Link


Social

Embed


Download

Download
Download Transcript

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:04]

GOOD EVENING. WELCOME TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

WE'RE GATHERED HERE AT SQUARE BOULEVARD, AND THE TIME IS 6:30 P.M.

. TONIGHT. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE COMMISSIONER CONE, COMMISSIONER COLBERG, COMMISSIONER BRIAN MORGAN, COMMISSIONER KENDALL, COMMISSIONER PETRAS AND I AM COMMISSIONER KELLY, NOW SERVING AS THE CHAIR FOR THIS EVENING'S MEETING.

WE HAVE REPRESENTING STAFF THIS EVENING.

WE HAVE FROM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES JOHN LETTELLEIR, PHILIP CLYMER, JONATHAN HUBBARD, STEPHANIE SCOTT SIMMS, SUZANNE PORTER, ROLANDREA RUSSELL, LORRIE CROSS, JENNIFER MORGAN.

HOW YOU DIDN'T CHECK HOLLY HERE.

HOLLY'S HERE. YEAH.

OK SORRY SCRATCH JENNIFER HOLLY ALL RIGHT.

FROM ENGINEERING, WE HAVE JASON KRIM AND JOEL FITTS.

FROM FIRE, WE HAVE JOHN GILLETTE.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT I DIDN'T CALL? MISS ANYBODY? NOW, DO WE HAVE HAD THE ROLL CALL? DO WE EVEN DO POINTS BEFORE CITIZEN INPUT? [INAUDIBLE] APPOINTMENTS.

OKAY, SO TONIGHT WE HAVE TO CONGRATULATE COMMISSIONER KENDALL FOR BEING REAPPOINTED TO THE COMMISSION.

[2. Consider and act upon election of the Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, and Secretary of the Planning & Zoning Commission.]

AND WE HAVE TO REELECT CHAIRPERSON, A VICE CHAIRPERSON AND THE SECRETARY FOR THE COMMISSION.

SO WE'LL OPEN THE NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR.

DO I HAVE A NOMINATION FOR CHAIRPERSON? I'D LIKE TO MAKE A NOMINATION.

I'D LIKE TO NOMINATE JOHN KENDALL FOR CHAIR.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. SECOND.

NOMINATION FOR JOHN KENDALL.

LAURIE, YOU HAVE THIS FIRST AND SECOND.

CONE WAS SECOND. DO I HAVE TO ASK FOR A SECOND ONE? WELL, ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR? SEEING NONE. VOTING ON THE CHAIRPERSON FOR JOHN KENDALL'S NOMINATIONS.

CLOSE THE NOMINATIONS AND VOTING FOR CHAIRPERSON THIS EVENING.

ALL IN FAVOR OF JOHN KENDALL.

SAY AYE.

AYE. ANY NAYS? CONGRATULATIONS, MR. KENNEDY. THANK YOU. CONGRATULATIONS.

CONGRATULATIONS. THANK YOU.

THE NEXT APPOINTMENT THIS EVENING WILL BE FOR VICE CHAIRPERSON.

DO I HAVE ANY NOMINATIONS FOR VICE CHAIR? YES. I'D LIKE TO NOMINATE BRIAN MORGAN FOR VICE CHAIR NOMINATION FROM COMMISSIONER CONE FOR BRIAN MORGAN.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND.

SECOND FROM JOHN KENDALL.

ARE THERE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? SEEING NONE WILL TAKE A VOTE ON THE VICE CHAIR, THOSE CLOSE OUT NOMINATIONS AND SEE BRIAN MORGAN FOR VICE CHAIR.

ALL IN FAVOR.

AYE. ANY NAYS? CONGRATULATIONS. COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

AND NOW THE LAST APPOINTMENT IS FOR SECRETARY.

THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

I HAVE A NOMINATION FOR SECRETARY.

I MOTION ED KELLY FOR SECRETARY.

THAT'S BEEN NOMINATED ED KELLY BY JOHN KENDALL.

IS THERE A SECOND? OKAY.

SECOND BY BRIAN MORGAN.

ARE THERE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? CLOSING OUT NOMINATIONS.

GOT IT. ALL IN FAVOR OF ED KELLY FOR SECRETARY.

SAY AYE.

AYE. ANY NAYS? NO.

NAYS. I GUESS AT THIS POINT WE CHANGE CHAIRS.

IT'S UP TO YOU WHAT YOU ALL WANT TO DO.

YOU WANT TO RUN THE MEETING? YEAH. EITHER WAY.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT SAYS WHAT.

I WOULD, I APPRECIATE YOU ALL PUTTING YOUR TRUST IN ME, AND I ALWAYS WELCOME FEEDBACK.

THANKS FOR THAT. FOR THOSE THAT ARE.

I SEE THERE'S QUITE A FEW PEOPLE.

I'LL BE HONEST. I DON'T KNOW WHY, BUT WE'LL FIND OUT HERE, I ASSUME, SHORTLY.

PLEASE BE PATIENT. THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE SAYS THIS IS ACTUALLY MY FIRST TIME RUNNING THE MEETING.

EVEN THOUGH I'VE BEEN UP HERE FOR SIX YEARS.

WANT TO HAVE TO FIND OUT WHERE I AM IN THE READING THE CUE CARDS AND SO FORTH.

SO I DO NEED TO FIND OUT WHERE IT IS.

ALL RIGHT, I THINK THIS IS IT.

[00:05:02]

NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS CITIZEN INPUT.

IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO IT AT THIS TIME.

PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM.

PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE.

PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR ANY APPLICANT PRESENT THIS EVENING.

TO ENSURE THERE IS ENOUGH TIME FOR ALL TO SPEAK.

PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF 5 MINUTES UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH CASE YOU MAY HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 10 MINUTES.

PLEASE NOTE THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT OR THE ITEMS NOT ON POSTED AGENDA EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY.

TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY OR TO INDICATE THAT A MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA.

THE NEXT, I AM GOING TO STOP THERE.

IS ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK DURING THE PUBLIC? SEEING NONE, WE'LL CONTINUE.

NEXT ITEM ON AGENDA IS THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES.

[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND..

ON THE MINUTES? OH.

OH. ALL RIGHT.

IS THERE ANY COMMENTS OR FEEDBACK ON THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST CITY COUNCIL MEETING? A MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE SEPTEMBER 27TH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING? I'VE GOT A MOTION BY ED KELLY.

SECOND BY PETRAS.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

MOTION PASS.

6-0. 5-0, 5-0.

YOU DON'T COUNT.

I'VE LOST MY [INAUDIBLE].

THAT'S THE TRICK. SORRY.

NEXT. NEXT IS THE CONSENT AGENDA.

[CONSENT AGENDA]

THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND NONCONTROVERSIAL ITEMS. ANY COMMISSION MEMBERS MAKING SUCH REQUESTS PRIOR TO A MOTION AND TO VOTE ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY, AND MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH A MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION.

