[00:00:01]
>> WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED.
[CALL TO ORDER]
WE WANT TO WELCOME YOU TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLAN & ZONING COMMISSION.WE WERE GATHERED AT 6101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD, AND THE TIME IS 6:30 P.M.
THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY CITY COUNCIL.
TONIGHT, COMMISSIONERS PRESENCE ARE STEVE CONE, BRYAN MORGAN, ED KELLY, WARREN RUIZ, BRITTANY COLBERG, AND I JON KENDALL AZ CHAIR.
REPRESENTING STAFF FROM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IN THE HOUSE IS JONATHAN LETTELLEIR, JONATHAN HUBBARD, ROLANDREA RUSSELL, DANIEL PONDER, PEYTON SHERMAN, SEAN O. QUINN, LULU PANG, AND LAURIE CROSS.
FROM ENGINEERING WE'VE GOT JOEL FITZ, AND TON FALAHEMI.
FROM FIRE, WE HAVE ALYSSA BARSTOW. IS THERE ANYONE I FORGOT? NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA, IS CITIZEN INPUT.
IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME.
PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM.
PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED, SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE.
PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR ANY APPLICANT PRESENT THIS EVENING.
TO ENSURE THERE'S ENOUGH TIME FOR ALL TO SPEAK.
PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH CASE YOU MAY HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 10 MINUTES.
PLEASE NOTE THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT ON ITEMS NOT POSTED ON THE AGENDA, EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY, TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA.
WITH THAT, IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK DURING CITIZEN INPUT? IF NOT, NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES.
[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
>> WE HAVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 27TH PLANNING IS ON THE COMMISSION.
>> I'VE GOT A MOTION BY BRYAN.
>> I'VE GOT A SECOND BY BRITTANY. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES 5,0.
NEXT IS THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM.
[CONSENT AGENDA]
THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND NON CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS. ANY COMMISSION MEMBER MAKING SUCH REQUESTS PRIOR TO A MOTION AND VOTE ON CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY [NOISE].ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH THE MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION.
WE HAVE ITEMS 6 THROUGH 23 THIS EVENING.
ARE THERE ANY THAT NEED TO BE PULLED FOR OH.
>> THANK YOU FOR CORRECTING ME. THREE THROUGH 23.
THANKS FOR THAT CORRECTION. ARE THERE ANY THAT NEED TO BE PULLED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION?
>> WE NEED TO PULL ITEM SIX FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.
>> ALL RIGHT WE'RE GOING TO PULL THAT.
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THERE'S A MOTION FOR ITEMS 3 THROUGH FIVE AND SEVEN THROUGH 23.
>> THANK YOU. LET'S TAKE A PAUSE.
IF YOU DON'T MIND, WE'RE GOING TO RECUSE THOSE MOTIONS.
ED AND BRITTANY. DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR ITEMS 3-5, 7-20, 22 AND 23.
>> I HAVE A MOTION BY BRITTANY.
>> SECOND BY ED. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES 5,0.
WITH THAT, LET'S GO TO ITEM 6 ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.
[6. Final Plat: Coit - 3557 Addition, Block A, Lots 2 & 4 (FP24-0042)]
LOOKS LIKE SHAN O QUINN.>> THANK YOU, CHAIR AND COMMISSION.
STAFF REQUESTS TO PULL ITEM NUMBER 6 FROM THE AGENDA TO UPDATE THE SUBDIVISION NAME, WHICH IS SUPPOSED TO READ COIT 3537 ADDITION, BLOCK A LOTS 2&4 FP240042, AND IS REFLECTED ON THE REPORTS IN FRONT OF YOU.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVE THE 30-DAY EXTENSION AND PLACE THIS ITEM ON THE OCTOBER 8TH, 2024, MEETING AGENDA.
>> SO JUST TWO WEEKS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
>> MOVE TO APPROVE THE 30-DAY EXTENSION, PUT THIS ITEM ON THE [OVERLAPPING].
>> I THINK IT'S JUST TWO-WEEK EXTENSION.
>> OH, I'M SORRY. YOU'RE RIGHT.
>> PUT THIS ON THE OCTOBER 8TH AGENDA?
>> I'VE GOT A MOTION BY BRYAN.
>> I'VE GOT A SECOND BY STEVE.
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES 5,0.
THAT HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO OCTOBER 8TH.
