[00:00:01] THAT WOULD HELP. WELCOME TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. [CALL TO ORDER] WE ARE GATHERED AT 6101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD AND THE TIME IS 6:31 P.M.. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. TONIGHT, COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE SEAN MERRILL, WARREN RUIZ, STEVE COHN, MICHAEL HOWARD, AND TIFFANY WELLS. MY NAME IS BRITTANY KOHLBERG. I WILL BE FILLING IN AS YOUR CHAIR TONIGHT SINCE JON KENDALL IS ABSENT. REPRESENTING STAFF TONIGHT ARE FROM THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. WE HAVE JOHN LETTELLEIR, JONATHAN HUBBARD, DANIEL PONDER, PEYTON SHERMAN, SEAN O'QUINN, LULU PANG AND HOLLY MARTIN. FROM ENGINEERING, WE HAVE JOEL FITTS AND RICARDO ORDONEZ. OH, I MESSED THAT UP. I PULLED A JON KENDALL AND I DIDN'T DO THAT RIGHT. I'M SORRY. ORDONEZ. ORDONEZ. IS THAT BETTER? YES. FROM FIRE WE HAVE JOHN GILLETTE. AND FROM LEGAL WE HAVE ALLISON COTTON. THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS CITIZEN INPUT. IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME. PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE. PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR ANY APPLICANTS PRESENT THIS EVENING. TO ENSURE THERE IS ENOUGH TIME FOR YOU ALL TO SPEAK, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES, UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH CASE YOU MAY HAVE A MAXIMUM OF TEN MINUTES. PLEASE NOTE THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA, EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA. DO WE HAVE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK DURING CITIZEN INPUT? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, THE NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. [APPROVAL OF MINUTES] WE ACTUALLY HAVE TWO OF THEM. SO, DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE DECEMBER 10TH PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING? I MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE DECEMBER 10TH PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING. MOTION BY STEVE. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. I AM ACTUALLY A VOTING MEMBER TONIGHT. SO WHEN YOU HEAR ME TALK TO MYSELF, THAT'S WHAT IT IS. ALL RIGHT. AND THEN DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE DECEMBER 5TH SPECIAL CALL JOINT WORK SESSION OF CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND ZONING AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE DECEMBER 5TH SPECIAL JOINT WORK SESSION. MOTION BY TIFFANY. SECOND. SECOND BY MICHAEL. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. [CONSENT AGENDA] ALL RIGHT. NEXT IS THE CONSENT AGENDA. THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS. ANY COMMISSION MEMBER MAKING SUCH REQUEST PRIOR TO A MOTION AND VOTE ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY. ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH THE MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION. TONIGHT WE HAVE ITEMS FOUR THROUGH 31 THIS EVENING. I UNDERSTAND THAT WE DO NEED TO PULL ITEM NUMBER 17. SO DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR ITEMS NUMBER FOUR THROUGH 16 AND 18 THROUGH 31? MOVE TO APPROVE. MOTION BY STEVE. SECOND. SECOND BY SEAN. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. AND THEN IF WE CAN PULL ITEM NUMBER 17. GOOD EVENING, [Preliminary Plat: The Rose Place (PP24-0008)] COMMISSIONERS. THIS ITEM, PP24-0008, WAS SUBMITTED ON DECEMBER 16TH, 2024. THE APPLICANT NEEDS ADDITIONAL TIME TO ADDRESS STAFF'S COMMENTS AND REQUESTS TO WITHDRAW THIS ITEM. STAFF RECOMMENDED THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THIS ITEM. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ABOUT THE REQUEST FROM THE APPLICANT? DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO SPEAK? ALL RIGHT THEN. DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR THIS WITHDRAWAL? MOVE TO APPROVE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. ALL RIGHT, SO TONIGHT WE HAVE EIGHT PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA. [Public Hearing - Replat: Artistry at Edgestone, Block A, Lot 1 (RP24-0030)] [00:05:04] WELCOME BACK FROM CHRISTMAS BREAK. RIGHT. AND I WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS. EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PRECEDED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST. THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED TEN MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION, FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION. THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER'S CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT. IF THERE ARE ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITION. PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS. THE TIME LIMIT IS FIVE MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK. THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME IF A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO WISHING TO SPEAK. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED. AFTER ALL, PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE. AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES, IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO A FUTURE MEETING. AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT. PLEASE NOTE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES UNLESS THE COMMISSION DISAPPROVES THE CASE, AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL THE DISAPPROVAL. FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AS TO WHEN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. SO OUR FIRST PUBLIC HEARING ITEM TONIGHT IS ITEM NUMBER 38. PUBLIC HEARING. OH, SO, SO SORRY. 