Apr 22, 2025 Frisco - Planning and Zoning Commission

[00:00:02]

W E'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED. WELCOME TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

[CALL TO ORDER]

THE FRISCO AND PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY CITY COUNCIL.

TONIGHT COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE PRESENT ARE TIFFANY WELLS, MICHAEL HOWARD, BRITTANY COLBERG, STEVEN CONE, SEAN MERRELL AND WARREN RUIZ. I APOLOGIZE, I SLIPPED RIGHT OVER AND I JON KENDALL AS YOUR CHAIR.

FROM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WE HAVE JOHN LETTELLEIR, JONATHAN HUBBARD, ROLANDREA RUSSELL, DANIEL PONDER, SEAN AUCOIN AND JENNIFER MORGAN. FROM ENGINEERING WE'VE GOT JASON GRIMM AND JOEL FITTS.

FROM FIRE WE HAVE ALYSSA BARSTOW, LEGAL COUNSEL, RYAN PITTMAN.

ANYONE I FORGOT? AWESOME. ALL RIGHT WITH THAT THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS CITIZEN INPUT.

IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME.

PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM. PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE. PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR THE APPLICANT OR ANY APPLICANT PRESENT THIS EVENING.

TO ENSURE THERE IS ENOUGH TIME FOR ALL TO SPEAK PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES, UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH CASE YOU MAY HAVE A MAXIMUM OF TEN MINUTES.

PLEASE NOTE THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT ON ITEMS NOT POSTED ON THE AGENDA, EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, OR TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MAY THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA.

WITH THAT, IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK DURING CITIZEN INPUT? ALL RIGHT.

[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE APRIL 8TH, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING.

I'VE GOT A MOTION BY BRITTANY. WOULD THAT BE THE REGULAR MEETING? IT'S JUST THE FIRST ONE. I'VE GOT A MOTION BY BRITTANY FOR ITEM TWO.

SECOND. I SECOND BY STEVE. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. AGAIN ITEM THREE WITH REGARDS TO THE MINUTES.

DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE WORK SESSION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON APRIL 8TH, 2025. I'VE GOT A MOTION BY BRITTANY. SECOND, SECOND BY SEAN.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO .

[CONSENT AGENDA]

ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION.

WE HAVE ITEMS 4 THROUGH 23 THIS NIGHT. I DO KNOW A FEW NEED TO BE PULLED.

BEFORE WE PULL THEM I'M GOING TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS 5, 8- 18, ITEM 20, ITEM 21 AND 23. SO MOVED. I'VE GOT A MOTION BY WARREN. SECOND.

SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. WE'RE GOING TO START WITH ITEM 4.

[Conveyance Plat: Preston PGA Retail, Block A, Lots 2 & 3 (CP25-0004)]

THANK YOU CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. AFTER THE AGENDA WAS PUBLISHED A DISCREPANCY IN THE SUBDIVISION NAME WAS IDENTIFIED.

THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED AN UPDATED EXHIBIT WITH THE CORRECT SUBDIVISION NAME OF PRESTON PGA RETAIL, AS SHOWN ON THE UPDATED EXHIBIT BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM WITH THE UPDATED SUBDIVISION NAME OF PRESTON PGA RETAIL.

THANK YOU AND I APPRECIATE TABBING AND EVERYTHING, IT'S MADE IT TREMENDOUSLY EASY TO READ.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR A MOTION FOR CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 4.

MOVE TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 4.

MOTION BY STEVE AS CORRECTED BY STAFF. I LOVE IT.

MOTION BY STEVE. I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY SEAN.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FOUR SIX ZERO.

[Conveyance Plat: Preston Promenade, Block A, Lots 1-12 (CP25-0007)]

ROLANDREA RUSSELL ITEM 7. I'D LOVE TO HEAR FROM YOU ON THIS ITEM.

THANK YOU CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. SO THE ITEM THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD HAS REQUESTED A 30 DAY EXTENSION AND REQUESTING TO MOVE TO THE MAY 13TH P&Z MEETING. SO THIS REQUEST CAME AFTER THE AGENDA PACKET WAS PUBLISHED, AND THE APPLICANT WAS UNABLE TO GET US THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTS ON TIME.

SO IT'S STILL BEING RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL? NO, SO WE'RE.

THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING IT DIDN'T SOUND LIKE IT. SO THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE REQUESTED 30 DAY EXTENSION THAT IS BEFORE YOU TODAY TO THE MAY 13TH P&Z MEETING.

[00:05:08]

GREAT. MOTION TO APPROVE THE 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR ITEM NUMBER 7.

WONDERFUL. AND ON THE MAY 13TH, I HAVE A MOTION BY TIFFANY.

SECOND. SECOND BY BRITTANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. THAT'S WHAT I GET IN TROUBLE WITH MY WIFE.

I THOUGHT YOU WERE GOING TO SAY APPROVE, AND I SHOULD JUST LET YOU FINISH. ALL RIGHT.

[Conveyance Plat: The Creek On 121, Block A, Lots 1-9 & Racetrac 121/Independence, Block A, Lot 2 (CP25-0006)]

[Site Plan: Cobb Business Park Addition, Block B, Lot 5 (SP25-0032)]

WE'RE GOING TO GO OVER ITEM 6 AND 22. ALL RIGHT.

SHOW THE RECORD THAT COMMISSIONER SEAN MERRELL HAS STEPPED OUT.

WERE GOING TO DO THESE TOGETHER. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS WITH REGARDS TO ITEM 6 OR 22 OR ENTERTAIN A MOTION? MOVE TO APPROVE ITEMS NUMBER 6 AND 22 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

I'VE GOT A MOTION BY BRITTANY. SECOND, SECOND BY TIFFANY.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

[Preliminary Site Plan: NWC Stonebrook & Parkwood, Block A, Lot 1 (PSP25-0012)]

ENJOY THAT BEAUTIFUL WEATHER OUT THERE, 86 DEGREE WEATHER.

ALL RIGHT. RECORDS SHOW THAT SEAN MERRELL IS BACK AT THE DAIS AND MICHAEL HOWARD HAS STEPPED OUT.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR ITEM 19? MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 19.

I'VE GOT A MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND, SECOND BY TIFFANY.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

CONGRATULATIONS. WITH THAT, AS HE WALKS IN, I'M GOING TO JUMP IN.