[21. Site Plan: Frisco Original Donation, Block 4, Lots 2A & 2B (SP24-0068)]
ITEM 21 HAS BEEN PULLED.LET'S SEE WHO'S TO COME UP AND SPEAK WITH REGARDS TO SITE PLAN FROM FIREFLY, BLOCK A, LOTS 1-3, AND BLOCK F, LOT 1 SP24-0065.
DO YOU HAVE ANY STAFF SPEAKING ON ITEM 21?
[00:05:05]
>> WE'LL GIVE YOU A MOMENT TO WALK UP AND LET US KNOW ANY CHANGES THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED ON ITEM 21.
ABSOLUTELY. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSION.
THIS APPLICANT REQUESTED TO MOVE TO EXTEND THEIR ITEM TO THE SEPTEMBER 24 PZ MEETING.
THEY STILL HAVE SIGNIFICANT MODIFICATIONS TO MAKE TO THEIR PLANS.
>> THANK YOU. JUST A QUICK QUESTION.
I'M GLAD YOU LET US KNOW SIGNIFICANT.
DO WE FEEL THEY'LL MAKE IT ON THE 24TH? IS THAT SUFFICIENT TIME FOR THEM TO CONFRONT US?
>> WE SPOKE THIS MORNING, AND THEY WANTED TO SET UP A MEETING FOR TOMORROW.
THE EMAIL THREAD IS STILL PENDING.
WE DO NOT HAVE A MEETING SET UP WITH THEM.
>> THERE'S A DISCREPANCY IN THE REQUEST, THE HEADER OF IT [NOISE] SAYS IT'S A 30 DAY REQUEST.
THEN THE DATE IS FOR SEPTEMBER 24TH, WHICH IS ONLY TWO WEEKS FROM NOW.
IF YOU READ IT, SOMETHING'S NOT RIGHT.
>> THE LETTER ITSELF IS DATED AUGUST 27TH.
>> ALL RIGHT. I APPRECIATE THAT.
>> YEAH, MR. MERREL IF YOU WANT TO LET US KNOW IF YOU ARE COMFORTABLE WITH TWO WEEK WARREN BROUGHT UP?
>> WHAT? FOUR WEEKS? SO [INAUDIBLE], WHAT ARE THEY ASKING FOR? BECAUSE SOMETIMES THEY DO ASK FOR A TWO WEEK AND NOW THE WHOLE 30 DAYS.
>> THEY ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED UNDER THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE PRELIMINARY FEEDBACK.
WHEN THEY SAW ALL THE COMMENTS WITH ENGINEERING, THEY WERE CAUGHT OFF GUARD, IF YOU WILL.
THEY COMMUNICATED TO ME YESTERDAY MORNING THAT THEY WANTED TO SET UP A MEETING WITH ENGINEERING.
IF IT ONLY HAD TO DO WITH PLANNING, I WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO MAYBE ADJUST AND HAVE THEIR THINGS ADDRESSED BY THE 24TH, BUT THEY'RE GOING TO NEED BASICALLY A DEPARTMENT WIDE, ANOTHER PRELIMINARY SUBMITTAL MEETING, BASICALLY.
>> OKAY. DID THEY SPECIFY THEY WANT TO BE ON IN TWO WEEKS OR GO FOR THE OCTOBER 8TH MEETING?
>> BECAUSE THEIR EXTENSION WAS GRANTED.
>> BECAUSE THEIR EXTENSION WAS GRANTED WITH THIS SPECIFIC DATE, I COMMUNICATED TO THEM THAT THEY WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO GO ON THE 24TH MEETING.
>> WE HAVE TO TAKE ACTION TONIGHT, CORRECT?
>> CORRECT. SO THEY DON'T HAVE ANY MORE EXTENSIONS?
>> THE FOUR IS A MOTION, I WOULD ASSUME FROM STAFF TO DENY.
>> RE LAUNCH YOUR ADDRESS IS COMING IS BACK UP. I APPRECIATE.
>> THIS ITEM IS BEING PULLED BECAUSE THE EXTENSION LETTER THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE PACKET HAD THE INCORRECT PROJECT NUMBER.
THEIR REQUEST IS TO GO TO THE SEPTEMBER 24TH MEETING.
HOWEVER, THE PACKET THAT YOU ALL RECEIVED HAD THE INCORRECT LETTER ATTACHED.
>> UNDERSTOOD. I WANT TO BE CLEAR.
SO THEY HAVE NOT HAD THEIR EXTENSION YET?
