Jun 28, 2022 Frisco - Planning and Zoning Commission

[00:00:01]

GOOD EVENING. WELCOME TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

[CALL TO ORDER]

THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY CITY COUNCIL.

TONIGHT, COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE COMMISSIONER KENDALL.

COMMISSIONER PETRAS.

COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

COMMISSIONER KELLY. I'M SERVING AS THE CHAIRMAN TONIGHT.

REPRESENTING STAFF FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.

JOHN LETTELLEIR.

STEPHANIE SCOTT SIMMS. SUZANNE PORTER.

CINDY JACKSON.

MATTHEW BARRERA.

LAURIE CROSS. JENNIFER MORGAN.

ENGINEERING. JASON GRIMM.

AND EDUARDO TORRES.

AND FROM FIRE, WE HAVE JOHN GILLETTE AND ALISSA BARSTOW.

AND OUR LEGAL COUNSEL TONIGHT IS PRESIDENT RYAN PITTMAN.

ANYONE I MISSED? THANK YOU. THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS CITIZEN INPUT.

IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEM THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME.

PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS.

PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED, SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE.

PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR ANY APPLICANTS PRESENT THIS EVENING.

TO ENSURE THERE IS ENOUGH TIME TO SPEAK, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF 5 MINUTES UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR IN WHICH TIME YOU HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 10 MINUTES.

PLEASE NOTE THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT OR ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA, EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK DURING CITIZEN INPUT?

[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

COMMISSIONERS THAT ARE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OR MAY HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 14TH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMITTEE APPROVED BY OR VOTED BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER PETRAS.

ALL IN FAVOR, NAYS, A MOTION CARRIES.

[CONSENT AGENDA]

THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS. ANY COMMISSION MEMBER MAKING SUCH A REQUEST PRIOR TO A MOTION AND VOTE ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER THEM INDIVIDUALLY.

ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH A MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION.

WE HAVE TONIGHT ITEMS THREE THROUGH 22.

ARE THERE ANY THAT NEED TO BE PULLED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION? COMMISSIONERS. ITEM 20.

OKAY, WE'LL PULL ITEM 20.

ANYTHING ELSE. OKAY.

ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THE REMAIN ON THE ITEMS NOT PULLED.

MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS THREE THROUGH 19 AND 21 AND 22 ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND.

SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR.

AYE. ANY NAYS. THAT MOTION CARRIES ON ITEM 20.

[20. Opens Space Plan & Site Plan: Teel Crossing Shopping Center II, Block A, Lot 2 (OS22-0058 & SP22-0031)]

WE HAVE A WE HAVE A DISCUSSION.

JUST A CORRECTION.

OH, I WOULD.

OH ON THE STAFF REPORT.

BRIAN SAID WE DIDN'T NEED TO DO IT.

OH, WE DON'T DO IT. NO, I APOLOGIZE.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

WE JUST HAD A TYPO ON ONE THING THERE, SO I THINK WE'RE OKAY.

SO WE'LL GO BACK AND ASK FOR.

CAN I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 20.

MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 20 AS SUBMITTED.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND.

ALL RIGHT. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

NAYS. THAT MOTION CARRIES.

NOW WE'LL MOVE. JUST ONE THING I DO WANT TO MENTION.

SO, JENNIFER, ALL THESE HAVE BEEN REGISTERED AS 4 TO 0.

YES. AM I SUPPOSED TO VOTE? YES. YOU ARE VOTING.

[00:05:02]

[23. Open Space Plan & Site Plan: Frisco Original Donation, Block 10, Lot 12 (OS21-0140 & SP21-0139)]

TONIGHT WE HAVE ONE.

TWO. WE HAVE THREE PUBLIC HEARINGS AND THREE OR TWO OTHER ITEMS, REGULAR ITEMS. I WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARINGS.

EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PRECEDED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST.

THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED 10 MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND THE APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION.

THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.

ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER'S CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT.

IF THERE ARE ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT A REPRESENTATIVE TO PRESENT YOUR POSITIONS.

PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS.

THE TIME LIMIT IS 5 MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS HAD A CHANCE TO SPEAK.

THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME IF A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO SPEAK.

PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.

REPEAT APPEARANCES AT THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED.

AFTER ALL, PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE.

AND THE COMMISSION CONCLUDES IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO A FUTURE MEETING.

AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT.