[Public Hearing – Specific Use Permit: Dollar Flowers Addition, Block A, Lot 3 (SUP24-0008)]

EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PERCEIVED BY STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST.

THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED TEN MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION. FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND THE APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION. THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.

ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT, WHO IS JENNIFER TONIGHT. IF THERE ARE ANY ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITIONS.

PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS, OTHER THAN TO STATE THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS.

THE TIME LIMIT IS FIVE MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS ENOUGH TIME TO SPEAK.

THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME IF A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO SPEAK. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED. AFTER ALL, PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SEEK THE PUBLIC HEARING, PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE, AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES IT IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO A FUTURE MEETING.

AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF OR THE APPLICANT. PLEASE NOTE THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES. UNLESS THE COMMISSION DISAPPROVES THE CASE, AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL THE DISAPPROVAL, FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY CITY COUNCIL. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT YOUR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AS TO WHEN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY CITY COUNCIL.

WITH THAT, I'M GOING TO CATCH MY BREATH AND TURN TO ITEM 24.

PUBLIC HEARING SPECIFIC USE PERMIT, DOLLAR FLOWERS ADDITION BLOCK A LOT 3 SUP 24-0008 OWNERS PCK LAND COMPANY, LLC. THANK YOU CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

THE ITEM MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. SO MOVED.

MOTION BY BRITTANY. SECOND. SECOND BY SEAN. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. THIS ITEM IS REMOVED, ROLANDREA YOU'RE BACK ON.

OKAY, SO JUST AS A REFRESHER FOR EVERYONE THIS EVENING, THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS FOR AN SUP FOR A LICENSED CHILD CARE FACILITY.

THIS ITEM IS BEFORE YOU BECAUSE IT WAS RECOMMENDED FOR DENIAL AND PER SOME DIRECTION BY THE COMMISSION WE, THE APPLICANT WAS ASKED TO DO AN UPDATED SOUND STUDY.

AND ALSO STAFF WAS ASKED TO GATHER SOME INFORMATION WHICH HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO YOU ALL TODAY.

SO SINCE THE MEETING IN FEBRUARY, THE APPLICANT DID HOST A NEW A DIFFERENT HOA MEETING WHICH STAFF WAS ABLE TO ATTEND.

AND SO IT WAS SET OUT MORE LIKE AN OPEN HOUSE.

NO FORMAL PRESENTATION WAS GIVEN, BUT AT ANY GIVEN TIME THERE WERE APPROXIMATELY TEN RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE.

SO SINCE THAT MEETING AFTER THE PACKET WAS PUBLISHED, WE RECEIVED SEVEN PROJECT FORMS IN SUPPORT OF THIS ITEM, WHICH YOU ALL HAVE. TODAY. AND SO YOU ALL HAVE A COPY OF THE SOUND STUDY.

AND JUST TO SUMMARIZE THE FINDINGS OF THE SOUND STUDY BASED ON THE DIRECTION THAT YOU ALL GAVE.

[00:10:02]

AND IN COMPARISON TO THIS LOCATION, THAT RICHARDSON LOCATION IS PREDOMINANTLY SURROUNDED BY NONRESIDENTIAL USE.

SO THE SOUND STUDY SHOWED WHAT THE CONDITIONS WOULD BE WITHOUT TRAFFIC.

WELL, WITHOUT THE BUILDINGS ON SITE, WITH ONLY THE TRAFFIC PREDICTIONS BASED ON THE CONDITIONS THAT WERE MODELED FROM THE RICHARDSON SITE.

AND SO THESE ARE THE COMPARISONS BEFORE YOU. WE DO HAVE A MODEL WITH JUST TRAFFIC NOISE, NO IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SITE.

ANOTHER ONE WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ALONG WITH TRAFFIC.

ONE WITH ONLY THE REQUIRED EIGHT FOOT MASONRY WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES TO THE NORTH AND EAST.

ALSO THERE IS ONE WITH THE THE WALL THAT WAS DISCUSSED AROUND THE PLAY SPACE, WHICH IS PROPOSED TO BE A EIGHT FOOT MASONRY WALL, AS WELL AS THE REQUIRED EIGHT FOOT MASONRY WALL THAT BORDERS THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES.

SO IN CONCLUSION, THE SOUND STUDY STATED THAT IT DID NOT ANTICIPATE THE ADDITION OF THE EIGHT FOOT WALL AROUND THE PLAY AREA HAVING ANY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT IN TERMS OF REDUCING THE NOISE LEVEL FOR THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS.

SO AFTER THIS SOUND STUDY, THE APPLICANT HAS ALSO INDICATED THAT THEY HAVE THEY DO NOT INTEND TO MODIFY THE EXHIBITS PROPOSED REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE SOUND STUDY SAYS. STAFF STILL DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE 2015 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE PLAY AREA TO BE LOCATED AWAY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL AREA. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS RECOMMENDATION WAS ALSO BROUGHT FORWARD IN THE 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT WAS RECENTLY APPROVED.

SO I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. DO I WAIT FOR QUESTIONS? LET THE APPLICANT GO AND THEN FURTHER QUESTIONS.

ALL RIGHT. IS THE APPLICANT HERE. AND DO YOU GUYS WISH TO SPEAK. YOU'VE GOT TEN MINUTES I THINK, YOU KNOW, TO FILL OUT A BLUE SPEAKER CARD. AND STEVE IS MANAGING THAT TIME.

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. COMMISSION MY NAME IS BILL DAHLSTROM, 2323 ROSS AVENUE.

AND THANK YOU, STAFF, FOR THE PRESENTATION. IT DID.

IT WAS PRETTY CONCISE AND DID MAKE THE CONCLUSIONS THAT WE THOUGHT WERE GOING TO IT WAS GOING TO MAKE.

BUT WITH ME TONIGHT, MIKE LYSSY WITH CROSS ARCHITECTS.

HE ADDRESSED YOU LAST TIME AS WELL WITH ANSWERING THE DETAILED QUESTIONS.

KRISTEN ROBERTS WITH PRIMROSE AND DREW DONOSKY OUR CIVIL ENGINEERS HERE AS WELL.