>> NO, THIS MEETING WOULD GRANT THEM THE EXTENSION.
>> THAT WAS KEY BECAUSE YOU ONLY GET ONE EXTENSION. PER [INAUDIBLE].
>> MY POINT WAS THAT THE LETTER, WHICH YOU GUYS HAVE PROVIDED TO US IS DATED AUGUST 27TH?
>> YES. IT REQUESTS A 30 DAY EXTENSION.
>> THEN IT SPECIFICALLY SAYS THAT THAT DATE OF THE EXTENSION WOULD EXTEND THEM OUT TO SEPTEMBER 24.
IT JUST SEEMS LIKE SOMETHING'S NOT CORRECT.
>> WE WOULD NEED TO TAKE ACTION TODAY.
WHILE WE GOT IT ON THE 27TH, THEY WERE NOT ON THE 27TH AGENDA.
>>JUST TO BE CLEAR THE LETTER IS [OVERLAPPING] OH 24TH. THAT'S RIGHT.
>> THEY WERE NOT ON A MEETING IN AUGUST BEFORE P&Z, CORRECT?
>> CORRECT. THE LETTER CAME IN AND SO I'M GETTING IT NOW.
TONIGHT, THEY'RE ASKING YOU TO DO A JUST AN EXTENSION FOR JUST TWO WEEKS.
THAT'S WHAT THEY REQUEST US, IS THAT CORRECT?
>> YES. BECAUSE WE WOULD NEED TO TAKE ACTION TONIGHT.
HOWEVER, THEY ARE NOT READY, AND SO THEY'RE REQUESTING AN ADDITIONAL TWO WEEKS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS AND WE'LL COME BACK BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON THE 24TH.
>> I APPRECIATE YOUR PATIENCE IN WALKING US THROUGH THAT.
ARE THERE QUESTIONS FROM STAFF? I KNOW THAT THE PAPER THAT WAS IN FRONT OF US, BUT I THINK THE STAFF HAVE WORKED THROUGH.
WE UNDERSTAND WHAT THE PAPER IS GIVEN, BUT WHAT'S BEING REQUESTED.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE A MOTION? TO ACCEPT OR DENY THIS REQUEST? IF NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
>> MOVE TO APPROVE AN EXTENSION TO THE SEPTEMBER 24, P&Z MEETING.
>> I'VE GOT A MOTION BY BRYAN.
[00:10:01]
>> SECOND BY BRITTANY. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES 5,0.
>> DO WE GIVE PROPS TO WARREN FOR BEING ABLE TO READ THIS SUPER SMALL PRINT?
>> I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WAS ON RECORD SOMEHOW.
>> IT'S EXTREMELY IMPRESSIVE THAT YOU CAN READ THAT.
[24. Open Space Plan & Preliminary Site Plan: 720 Preston Trace Center, Block A, Lot 2R & Preston Main Village, Block A, Lots 1 & 4 (OS24-0051 & PSP24-0024)]
WE HAVE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA, AND I WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS.EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PROCEEDED BY STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUESTS.
THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED 10 MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION AT THE COMMISSION.
FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.
ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT.
IF THEY ARE ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES FOR YOUR POSITIONS.
PLEASE AVOID WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS.
OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS.
THE TIME LIMIT IS FIVE MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE THAT EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK.
THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME IF A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO SPEAK.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED.
AFTER ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED, AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE, AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES IT IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING IN A FUTURE MEETING.
AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF OR THE APPLICANT.
PLEASE NOTE THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES UNLESS THE COMMISSION DISAPPROVES THE CASE AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL THE DISAPPROVAL.
THE FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY CITY COUNCIL.
YOU'RE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF TO WIN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY CITY COUNCIL.
WITH THAT, LET ME GO TO SOME OF THE ITEMS ON OUR REGULAR AGENDA.
ITEM 24, OPEN SPACE PLAN AND PREMIER SITE PLAN, 720 PRESTON TRACE CENTER, BLOCK A LOT 2R AND PRESTON MAINE VILLAGE, BLOCK A, LOTS 1&4, OS24-0051, AND PSP24-0024., OWNERS, SIT PROPERTIES, LLC, LLBD, LLC, 720 PRESTON TRACE, LP AND ASH CORPORATION.
>> THESE PROJECTS WERE SUBMITTED ON JULY 29, 2024, AND THE COMMISSION APPROVED A 30 DAY EXTENSION ON AUGUST 27TH, 2024.