WE HAVE ITEMS, I BELIEVE IT'S THREE THROUGH 18 THIS EVENING.

FOUR THROUGH 18. FOUR THROUGH 18 THIS EVENING.

ARE THERE ANY THAT NEED TO BE PULLED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION? SEEING NONE, DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOVE TO APPROVE IT, CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS FOUR THROUGH 18.

MOTION BY COLBERG.

SECOND. SECOND BY MORGAN.

ALL IN FAVOR.

AYE.

MOTION PASSED FIVE ZERO.

TONIGHT WE HAVE QUITE A FEW.

[19. Open Space Plan & Site Plan: Prestmont Center, Block A, Lots 1, 2, 5 & 7 (OS22-0042 & SP22-0070)]

WE'VE GOT ONE. QUITE A FEW.

FOUR, FIVE, SIX, SEVEN, EIGHT, NINE.

NOW WE HAVE NINE.

WELL, WE HAVE NINE ITEMS, BUT PUBLIC HEARINGS.

WE HAVE SIX SIX PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA.

AND I WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS.

EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PROCEED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUESTS.

THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED 10 MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION.

FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.

ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER'S CARD AND PROVIDED TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT.

THAT WOULD BE OUR LORIE AND HOLLY OVER HERE.

IF THERE ARE ORGANIZATION ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITION.

PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS.

THE TIME LIMIT IS 5 MINUTES TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK.

THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME.

IF A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO SPEAK, PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE ONLY ONE, PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.

REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED.

AFTER ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.

THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS [INAUDIBLE] UNLESS CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE. AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO A FUTURE MEETING.

AFTER CLOSING PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT.

PLEASE NOTE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES UNLESS THE COMMISSION DENIES THE CASE AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL THE DENIAL, FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY CITY COUNCIL.

YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AS TO WHEN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

WITH THAT, WE WILL JUMP IN, AND I'M GOING TO STEAL THIS FROM YOU.

[00:10:01]

OUR FIRST ONE ON THE REGULAR AGENDA IS OPEN SPACE PLAN SITE PLAN FOR PRESMONT CENTER, BLOCK A, LOTS 1, 2, 5 AND 7.

OS22-0042 AND SP22-0070, OWNERS SEJ ASSET MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENTS CO 711 INC., PRESTON FRISCO LTD, A- AS 137 FRISCO RANCH PHASE TWO LP.

THANKS FOR THAT LONG NAME.

WE'VE GOT THAT ONE. YES, GO AHEAD.

GOOD EVENING, CHAIR KENDALL AND COMMISSIONERS.

THESE PROJECTS WERE SUBMITTED ON JULY 25, 2022.

TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED A 30 DAY EXTENSION AT THE AUGUST 23RD, 2022 MEETING BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 0.

THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DISAPPROVED THIS APPLICATION AT THE SEPTEMBER 13, 2022 MEETING WITH A VOTE OF 6 TO 0.

STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PROJECTS AND FOUND THAT IF THEY FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND AND OTHER APPLICABLE CITY CODES, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, RULES, POLICIES OR STANDARDS.

AS NOTED NEXT TO EACH REASON FOR DISAPPROVAL IN THE STAFF REPORT.

STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT YOU DISAPPROVE THESE PROJECTS FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT.

THANK YOU. THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING, BUT IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? CAN I ENTERTAIN A MOTION? I MOVE. GO AHEAD BRITTANY.

I MOVED TO DISAPPROVE ITEM NUMBER 19 FOR THE REASONS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF'S REPORT AND DELEGATE TO STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT OF THE REASONS FOR THE DISAPPROVAL.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

ALL IN FAVOR.

AYE.

MOTION IS DENIED, 5-0.

NEXT ITEM, MOTION IS DISAPPROVED.

DISAPPROVED AND FIVE ZERO.

ITEM 20, OPEN SPACE PLAN AND SITE PLAN, PRESTON MAIN VILLAGE, BLOCK A, LOT FOUR.

[20. Open Space Plan and Site Plan: Preston Main Village, Block A, Lot 4 (OS22-0052 & SP22-0083)]

OS22-0052 AND SP 22-0083, OWNERS LLBD LLC.

THANK YOU, CHAIR KENDALL.

I'D LIKE TO FIRST CORRECT THE DESCRIPTION THAT WAS INCLUDED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT.

THIS PROJECT IS ACTUALLY ONE RETAIL BUILDING ON ONE LOT ON 5.5 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES, 390 PLUS OR MINUS FEET WEST OF PRESTON ROAD AND 235 PLUS OR MINUS FEET NORTH OF MCKINNEY ROAD.

THE PROPERTY IS OWN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO 1 TO 19 MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD NUMBER 11.

THESE PROJECTS WERE SUBMITTED ON MAY 31ST, 2022, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DISAPPROVE THESE PROJECTS AT THE SEPTEMBER 13TH 2022 MEETING BY A VOTE OF 6 TO 0.

STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PROJECTS AND FOUND THEY FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND OR OTHER APPLICABLE CITY CODES, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, RULES, POLICIES OR STANDARDS.

AS NOTED NEXT TO EACH REASON FOR DISAPPROVAL WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT.

STAFF RECOMMENDS THESE ITEMS FOR DISAPPROVAL FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT.

THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME, DO I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME FOR ITEM 20.

THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING.

WITH THAT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I'LL MOVE TO DISAPPROVE ITEM 20.

FOR THE REASONS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF'S REPORT AND DELEGATE TO STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT OF THE REASONS FOR THE DISAPPROVAL.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONE.

ALL IN FAVOR.

AYE.

MOTION IS DENIED FIVE-ZERO.

DISAPPROVED, DENIED, I DIDN'T WORK ON THAT.

DISAPPROVE. THANK YOU.

BEFORE WE JUMP TO ITEM 21, JUST WANT TO TAKE A PAUSE AGAIN.

IF YOU WERE FILLING OUT A BLUE CARD, IF YOU GET A CHANCE TO BRING THAT UP AND THEN WHEN YOU ARE, WE'LL JUST KIND OF HAVE THAT IN QUEUE.

WE'LL KIND OF PREPARE US FOR THAT.

SO IF YOU HAVEN'T FILLED ONE OUT AND YOU'RE PLANNING TO SPEAK OR SPEAKING ON AN ITEM, PLEASE GO AHEAD AND START BRINGING THOSE UP TO LORI AND HOLLY OVER THERE.

THANK YOU. ITEM 21, OPEN SPACE PLAN AND PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN, WADE PLAZA.

[21. Open Space Plan & Preliminary Site Plan: Wade Plaza, Block B, Lots 1 & 2 (OS22-0077 & PSP22-0049)]

[00:15:04]

BLOCK B, LOTS ONE AND TWO, OS22-0077 AND PSP22-0049 OWNERS WESTON GRAIN COMPANY AND GAINES TXRE FRISCO, LLC.