OUR SUPPORT DECIDED NOT TO COME. NOT TONIGHT.

THEY WERE OUT HERE LAST TIME, BUT WE DO HAVE THE RESPONSES IN SUPPORT.

I'M GOING TO GO QUICKLY. AGAIN, WE KNOW THE LOCATION, THE SITE LAYOUT, WE'RE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THIS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.

THESE ARE SOME OF THE ACTIVITIES. THIS IS BASICALLY WHAT WE SHOWED LAST TIME IN TERMS OF THE ACTIVITIES INTERNAL.

AND AGAIN THIS IS THE BASE LEVEL FOR THE STUDY WHICH SHOWS THE THE SOUND COMING EMANATING FROM THE TWO THE TWO ROADWAYS.

THIS IS THE SLIDE WE COULD NOT FIND LAST TIME IT WASN'T IN THE LAST SET OF SLIDES.

AND IT SHOWS THAT OUR PLAYGROUND IS 48 TO 50FT AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.

THE PLAYGROUND ON THE NORTH SIDE IS 88FT AWAY FROM THE GARAGE ON THAT HOUSE, AND IT'S 60FT AWAY FROM THE PRIVACY FENCE ON THE NORTH SIDE.

ON THE EAST SIDE, THE PLAYGROUND IS 68FT FROM THE PROPERTY LINE, 83FT FROM THE PRIVACY FENCE ON THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE ON THE EAST, AND 107FT AWAY FROM THE GARAGE ON THE EAST SIDE.

I TRIED TO DESCRIBE THAT LAST TIME, BUT WITHOUT HAVING THE GRAPHIC WAS DIFFICULT.

AGAIN, AS WAS STATED, WE DID DO THE REPORT, THE SOUND STUDY, THE ACOUSTIC STUDY BASED ON YOUR DIRECTION, FINDING A FACILITY VERY SIMILAR. THE PURPOSE OF USING THE RICHARDSON SITE WAS TO GET THE DATA, THE SOUND EMANATING FROM THE THE PLAYGROUNDS.

SO WHAT'S SURROUNDING THAT PROPERTY IN RICHARDSON I DON'T THINK IS RELEVANT, BUT WHAT IS RELEVANT IS THE SOUND COMING FROM THOSE PLAYGROUNDS.

AND THAT'S WHAT WE HAD TO ENGAGE THE ACOUSTIC ENGINEER FOR.

AND THE GRAPHIC SHOWS THE PEAK HOURS, YOU KNOW BASICALLY AN HOUR, HOUR AND A HALF PEAK IN THE MORNING HOUR AND A HALF HOUR AND A HALF IN THE AFTERNOON. NOW, THESE SOUND RESULTS ARE FROM ARE TAKEN AT THE THE FENCE.

THEY ARE NOT THEY DO NOT FACTOR IN THE OTHER VARIABLES SUCH AS THE DISTANCE TO THE THE ADJACENT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

[00:15:04]

AND AGAIN YOU SAW THIS. YOU JUST SAW THE SAME RESULTS.

THE ONE ON THE LEFT SHOWS THE RESULT OF THE SOUND STUDY WITH THE EIGHT FOOT MASONRY WALL AROUND THE PROPERTY LINE.

AND THE ONE ON THE RIGHT SHOWS THE RESULT OF THE TEST, WITH THE EIGHT FOOT WALL AROUND THE PROPERTY LINE AND AROUND THE PLAYGROUND.

AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S VERY, VERY LITTLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO.

SO WE DID A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ONE ON THE LEFT IS THE BASS SOUND STUDY, AND ON THE RIGHT IS THE SOUND STUDY WITH OUR EIGHT FOOT WALL AND WITH THE DAYCARE THERE. AND YOU CAN SEE THAT IT'S ACTUALLY A BETTER SITUATION IN SOME CIRCUMSTANCES ALONG THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF THE THE DAYCARE CENTER. SO THE SOUND STUDY AND THIS IS IN THE REPORT AS WELL, THE PREDICTED SOUND LEVELS WITH ONLY THE WALL INDICATE THAT THE RESIDENTS WOULD EXPERIENCE OVERALL SOUND LEVELS EQUAL TO OR LOWER THAN WHAT THEY CURRENTLY EXPERIENCE FROM ONLY THE TRAFFIC NOISE.

EFFECTIVELY HAVING THE EIGHT FOOT WALL GETS US TO THAT THAT CONDITION.

HAVING BOTH WALLS DOESN'T DOESN'T MAKE AN APPRECIABLE DIFFERENCE IN THE SOUND.

SO OUR POSITION IS THE EIGHT FOOT WALL AROUND THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY DOES ENOUGH TO REDUCE THE SOUND AND MAKE IT ACTUALLY, IN MANY CASES, BETTER THAN WHAT'S THERE TODAY.

SO THAT'S OUR SOUND RESULT. I THINK OUR SOUND RESULT IS BACKS UP THAT THE USE IT DOES NOT PRESENT AN ISSUE WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. ONE OF THE OTHER DIRECTIONS THAT WE.

I BELIEVE WE WERE ASKED TO TAKE, OR THAT WE DECIDED TO TAKE WAS DO AN INVESTIGATION OF 13 DAYCARE CENTERS IN THE CITY.

AND FILED A REQUEST TO FIND OUT IF THERE ARE ANY NOISE REPORTS OR POLICE REPORTS BASED ON NOISE FROM THESE 13 DAYCARES.

AND THERE ARE TWO LOCATIONS THAT HAD POLICE REPORTS BASED ON SOUND.

I'M GOING TO GO TO THE ONE ON THE BOTTOM. THAT WAS A HANDYMAN JACKHAMMERING A SIDEWALK AT 10:00 AT NIGHT.

HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CHILDREN PLAYING THERE. IT'S OUR UNDERSTANDING, BASED ON THE REPORT THAT HE WAS ASKED TO LEAVE AND HE IMMEDIATELY LEFT.

THE ONE ON THE TOP, THE 7040 INDEPENDENCE PARKWAY.

THERE WERE TWO REPORTS IN AUGUST AND DECEMBER OF 2014, AND IT'S 11 OVER 11 YEARS AGO.

IT'S OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS WAS THESE WERE THE EVENTS THAT PRECIPITATED THE CHANGE IN THE THE COMP PLAN.