STAFF HAS REVIEWED THESE PROJECTS AND FOUND THAT THEY FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, ENGINEERING STANDARDS, AND OR OTHER APPLICABLE CODES.
STAFF RECOMMENDS DISAPPROVAL FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT.
>> THANK YOU. THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING, BUT ARE THERE'S QUESTIONS FOR STAFF BEFORE WE MAKE A MOTION?
MOVE TO DISAPPROVE ITEM 24 FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND DELEGATE THE STAFF TO NOTIFY AND PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT OF THE REASONS FOR THE DISAPPROVAL.
>> SECOND BY BRYAN. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES 5,0.
TWENTY FOUR HAS BEEN DISAPPROVED.
[25. Open Space Plan & Preliminary Site Plan: Park 25, Block C, Lots 1 & 10 (OS24-0057 & PSP24-0025)]
ITEM 25, OPEN SPACE PLAN AND PRIMARY SITE PLAN FOR PARK 25, BLOCK C LOTS 1&10 OS24-0057 AND PSP24-0025, OWNERS, STAR BUSINESS PARK, LLC.>> THANK YOU CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THE SUBJECT PROJECTS WERE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ON JULY 29TH, 2024, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED A 30-DAY EXTENSION ON AUGUST 27TH, 2024.
THESE PROJECT HAS SINCE BEEN RESUBMITTED, AND REVIEWED BY STAFF, WHO HAS FOUND THAT THESE PROJECTS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, ENGINEERING STANDARDS, AND APPLICABLE CODES, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, AND POLICIES.
STAFF RECOMMENDS DISAPPROVAL OF THESE ITEMS FOR THE REASONS STATED IN YOUR STAFF REPORT.
>> THANK YOU. SIMILAR ITEM IS 24 IN THE SENSE OF NOT A PUBLIC HEARING, BUT ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE MOTION IS MADE?
>> NO, I'LL MAKE A MOTION. I MOVE TO DISAPPROVE ITEM NUMBER 25 FOR THE REASONS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF'S REPORT AND DELEGATE TO STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT OF THE REASONS FOR THE DISAPPROVAL.
>> I'VE GOT A MOTION BY BRITTANY.
>> SECOND BY BRYAN. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> AYE. ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES 5,0.
[26. Site Plan: Fields West, Block A, Lots 7, 10 & 11 (SP24-0083)]
SITE PLAN FIELDS WEST BLOCK A, LOTS 7,10, &11, SP24-0083, OWNERS, FIELDS MIDTOWN WEST INVESTMENT PARTNERS LP.>> THANK YOU, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THIS PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED ON JULY 29TH, 2024.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED A 30 DAY EXTENSION ON AUGUST 27TH.
THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN RESUBMITTED AND REVIEWED BY STAFF,
[00:15:04]
WHO HAS FOUND THAT THIS PROJECT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, ENGINEERING STANDARDS, AND OTHER APPLICABLE CITY CODES, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, POLICIES, AND STANDARDS.STAFF RECOMMENDS THIS APPROVAL FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT.
>> THANK YOU. BEFORE WE JUMP IN OUR TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS, IF THERE'S ANY MEDIA.
IT'S HELPFUL TO UNDERSTAND, PEOPLE THINK WE'RE DENYING PROJECTS.
IT'S MORE HOW OUR STATE CODE IS WRITTEN NOW IS THERE'S A SHOT CLOCK, AND THERE'S A TIME LIMIT AND SO WE'RE REQUIRED TO ACT UPON IT.
THERE IS JUST MAYBE ITEMS THAT THEIR CONSULTANTS, ENGINEERS MAY HAVE NOT COMPLETED.
DOESN'T MEAN THE PROJECT IS BEING STOPPED OR ARE NOT MOVING FORWARD, BUT THEY JUST HAVE TO WAIT TILL THOSE ITEMS ARE ADDRESSED.
THAT'S WHAT'S HAPPENING ON THESE INSTANCES.
WITH THAT, IS THERE A MOTION OR A QUESTION?
>> I'LL MAKE A MOTION, IF THERE'S NO QUESTIONS.
I MOVE TO DISAPPROVE ITEM NUMBER 26 FOR THE REASONS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND DELEGATE TO STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT OF THE REASONS FOR THE DISAPPROVAL.
>> I'VE GOT A MOTION BY STEVE.
>> SECOND. SECOND BY ED. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES 5,0.