THANK YOU, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

THE PROJECTS THAT WERE JUST READ INTO THE RECORD WERE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ON SEPTEMBER 12, 2022.

STAFF HAS REVIEWED THIS PROJECT AND FOUND THAT THEY FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CITY ORDINANCE POLICIES REGULATIONS.

THEREFORE, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THIS APPROVAL BASED ON THE REASONS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT PROVIDED IN YOUR PACKET.

I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ANY QUESTIONS WITH REGARDS TO ITEM 21 ON THE REGULAR AGENDA? I WOULD JUST SAY LET IT BE NOTED, THIS IS WADE PLAZA.

THIS IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH WADE PARK.

SO. THAT IS CORRECT.

SO JUST IN CASE IT WERE TO COME UP, MAKE SURE THERE'S SOME CLARITY.

THERE'S NO CORRELATION.

WITH THAT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR ITEM.

DID YOU HAVE SOMETHING? ENTERTAIN A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION. I MOVED TO DISAPPROVE ITEM NUMBER 21 FOR THE REASONS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF'S REPORT AND DELEGATE TO STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT OF THE REASONS FOR THE DISAPPROVAL.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CONE.

SECOND. A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

ALL IN FAVOR.

AYE. PASSES, ITEM 21 IS DISAPPROVE FIVE-ZERO.

PERFECT. NOW, ALL RIGHT, NOW WE JUMP INTO OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS.

[22. Public Hearing - Replat: Stonebriar Mall at the Bridges, Block A, Lot 3 (RP22-0033)]

ITEM 22 PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT, STONEBRIAR MALL AT THE BRIDGES, BLOCK A, LOT 3.

RP22-0033, OWNER STONE BRYER MALL LLC.

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS.

THE PURPOSE OF THIS RE PLAT IS TO ADD NECESSARY EASEMENTS TO ALIGN WITH THE SITE PLAN.

SP 21-0103 THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON OCTOBER 13, 2021.

THE PLAT CONFORMS WITH THE SITE PLAN REFERENCED AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT, AS NOTED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT.

THANK YOU. QUESTIONS WITH REGARD FOR STAFF ON ITEM 22 BEFORE WE OPEN PUBLIC HEARING.

[INAUDIBLE] FOR ITEM 22.

WITH THAT, DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVE. A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.

SECOND. A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

AYE. MOTION PASS FIVE ZERO.

WE ARE NOW IN PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 22.

IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK ON ITEM 22? DO I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC..

SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

MOTION PASSES FIVE-ZERO.

PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.

IS THERE ANYTHING, COMMENTS WITH REGARDS TO THIS THAT ANYONE HAS? WE'VE BEEN PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

THOSE THAT ARE IN ATTENDANCE MAY JUST WONDER.

A LOT OF TIMES WE CLEAN UP ZONING CASES OR REPLATS WHEN WE'RE JUST TRYING TO WORK THROUGH SOME DEVELOPMENT.

SO MORE SOMETIMES THINGS ARE MORE OF A FORMALITY AND THIS WOULD KIND OF FALL IN THAT IN THAT LINE.

CAN I? DOES ANYONE WANT TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR ITEM 22? I MOVED TO APPROVE ITEM 22 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CONE.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

MOTION PASSES. FIVE ZERO.

CONGRATULATIONS. NUMBER 23, PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT, FIRST STREET PARK BLOCK A, LOT ONE.

[23. Public Hearing – Replat: First Street Park, Block A, Lot 1 (RP22-0039)]

RP 22-0039, OWNERS, CITY OF FRISCO.

THANK YOU, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

THE PROJECT THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD WAS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ON SEPTEMBER 12, 2022.

THE APPLICANT HAS SINCE REQUESTED A 30 DAY EXTENSION, WHICH IS PERMITTED UNDER HOUSE BILL 3167.

STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE COMMISSION TABLE THIS ITEM AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO THE NOVEMBER 8TH, P AND Z MEETING.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? WITH THAT, I DO HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

MOVE TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING.

SO MOVE BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

SECOND. SECOND.

MY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN, PASSING FIVE ZERO.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WAS HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM 23? BEFORE WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

[00:20:08]

THAT'S ALL RIGHT.

I KNOW, BUT I WANT TO SEE ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO TABLE THIS AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

YES, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE THE REQUEST AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO THE NOVEMBER 8TH, 2022 MEETING AGENDA.

I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.

SECOND.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

ITEM 23 IS TABLED.

[24. Public Hearing - Replat: Frisco Square, Block A, Lot 1 (RP22-0040)]

ITEM 24, PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT, FRISCO SQUARE BLOCK A, LOT ONE.

RP 22-0040.

OWNERS COLUMBIA MEDICAL CENTER OF PLANO SUBSIDIARY LP AND HTA, FOREST PARK FRISCO LLC.

THANK YOU, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

THE PROJECT JUST READ INTO THE RECORD, WAS SUBMITTED ON SEPTEMBER 12, 2022.

THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A 30 DAY EXTENSION.

STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE COMMISSION TABLED THIS ITEM AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO THE NOVEMBER 8TH MEETING.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? SEEING NONE. I DO HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SO MOVE.

A SO MOVE BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.

SECOND.

A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

WE ARE NOW IN PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ABOUT ITEM 24? WITH THAT BEFORE WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO GIVE A MOTION? I WILL. I'D LIKE TO MOVE TO TABLE ITEM 24 TO THE NOVEMBER 8TH MEETING AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

AND I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CONE.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

ITEM 24 PASSES FIVE ZERO.

ITEM HAS BEEN TABLED.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

SUSPENSE IS KILLING ALL THESE PEOPLE HERE.

AND I ASSUME IT'S COMING UP HERE, ONE OF THESE BIG ONES TO SPEAK.

SO. ITEM 25, PUBLIC HEARING.

[25. Public Hearing - Zoning: Legacy One (Z22-0015)]

ZONING, LEGACY 1Z22-0015, OWNERS, MULTIPLE OWNERS.

SO THIS IS IT.

FIND OUT. YES.

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.

SO BEFORE YOU TONIGHT, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO ZONE THE PROPERTY SHOWN HERE IN RED TO OFFICE ONE.

SO THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 245, THAT BEING THE BOUNDARIES SHOWN HERE IN YELLOW.

THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DID APPROVE A CALL TO PUBLIC HEARING TO OPEN THE BOUNDARIES OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 245 IN SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR.

SO FOR THE PROPERTY SHOWN IN RED, THE ADOPTED PLAN DEVELOPMENT 245 DOES SHOW SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON THAT.

IN ADDITION TO THAT, IN MARCH OF 2017, CITY COUNCIL DID GRANT A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A LICENSE CHILD CARE CENTER ON THAT LOT. TO DATE, NEITHER THE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS OR THE LICENSED CHILD CARE CENTER HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED.

THEREFORE, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO RAISE ON THE PROPERTY TO OFFICE ONE.