BUT AS YOU CAN SEE, SINCE THAT TIME, NOTHING HAS OCCURRED ON THAT SITE, NOR HAS THERE BEEN A POLICE REPORT ON THE OTHER SITES.

AND OUR TRAFFIC OUR CIVIL ENGINEER ACTUALLY MADE THE REQUEST, THE OPEN RECORDS REQUEST AND THIS IS THE THESE ARE THE RESULTS THAT WE GOT FROM THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. AND JUST TO BACK UP, WE DIDN'T JUST PICK SITES THAT WERE OUT IN THE MIDDLE OF COMMERCIAL AREAS.

THESE ARE ACTUALLY SITES THAT, AS YOU CAN SEE IN MANY INSTANCES, ARE CONTIGUOUS TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES.

SO WE THINK THAT THIS IS ALMOST COMPELLING THAT THE USE IS COMPATIBLE WITH SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

PLUS, GIVEN THE THE SOUND WALL AND THE REDUCTION IN THE SOUND, WE THINK THAT IS A COMPATIBLE USE WITH SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

AND AS WE STATED IN THE LAST HEARING, IT'S A REASONABLE USE OF THE PROPERTY.

AND I'LL SKIP THROUGH THESE BECAUSE WE LOOKED AT THESE LAST TIME AND IT'S IN THE THE STAFF REPORT THAT OUR MATERIALS DO COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S ZONING REGULATIONS.

AND I'LL ASK MIKE LYSSY IF HE HAS ANYTHING TO ADD.

AND WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE AND RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL ON THIS APPLICATION.

YOU'VE GOT THREE A LITTLE OVER THREE MINUTES MIKE. MIKE LYSSY 1255 WEST [INAUDIBLE] STREET, WEST 15TH STREET IN PLANO. I DO NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD AT THIS TIME.

WOULD BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. WITH THAT DO I HAVE A MOTION? NO. THAT'S FINE. DO YOU HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING? MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. A MOTION BY SEAN.

SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. WE ARE NOW PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 24.

I BELIEVE WE'VE GOT TWO COMMENTS AND ONE WANT TO SPEAK.

WE DO HAVE BILL, AND MIKE IS OBVIOUSLY IN FAVOR OF SUPPORTING THIS AGENDA ITEM.

SO I GUESS Y'ALL DON'T PROBABLY NEED TO SPEAK AGAIN. DREW, IS IT DONNA LEE? THAT LOOKS LIKE IN FAVOR OF THE AGENDA ITEM. IF QUESTIONS, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK OR?

[00:20:01]

HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND LOOK FORWARD TO DISCUSSION TONIGHT.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANKS. ANYONE ELSE BEFORE WE MAKE A MOTION? MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY SEAN.

SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. PUBLIC HEARING PORTION HAS BEEN CLOSED FOR ITEM 24.

ALL RIGHT. ANY ONE PARTICULAR START? I'LL PICK A SIDE.

I'LL START. ALL RIGHT SEAN, I DO WANT TO NOTE ALSO THAT IF YOU LOOK, WE'VE GOT THESE PROJECT INPUT FORMS I BELIEVE THIS IS FOR THIS ONE.

AND THEY'RE ALL IN SUPPORT OF THIS FACILITY. AND I BELIEVE THEY ALL LIVE PRETTY CLOSE ACCORDING TO WHAT THEY'RE SAYING ON THESE.

AGAIN, BEING AN ENGINEER, I'M LOOKING AT THIS AND IT MAKES TOTAL SENSE THAT THE SOUND STUDY LOOKS SOLID.

I DON'T SEE ANY REASON WHY THIS SHOULDN'T BE BUILT THE WAY YOU GUYS ARE PLANNING ON IT.

AND I THINK IT WOULD BE A GREAT FACILITY. AND I'M GOING TO BE VOTING FOR APPROVING THIS.

SO, SO JUST SO EFFICIENT IS THAT WITH JUST ONE EIGHT FOOT WALL OR THE DOUBLE WALL? NOT THE DOUBLE WALL, I DON'T THINK IT'S NEEDED. ALL RIGHT.

GREAT. ALL RIGHT WARREN, ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? WELL, I THOUGHT SEAN HAD SOME OTHER INFORMATION THAT HE MIGHT BE WILLING TO SHARE IN TERMS OF EXISTING FACILITIES AND DISTANCES, ET CETERA. WELL, THAT WAS WHAT THE STAFF PROVIDED.

THE STAFF PROVIDED THAT. YES, STAFF PROVIDED THIS.

SO FOR THOSE THAT MIGHT BE WONDERING, STAFF PROVIDED A LIST OF ALL THE SCHOOLS THAT HAVE BEEN BUILT OR I DON'T WANT TO MISSPEAK IF YOU WOULD SORRY I KNOW WHAT IT IS, BUT I WANT TO. YES, THAT IS CORRECT.

THEY WERE EITHER APPROVED OR CONSTRUCTED AFTER THE RECOMMENDATION WENT INTO THE 2015 COMP PLAN.

AND SO THERE'S ABOUT 18 HERE. AND IT LOOKS LIKE IN THAT TIME THERE'S BEEN ONLY 1 COMPLAINT IN THESE 18 THAT HAVE BEEN BUILT.

AND WHAT ARE THE DISTANCES SHOWN ON. WHY WASN'T THAT INCLUDED IN OUR PACKET? I DON'T KNOW. IT DOESN'T. OH, IT GOES THROUGH.

I'LL HAND THIS DOWN AND IT READS SOME OF THE DISTANCES.

WHILE HE'S REVIEWING THAT WE'LL SKIP OVER. AND STEVE, ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? YEAH, I GUESS MY QUESTION WOULD JUST BE FOR STAFF AS FAR AS OTHER EITHER IN THIS PACKET HERE OR IF THERE'S ANY OTHERS THAT ARE NOT IN THIS PACKET, OR BASED ON THE PICTURES WE SAW WHERE IT'S A SIMILAR SITUATION WHERE THE PLAYGROUND IS CLOSER TO EITHER CLOSER TO RESIDENTIAL OR DOESN'T MATCH WITH WHAT THE STANDARD IS.