[27. Public Hearing – Specific Use Permit: Highlands at Panther Creek, Block A, Lot 14 (SUP23-0012)]
PUBLIC HEARING, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT HIGHLANDS AT PANTHER CREEK, BLOCK A, LOT 14 SUP23-0012, OWNERS, FM42325 ACRES PARTNERS LLC.>> THANK YOU, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING IS FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A DAYCARE.
STAFF DID NOTICE FOR THIS REQUEST FOR THE SEPTEMBER 10TH MEETING, HOWEVER, FAIL TO PREPARE A STAFF REPORT IN THE EXHIBITS FOR THE PACKET.
IN LIGHT OF THIS, STAFF HAS REACHED OUT AS VISITED WITH THE APPLICANT AND HAS THIS REQUEST TO YOU THIS EVENING TO TABLE THIS ITEM AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL THE SEPTEMBER 24TH MEETING.
>> IS THE APPLICANT HEARING? DO THEY WISH TO SPEAK? ALL RIGHT, IF NOT. DO YOU HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING?
>> MOVE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> SECOND BY BRYAN. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES 5,0.
WE'RE IN PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 27.
AS THE CORRECT REQUEST WAS, WAS TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING, SO WE'RE NOT GOING TO CLOSE IT.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK TODAY ON THIS ITEM? IF NOT, IS THERE A MOTION THAT HAS BEEN BRIEFED?
>> I'LL MOVE TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THE ITEM TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 24TH, 2024.
>> I HAVE A MOTION BY BRITTANY.
>> SECOND BY ED. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES 5,0.
CONGRATULATIONS. THAT WILL BE TABLED TILL NEXT TIME. ITEM 28.
[28. Public Hearing - Specific Use Permit: Rescind Specific Use Permits S-74 & S-84 (SUP24-0004)]
PUBLIC HEARING SPECIFIC USE PERMIT RESCIND SPECIFIC USE PERMITS, S-74 AND S84, SUP240004, OWNERS, CITY OF FRISCO.>> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR, COMMISSIONERS.
BEFORE YOU ALL THIS EVENING IS A REQUEST TO RESCIND TWO SPECIFIC USE PERMITS, S74 AND S84, ONE FOR A COMMERCIAL NURSERY, THE OTHER FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE.
THESE SPECIFIC USE PERMITS WERE ADOPTED PRIOR TO THE PROPERTY BEING RE ZONED TO HIGHWAY.
THE HIGHWAY ZONING PERMITS BOTH THE COMMERCIAL NURSERY AND THE ASSOCIATED OUTDOOR STORAGE.
THEREFORE, THESE SUPS ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY.
THEREFORE, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THESE SUPS BE RESCINDED THIS EVENING, AND WITH THAT, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
>> GREAT. ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE WE OPEN PUBLIC HEARING?
>> THIS WAS THE PROJECT THAT WE DID OUR LAST MEETING.
>> THAT'S CORRECT. WAREHOUSE IS IN THE FAN AND TREE FARM.
>> THIS IS JUST TAKING THE SUP OFF.
>> THE SUP THAT YOU ALL ACTED ON AT THE LAST MEETING WAS A NEW SUP FOR THIS SAME PROPERTY FOR A PORTION OF THIS PROPERTY.
THIS CASE IS TAKING OFF THESE TWO SUPS THAT ARE NO LONGER NEEDED.
>> CORRECT. GOT YOU. THANK YOU.
>> I DON'T KNOW IF I'M TRYING THE RIGHT WORD.
WHAT'S IMPRESSIVE IS HOW ACTIVE OUR CITY IS WITH REGARDS TO HEAVEN FORBID, THESE OTHER FUTURE BUILDINGS GET BUILT, AND THERE IS A TORNADO DISASTER.
ALL OF A SUDDEN, THEY STILL HAVE THEIR RIGHTS TO START A TREE FARM AGAIN.
BY RESCINDING THIS, WE MAKE SURE THAT THE ZONING THAT'S BEEN PUT IN PLACE IS THE ONLY ZONING ALLOWED.
RATHER THAN HAVING TO CLEAN IT UP IN A YEAR, FIVE YEARS, WE'RE IMMEDIATELY ACTING ON IT, SO APPRECIATE STAFF BEING ON TOP OF IT.
YOU HAVE A MOTION OPEN PUBLIC HEARING?
>> MOTION OPEN TO PUBLIC HEARING.
[00:20:01]
>> SECOND BY ED. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES 5,0.