SO PER THE ZONING ORDINANCE, THE OFFICE ONE DISTRICT IS DESCRIBED AS A DISTRICT THAT CREATES A FLEXIBLE DISTRICT FOR LOW INTENSITY.

OFFICE USES AND PROFESSIONAL USES.

PERMITTED USES SHOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS, AND THAT IT ALSO GOES ON TO DESCRIBE HIGH.

SO AS FAR AS BUILDING HEIGHT FOR THE OFFICE ONE DISTRICT WITHIN 60 FEET OF ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL, THAT MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 30 FEET, ONE STORY. ONCE YOU'RE BEYOND THAT 60 FEET, YOU CAN DO TWO STORIES, 40 FEET.

THE APPLICANT DID HOLD AN HOA MEETING IN JULY OF THIS YEAR WITH THE ADJACENT HOA'S WAS THERE WERE A FEW RESIDENTS THAT ATTENDED THAT MEETING.

THOSE THAT WERE IN ATTENDANCE DID POSE SOME GENERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT AND EXPRESS GENERAL SUPPORT.

TO DATE, THOUGH, STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY PROJECT INPUT FORMS ON THIS SPECIFIC REQUEST.

IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE PROPERTY SHOWN HERE IN RED THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE ZONING REQUEST THIS EVENING IS DESIGNATED AS A SUBURBAN NEIGHBORHOOD ON THE CITY'S FUTURE LAND USE PLAN THAT MEANING RESIDENTIAL USES.

HOWEVER, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES LAY OUT CRITERIA WHEN SOMEONE IS LOOKING TO CHANGE PROPERTY DESIGNATED FOR RESIDENTIAL USES TO NON RESIDENTIAL ZONING.

AS NOTED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT, THIS REQUEST MEETS ALL OF THAT CRITERIA.

THEREFORE, THIS REQUEST IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS EVENING.

THE APPLICANT IS IN ATTENDANCE SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM? AND I'M ALSO HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.

[00:25:03]

THANK YOU. BEFORE WE INVITE THE APPLICANT TO SPEAK, IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD HE LIKE TO SPEAK? YOU CAN. YOU'LL HAVE 10 MINUTES.

YOU DON'T HAVE TO USE ALL OF IT, BUT YOU SURE? GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE. MY NAME IS KEVIN PATEL.

I'M WITH THE TRIANGLE ENGINEERING, 1782 WEST MCDERMOTT DRIVE.

ALLEN, TEXAS 75013.

I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTION YOU GUYS MIGHT HAVE.

I THINK JONATHAN COVERED MAJORITY OF THE STUFF.

ALL RIGHT, SO YOU'RE HERE IF WE'VE GOT QUESTIONS.

YES. I APPRECIATE IT.

THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? THANK YOU. WE'LL LET YOU KNOW.

DO YOU HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED. SO MOVED BY COMMISSIONER CONE.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

WE ARE NOW IN PUBLIC HEARING.

THIS IS, IF YOU WERE WONDERING, MY MOST WEAKEST THING IS PRONOUNCING NAMES.

AND SO REASON WHY I'VE NOT WANTED TO BE CHAIRS BECAUSE I STRUGGLE PRONOUNCING NAMES.

BUT WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A SHOT AT THIS.

FIRST UP, DEEPAK [INAUDIBLE], LET'S JUST GO WITH DEEPAK.

IF YOU ARE HERE, WE'D LOVE TO HEAR FROM YOU AND YOU CAN CORRECT ME AT MY MISPRONUNCIATION AT ANY MOMENT.

IF YOU COULD TELL ME WHERE YOUR ADDRESS IS.

YES. MY NAME IS DEEPAK SAMAR APU.

MY ADDRESS IS 4360 HAZELWOOD AVENUE, FRISCO, TEXAS.

MY HOUSE IS JUST RIGHT NEXT TO THE RED LINE OUT THERE.

THIS IS MY FIRST TIME COMING TO THESE MEETINGS.

AND CONGRATULATIONS ON THE NEW POST THIS AFTERNOON.

THE I HAD A DIFFERENT EXPECTATIONS BEFORE I SAW HOW THE PROCESSES ARE GOING.

I WAS HOPING TO HEAR MORE ON WHAT'S GOING IN THERE.

WITH THAT SAID, I REALLY APPRECIATE THE BUILDERS AND JONATHAN COMING TO OUR COMMUNITY AND TALKING ABOUT WHAT IS GOING INTO THAT SPACE NEXT TO MY HOUSE.

WE WERE ALL VERY I MEAN, WE LIKE THE PROJECT, BUT WE DIDN'T KNOW WHAT IS THERE IN THE FINAL PAPERS.

PROBABLY THE EXPECTATION WAS FOR ME TO LOOK AT BEFORE COMING HERE.

IF THAT'S THE CASE, IT'S MY BAD.

BUT I WOULD DEFINITELY LIKE TO HEAR FROM JONATHAN OR FROM THE OWNER TO EXPLAIN WHAT IS COMING IN THIS. AND I DID HEAR SOME RULES SAYING TWO STORIES, ONE STORY KIND OF A COMMENT.

BUT WHEN WE HEARD ABOUT THE PLAN, IT WAS A ONE STORY BUILDING.

SINCE I'M RIGHT NEXT TO THE THE PROPOSED PROPERTY, ONE OF THE KEY THINGS WAS THE GATE, WHICH IS RIGHT NEXT TO MY DOOR.

I WAS TALKING TO MY NEIGHBOR JUST A FEW MINUTES BACK.

HE DID SAY THAT THE GATE IS STILL GOING TO BE THERE AS PER THE DOCUMENTS.

I WAS I'M HERE TO BASICALLY TALK IN FAVOR OF HAVING A NEIGHBOR TO ME.

AND THEN I, I DID LIKE THE ONE WHICH WAS PROPOSED.

BUT I WOULD MY EXPECTATION WAS, I'LL HEAR WHAT IS THE FINAL THING COMING OUT THERE IN THIS COMMISSION, WHICH I HAVE NOT SEEN.

AND WITH THAT SAID, WE I DO LIKE THE THE PROPOSED ONE STORY BUILDING FOR OFFICES AND PROBABLY A BANK WHICH IS COMING OUT THERE WITH THE GATE NEXT TO MY DOOR, MY HOUSE BEING A CLOSED DOOR LIKE HOWEVER IT IS RIGHT NOW, WHICH WILL OPEN ONLY FOR THE EMERGENCY VEHICLES.

WITH THAT SAID, I WILL YIELD MY TIME, BUT THAT'S THE REQUEST IF I CAN GET THOSE THINGS LITTLE BIT CLARIFIED.

THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS.

SO THANK YOU. NEXT UP, I HAVE A TIM CRYSTAL.

GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE.