CAN YOU JUST REPEAT WHAT WHAT THE BASELINE STANDARD IS FOR PLAYGROUNDS? IN TERMS OF THE LOCATION, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SPECIFIES THAT OUTDOOR OUTDOOR PLAY AREAS MUST BE LOCATED SHOULD BE LOCATED AWAY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING. AND THAT'S THE EXTENT OF THE LANGUAGE IS JUST AWAY FROM.

THAT IS CORRECT. THERE'S NO DISTANCE. THERE'S NOT A DISTANCE OR SCREENING OR ANYTHING ELSE JUST AWAY FROM.

YES. OKAY. I DO WANT TO ADD. WELL, SORRY, I JUST.

HOLD ON. WELL THERE WE GO. [INAUDIBLE] SO THE COMP PLAN THAT WAS RECENTLY ADOPTED AND THAT WAS CARRIED OVER FROM 2015, AS BILL NOTED IT WAS IN 2014 INCIDENT THAT LED TO THIS.

SO SINCE THEN IS LOCATING IT FURTHEST AWAY AS POSSIBLE FROM SINGLE FAMILY.

AND SO IF THERE'S A BUILDING LIKE THE DAYCARE BUILDING AND YOU PUT THE OPEN SPACE ON THE OTHER SIDE, WE HAVE ALLOWED THAT. BUT IN THE OTHER ISSUE THAT WE HAVE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, WE HAD TO CALL THOSE THINGS OUT WHEN THERE'S A BARRIER THAT WILL BE THERE TO TO BLOCK THE NOISE. AND SO WE'RE JUST CONTINUING WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT JUST WAS RECENTLY ADOPTED.

SO JOHN, I DON'T REMEMBER THAT BEING ANY PART OF ANY OF OUR DISCUSSIONS DURING THE COMP PLAN.

I DON'T REMEMBER THAT COMING UP AT ALL. WELL, WE'RE JUST CARRIED THAT FORWARD A ND WE MENTIONED THESE ARE THINGS THAT'S IN THE COMP PLAN FROM THE 2015 THAT WE PUT INTO THE MOST RECENT DOCUMENT.

SO IT'S THERE. I'M NOT QUESTIONING WHETHER IT WAS THERE.

I'M JUST SAYING I DON'T RECALL IT BEING A POINT.

BUT IT WAS INCLUDED IN THE DRAFT AND DISTRIBUTED.

OKAY. SO, JOHN, THE LANGUAGE YOU JUST GAVE, IS THAT THE LANGUAGE THAT'S IN THE COMP PLAN OR WHICH IS THE LANGUAGE THAT'S IN THE COMP PLAN? ROLANDREA DO YOU HAVE THAT SPECIFIC LANGUAGE?

[00:25:01]

SHOULD. YES.

BRITTANY, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? I MIGHT NEED A REFRESHER ON THE TWO MASONRY WALLS VERSUS THE ONE.

CAN YOU REMIND ME? WAS ONE RECOMMENDED? WERE WE FLESHING OUT THE ONE VERSUS THE TWO, OR WAS THAT WHAT THE APPLICANT ORIGINALLY WAS PROPOSING? SO THE ONE ALONG THE PROPERTY LINES THAT IS REQUIRED PER CODE.

AROUND THE PLAY AREAS THAT JUST CAME UP IN DISCUSSIONS AS WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE SOUND STUDY AND THE ACOUSTICS.

AND SO ONE OF THE COMMISSIONERS, I BELIEVE, ASKED IF THE APPLICANT WOULD BE WILLING TO DO THAT SO THAT KIND OF CAME UP IN THE CONVERSATION.

GOTCHA. THAT'S WHAT I NEEDED TO KNOW. OKAY. THANK YOU.

I HAVE A QUESTION. YEAH OF COURSE. SO IN SHORT OF BUILDING THAT BLUE FENCE ON THE RIGHT, THERE'S GOING TO BE A WROUGHT IRON FENCE THERE TO KEEP THE KIDS IN, THOUGH, RIGHT? IT'S JUST NOT SOUNDPROOF. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. AND WE'LL COME BACK IF THERE'S QUESTIONS. BUT, MICHAEL, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT? NO, I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. TIFFANY. I JUST WANT TO SEE THE SHEET THAT I'M GOING TO DESCRIBE IT AND HE'LL GET IT TO YOU SHORTLY. WE'LL MAKE SURE YOU HAVE IT BEFORE FURTHER DISCUSSION. IT GOES IN OH, EVEN BETTER. EVEN BETTER. ALL RIGHT, WELL, THEY'RE LOOKING AT THAT.

OH, THERE IT IS. WHILE THEY'RE TAKING A MOMENT, IF YOU'LL BE PATIENT WITH THIS.

WE JUST HAD ONE COPY, IT'S BEING HANDED AROUND.

IT'S LIKE WHEN YOU'RE AT A RESTAURANT, THEY JUST GIVE YOU ONE. THEY SAY, HEY, COCKTAIL MENU. I WOULD SAY THE ONLY THING IS, I WOULD NOT BE FOR THE ADDITIONAL WALL GOING AROUND THE PLAYGROUND. THAT JUST SEEMS LIKE THAT WOULD FEEL VERY DARK AND ENCLOSED.

AND AS YOU COMMISSIONERS MAKE A DECISION, THAT'S THE ONLY THING I WOULD CAUTION AGAINST, IS FOR SURE.

THAT DOUBLE WALL TO ME DOES NOT MAKE SENSE IF IT IS SOMETHING THAT YOU WANT TO RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL.

THAT'S ONE THING I JUST. BEFORE I GET A CHANCE TO LOOK AT THIS, A QUESTION FOR JOHN LETTELLEIR.

JOHN, YOU REFERENCED AN INCIDENT IN 2014. IS THAT WHAT'S CAPTURED ON THE WHAT WE SAW FROM THE APPLICANT THAT SHOWED THE TWO INCIDENTS? IS THAT THE SAME THING? SPEAKERS] THE ONES WE'RE LOOKING AT THERE. ARE THOSE THE ONES THAT THEN LED TO US ADDING SOME LANGUAGE TO 2014? THAT WAS THE CASE. YEAH. THAT'S WHERE POLICE GOT CALLED OUT AND WHERE A RESIDENT HAD A, WELL, SUPPOSEDLY A GUN. AND IT WAS GOT NASTY BETWEEN THE DAYCARE AND THE RESIDENTS.

