WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR CONTINUING THIS PUBLIC HEARING.

SURE, I MAKE A MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 20 TO THE MAY 27TH, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING. I'VE GOT A MOTION BY BRITTANY.

SECOND, SECOND BY SEAN. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. ITEM 21. RESULTS OF THE MAY 6TH, 2025 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

[Results of the May 6, 2025, City Council meeting.]

THANK YOU FOR THAT. WHAT WAS THE VOTE ON THE DENIAL FOR TWO? CAN YOU ADD ANY CLARIFICATION ON HOW THEY CAME TO THEIR DECISION? IN A NUTSHELL, THOSE THAT WERE AGAINST JUST STATED THAT NOTHING HAD REALLY CHANGED.

[00:10:02]

PERFECT. INTERESTING. ITEM 22, SCHEDULE OF FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS.

[Schedule of future discussion items.]

NOT THAT I'M AWARE OF. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. BUT I WOULD SAY EVERYONE PLAN ON HAVING A WORKSHOP AFTER TWO WEEKS FROM NOW.

SO, EAT BEFORE YOU COME. ALL RIGHT WITH THAT, IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE, ONE LAST THING.

MOVE TO ADJOURN. MOTION BY WARREN. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

WE ADJOURNED AT 6:41 P.M. FOR THE RECORD, I WANT TO SAY BRITTANY WAS RIGHT.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.