32. THANK YOU. PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT, ARTISTRY AT EDGESTONE, BLOCK A LOT. ONE RP24-0030. OWNER. ARTISTRY SENIOR RESIDENCES AT EDGESTONE, LLC. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. THIS PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED ON OCTOBER 14TH, 2020, FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, APPROVED A 30 DAY EXTENSION REQUEST, CONTINUED THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND TABLED THE ITEM TO THE NOVEMBER 26TH, 2024 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ON NOVEMBER 12TH, 2024. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DISAPPROVED THIS ITEM ON NOVEMBER 26TH, 2024. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO DEDICATE UNNECESSARY EASEMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT. THIS PLAT CONFORMS TO SITE PLAN SP 18-0026 THAT STAFF APPROVED ON MAY 18TH, 2018. STAFF RECOMMENDED THIS ITEM FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED. THANK YOU. LULU IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY LIKE TO SPEAK? IF THERE AREN'T ANY IMMEDIATE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF, WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING? MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. WE ARE NOW IN PUBLIC HEARING. SEEING NO ONE TO SPEAK. MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY STEVE. SECOND. SECOND BY SEAN. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR STAFF, OR DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM NUMBER 32? MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 32. MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. CONGRATULATIONS. ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER 33. PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT. DALFEN INDUSTRIAL BLOCK B, LOT ONE, RP [Public Hearing - Replat: Dalfen Industrial, Block B, Lot 1 (RP24-0032)] 24-0032. OWNER, DG FRISCO LOGISTICS CENTER, TEXAS. PROPERTY OWNER LP. GOOD EVENING COMMISSION. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT IS TO ADJUST THE FLOODPLAIN DESIGNATION BASED ON THE APPROVED LETTER OF MAP REVISION THAT WENT INTO EFFECT ON NOVEMBER 4TH OF 2024. THIS PLAT CONFORMS TO FINAL PLAT FP 23 0051 THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED ON JANUARY 9TH OF 2024. EXCELLENT. IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY LIKE TO SPEAK? AND IF WE DON'T HAVE ANY IMMEDIATE QUESTIONS, DO WE. DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING? MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY MICHAEL. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. WE ARE NOW IN PUBLIC HEARING. SEEING NO SPEAKERS. MOVE TO CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR STAFF, OR DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM NUMBER 33? I MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 33, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. [00:10:01] MOTION BY STEVE. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. MOVING RIGHT ALONG. [Public Hearing - Replat: Frisco Square Residential, Block A, Lot 6 (RP24-0034)] ITEM NUMBER 34. PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT FRISCO SQUARE RESIDENTIAL BLOCK A LOT SIX RP24- 0034, OWNER T.B. CHURCH STREET, LLC. THANK YOU. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING AN EXTENSION. THEREFORE, STAFF IS RECOMMENDED THE COMMISSION ACCEPT THE APPLICANT'S 30 DAY EXTENSION. CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THIS ITEM TO THE JANUARY 28TH MEETING. EXCELLENT. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? WOULD THEY LIKE TO SPEAK? ALL RIGHT. WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. MOVE TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY STEVE. SECOND. SECOND BY SEAN. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. AND REMEMBER, THE REQUEST IS TO STAY IN PUBLIC. HEARING AT THE TABLE. I'LL MAKE A MOTION. I MOVE TO TABLE THIS ITEM TO THE JANUARY 28TH PNZ MEETING AND TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY STEVE. SECOND. SECOND BY MICHAEL. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. YOU NAILED THAT. IT ALWAYS GETS US SOMETIMES, RIGHT? SOMETIMES, YEAH, I KNOW. ALL RIGHT. [Public Hearing - Replat: Hazelwood Addition, Block C, Lots 32X-33X, 34-Park & 59X; Block I, Lots 3-4, 17-33 & 35-42 (RP24-0036)] ITEM NUMBER 35, PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT HAZELWOOD ADDITION, BLOCK C, LOTS 32 X 33 X 34 PARK AND 59 X BLOCK I. LOTS THREE THROUGH FOUR, 17 THROUGH 33 AND 35 THROUGH 42 PP 24 036. OWNERS. GRBK EDGEWOOD LLC AND C.B. JENNINGS 2020, LLC. THANK YOU. THIS PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED ON DECEMBER 16TH, 2024. THIS REPLAT IS TO DEDICATE EASEMENTS NECESSARY FOR DEVELOPMENT. THE PLAT CONFORMS TO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO 85 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. STAFF RECOMMENDED THIS ITEM FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED. THANK YOU. EXCELLENT. DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT PRESENT THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? IF NOT, IF WE DON'T HAVE ANY IMMEDIATE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF, DO YOU HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING? YOU KNEW WHAT I WAS GOING TO SAY I LOVE IT. MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND. SECOND BY STEVE. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. WE ARE NOW IN PUBLIC HEARING. SEEING NO ONE TO SPEAK. MOTION TO MOVE. MOTION TO CLOSE. PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND. SECOND BY MICHAEL. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS OR A MOTION ON ITEM NUMBER 35? I MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 35 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. MOTION BY STEVE. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. ITEM NUMBER 36, PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT. [Public Hearing - Replat: Hunters Creek Phase 5, Block L, Lot 23 & Block X, Lot 1 (RP24-0039)] HUNTER'S CREEK, PHASE FIVE, BLOCK L, LOT 23 AND BLOCK X, LOT ONE RP 24-0039. OWNERS JASON L WRIGHT AND MICHELLE TRISCA WRIGHT AND FRISCO HUNTERS CREEK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.. THANK YOU, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO ADJUST COMMON PROPERTY BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL LOT AND THE HOA LOT, TO WHERE THE RETAINING WALL IS MOVED FROM THE PATIO HOME LOT TO THE HOA LOT. THE HOA HAS AGREED TO ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE OF THE RETAINING WALL. THE PATIO HOME LOT COMPLIES WITH THE MINIMUM ZONING DISTRICT LOT STANDARDS. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING NO CHANGE ON THE HOA LOT AND IT WILL REMAIN A FLOODPLAIN DRAINAGE EASEMENT. THESE LOTS MEET THE PATIO HOME DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. STAFF RECOMMENDS FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED. HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY LIKE TO SPEAK? DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE OPENING PUBLIC HEARING? I HAVE A MOTION. MOVE TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY MICHAEL. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. WE ARE NOW IN PUBLIC HEARING. SEEING NO SPEAKERS, I MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY STEVE. SECOND. SECOND BY SEAN. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? OR DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM NUMBER 36? MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 36. MOTION BY MICHAEL. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? THEN ITEM NUMBER 36 IS APPROVED. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER 37. [Public Hearing – Specific Use Permit: Dollar Flowers Addition, Block A, Lot 3 (SUP24-0008)] PUBLIC HEARING SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. DOLLAR FLOWERS EDITION, BLOCK A, LOT THREE SUP 24-0008, [00:15:04] OWNER PCK LAND COMPANY, LLC. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. PRIOR OR AFTER THE PACKET WAS PUBLISHED. THE APPLICANT HAS DETERMINED THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO TABLE THIS ITEM, AND THEREFORE STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST AND IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE COMMISSION OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THIS ITEM TO THE FEBRUARY 11TH, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. EXCELLENT. THANK YOU JONATHAN. ANY QUESTIONS FOR JONATHAN? EVEN THOUGH WE DO HAVE A REQUEST TO TABLE, WE STILL NEED TO HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO DO I HAVE A MOTION? WE'LL SEE IF THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO SPEAK. WE CAN. YEAH. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK? OH THANK YOU STEVE. MADAM CHAIR, COMMISSIONER, MY NAME IS BILL DAHLSTROM, 2323 ROSS AVENUE. JONATHAN'S RIGHT. WE ARE RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING A POSTPONEMENT OF THIS CASE FOR A MONTH, SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE WORKING WITH JONATHAN AND JOHN ON THIS APPLICATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING, AND THE REQUEST IS TO TABLE AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO CAN I GET A MOTION ON THAT? I MOVE TO TABLE THE ITEM UNTIL THE FEBRUARY 11TH P&Z MEETING AND CONTINUE THE OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. EXCELLENT MOTION BY STEVE. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. I BELIEVE WE HAVE SOMEONE I MIGHT NEED. [Public Hearing - Specific Use Permit: Independence & 121 (SUP24-0013)] DO I NEED TO READ IT IN FIRST BEFORE HE RECUSES HIMSELF OR NOT NECESSARILY. NO. YOU CAN GO AHEAD. OKAY. SO WE WILL MISS YOU, SHAWN. JUST STATE FOR THE RECORD. YES. YEAH. SO THE STATE FOR THE RECORD, THAT SHAWN IS RECUSING HIMSELF ON OUR NEXT ITEM, WHICH IS ITEM NUMBER 38. SO WE HAVE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NUMBER 38, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT, INDEPENDENCE AND 121. SUP 24-0013 OWNER THE CREEK ON 121 LP. THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS. BEFORE YOU ALL, THIS EVENING IS A REQUEST FOR AN OFFICE WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION CENTER SPECIFIC USE PERMIT ON THE PROPERTY SHOWN HERE. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONSISTS OF FOUR BUILDINGS TOTALING JUST OVER 350,000FT². AS YOU CAN SEE HERE ON THIS EXHIBIT, THE BUILDINGS ARE ORIENTED FROM THE SOUTHEAST TO THE NORTHWEST, TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE UNIQUE TRIANGULAR SHAPE OF THE PROPERTY. NOT ONLY DOES THIS TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE PROPERTY SHAPE, BUT IT ALSO ALLOWS THE LONG SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND MANY OF THE BUILDING'S PRIMARY ENTRANCES TO FRONT ONTO THE NATURAL AREA ALONG THE NORTH NORTHEAST AREA OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS ALSO WHERE THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING THE OPEN SPACE. THIS ALSO INTERNALIZES MANY OF THE TRUCK DOCKS INTERNALLY TO THE DEVELOPMENT. TRUCK DOCKS WILL ALSO BE SCREENED FROM 121 AS FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OCCURS ALONG 121. THIS PROPERTY HERE IS NOT PART OF THIS SUP REQUEST, SO THERE WILL BE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT THAT COMES IN TO FURTHER SCREEN THESE TRUCK DOCKS. ADDITIONALLY, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A