CAN YOU SAY THAT ONE MORE TIME? I'M SORRY. NO.

ON THAT INCIDENT OVER AT INDEPENDENCE AND HUNTERS CREEK.

I MEAN, IT GOT NASTY. I MEAN, SO REPORTEDLY, THE RESIDENT CAME OUT WITH A GUN COMPLAINING ABOUT THE NOISE.

AND WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS AS GENERALLY AS PEOPLE CAN HAVE THE POSSIBILITY OF WORKING REMOTELY, WHEREAS BEFORE EVERYBODY WENT INTO THE OFFICE AND SO NOISE CREATED DURING THE DAY WASN'T AS MUCH OF AN ISSUE.

BUT AS MORE PEOPLE WORK REMOTELY, THAT BECOMES MORE SENSITIVE.

BUT IT WAS NASTY THERE FOR SEVERAL WEEKS BETWEEN THE THE DAYCARE AND AND THE HOMEOWNERS.

THOSE ARE THOSE THOSE TWO CALLS WERE THE ONLY ONES ON THAT PROPERTY THOUGH, SAME PERSON.

I JUST HAVE TO RELY ON, THAT'S THE INFORMATION THAT WAS PROVIDED.

I DON'T KNOW THAT FOR SURE. HAVE AN ADDITIONAL QUESTION? ALL RIGHT. SO READING BACK THAT LANGUAGE IN THE COMP PLAN IT SAID SHOULD NOT SHALL.

AND AGAIN I'M AN ENGINEER WORDS HAVE MEANINGS.

WHEN I READ ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS THERE'S A SHOULD AND A SHALL AND A SHOULD KIND OF YEAH, THAT'D BE NICE IF YOU COULD.

A SHALL IS YOU BETTER DARN WELL DO IT OR HAVE A REALLY, REALLY GOOD REASON.

SO I'M JUST WONDERING WHY THE WORD SHOULD NOT SHALL IS IN THERE.

WELL, THAT'S WHAT ULTIMATELY GOT APPROVED. WE WORK ON SITE BY SITE BASIS.

WE'LL MAKE A RECOMMENDATION. BUT IN ALL OF THESE WE'VE BEEN LOCATING THE OPEN SPACE NOT NEXT DOOR TO RESIDENTS IN THE FIRST PLACE.

SO THIS IS AN SUP SO YOU HAVE LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY TO VOTE THIS UP OR DOWN CHANGES AND WHATNOT.

COMMISSION JUST FOR THE RECORD, I HAVE PULLED UP THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT GOT APPROVED RECENTLY,

[00:30:03]

CAN YOU SAY THAT ONE MORE TIME, RYAN? YES, SIR.

THE VERBATIM LANGUAGE FROM THE COMP PLAN IS THAT OUTDOOR PLAY AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED AWAY FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS.

RYAN CAN YOU PROVIDE MORE CONTEXT ON WHAT THAT WORD SHALL MEANS TO YOU.

I MEAN, HOW DEFINITIVE IS THAT IN YOUR MIND? WELL, YEAH, I MEAN, JUST ISOLATING THAT WORD.

I WOULD INTERPRET THE WORD SHALL TO BE A DECLARATIVE, IT MUST BE DONE.

MUST. BUT RECALL THAT THE COMP PLAN IS NOT ZONING, AND YOU ALL HAVE DISCRETION TO MAKE ZONING DECISIONS. TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY'RE NOT MATERIALLY DIFFERENT THAN WHAT IS REFLECTED IN THE COMP PLAN.

AND AND YOU'VE GOT DISCRETION ON, ON THIS SUP.

SO I WOULD NOT CONSIDER THE COMP PLAN AS BEING BINDING THAT LANGUAGE IN THE COMP PLAN AS BEING BINDING ON YOU.

SO IT'S A LITTLE BIT OF A IT'S GUIDANCE. BASICALLY IT'S GUIDANCE.

EXACTLY. FOR THE 7040 INDEPENDENCE PARKWAY DAYCARE PLACE WAS WAS ANY WERE ANY CHANGES MADE? INCREASING WALLS, INCREASING ANY CHANGE, ANY PHYSICAL CHANGES MADE THAT HAVE PREVENTED FUTURE PROBLEMS THAT HAVE REDUCED THE THE PROBLEMS? THERE WAS A LOT OF DISCUSSIONS THAT WENT ON STAFF, POLICE, HOMEOWNERS, HOA AND THE DAYCARE OPERATORS. OKAY, EVENTUALLY IT GOT BETTER ONCE THE RESIDENTS MOVED.

OKAY, SO IT WAS AN ISOLATED INCIDENT WHERE THAT PARTICULAR RESIDENT HAD AN ISSUE WITH THE DAYCARE AND IT GOT UGLY BECAUSE OF HIM OR THAT OR WHOEVER, AND A WEAPON WAS WAS INVOLVED, WHICH FOR NO REASON, I CAN'T IMAGINE ANY INSTANCE YOU SHOULD BRING A WEAPON TO AN INCIDENT.

I ADD A FOLLOW UP TO THAT AS I LOOK AT OUR LAYOUT HERE.

THAT PARTICULAR PROPERTY, THERE WAS 23FT DISTANCE BETWEEN THE CLOSEST RESIDENT AND THAT PLAYGROUND.

AND THIS ONE IS CAN YOU GO TO THAT FLYER THAT SHOWS? IT SHOWS IT'S JUST BLACK AND WHITE WITH THE RED, IT SAYS IT'S 50FT, 80FT TO THEIR PROPERTY LINE AND 107 OR 103 TO THEIR ACTUAL RESIDENCE.

THAT'S WHAT I WAS LOOKING FOR. THANK YOU. RIGHT.

SO THIS ONE WAS 23FT IN THAT INCIDENCE. THE CLOSEST ON HERE IS ALMOST FOUR TIMES 88.

SO JUST SO WE'RE MEASURING APPLES AND APPLES THAT 23FT YOU SAID IS THAT FROM THE THAT IS FROM THE PLAYGROUND TO THEIR PROPERTY LINE.

SO IT WOULD BE COMPARISON TO THE 60 AND THE 83.

THE 60 AND THE 83. OKAY. THANK YOU.

IS OUR BIGGER CONCERN. I NOTICED THE PLAYGROUND DOWN TO THE SOUTH.