THANK YOU. TIM CRYSTAL, 3746 OLMSTEAD DRIVE, FRISCO RESIDENT FOR 20 YEARS AND AN OLMSTEAD IN EDGE STONE RESIDENT THERE FOR OVER TWO YEARS.

I'M ALSO ON THE HOA BOARD FOR EDGE STONE AS WELL.

SO HERE TONIGHT TO EXPRESS MY APPROVAL AND SUPPORT FOR THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, WE DID GREATLY APPRECIATE THE JULY MEETING WITH THE DEVELOPER OWNER. MAKES A HUGE DIFFERENCE WHEN THE PROCESS INCLUDES EARLY ENGAGEMENT WITH OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO THE ONLINE VERSION OF THAT, PLUS THE IN-PERSON VERSION, WAS VERY HELPFUL.

AGAIN, I, I'M UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THE RENDERINGS AND PLANS PUT FORTH AT THAT TIME ARE PROBABLY STILL IN PLAY WITH SUBTLE ADJUSTMENTS.

[00:30:07]

BUT CERTAINLY I THINK THIS MOB BANK ONE STORY, VERY LOW INTENSITY TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT IS VERY APPROPRIATE FOR THAT CORNER.

IT FITS REALLY WELL WITH WHAT COULD BE THERE VERSUS A MORE INTENSE RETAIL SETTING OR SOMETHING OF THAT NATURE.

SO SPEAKING IN FAVOR OF IT, ECHOING ABOUT THE EMERGENCY GATE, THAT WAS ONE OF MY CONCERNS, IS THAT EMERGENCY GATE THEY'RE ON AT THE END OF HAZELWOOD.

WE WERE HOPING THAT THAT WOULD REMAIN CLOSED AND ONLY OPEN FOR EMERGENCIES BECAUSE THERE WAS SOME CONCERN ABOUT PEOPLE SHORT CIRCUITING THROUGH HAZELWOOD TRYING TO GET SOUTHBOUND ON LEGACY. AND IT WOULD BE NICE TO NOT HAVE THAT HAPPEN IF POSSIBLE.

SO ANYWAY, THAT'S BASICALLY IT.

JUST WANTED TO EXPRESS MY SUPPORT AND APPRECIATIVE OF THE PROCESS THUS FAR FROM THIS DEVELOPER.

SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU TIM.

BEFORE I MAKE A MOTION, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT IS HERE TO SPEAK IN BEHALF FOR OR AGAINST OR JUST AN OPINION ON ITEM 25.

SEEING NONE. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO FOR CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING? TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SO MOVE BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

WE ARE NOW PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.

WITH THAT, I'LL OPEN UP TO THE DIAS.

IS THERE ANYONE THAT HAS QUESTIONS TO MR. JONATHAN HUBBARD OR THE APPLICANT? I WASN'T SURE WHERE THIS EMERGENCY GATE IS.

CAN YOU POINT TO THAT? SURE. SO THE EMERGENCY GATE IS ESSENTIALLY RIGHT HERE AT THE END OF THIS STREET.

OKAY. SO IT IS THERE TODAY AND IT WILL REMAIN AS IS CLOSED NOR PROVIDE EMERGENCY ACCESS IN BOTH DIRECTIONS.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. YEAH IF NO ONE ELSE HAD A QUESTION, JONATHAN, JUST FOR THE PUBLIC RECORD, CAN YOU JUST KIND OF EXPLAIN OUT LOUD TO THE AUDIENCE WHAT WILL BE THE SCREENING BETWEEN THE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL AREA? SURE. SO IT IS AT THIS POINT IN TIME, IT IS NON RESIDENTIAL TO RESIDENTIAL.

SO THERE WILL BE A MASONRY SCREENING WALL WITH A 15 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH WITH THE TREES THAT IS THAT'S OUR TYPICAL SCREENING AT THIS POINT IN TIME.

UNLESS THE APPLICANT WERE TO COME BACK IN THE FUTURE AND PROPOSE A LIVING SCREEN WHICH WOULD REQUIRE APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

BUT AT THIS POINT IN TIME TO FOLLOW UP ON THAT QUESTION AND JUST TO SPEAK TO SOME OF THE QUESTIONS THAT THE RESIDENTS BROUGHT UP THIS EVENING, THIS IS A STRAIGHT ZONING REQUEST FOR OFFICE ONE.

SO THE PLANS THAT WERE SHARED WITH THE RESIDENTS AT THAT JULY HOA MEETING ARE THE SAME PLANS THAT THE APPLICANT HAS TO SHARE TONIGHT.

HOWEVER, AGAIN, IT'S A STRAIGHT ZONING REQUEST.

NONE OF THOSE PLANS ARE TIED DOWN.

IT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE CITY'S STANDARD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS AND THAT ALL OF THAT WILL BE REVIEWED AT THE TIME OF PRELIMINARY PLAN, SITE PLAN AND SO FORTH.

THANK YOU. DO YOU KNOW IF THERE'S A TENANT THAT'S BEEN COMMITTED TO THIS PROPERTY? YOU IDENTIFIED ON THIS ONE? IDENTIFYING? YEAH. THERE'S NOTHING TIED DOWN IN ANYTHING.

I BELIEVE THE DEVELOPER IS INTENDING TO DEVELOP THIS FOR AT LEAST A PORTION OF THIS FOR THEMSELVES.

BUT AGAIN, THAT'S SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

IT'S STRAIGHT OFF THIS ONE.

THE PROPERTY COULD CHANGE HANDS AND SOMETHING ELSE HAPPEN.

ONE THING I DO WANT TO POINT OUT, WE HAVE A MAJOR HIKING BIKE TRAIL THAT RUNS ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY FROM FUTURE GRAND PARK, GOING ALL THE WAY DOWN INTO LAKE LEWISVILLE. SO THE APPLICANT IS AWARE, BUT ANY DEVELOPMENT ON THIS PROPERTY, WE'RE GOING TO MAKE SURE THEY'RE RESPECTFUL OF THAT CREEK.

AND IT'S NOT A BACK UP HOUSE.

GOOD INFO. I HAVE ONE COMMENT TO MAKE.

AS JONATHAN POINTED OUT, THE ON THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN, IT SHOWS THIS AREA AS RESIDENTIAL.

CORRECT. AND AS A CITY, WE'RE VERY CAUTIOUS WHEN WE TRY TO GO FROM THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND CHANGE TO A DIFFERENT USE.

WE SHOULD ALSO KEEP IN MIND THAT THE COMMITTEE THAT CREATED THAT PAINTS WITH A PRETTY BROAD BRUSH.

SO THIS WIDE AREA HERE WOULD HAVE BEEN PAINTED AS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

AND KNOWING THAT A SMALL COMMERCIAL CORNER LIKE THIS VERY LIKELY WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR ANOTHER USE.

THIS SEEMS LIKE A GOOD CONVERSION FROM THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN OVER TO THE SMALL COMMERCIAL CORNER.

SO I SUPPORT IT. EXACTLY RIGHT.