WE'RE IN PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 28.
PLEASE JUST FILE A SINGLE FILE LINE ON THIS RIGHT SIDE IF YOU'RE COMING UP.
>> SEE, NO ONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THE PUBLIC HEARING.
I MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> ALL RIGHT. I'VE GOT A MOTION BY STEVE.
>> SECOND BY BRYAN. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES 5,0.
PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED FOR ITEM 26.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? CLARIFICATIONS FOR ITEM 28?
>> I MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 28 AS PRESENTED BY STEVE.
>> THANK YOU FOR GIVING THE DETAIL. MOTION BY ED.
>> SECOND BY BRYAN. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES 5,0.
CONGRATULATIONS ON CITY OF FRISCO FOR GETTING THAT REMOVED.
[29. Results of the September 3, 2024, City Council meeting.]
>> ITEM 29 RESULTS OF THE SEPTEMBER 3RD, 2024, CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
>> THERE WAS ONLY ONE ITEM THAT WAS ON CITY COUNCIL, AND THAT WAS THE RECESSION OF THE SUP AT OHIO AND LEBANON.
COUNCIL MEMBER LIVINGSTON WAS ABSENT FROM THE MEETING, AND YOU ALL UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RESCINDING THAT SUP TO CITY COUNCIL, WHICH THEY ACCEPTED.
>> THAT'S THE ONLY THING. WITH THAT, ITEM 30.
[30. Schedule of future discussion items.]
SCHEDULE OF FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS. IS THERE ANYTHING FROM STAFF OR THE OTHER PEOPLE ON THE DAIS WITH ME? COMMISSIONERS ON DAIS WITH ME THAT WE'D LIKE? MAYBE EVEN LAURIE, IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU WANTED?>> JOHN LETTELLEIR, DO WE HAVE THE DATE FOR THE OPEN HOUSE? I DON'T HAVE THAT HERE IN FRONT OF ME.
IT'S GOING TO BE FOR THE CPAC OPEN.
>> YEAH. I THINK THAT WAS SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 6TH.
I JUST WANTED TO GET THAT TO PEOPLE'S RADAR.
>> NOVEMBER 6TH. NOW BE [INAUDIBLE].
>> I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS THE RIGHT TIME OR [OVERLAPPING].
>> PLACE TO DO THIS, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE ABILITY, AND I'M SURE BRYAN WILL TOO TO ADDRESS A NEXT MEETING, IT'S OUR LAST MEETING.
COULD WE PUT THAT ON THE AGENDA?
>> WHAT I CAN ASSURE YOU ED AND BRYAN, THAT THE MEETING WILL NOT CLOSE, AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE THERE'S AMPLE TIME, AND I WOULD LOVE TO HEAR FROM ALL OF YOU AND EVEN US GET THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPRESS OUR [INAUDIBLE].
>> WE DON'T HAVE TO HEAR FROM EVERYBODY.
>> NO. WONDERFUL. I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT.
>> I DON'T KNOW IF WE NEED IT ON THE AGENDA, WE JUST DO IT.
>> WELL, YOU'RE GOING TO DO IT.
>> WHATEVER'S THE RIGHT PROTOCOL.
>> [INAUDIBLE] WANT TO DO THAT.
>> IF THERE'S PEOPLE IN THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT THAT TRY TO STOP IT, I'M GOING TO [LAUGHTER].
>> TONY AND JOY. CHANSON STOPPING.
>> GOOD TO SEE JONATHAN HUBBARD BACK.
>> OH, YEAH. YOU JUST HAD THREE OR FOUR KIDS? CONGRATS. EXCITING. WITH THAT, THERE'S ONE ITEM LEFT.
>> MOVE TO ADJOURN. IS THERE WORK SESSION AFTER?
>> OH, YEAH. FOR THOSE THAT WANT TO KNOW AFTER WE CLOSE THIS MEETING, THERE WILL BE A WORK SESSION ON FLOOR.
>> THREE. YOU'VE GOT ABOUT ANYWHERE 2-4 MINUTES TO GET UP THERE.
WE DO WANT TO START THE MEETING, BUT THEN WE'LL HAVE COPIOUS AMOUNT OF TIME TO DISCUSS WHAT'S IN FRONT OF US.
SO YES, THAT IS CORRECTLY AFTER THIS.
>> SECOND BY ED. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION PASSES 5,0.
WE ARE ADJOURNED AT 6:54 P.M. THANK YOU.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.