THERE DOES NOT HAVE ANY MEASUREMENTS ON IT. WE OBVIOUSLY CAN CARRY THOSE DOWN THERE. IS THERE NOT A CONCERN ABOUT THAT PLAYGROUND DOWN THERE? ALSO, ARE WE CONCERNED ABOUT BOTH PLAYGROUNDS? THERE IS A CONCERN FOR BOTH SO THAT BASED ON OUR RECOMMENDATION AND THE MEASUREMENTS, BOTH DAYCARES ARE ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL.

AND THE OTHER ONES THAT WE HAVE IN HERE, I HAVEN'T FINISHED LOOKING THROUGH THE PACKET, BUT DO VERY MANY OF THEM HAVE A PARKING SPACES BETWEEN THE PLAYGROUND AND THE HOUSES? NOT MANY. OKAY. CAN I ASK, IS THERE I ALSO SEE A 15 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER? WILL THERE BE TREES? BUSHES? DO WE KNOW? THERE WILL BE SHADE TREES PLANTED 30FT ON CENTER.

WELL, THAT HASN'T EVEN BEEN TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT, THAT'S MORE. OKAY.

SO WHAT IS A TYPE ONE, A TYPE B1 LANDSCAPE BUFFER SAYS TYPE B1, 15 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER.

WHAT DEFINE THAT FOR US IF YOU WOULD. SO THAT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG WITH THE REQUIRED SCREENING WALL IS 15FT WITH THE SHADE TREES THAT ARE PLANTED 30FT ON CENTER. I BELIEVE THEY'RE PLANTED AT 3 INCH CALIPERS.

SO LIKE LIKE A STREET TREE BASICALLY. AS QUESTIONS AND I WANT TO PERSUADE MORE JUST AND I DON'T WANT THERE'S THERE'S NEWER COMMISSIONERS HERE AND SO I'M JUST SHARING MY THOUGHTS.

AND YOU STILL FOLLOW WHAT YOU FEEL IS BEST FOR YOU.

I THINK I'VE SHARED IN THE PAST FIRST THING I LOOK AT IS SAFETY.

[00:35:03]

I FEEL THERE'S NOT A HURT TO THEIR PROPERTY VALUES, AND I BELIEVE IT'S THE SAME ONES.

I THINK IT WAS 5 OR 6 OF THOSE RESIDENTS WHERE THE RESIDENTS LIVING RIGHT BEHIND IT THAT WERE IN SUPPORT OF IT.

THEN, YOU KNOW, THIRDLY IS IT THE RIGHT USE IN THIS AREA? WHAT ELSE WOULD GO HERE? I ALWAYS TRY TO CONSIDER WHAT ELSE WOULD BE PUT AT THIS LOCATION.

I MEAN, IT'S IT'S NOT FRONT FRONTAGE OF COMMERCIAL OR RETAIL.

IT'S IN THE BACK. IT'S NOT A TOWNHOME SITE OR A MULTIFAMILY SITE, IS IT A MINIATURE CHURCH? IS IS IT JUST A A SMALL OFFICE COMPLEX? BUT I TRY TO LOOK AT WHAT ELSE WOULD GO HERE.

THIS TO ME, FEELS LIKE IT'S IN THE WHEELHOUSE OF SOMETHING THAT COULD BE COMPATIBLE.

BUT THOSE ARE JUST THINGS THAT I LOOK FOR. BUT THAT'S JUST SOME OF MY THOUGHTS.

I'M NOT GOING TO RUSH ANYONE ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR STAFF FOR THE APPLICANT? AND AGAIN, MORE JUST WANT YOU GUYS TO STILL FEEL WHAT YOU MIGHT FEEL IS RIGHT.

I'LL JUST ADD A COMMENT THAT I DO APPRECIATE THE CONTINUED EFFORTS OF THE SOUND STUDY, AND I APPRECIATE STAFF PUTTING THIS TOGETHER FOR US, AS WELL AS JUST DETAILING OUT AGAIN THE DISTANCE THAT HELPS US WITH PERSPECTIVE.

AND I FEEL COMFORTABLE HERE. I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND WHY, ESPECIALLY BASED ON THE BACK STORY OF 2014 AND AND WHY WE WERE LOOKING AT MAKING SURE WE HAD JUST SOME MORE SPACE AND WE'RE ALWAYS LOOKING OUT FOR THE RESIDENTS IN THE BIG PICTURE HERE.

BUT GIVEN THAT YOU DID HAVE THE HOA MEETING, BEING THAT WE HAVE GOTTEN SUPPORT CARDS AND THEN BEING THAT WE DON'T HAVE ANY FEEDBACK FROM RESIDENTS SAYING THAT THIS IS NOT SOMETHING THAT THEY WOULD BE COMFORTABLE WITH, I FEEL LIKE WE'VE TOUCHED ON THOSE AREAS AS WELL.

BUT I AM COMFORTABLE WITH THIS AND WITH JUST ONE MASONRY WALL.

I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION IF THERE'S NO OTHER QUESTIONS. IS THERE ANY MORE QUESTIONS? I WANT TO MAKE SURE NO ONE'S RUSHED. GOOD TO GO. ALL RIGHT. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE DO NOT GO WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION. INSTEAD, APPROVE WITH THE ONE SINGLE WALL THAT WAS ORIGINALLY PLANNED, NOT EIGHT FOOT. EIGHT FOOT WALL. I'VE GOT A MOTION BY SEAN.

SORRY. DO I HAVE TO INCLUDE THE OTHER STUFF AS LIKE CIRCULATION STUDY, THE OTHER ITEMS THAT WE INCLUDE WITH RECOMMENDATION.

SO THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDED SO ROLANDREA DO YOU WANT TO CALL THOSE OUT.

THERE IS EXHIBIT B, EXHIBIT C, AND D WHICH IS THE CIRCULATION STUDY.

OR YOU COULD ALSO MAKE THE MOTION TO RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL WITH THE EXHIBITS AS IN THE PACKET, BECAUSE THE EXHIBITS ARE ATTACHED. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS WITH THE DIFFERENT APPENDICES.

YOU SAID B AND C EXHIBITS WITH THE EXHIBITS EXHIBITS B AND C WITH THE ONE EIGHT FOOT WALL.