I THINK MOST OF YOU STOLE MY THUNDER.

I WAS GOING TO ADDRESS THOSE ITEMS, BUT FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE, IT JUST MAKES SURE THAT THERE'S CLARITY.

AS MR.

[00:35:02]

HUBBARD SAID, IS WE ARE JUST DOING A STRAIGHT ZONE.

I KNOW THAT YOU'VE SEEN THAT, BUT HOPEFULLY, YOU KNOW, WHAT I TRY TO EDUCATE PEOPLE IS THAT IF YOU'VE EVER DRIVEN AROUND FRISCO, YOU CAN SEE THE STANDARD THAT IS REQUIRED IN FRISCO AND THIS WILL STILL BE REQUIRED AS THEY GO THROUGH THE PROCESS.

AND THERE WAS A QUESTION ABOUT THE HEIGHT REQUIREMENT, I THINK I HEARD IS TO GO IF THEY WERE TO GO TO TWO STORIES, THERE WOULD BE A 60 FOOT SETBACK.

SO WITHIN 60 FEET OF THE SINGLE FAMILY ZONED PROPERTY, THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS ONE STORY, 30 FEET BEYOND THAT.

THEY BEYOND THE 60 FEET, THEY COULD GO TO TWO STORIES, 40 FEET.

SO SO THAT IS A POSSIBILITY.

I HAVE A LOT OF FAITH AND TRUST IN THE CITY AND IN WHAT THEY DO IN FILLING THE RECOMMENDATION.

BEFORE I ASK FOR A MOTION, I WOULD JUST ASK 25.

USUALLY THERE'S APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL.

THIS ONE HAD A PLETHORA OF DETAIL WITH THE RECOMMENDATION, SO I WOULD JUST MAYBE INCLUDE IF THERE IS A MOTION FOR 25 TO INCLUDE ALL NOTES INCLUDED IN THE STAFF REPORT.

NOW, ONE THING I DO WANT TO POINT OUT, I CAN'T RECALL IF JONATHAN POINTED IT OUT SO TIM, SO THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE WOULD BE ANOTHER ZONING CASE ON THIS PROPERTY TO REMOVE THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE DAYCARE THAT WAS APPROVED SEVERAL YEARS AGO.

THAT APP HAS FALLEN THROUGH ON THE PROPERTY AND THAT WON'T.

AND SO IF THERE'S EVER ANOTHER DAYCARE ON THE PROPERTY, THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK AND GET A NEW SUP.

SINCE THE SUP IS VERY SITE SPECIFIC WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS.

AS IT WAS EXTREMELY TIED DOWN IN DETAIL.

SO YES, THANK YOU. I ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR ITEM 25.

MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 25, WITH ALL OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS LANGUAGE THAT'S INCLUDED IN THE STAFF REPORT WITH REGARD TO THE, I GUESS, THE CONDITIONS OF THOSE RECOMMENDATION.

PERFECT. RECOMMENDED BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

ALL IN FAVOR.

AYE. MOTION APPROVE OR APPROVES FIVE ZERO.

CONGRATULATIONS. ITEM 26, PUBLIC HEARING ZONING FM 423 AND MAIN STREET

[26. Public Hearing - Zoning: FM 423 & Main Street (Z22-0016)]

Z22-0016, OWNERS, THE JACKIE THOMPSON TRUST.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU ALL TONIGHT IS TO ZONE THE PROPERTY SHOWN HERE FROM AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY SEVEN.

HOWEVER, AFTER THE PACKET WAS PUBLISHED ON FRIDAY, STAFF HAS RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER REQUESTING TO WITHDRAW THIS ZONING REQUEST.

SINCE THIS IS A NOTICE REQUEST, I WOULD ASK THAT THE COMMISSION HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING THIS EVENING AND THEN ACCEPT THE, EXCEPT THE PROPERTY OWNERS REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THE ZONING REQUEST.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? WHAT WOULD THE PUBLIC STILL OPEN IT UP TO? STILL HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN ACCEPT THE APPLICANT'S WITHDRAWAL? AND IS THE APPLICANT HERE? DO THEY WANT TO SPEAK? JUST. YOU DON'T HAVE TO.

BUT IF IF YOU'RE THE APPLICANT, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK BEFORE WE GO TO A PUBLIC HEARING.

OK. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? MOVE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SO MOVED BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

WE ARE NOW IN PUBLIC HEARING.

I HAVE ONE SUMMON.

[INAUDIBLE] WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK? LIKE ME. I WANT TO MAKE SURE I SAY IT CORRECTLY.

IF YOU COULD GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.

SURE. GOOD EVENING.

THIS IS [INAUDIBLE] I'M STAYING AT 617 [INAUDIBLE] DRIVE FRISCO 75033.

SO FOUR.

FIRST OF ALL, THANKS FOR ALL OF YOU TAKING TIME AND INVITING US TO BE HERE AND TRY TO UNDERSTAND THE PROJECT FOR FUTURE PROJECT.

AND WE HAVE A BUNCH OF FOR HOMEOWNERS ALSO.

THANKS FOR THEM TO JOIN OVER HERE.

SO WE WOULD LIKE TO UNDERSTAND THIS IS LOOKS LIKE AN INTERESTING PROJECT WHICH IS COMING NEXT TO MY HOME.

WANTED TO UNDERSTAND THE MORE DETAILS LIKE WHETHER THIS IS A FOCUS.

THE DEVELOPER IS GOING TO FOCUS ON THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, THE TOWNHOMES OR THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY.

THAT IS ONE WHICH IS NOT VERY CLEAR FROM THE DETAILS OVER HERE.

IF SOMEONE CAN HELP US, WE CAN UNDERSTAND THAT.

NUMBER TWO, WE WHAT WE WILL WE ARE MORE INTERESTED IS THERE IS A WALL WE SEE HERE, RIGHT THIS.

[00:40:01]

YEAH. THIS IS THE WALL HERE.

OK RIGHT THERE. SO? SO THAT IS THE SMALL PLAY AREA OF WHAT WE HAVE FOR THE ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE 100 PLUS FAMILIES ARE LIVING THERE.

SO THE, YOU KNOW, WE WOULD LIKE TO RETAIN THAT WALL THERE AND SO THAT, YOU KNOW, THE KIDS CAN COME ONE EVENING AND DURING SUMMER TIMES THEY CAN PLAY OUT THERE.

SO THAT'S THE ONLY SMALL SPACE WHERE TODAY THE FAMILIES ARE SPENDING SOME TIME IN THE DURING THE EVENING TIMES.

THAT'S NUMBER TWO.

WE WOULD LIKE TO UNDERSTAND HOW THE WALL, THE STRUCTURE OF THE PROPERTY IS GOING TO COME OUT THERE.

AND NUMBER THREE, WHAT WE WANT TO UNDERSTAND IS THE ENTRANCE FOR THIS PROPERTY, WHETHER THIS IS GOING TO YOU KNOW, THEY'LL HAVE THE ACCESS ON THE MAIN STREET HERE OR ON THE 423 HERE.