DOUBLE ROW OF TREES ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF THE PROPERTY TO SCREEN THE TRUCK DOCKS FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST DOES COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S OPEN SPACE ORDINANCE, AS WELL AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE AS IT PERTAINS TO BUILDING MATERIALS AND BUILDING DESIGN. THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS VOLUNTARILY SIGNED THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO ESTABLISH BUILDING MATERIAL STANDARDS AND LOCAL BUILDING CODE AMENDMENTS. THAT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WILL BE PLACED ON THE SAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS SUB REQUEST. TO DATE, STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY INPUT ON THIS REQUEST FROM THE PUBLIC. HOWEVER, IT HAS BEEN NOTICED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW. AS WITH ALL SUP REQUESTS, THIS SUP HAS BEEN REVIEWED TO ENSURE IT MEETS THE GENERAL OBJECTIVES OF THE CITY AND AS INDICATED IN THE STAFF REPORT, THIS REQUEST MEETS EACH OF THOSE CONDITIONS. YOU DO HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL THIS EVENING SUBJECT TO THE EXHIBIT B SITE PLAN. THE EXHIBIT C OPEN SPACE PLANS AND LANDSCAPE PLANS, AND THE EXHIBIT D FACADE PLANS. I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT IS IN ATTENDANCE THIS EVENING, BUT I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. [00:20:05] THANK YOU, JONATHAN. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS ONE? I HAVE ONE EARLY QUESTION, JONATHAN, IF YOU CAN JUST KIND OF STATE FOR THE RECORD AND FOR THE AUDIENCE. THIS LAND IS CURRENTLY ZONED. CORRECT. CAN YOU TELL EVERYONE WHAT IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED? THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED HIGHWAY. THE CURRENT ZONE HIGHWAY AND SIMILAR USES TO THIS ARE CURRENTLY ALLOWED. THAT IS CORRECT. SO FOR EXAMPLE, OFFICE WAREHOUSE IS A PERMITTED USE IN THE HIGHWAY DISTRICT AND COULD BE DEVELOPED ON THIS PROPERTY BY RIGHT. HOWEVER, OFFICE WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION CENTER WHICH REALLY COMES TO A THRESHOLD OF THE AMOUNT OF WAREHOUSE SPACE IT REQUIRES AN SUP. THUS THAT IS WHY WE ARE HERE TONIGHT. OKAY. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. FOR ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, SINCE THE APPLICANT I KNOW IS HERE, WOULD THEY LIKE TO SPEAK? RUSTY HAD ASKED THE PLAN, SO I THINK I'VE GOT IT. SO GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS REED DUNBAR. MY ADDRESS IS 6331 WAGNER DRIVE, DALLAS, TEXAS. WE UNFORTUNATELY DID NOT GET OUR ELECTRONIC PRESENTATION LOADED UP, SO I BROUGHT SOME HANDOUTS. IF I CAN PRESENT THOSE TO YOU GUYS, ABSOLUTELY. YOU'LL GIVE THEM TO THE. YEAH, SHE'LL PASS THEM DOWN. I'VE GOT A COUPLE MORE. THERE'S NOT ENOUGH. SO THIS EVENING I WANTED TO JUST GIVE A QUICK INTRODUCTION TO EAST GROUP PROPERTIES AND TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE PRESENT, OUR PROJECT, AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. SO EAST GROUP PROPERTIES WERE A NATIONAL COMPANY WITH A LOCAL PRESENCE. WE HAVE A 40 PLUS YEAR HISTORY OF SOLELY FOCUSING ON HIGH END MULTI-TENANT BUSINESS DISTRIBUTION PRODUCT. WE'RE CONSIDERED A PREEMINENT DEVELOPER FOR OUR PRODUCT TYPE ACROSS THE COUNTRY. WE HAVE A LONG TERM OWNERSHIP HORIZON AND THEREFORE DESIGN AND DEVELOP WITH THAT MENTALITY. SO WHAT THAT MEANS FOR YOU GUYS IS WE'RE NOT BUILDING THESE BUILDINGS LOOKING TO FLIP THEM OR SELL THEM SELL THEM FOR A QUICK PROFIT. WE LIKE TO DEVELOP BUILDINGS IN A PARK LIKE SETTING, TO CREATE A SENSE OF PLACE AND CREATE A HIGH END, CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT. BECAUSE WE ARE LONG TERM OWNERS, WE STRIVE TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS AND PARTNERS WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY. WE HAVE A STRONG RECORD OF DOING SUCH. PART OF THIS PROCESS WE HAVE PROACTIVELY REACHED OUT TO THE RICHWOODS HOA, WHO IS THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NORTH. THERE'S NO ACCESS TO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT THEY WERE THE CLOSEST RESIDENTS, SO WE FELT PRUDENT TO GO AHEAD AND REACH OUT AND DESCRIBE OUR DEVELOPMENT PLANS WITH THEM. HERE LOCALLY, WE HAVE A PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF SUCCESS, SUCCESSFUL DEVELOPMENTS ALONG THE 121 CORRIDOR, WHICH THIS IS A PART OF, OBVIOUSLY. WE'VE DEVELOPED 22 BUILDINGS WHICH TOTAL ALMOST 02,000,000FT², AND IT'S CURRENTLY 100% OCCUPIED WITH 46 TENANTS. SO WE KNOW THIS PRODUCT TYPE. WE KNOW THIS AREA PROBABLY BETTER THAN THESE. THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL SERVICE USERS DON'T FIT INTO YOUR TRADITIONAL OFFICE SPACE. OUR BUILDINGS WILL CATER TO SHOWROOM SPACE, TRAINING FACILITIES, LAB AND RD USERS AND POTENTIALLY LIGHT ASSEMBLY FOLKS. IF YOU TURN TO THE SITE PLAN, WHICH IS KIND OF TOWARDS THE BACK, THE SECOND TWO PAGES IN THE RENDERING, WHICH WAS ON THE FRONT PAGE, IT'S ALSO ON THE LAST PAGE. JUST GIVE YOU A COUPLE KEY COMMENTS. YOU KNOW, WE'RE REALLY LOOKING TO INTEGRATE THIS DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE GREEN SPACE, AS JONATHAN MENTIONED. WITH MOST OF THE FRONT AREAS FOCUSING ON THAT GREEN SPACE. WE'RE LOOKING TO BRING SOME OF THE ACCESS POINTS INTO HIGHWAY 121. SO IF AS YOU'RE COMING INTO THE PROJECT AND THE DEVELOPMENT, ALL THE STOREFRONTS WILL FACE HIGHWAY 121. AND IF YOU LOOKED AT THE RENDERING ON THE ON THE LAST PAGE, YOU'LL NOTICE THAT THE STOREFRONT IS ALLOCATED OR ORIENTED TOWARDS THE 121 FRONTAGE. SO AS YOU COME INTO THE PARK, YOU HAVE A SENSE OF PRESENCE THAT YOU'RE COMING INTO THE BUILDINGS. THESE WILL BE HIGH IMAGE BUILDINGS WITH ABUNDANT GLASS. THEY'RE GOING TO LOOK AND FEEL MORE LIKE AN OFFICE THAN ANYTHING ELSE. WE ALSO LIKE A LOT OF LANDSCAPING. THERE'LL BE A LOT OF NATURAL ELEMENTS THAT WE BRING INTO IT. AND IDEALLY, YOU KNOW, WE'RE FILLING AN UNMET NEED WITH COMMERCIAL AND FLEXIBLE REAL ESTATE PRODUCT HERE. WE KNOW THAT FROM OUR OWN EXPERIENCE ALONG THIS 121 CORRIDOR. [00:25:05] AND WE REALLY FEEL LIKE THIS TYPE OF PRODUCT IS HERE TO ACCOMMODATE SOME UNIQUE AND DESIRABLE USES THAT SUPPORTS LOCAL BUSINESSES AND RESIDENTS FOR FRISCO. SO WITH THAT, WE'LL OPEN IT UP TO ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE FOR US. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE FOR THE APPLICANT. ALRIGHT IF NOT, THEN THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND WE WILL GO AHEAD AND MOVE TO PUBLIC HEARING. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING? A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY TIFFANY. SECOND. SECOND BY MICHAEL. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT? SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY WARREN. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS WE NEED TO ADDRESS OR ANY COMMENTS OR FEEDBACK? I DO HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. SURE. JONATHAN. YEAH. IF YOU GOT THE GOT THE SITE PLAN UP THERE, CAN YOU JUST CLARIFY WHAT YOU SAID EARLIER ABOUT THE KIND OF THE GREEN BELT, THE NATURAL AREA THAT'S ALONG THERE AND KIND OF JUST ELABORATE TO EVERYBODY WHAT THEY'RE DOING ON THEIR SIDE OF THE GREEN BELT. SURE. SO THERE IS KIND OF ESSENTIALLY THE NATURAL AREA ON THE NORTH-NORTHEAST PORTION OF THIS PROPERTY. THE APPLICANT IS TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THIS AS HE MENTIONED AND I REFERENCED EARLIER, NOT ONLY ARE THEY ORIENTING THE BUILDINGS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT. SO FRONTING THE BUILDINGS ONTO THAT SPACE WITH MANY OF THEIR PRIMARY ENTRANCES FRONTING THAT NATURAL AREA, BUT THEY'RE ALSO ENHANCING IT BY PUTTING THERE ARE TRAILS AND KIND OF STEPS THAT GO DOWN INTO THAT AREA, ENHANCE PLANTING BEDS OR, SORRY, ENHANCE PLANTINGS, RAISE PLANTER BEDS, SEATING OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL SIGNAGES SCULPTURES. ALSO TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE YOU KNOW, TOPOGRAPHY, YOU KNOW, WHERE THEY'RE KIND OF PUTTING SOME OVERLOOKS OR OUTLOOKS THAT KIND OF LOOK OUT INTO THAT NATURAL AREA. SO FULLY TAKING ADVANTAGE OF WHAT THAT SPACE IS YOU KNOW, ESSENTIALLY CREATING A DESTINATION FOR EMPLOYEES AND VISITORS TO THE DEVELOPMENT TO, TO USE THAT AREA. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND I HAVE A FOLLOW UP QUESTION WITH THAT. IS THERE ANYTHING THAT THEY'RE DOING WITH THE PLANS THAT WOULD INHIBIT OR HINDER FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE GREENBELT FROM TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THAT GREENBELT? WHETHER THE CITY CAME THROUGH WITH A HYPOTHETICALLY, WITH A REGIONAL TRAIL, OR IF THE ADJACENT LANDOWNER THERE WANTED TO ENHANCE THAT SIDE, OR ARE THEY DOING ANYTHING THAT WOULD INHIBIT THAT? NO. OKAY. I DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING THAT LOOKED LIKE IT WOULD INHIBIT IT. SO WE APPRECIATE THAT. AND, STEVE, SINCE YOU BROUGHT UP THE TRAIL, I HAD JONATHAN DO SOME RESEARCH ON THAT QUESTION, SO IF YOU IF YOU WOULD, JONATHAN. SURE. SO I KNOW THERE HAS BEEN SOME DISCUSSION REGARDING THE POTENTIAL FOR A TRAIL IN THIS AREA, BUT IT IS IMPORTANT TO POINT OUT THAT ON THE FRISCO HIKING BIKE TRAIL MASTER PLAN, THERE IS NOT A TRAIL SHOWN HERE ON THE PLANO HIKING BIKE TRAIL MASTER PLAN. THEY TOO ARE NOT SHOWING A TRAIL IN THE COLLIN COUNTY KIND OF MORE REGIONAL LOOK. THEIR PLANS DO NOT SHOW A TRAIL COMING THROUGH THIS AREA. BUT IN TERMS OF THE PROPERTY, YOU KNOW, AND JUST LOGISTICALLY, COULD YOU GET A TRAIL THROUGH THERE? SO IN VISITING WITH SOME STAFF, THAT WAS PART OF THE DISCUSSIONS FOR THE MOST RECENT HIKING BIKE TRAIL, MASTER PLAN, HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL MASTER PLANS. THE CITY WAS ESSENTIALLY PERMITTED THREE CROSSINGS UNDER THE TOLLWAY, THROUGH NTTA. SO ESSENTIALLY WE HAVE ONE FURTHER TO THE EAST AT CUSTER, ONE IN THE HILLCREST AREA. AND THEN WHEN WE'RE PERMITTED THREE, THE EXPECTATION IS THAT ONE WOULD BE ON THE WEST SIDE AS WELL. ALSO, NOT ONLY THREE. SO FOR EXAMPLE, IF WE SAID, HEY, WE'RE GOING TO PUT ONE HERE, WHICH OF THOSE OTHERS ARE WE GOING TO GIVE UP? ALSO, WHEN YOU LOOK AT ESSENTIALLY JUST THE PHYSICAL SPACE ITSELF FURTHER EAST, IF YOU LOOK AT THAT AREA OF CUSTER, IT'S SIGNIFICANTLY WIDER. SO YOU SEE THAT THERE IS PLENTY OF AREA TO ACCOMMODATE THE DRAINAGE AND THE TRAIL AS WELL. IF YOU LOOK AT THIS AREA HERE AND I'LL HAVE TO GET THROUGH IT. OH, IT'S LIKE C AND E. SO ESSENTIALLY HERE ON THE FRISCO SIDE AND ON THE [00:30:02] PLANO SIDE, THIS AREA IS SIGNIFICANTLY NARROWER THAN WHAT YOU HAVE FURTHER TO THE EAST. SO THIS CROSS SECTION REALLY ONLY IS KIND OF WIDE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE THE DRAINAGE. AND THEN THE QUESTION WOULD BE WHERE WOULD THE TRAIL GO? SO SOMETHING ELSE TO KEEP IN MIND. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU FOR THAT. JONATHAN WAS VERY HELPFUL. I SAW A COUPLE COMMENTS, BUT DO YOU. HOW MANY TRUCK DOCKS ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? TOP OF YOUR HEAD? NO, YOU KNOW THAT I DON'T KNOW OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD, BUT WE CAN CERTAINLY FIGURE THAT OUT. I THINK, TIFFANY COUNTERS. SHE LOOKS LIKE 28. SHE'S GOING TO GO 20. WHERE WERE YOU LOOKING? TOTAL OR PER BUILDING? BECAUSE I WAS LIKE, I'M UP TO 30. I'M UP TO 32 ON THIS BUILDING. WELL, I'D BE INTERESTED IN THE ANSWER TO BOTH QUESTIONS. HOW MANY PER BUILDING AND HOW MANY IN AGGREGATE? YEAH CERTAINLY I DO. MY APOLOGIES. I DO NOT HAVE THAT INFORMATION OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. SO BUILDING IS IT CUSTOMARY TO REQUIRE THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AND NOT THE NUMBER OF TRUCK DOCKS ON THE WAREHOUSE? YEAH, I MEAN, WE DID NOT LOOK AT THE PARTICULAR NUMBER OF TRUCK DOCKS IN THE REVIEW. IT IS MORE LOOKING AT HOW THOSE TRUCK DOCKS ARE SCREENED. SO HAD THERE BEEN TEN, TEN TRUCK DOCKS, 20 TRUCK DOCKS, 30 TRUCK DOCKS FROM STAFF'S PERSPECTIVE, YOU KNOW HOW THOSE ARE SCREENED WOULD STILL BE THE MOST IMPORTANT THING. SO IN THIS CASE, YOU IT GOES BACK TO ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING. YOU KNOW, AND PART OF THAT IS THE TRIANGULAR SHAPE OF THE PROPERTY THAT JUST THAT ITSELF IS GOING TO SCREEN MANY OF THEM. ALSO, AS I INDICATED EARLIER, THIS PROPERTY OR, YOU KNOW, THIS PARTICULAR SUP REQUEST SITS ABOUT 300FT OFF OF 121. AND THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN THIS SNP REQUEST. SO THERE WILL BE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ALONG 121. SO THAT DEVELOPMENT IS GOING TO, AT SOME POINT IN TIME, SCREEN THE TRUCK DOCKS FURTHER. AND THEN IN THE AREA ALONG THE WEST, STAFF WORKED CLOSELY WITH THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE THAT DOUBLE ROW OF TREES TO FURTHER SCREEN THE TRUCK DOCKS FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. AND I WANT TO POINT OUT, AS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TO THE WEST, AND THIS DOUBLE ROW OF ROW OF TREES. THEY DO HAVE SOME AREAS, WHILE THE DOUBLE ROW OF TREES ARE PROVIDED ALONG THE PROPERTY. THEY DO HAVE THESE AREAS, YOU KNOW, KIND OF TRIANGULAR WHERE THEY WENT IN AND PUT ADDITIONAL TREES TO FURTHER SCREEN THE TRUCK DOCKS. IT'S SOMETHING THAT OUR LANDSCAPE GROUP WORKED VERY CLOSELY WITH THE APPLICANT ON TO DO. SO I APPRECIATE THE EXPLANATION, BUT MY QUESTION WAS MORE ALIGNED WITH TRAFFIC. THE TRAFFIC DID THE ADDITIONAL TRUCK TRAFFIC ALONG THAT ROADWAY? YEAH. I MEAN, I DO KNOW IT'S A TRUCK ROUTE. I DON'T KNOW IF JOE, IF YOU HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION REGARDING TRAFFIC. I'M CURIOUS IF THERE'S, YOU KNOW, WAS THERE A TRAFFIC STUDY? WHAT WAS THE IMPACT? SO, WE DID NOT REQUIRE A TRAFFIC STUDY BECAUSE IN GENERAL, WHEN YOU LOOK AT A FACILITY LIKE THIS AND THE AMOUNT OF SPACE IT TAKES UP AND YOU COMPARE IT TO JUST THE GENERAL AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT WOULD BE GENERATED, FOR INSTANCE, LET'S SAY THIS WAS ALL RETAIL OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. RETAIL WOULD GENERATE SO MUCH MORE TRAFFIC BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE, CUSTOMERS COMING AND GOING, MUCH SHORTER TIME FRAME, THINGS LIKE THAT. SO IN GENERAL, WHEN WE LOOK AT SOMETHING LIKE THIS, WE JUST KNOW THE DIFFERENT AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC GENERATION BASED ON DIFFERENT LAND USE TYPES. AND THIS ONE DIDN'T GENERATE ANY CONCERNS BECAUSE IT'S LESS TRAFFIC THAN THE EQUIVALENT SPACE IN RETAIL OR OFFICE. IT'S ALSO ALONG A FRONTAGE ROAD OF A HIGHWAY, TRUCK ROUTE AND SO FORTH. SO NONE OF THOSE THINGS TRIGGERED ANYTHING WHERE WE HAD CONCERNS ABOUT TRAFFIC. THANK YOU. JOEL. GOOD. DID THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, MARK? DOES. ALL RIGHT. WELL, I WAS JUST GOING TO MAKE A QUICK COMMENT. AND THEN WE CAN GO DOWN THE LINE FOR COMMENTS AS WELL. BUT I JUST REALLY APPRECIATE STAFF'S THOROUGHNESS AND WHAT THE APPLICANT HAS DONE WITH THIS SPACE HERE. I KNOW IT'S TRICKY WITH JUST A PIE SHAPED LOT HERE AND APPRECIATE THE DETAIL THAT WENT INTO THIS, [00:35:03] AS WELL AS THE ADDITIONAL SCREENING AND JUST HOW YOU ALL ORIENTED THE BUILDINGS. AND THIS SEEMS LIKE THE PERFECT PLACE FOR IT. I THINK IT WAS A JOB WELL DONE. AND IF WE HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS, WE CAN START WITH YOU, TIFFANY, AND GO DOWN OR I'M GOOD. I DON'T HAVE ANY COMMENTS. OKAY. I DON'T HAVE ANY CONCERNS. I'M GOING TO SUPPORT APPROVAL. MR. CONE. YEAH, I HAVE A COUPLE OF CONCERNS. I JUST WANT TO CONFIRM, JONATHAN, THAT THE TREES THAT ARE ADDED THERE ON THE WEST SIDE, THOSE ARE LOCKED IN CANNOT BE REMOVED AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE, WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED IF THEY DIED. THAT IS CORRECT. THE EXHIBIT THAT YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN BEFORE YOU IS THE LANDSCAPE AND OPEN SPACE PLAN, WHICH IS AN EXHIBIT TIED DOWN IN THE SUP. OKAY. AND THEN THE DOUBLE ROW OF TREES IS ARE THOSE TREES OFFSET FROM EACH OTHER? THEY ARE. YES. SO, IT REALLY DOES DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF TREE COVERAGE. YES. IN TIME IT WOULD BE ESSENTIALLY A SOLID ROW. YES. EXCELLENT. NO, I REALLY WE REALLY APPRECIATE THAT. I APPRECIATE EVERYTHING STAFF HAS DONE. THE APPLICANT HAS DONE. I ONLY WANT TO I ONLY WANT TO POINT OUT THAT MY CONCERN ABOUT THIS IS THAT WE HAVE VERY LITTLE NATURAL SPACE LEFT IN FRISCO, SO I THINK WE SHOULD TREAD LIGHTLY WHEN WE'RE DOING SOMETHING LIKE THIS. THERE WAS ANOTHER CASE SIMILAR DOWN THE ROAD, SAME APPLICANT THAT INVOLVED NATURAL SPACE. AND WE CAN WE CAN HIGHLIGHT THE NATURAL SPACE. WE CAN HIGHLIGHT THE TRUCK ROUTE. WE CAN LOOK AT BOTH OF THOSE. AND THERE'S KIND OF A LITTLE BIT IN CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER. I APPRECIATE WHAT THE APPLICANT HAS DONE WITH SUCH A LARGE PIECE OF LAND WHERE THEY HAVE NOT PREVENTED EITHER DEVELOPMENT TO THE EAST NORTHEAST OR TO THE WEST FROM DOING SOMETHING DIFFERENT. I WOULD BE CONCERNED IF THIS STARTED KIND OF A TREND OF A WALL OF THESE, YOU KNOW, LINING MILES OF THE HIGHWAY. THERE WOULD BE MY CONCERN FOR THE REST OF THE COMMISSION, BUT I THINK THEY'VE DONE A GOOD JOB KIND OF SLIPPING THIS IN TO A NICE PIECE OF LAND AND LEAVING THE REST OF IT OPEN FOR