RIGHT. SO THERE'S A MOTION FOR APPROVAL WITH TO INCLUDE AND TO FOLLOW ALL THE EXHIBITS THAT STAFF HAVE PROVIDED AND INCLUDE AN EIGHT FOOT WALL.

I'VE GOT A MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO.

CONGRATULATIONS, Y'ALL. ALL RIGHT. ITEM 25. PUBLIC HEARING SPECIFIC USE PERMIT RESCIND SPECIFIC USE PERMIT

[Public Hearing - Specific Use Permit: Rescind Specific Use Permit S-306 (SUP25-0002)]

STAFF IS IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST TO RESCIND AND DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST.

ALL RIGHT. AND THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING.

SO MOVED. SORRY. MOTION BY BRITTANY. SECOND. SECOND BY STEVE.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO.

WE'RE IN PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 25. SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.

I'VE GOT A MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO.

PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED FOR ITEM 25. ARE THERE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF, AND I APOLOGIZE, IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WISH TO SPEAK? I DON'T THINK THERE'S AN APPLICANT FOR. YES.

[00:40:03]

OKAY, SO I APOLOGIZE. I DIDN'T BRING THAT UP EARLIER.

DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR ITEM 25 TO RESCIND? YES.

WE CLOSED. WE DID. DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR ITEM 25 TO RESCIND THE SUP ACTUALLY SPECIFIC USE PERMIT.

I MOVE TO RESCIND THE SUP IN ITEM 25, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

I'VE GOT A MOTION BY STEVE. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO.

WITH THAT, OUR LAST PUBLIC HEARING. OH, WE GIVE A MOMENT.

STATE FOR THE RECORD THAT HE LEFT. YES. LET THE RECORD SHOW THAT SEAN MERRELL HAS LEFT THE DAIS.

[Public Hearing - Zoning: Champions Frisco (Z24-0002)]

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THIS ITEM WAS TABLED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED AT THE MARCH 25TH, 2025 MEETING. SO I'D FIRST LOOK FOR A MOTION TO REMOVE THE ITEM FROM THE TABLE.

MOTION TO REMOVE THIS FROM THE TABLE. MOTION BY BRITTANY.

SECOND. SECOND BY STEVE. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. THAT'S TWICE NOW BRITTANY HAS BEATEN STEVE.

ALL RIGHT. IT'S BEEN REMOVED. IT'S ALL YOURS, JONATHAN.

PERFECT. THANK YOU. THE APPLICANT DOES CONTINUE TO WORK WITH STAFF ON THIS REQUEST AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

THEREFORE, THEY ARE REQUESTING TO TABLE THIS ITEM ONCE AGAIN TO THE MAY 27TH, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.

THEREFORE, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE COMMISSION CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THIS ITEM TO THE MAY 27TH, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

I THINK I UNDERSTAND IT'S ALREADY OPEN. CORRECT.

SO WE'RE NOT OPENING AGAIN. WE JUST, WE'RE JUST CONTINUING IT AND TABLING TO MAY 27TH.

JUST WANT TO CONFIRM THAT'S WHAT MY ASSUMPTION WAS. ALL RIGHT. WONDERFUL. I DON'T SEE THE APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT, BUT THIS IS ALREADY I DON'T NEED TO OPEN IT. BUT IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR ITEM 26? OKAY, WE'RE NOT LOOKING FOR A CLOSING, BUT ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF BEFORE WE ENTERTAIN A MOTION THAT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING? JUST WAITING FOR STEVE. NO QUESTIONS.

ALL RIGHT, I MOVE ON ITEM 26 TO TABLE THE ITEM AND TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL THE MAY 27TH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. ALL RIGHT. MOTION BY STEVE. SECOND. SECOND BY WARREN.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

AND NOW THE SCORE IS STEVE ONE BRITTANY TWO. WITH THAT, IF SOMEONE WOULDN'T MIND GRABBING SEAN MERRELL.

AS HE'S WALKING BACK IN ITEM 27, RESULTS OF THE APRIL 15TH.

[Results of the April 15, 2025, City Council meeting.]

WHAT DOES IT SAY ON THE AGENDA? NO ITEMS TO REPORT.

I'M JUST A LINE BY LINE GUY. YEAH, WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY ITEMS, SO NO ITEMS. YEAH, THE ITEMS IS WE DON'T PAY TAXES ON THE 15TH.

[Schedule of future discussion items.]

THAT'S SOMETHING THAT SHIP SAILED. ALL RIGHT.

SHIP HAS SAILED. THAT'S WHAT HE'S SHARING WITH YOU. ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANYTHING ELSE? IS THAT SOMETHING THAT P&Z WANTS? IF NOT, WE'RE NOT GOING TO SPEND ANY TIME ON IT BECAUSE OUR PLATE IS FULL.

I'M KIND OF WITH WARREN. NO MATTER WHAT. RIGHT.

HOW DO YOU. HOW DO YOU REVISE AND APPROVE COMP PLAN? YEAH. YEAH, THAT WAS A REAL QUESTION. NO. YEAH, I KNOW WE DO FROM TIME TO TIME.

WE DO. YEAH, BUT I'M WITH YOU. I SEE WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM AND I'M NOT SAYING NOT, BUT I THINK WE HAD A VERY THOROUGH MEETING HERE OF ALMOST IT IS A CASE BY CASE. SOMEONE NEEDS TO KNOW THAT THE NEXT DAY CARE COMES IN.

IT HAS TO STAND ON ITS OWN MERIT. IT'S NOT GOING HEY, THE LAST ONE WAS APPROVED, THAT'S NOT HOW THIS WORKS.

IS WE HAD SEVEN RESIDENTS SAY THEY WERE FOR IT.

IF THREE COME OUT NEXT TIME AND SAY THEY'RE AGAINST IT, I'M GOING TO, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A GOOD CHANCE IT WOULD BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY, WHOEVER IS ON THIS DAIS. I AGREE WITH THAT. ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE? OH, YEAH. WE GOT A WORK SESSION AFTER THIS UPSTAIRS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, THIRD FLOOR.

THAT'S GREAT NEWS. WONDERFUL. ALL RIGHT. MOTION TO ADJOURN.

MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND, SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. WE ARE ADJOURNED AT 7:15 P.M..

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.