SO WE ARE NOT VERY SURE OF THE DETAIL OF IT.

RIGHT. OR THE ENTRANCE IS GOING TO BE CONTINUED FROM THIS WAY TO THIS WAY.

OKAY. SO THAT DETAIL IS ALSO WE WOULD LIKE TO WHICH HELPS US, YOU KNOW, MORE CLARITY WHERE WE CAN MAKE FEW DISCUSSIONS AROUND THE HEDGEWAY. THAT'S THAT'S NUMBER THREE.

AND THEY FINALLY SO THERE IS A FLOOD ZONE IS WHAT BEING IDENTIFIED THIS AREA, I BELIEVE.

YES. SORRY, JUST.

JUST. SORRY. SO PLEASE HELP ME HERE AND YOU'RE WELCOME TO COME UP.

BUT IF YOU COULD GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS BEFORE YOU SPEAK.

YEAH. I NEED TO FILL OUT A BLUE CARD IF YOU HAVE NOT.

MY NAME IS SAMANTHA BALI.

I LIVE IN SIX, FIVE TWO.

SAHAL DRIVE. FRISCO, TEXAS, 75033.

THE FLOOD ZONE IS IDENTIFIED SOMEWHERE AROUND HERE AND MAYBE HERE.

I'M NOT SURE, BUT THIS FOR SURE.

SO WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THIS AREA IS GOING TO REMAIN AS A FLOOD ZONE OR WILL THERE BE ANY DEVELOPMENT ON TOP OF IT, BECAUSE WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THAT JUST IN CASE WE DON'T WANT TO GET FLOODED IN THE HOMES.

SO THAT'S A QUESTION.

THANK YOU FOR LETTING US KNOW.

ANYTHING ELSE? AND THEN IF YOU COULD FILL OUT A BLUE SPEAKERS CARD.

I'VE ALREADY DONE THAT. YOU CALL ME SOMEONE.

SOMEONE? OH, THIS IS YOU.

SO, DID YOU NOT FILL OUT OF CARD? I DID FILL THE CARD.

WHICH IS. THE NEXT ONE.

YOU HAVE THE SECOND CARD? [INAUDIBLE] YES, I GOT IT RIGHT.

I'M SO. I WISH I HADN'T BETTER.

YOU'RE 100% RIGHT.

OKAY, SO YOU PRONOUNCING IT RIGHT.

ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU FOR FILLING OUT.

ANYTHING ELSE? YOU'VE GOT A 1:20 LEFT.

YEAH. JUST, YOU KNOW, THE MORE DETAILS OF THE PROJECT WILL HELP US.

BUT AGAIN, WE JUST HEARD THAT THIS IS BEING WITHDRAWN, SO ALL OUR QUESTIONS MIGHT BE MORE, BUT WE'LL HOPEFULLY STILL BRING YOU SOME CLARITY.

APPRECIATE YOU ALL COMING OUT.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. BEFORE MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE ELSE OUT IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ITEM 26? SEEING NONE. SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PETRAS.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.

I'M HAPPY TO ADDRESS IT, BUT IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS? I KNOW WE'RE ABOUT THERE ASKING FOR WITHDRAWAL, BUT ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS BEFORE I MAKE THEM? I THINK WE HAVE TO WORK ON THE WITHDRAWAL.

I MEAN, THERE'S NOTHING REALLY ELSE TO DISCUSS.

NO, I WAS JUST GOING TO DO IT MORE.

JUST SOME QUICK EDUCATION.

AS YOU HEARD THE ITEMS BEING WITHDRAWN.

BUT I WANT TO MAKE IT WORTH YOUR TIME.

YOU DROVE OUT HERE AND YOU SPEND A LOT ON GAS, SO HOPEFULLY I CAN GIVE YOU $0.02 WORTH OF KNOWLEDGE.

YOU KNOW, YOU ASK WHERE THOSE ACCESS POINTS WERE.

ANY TIME IN A DEVELOPMENT, WE'VE GOT TO HAVE AT LEAST TWO POINTS OF ACCESS AS YOU DREW THEM UP.

THOSE ARE PROBABLY PRETTY ACCURATE OF WHAT THEY COULD POTENTIALLY DO.

ONE, COME OFF OF MAIN STREET AND ONE OFF OF 423.

I DON'T SEE ANYTHING WHY THEY WOULD CUT THROUGH YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD AS JOE MIGHT BE ABLE TO SPEAK.

BUT I'M GOING TO ACTUALLY ASK JOE, IS THERE ANY CHANCE THAT IF A DEVELOPMENT WERE TO COME FORWARD, THAT IT WOULD CONNECT TO THAT KNUCKLE IN THE END.

BEFORE ANSWERING THAT QUESTION? SO THAT'S NOT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA.

LET'S NOT GO THERE, THEN.

I APOLOGIZE. ONE OF THE THINGS I WAS GOING TO SAY IS TONIGHT'S CASE WAS STRICTLY CHANGING THE ZONING.

SO WE HAVE NO PLANS, NO PLATS, NO NOTHING IN FRONT OF US.

ALL WE WOULD DO IS SPECULATE.

CAN I ASK STAFF JUST A VERY GERMANE QUESTION, JONATHAN, TO THE CHANGE TO SINGLE FAMILY SEVEN.

YES. CAN YOU JUST SAY THE REQUEST FOR SINGLE FAMILY SEVEN, DOES THAT ALLOW ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND TOWNHOMES IN SINGLE FAMILY SEVEN.

[00:45:01]

SINGLE FAMILY SEVEN IS SINGLE FAMILY, DETACHED MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 7000 SQUARE FEET.

SO THAT'D BE STRAIGHT ZONING, DETACHED HOMES, MEETING ALL OF THE CITY'S SINGLE FAMILY SEVEN STANDARDS.

OKAY. THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT.

SURE. AND THANKS FOR CORRECT ME.

WE DO HAVE A SOMEONE PULLING APPLICANT, BUT IF YOU WERE TO STAY AFTER, I ASSUME SOMEONE HERE OR STAFF COULD ANSWER SOME OF THE QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAD WITH THAT. DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 26? I MOVED TO ACCEPT THE WITHDRAWAL OF ITEM NUMBER 26.

DO I HAVE. THAT'S A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

SECOND.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

ITEM IS REMOVED.

THAT'S ALL. WITHDRAWAL.

WITHDRAWAL. ALL RIGHT.

[27. Public Hearing - Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance (ZA22-0004)]

ITEM 27, PUBLIC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT.

AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE ZA22-0004, OWNERS, CITY OF FRISCO.

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.

ZONING ORDINANCE SUBSECTION 6.06.O5C DEALS WITH REQUIRED PROTEST AGAINST PROPOSED AMENDMENTS.