POSSIBLY OTHER KINDS OF DEVELOPMENTS THAT COULD POTENTIALLY GO THERE. SO THIS DOESN'T DICTATE EITHER WAY, BUT IT CAN KIND OF START A EITHER AN AVALANCHE OR A TREND. AND THAT WOULD BE MY NUMBER ONE CONCERN WITH THIS. OTHER THAN THAT, THOUGH, I APPRECIATE WHAT THE APPLICANT HAS DONE TO KIND OF PUT THIS IN THERE AND NOT CAUSE ANY CONFLICTS WITH THE NICE AREA, THE BEAUTIFUL AREAS AROUND IT. SO I WOULD BE ABLE TO SUPPORT THIS. VICE CHAIR. I JUST WANT TO MAKE A COMMENT AND WHAT STEVE CONE HAS MENTIONED. WE DO THIS ON ALL APPLICATIONS. WHEN WE HAVE SITES, NATURAL FEATURES. IT COULD BE A TREE GROVE. IT COULD BE THE TRIBUTARY OR FLOODPLAIN. BUT AS WE DID WITH THIS APPLICANT, WE TALKED WITH THEM ABOUT PRESERVING THE NATURAL FEATURES. THAT IS SOMETHING THAT'S IN OUR STANDARD ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES. WE DO THAT. SO I DON'T WANT THAT TO BE FORGOTTEN OR THINK ABOUT. STAFF IS NOT THINKING ABOUT IT. WE ARE. THAT'S ALWAYS AT THE TOP OF OUR DISCUSSIONS ANYTIME WE'RE ENTERTAINING ANY SUCH DEVELOPMENT REQUESTS. THANK YOU. JOHN WARREN, DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU WANTED TO ADD? I'M GOOD. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. WELL, DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM NUMBER 38? I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 38 AS STAFF RECOMMENDED MOTION BY TIFFANY. SECOND. SECOND BY MICHAEL. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. HOLLY, I REALIZED EARLIER I PROBABLY SAID SIX ZERO IN OUR PUBLIC HEARING. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT NEEDS TO BE FIXED, BUT I FORGOT THAT SEAN ISN'T HERE. BUT FIVE ZERO. IT PASSES. CONGRATULATIONS. CONGRATULATIONS TO FIVE. FEELING PRETTY GOOD. ALL RIGHT, SO OUR NEXT. OH. I'M SORRY. YES. PLEASE GET SEAN. I DIDN'T MEAN TO KEEP HIM BACK THERE FOREVER. THAT WASN'T VERY FAIR. I LOVE HER. YEAH. NOT LITTLE TWIGS HERE FOR. LET ME SEE. YEAH. YES. IS THAT. IS THAT FOR EVERYTHING? FOR THE RECORD. SEAN MERRILL IS REJOINING US FOR ITEM NUMBER 39. [Public Hearing – Specific Use Permit: Best Brains Addition, Block A, Lot 3 (SUP24-0014)] PUBLIC HEARING SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. BEST BRAINS ADDITION BLOCK A LOT 324 001 FOR OWNER LEX MONTEREY, LLC. THANK YOU. VICE CHAIR. CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROPERTY FOR A LICENSED CHILD CARE CENTER IN SEPTEMBER OF 2023. THE APPLICANT SUBSEQUENTLY SUBMITTED SITE PLANS THAT DID NOT COMPLY WITH THAT SPECIFIC USE PERMIT, AND THEREFORE, THEY ARE REQUESTING TO MODIFY THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT SPECIFICALLY TO INCREASE THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT BY 900FT² AND DECREASE THE MAXIMUM ENROLLMENT FROM 189 89 STUDENTS TO 175 STUDENTS. [00:40:02] AS NOTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, THIS REQUEST STILL COMPLIES WITH THE GENERAL OBJECTIVES OF THE CITY, AND YOU DO HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL THIS EVENING. SUBJECT TO THIS SITE PLAN ON EXHIBIT B, THE FACADE PLAN IN EXHIBIT C, AND THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION PLAN. AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. THANK YOU. JONATHAN. IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY LIKE TO SPEAK? FABULOUS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN? PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY TIFFANY. I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY SEAN. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. WE ARE NOW IN PUBLIC HEARING. SEEING NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK, I MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY STEVE. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OVER. SO ITEM NUMBER 39. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS OR A MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 39 WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. MOTION BY SEAN. SECOND. SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. THANK YOU. [Adoption of Revised 2025 Development Review Schedules] ALL RIGHT. SO, ITEM NUMBER 40, ADOPTION OF REVISED 2025 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SCHEDULES. THANK YOU. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ADOPTED THE 2025 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SCHEDULES IN SEPTEMBER OF LAST YEAR. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING MODIFYING THOSE REVIEW SCHEDULES TO ACCOMMODATE THE THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY, PARTICULARLY MOVING THE TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25TH, 2025 MEETING TO MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24TH, 2025. THERE ARE FOUR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SCHEDULES THAT FALL UNDER THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION'S AUTHORITY, AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THOSE AS SUBMITTED. LOVE THAT. THANK YOU JONATHAN. AND ONE THING FROM GOING FORWARD THAT IS NOW INGRAINED TO MOVE THAT MEETING THAT WE HAVE WITH THANKSGIVING WEEK FROM TUESDAY TO MONDAY. SO, PEOPLE IN SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR, WHEN YOU'RE APPROVING THE 2026 CALENDARS, BE SURE YOU WATCH OUT FOR US. I APPRECIATE THE ATTENTION TO DETAIL AND THE EXTRA DAY THERE SINCE, YOU KNOW, THURSDAY AND FRIDAY IS A HOLIDAY. THIS IS WHY THANKSGIVING IS ONE OF THE BEST HOLIDAYS, RIGHT? ALL RIGHT, SO DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR STAFF REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SCHEDULE REVISION? I RECOMMEND TO APPROVE THE REVISION TO THE SCHEDULE. ALL RIGHT. MOTION BY TIFFANY. SECOND. SECOND BY MICHAEL. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. WE WILL SEE YOU ON MONDAY OF THANKSGIVING WEEK. ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER 41 RESULTS OF THE JANUARY 7TH, 2025 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. [Results of the January 7, 2025, City Council meeting.] YES. JUST A NUMBER OF CASES. ONE. JONATHAN CARRIED THE LOAD ON THIS, BUT THAT'S THIS WAS UPDATING THE CELL TOWER ANTENNA ORDINANCE. AND SO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HAD NARROWLY APPROVED THAT 4 TO 3 COUNCIL APPROVED THE ORDINANCE 6 TO 0, BASICALLY THE SAME AS IT CAME BEFORE P AND Z. JUST A COUPLE MINOR WORDSMITHING ISSUES, NOT ISSUES, BUT CHANGES WERE MADE. JOHN, CAN I ASK A QUESTION ABOUT THAT? DID WAS THERE EVER A MEETING WITH THE CARRIERS? OH YES. WE HAD SEVERAL AFTER I MEAN AFTER. NO. WELL, YOU KNOW, HERE'S WHAT WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING AFTERWARD. JONATHAN AND I VISITED. WE'RE GOING TO KEEP TRACK. AND WE MENTIONED THIS WHEN IT WAS THE MAYOR. JONATHAN AND MYSELF MEETING WITH THE CARRIERS AND GOING OVER. WE'RE GOING TO TRACK WHEN THEY HAVE MEETINGS WITH US, WHEN THEY SUBMIT, AND WE'RE GOING TO DO REPORTS TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO LET THEM NOW, AND WE STRESS TO THEM THAT ONE OF THEM NEEDS TO BE IN THAT MEETING AND JUST NOT DELEGATE IT TO A CONTRACTOR TO DO THE WORK, BECAUSE IN ONE OF THE PEOPLE THAT WAS AT THE MEETING, THEY SAID, WELL, THIS IS WHAT OUR CONTRACTOR TOLD US. AND I SAID, WELL, YOU DON'T HAVE THE CORRECT INFORMATION. SO A LOT OF THAT IS, YOU KNOW, WHEN THE DELEGATED MISINFORMATION AND JUST IN THE PAST, I THINK 2 TO 3 YEARS, WE ONLY HAD LIKE MAYBE THREE REQUESTS, TWO ON THE SAME ONE. AND JONATHAN HAD A MEETING WITH THEM LIKE MARCH OF LAST YEAR. AND WE STILL DON'T HAVE ANYTHING. SO WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT THE SENSE OF URGENCY AND MOVING FORWARD, I'M GOING TO SAY IT DOESN'T REFLECT IN WHAT WE GET, BUT WE'RE GOING TO BE TRACKING THAT INFORMATION FOR COUNCIL. I WANT TO COMMEND YOU AND YOUR STAFF FOR BEING PROACTIVE IN THAT AREA. SO THANK YOU. I THINK THAT'S RIGHT. WELL, JONATHAN WAS TOOK UP ON THAT TASK WHEN A GENTLEMAN LEFT IN THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE. SO HE BROUGHT IT TO A CONCLUSION. JONATHAN, I LIKE THE IDEA THERE OF KEEPING TRACK OF THAT AND REPORTING AT CITY COUNCIL. WILL THAT INCLUDE WHO YOU MET WITH, WHETHER IT WAS A CONSULTANT, A CONTRACTOR, OR DIRECTLY WITH? [00:45:03] WE HAVE MEETINGS. WE'RE GOING TO TREAT THIS LIKE A PRE-SUB MEETING. YES, WE DO KEEP TRACK OF WHO'S IN THAT MEETING. GOOD. WE HAVE A RECORD AND THE DATE AND THE TIME. ALL THE DETAILS. OH, MAN. WE'RE GOOD. STAFF IS GOOD. OKAY. AND THEN THE NEXT ONE WE'RE RECENSION OF THE SUP FOR THE BAPTIST CHURCH DOWN ON MAIN STREET. THAT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. THE HISTORICAL HOUSE. THE PINK HOUSE THAT WAS TABLED. WE'RE TAKING A LITTLE LOOK AT IT. THEY WERE OUT OF THE COUNTRY. SO THAT WAS TABLED TO A FUTURE MEETING. I FORGET WHICH ONE. SO MAYBE AT THE END OF THIS MONTH. NO, IT'S NOT THIS MONTH. IT'S NEXT MONTH. SO WE'RE GOING TO BE TALKING ABOUT THE PINK COLOR. SO THAT'S IT ON THAT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. WELL, WE HAVE ONLY ONE ITEM LEFT. MOTION TO ADJOURN. WELL, BEFORE YOU MAKE A MOTION, I JUST WANT TO REMIND. YOU ABOUT FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS. I'M SORRY. YES. OVER THAT. SO WE DO HAVE WHAT COULD BE OUR LAST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE TOMORROW AT THE LIBRARY. SO THAT MEETING STARTS AT 6:00. AND SO IF CPAC APPROVES, WE'LL HAVE THIS CASE ADVERTISED FOR THE FEBRUARY 11TH P&Z MEETING. SO THAT'S ON THE HORIZON. DOES THAT EVENTUALLY HAVE TO BE APPROVED BY MULTIPLE BOARDS IN THE CITY COUNCIL? NO, IT IS JUST A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ADVISORY COMMITTEE MAKES ITS RECOMMENDATION TO P&Z AND P&Z ACTS ON THAT RECOMMENDATION. YOU CAN ACCEPT IT AS IS. YOU CAN RECOMMEND CHANGES TO IT, THEN TO CITY COUNCIL. CITY COUNCIL HAS ULTIMATE SAY. AND THEN AFTER THAT, JUST LIKE ANY ZONING CASE, IS ADOPTED BY AN ORDINANCE. GOOD TO KNOW. THANKS. JOHN. ANYBODY WHO'S WATCHING, IF THERE'S ANYONE OUT THERE. THE MEETING IS PUBLIC AND OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. OH, YEAH. ALL OF THESE ARE. YES. 6:00 AT THE LOCATION AGAIN. THE LIBRARY. LIBRARY. LET'S MAKE SURE OVER HERE AT COTTON GIN. SO THAT INCLUDES ANYONE ON P AND Z, SINCE THE NEXT STEP WILL BE COMING TO P AND Z IF THEY WANT TO ATTEND. IF YOU GO TO P, IF P AND Z SHOWS UP AND THEY'RE THERE AS A MAJORITY, YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE. STEVE AND WARREN CAN PARTICIPATE, BUT THE OTHERS WILL NOT BE BECAUSE IT IS NOT POSTED AS A PUBLIC MEETING. SO YOU WOULD BE IN VIOLATION OF THE PUBLIC MEETING ACT. SO THEY WOULD JUST BE THERE TO LISTEN, LISTEN AND NOT PARTICIPATE. THANK YOU. AND THE OTHER THING I KNOW A COUPLE OF YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE NATIONAL PLANNING CONFERENCE THAT'S IN DENVER, BUT I WANT TO TALK TO YOU AFTERWARDS TO SEE WHAT THE INTERESTS ARE. AND SO WE CAN THEN START MAKING RESERVATIONS FOR EVERYTHING. SO I KNOW STEVE HAS EXPRESSED AN INTEREST AS WELL AS WARREN SEAN IS GOING TO BE OUT. HE'S GOT ANOTHER COMMITMENT. SO, BRITTANY, MICHAEL AND TIFFANY, JUST TO TALK TO YOU BRIEFLY AFTER THE MEETING. THAT'S GOOD. THAT'S WHAT I WAS GOING TO ASK THAT YOU AND STEVE HAVE PUT IN A LOT OF TIME AND EFFORT. SO JUST TO MAKE SURE I CAN GET Y'ALL'S AUTOGRAPHS TOO. YEAH, ANYTIME. YES, I DO. ALL RIGHT. SO SINCE I RUSHED THIS EARLIER, NOW WE ONLY HAVE ONE ITEM LEFT. [Schedule of future discussion items.] EXCELLENT, MOTION BY SEAN, SECOND BY TIFFANY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. WE ARE NOW ADJOURNED AT 7:19 P.M.. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.