SO THE WAY THE ZONING ORDINANCE READS TODAY, THOSE PROTESTS HAVE TO BE FILED WITH THE CITY AT LEAST SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS BEFORE THE DATE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SO OFTENTIMES PROPERTY OWNERS REQUEST ADDITIONAL TIME AND STAFF ACCOMMODATES THOSE REQUEST.

BUT IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT STAFF STILL HAVE THOSE PROTESTS IN HAND SO THAT WE CAN WORK WITH THE CITY'S GIS DEPARTMENT TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THAT 20% THRESHOLD HAS BEEN MET.

SO IN ORDER TO ALIGN WITH KIND OF OUR PROCESS, STAFF IS PROPOSING TO AMEND THIS SUBSECTION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE SO THAT THOSE PROTESTS BE FILED NO LATER THAN 12 P.M., THE MONDAY PRIOR, THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING.

SO AS AN EXAMPLE FOR TONIGHT'S PUBLIC HEARING, ALL OF THOSE PROTESTS WOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN NOON YESTERDAY.

THIS IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL, AS NOTED WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

WITH THAT. ANY QUESTIONS? YEAH. DOES THAT GIVE YOU ENOUGH TIME? YES. YOU'RE COMFORTABLE? IT DOES. LET ME MENTION ONE OTHER THING.

THERE WAS A COURT CASE DOWN IN DALLAS AND THE RECOMMENDATION OF OUR CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.

THEY RECOMMEND THAT WE MAKE THIS CHANGE IN ORDER TO BE COMPLIANT WITH RECENT CASE LAW.

WHAT? HAVE ONE QUESTION FOR JONATHAN.

CAN YOU CLARIFY THE 12:00 DEADLINE? 12:00 PM NOON.

12 P.M. NOON, THE MONDAY PRIOR THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING.

MONDAY PRIOR TO THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING, WHICH WAS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING THE NEXT DAY.

OK 12 NOON THE DAY BEFORE? CORRECT. I THOUGHT YOUR CENTRAL TIME OR EASTERN TIME? NO. WAS GETTING MORE TECHNICAL THAN THAT, BUT I'M GOING TO LET IT GO.

OKAY. THANK YOU, JONATHAN.

ALL RIGHT. IF THERE ARE NO OTHER QUESTIONS, DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR ITEM 27? IT'S A PUBLIC HEARING. I APOLOGIZE.

THANK YOU. MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING.

SO MOVE.

A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

MOTION PASSES.

FIVE ZERO. WE ARE NOW IN PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYONE OUT THERE DYING TO WORK ON THE PUBLIC SPEAKING SKILLS, SEEING NONE.

MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.

A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.

SECOND. A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.

ANY QUESTIONS OR CAN I ENTERTAIN A MOTION? I WOULD MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 27 AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COHN.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO.

CONGRATULATIONS [INAUDIBLE] THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT. ITEM 28 RESULTS OF THE OCTOBER 4TH, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

[28. Results of the October 4, 2022, City Council meeting.]

I DON'T THINK WE HAD MUCH ON THERE.

SO IT WAS A QUICK MEETING.

A QUICK MEETING. IT'S LIKE WE COULD SHOOT THAT A LONG TIME BEFORE THAT HAPPENED.

LIVING THE DREAM. ALL RIGHT.

LESS LAND TO DEVELOP.

APPOINTED THE ANIMAL COMMITTEE.

YES, THAT'S OKAY.

THAT'S NOT US. OH, IT'S NOT US.

IS ITEM 29, A SCHEDULE OF FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS OR ANYTHING?

[29. Schedule of future discussion items.]

[00:50:04]

YES. SO FOLLOWING UP ON THE DISCUSSION REGARDING THE COMMISSIONER'S ACCESS TO THE CITY'S ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW SYSTEM SO THAT YOU ALL HAVE ACCESS TO APPROVED PLANS.

I HAVE WORKED WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUSINESS ANALYST, AS WELL AS I.T.

TO FIGURE OUT WHETHER OR NOT THAT IS FEASIBLE.

AND IT IS A FAIRLY SIMPLE PROCESS.

SO LATER THIS WEEK YOU ALL SHOULD RECEIVE AN EMAIL INSTRUCTING YOU ALL ON HOW TO SET UP AN ACCOUNT.

SO ONCE YOU GET THAT EMAIL, PLEASE GO AHEAD AND GO INTO THE SYSTEM, SET UP THE ACCOUNT.

PLEASE REACH OUT TO STAFF IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

AND THEN AFTER THE REGULAR NOVEMBER 8TH MEETING, WE WILL HAVE A SHORT WORK SESSION AFTERWARDS TO KIND OF GO OVER SOME OF THE GENERAL TOOLS AND KIND OF GIVE YOU A QUICK TUTORIAL ON HOW TO USE THAT SYSTEM FOR YOUR NEEDS. IS THAT THROUGH THE GIS PORTAL OR IS IT A..

NO, IT'S A SEPARATE SOFTWARE EVOLVE SOFTWARE THAT THE CITY HAS.

SO THIS WOULD GIVE US ACCESS TO PLANS IN THE PAST.

LIKE IT'S A HISTORY DATABASE.

YES. SO THE CITY PLANNING HAS HAD THIS FOR..

2018, MONTHS NOW.

21, YEAH SO THAT'S GOING TO GIVE YOU ACCESS TO EVERYTHING IN THE SYSTEM.

IT'S NOT GOING TO..

IT'S NOT GOING TO ALLOW YOU..

WHAT WE NORMALLY GET IN THE FRIDAY PACKAGES.

CORRECT. YEAH. EVERYTHING IN THE FRIDAY PACKET YOU KNOW, IS WHAT'S ON FOR APPROVAL THIS EVENING.

THAT'S WHAT'S MOST IMPORTANT.

THIS IS REALLY YOU KNOW A LOT OF TIMES WHEN YOU ALL GET A STAFF REPORT IN FRONT OF YOU, IT SAYS THIS REPLAT CONFORMS TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 21, WHATEVER THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED ON JUNE 8TH.

I KNOW SOME OF YOU ALL HAVE VOICED THE DESIRE TO BE ABLE TO FIGURE OUT WHAT DOES PSP 21 LOOK LIKE.

THIS WOULD GIVE YOU THAT ACCESS.

IT'S EXCITING TO HAVE ACCESS TO THAT.

DOES THAT MEAN ANY CHANCE WE CAN HAVE ACCESS TO YOUR HAIRSTYLIST? NO. SORRY ABOUT THAT, WE TRIED.

YOU TRIED? WELL, WITH THAT BEING SHUT DOWN, I GUESS WE'LL END IT WITH DO YOU HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? SO MOVED.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONE.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

WE ARE OFFICIALLY ADJOURNED.

PASSES FIVE ZERO.

THANK YOU. 7:22 TIME IS 722.

THANK YOU. AND A ROUND OF APPLAUSE FOR OUR NEW CHAIRMAN.

OH, WELL DONE.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.