PLEASE NOTE THE PLANNING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A COMMISSION, ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES UNLESS THE COMMISSION DENIES THE CASE AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL TO THE DENIAL.

FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AS TO WHEN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY CITY COUNCIL.

SO MOVING ON, AGENDA ITEM 23.

GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS.

THIS IS FOR FRISCO ORIGINAL DONATION BLOCK TEN, LOT 12, AND THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED THESE PROJECTS ON MAY 16TH AND RECEIVED A 30 DAY EXTENSION BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON THE 14TH.

WE ARE CONTINUING TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT TO RESOLVE THE OUTSTANDING ISSUES THAT ARE LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT.

HOWEVER, AT THIS TIME WE HAVE TO RECOMMEND DISAPPROVAL AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME, PLEASE LET ME KNOW.

COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS? THIS ISN'T A PUBLIC HEARING. NO, IT'S NOT A PUBLIC HEARING.

JUST MAKE A MOTION ON THE RECOMMENDATION.

I MAKE A MOTION TO DISAPPROVE ITEM 23 FOR THE REASONS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND DELEGATE THE STAFF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT FOR THE REASONS FOR THE DISAPPROVAL.

BEEN MOVED BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. AYE.

OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES FOUR ZERO.

[24. Open Space Plan & Preliminary Site Plan: The Link Mixed Use Urban, Phase 1, Blk A, Lot 1 (OS22-0044 & PSP22-0029)]

GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS.

THIS ITEM WAS SUBMITTED ON MAY 16 AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED A 30 DAY EXTENSION ON JUNE 14.

THE APPLICANT HAS NOT YET SATISFIED ALL OUTSTANDING REVIEW COMMENTS.

STAFF IS CONTINUING TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT.

HOWEVER, AT THIS TIME WE ARE RECOMMENDING DISAPPROVAL DUE TO THE REASONS IN THE STAFF REPORT.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I'D ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON ITEM 24.

MOVE TO DISAPPROVE ITEM 24 FOR THE REASONS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF REPORT.

DELEGATE TO STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT OF THE REASONS FOR DISAPPROVAL.

SECOND.

HAS BEEN MOVED BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PETRAS.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

AYE. NAY.

MOTION CARRIES 4-0.

[25. Public Hearing - Replat: Gateway Church, Block A, Lot 1 (RP22-0020)]

THIS ITEM WAS SUBMITTED ON MAY 31ST, 2022.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A 30 DAY EXTENSION AND IS REQUESTING TO PLACE THIS ITEM ON THE JULY 26, 2022 MEETING AGENDA. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? IS THERE A MOTION? THIS WAS A PUBLIC HEARING, RIGHT?

[00:10:03]

OH, IT IS? YEAH. SO I MOVE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

OH, SORRY. THAT'S BEEN MOVED BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PETRAS.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

AYE. W ARE NOW IN PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM.

SEEING NONE, I'D MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? IT'S BEEN MOVED BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PETRAS.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

AYE. MOTION CARRIES FOUR ZERO.

WE'RE NOW OUT OF PUBLIC HEARING.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ONE COMMISSION? ANY DISCUSSION? MAY I HAVE A MOTION. IF I COULD INTERJECT THIS, THE RECOMMENDATION SHOULD BE TO TABLE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONTINUE THE PROJECT TO THE JULY 26, 2022 MEETING.

JULY 22.

SAYS IN THE MEETING 26 IN THE STAFF REPORT 26TH.

SORRY. PROCEDURALLY.

SO WE HAVE TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? YES. OKAY.

THE MOVE TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING.

THE PUBLIC HEARING. IT'S BEEN MOVED BY COMMISSIONER PETRAS.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. AYE.

WE'RE NOW BACK IN PUBLIC HEARING.

SO THE MOTION IS TO TABLE AND TO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING.

TO THE JULY 26 OR 26.

WHICH ONE IS IT? 20.

PARDON ME? 26. 26.

SO I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE THE 30 DAY EXTENSION TABLE, THIS ITEM TO THE JULY 26 MEETING, AND CONTINUE TO THE PUBLIC.

AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IT'S BEEN MOVED BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. AYE.

MOTION CARRIES FOUR ZERO.

THANK YOU. I GET THIS RIGHT.

I NEED YOUR HELP, JOHN.

COME ON. I'LL MAKE A NOTE.

[26. Public Hearing – Zoning: Frisco Flyers Addition, Block A, Lot 5 (Z22-0012)]

MAKE A NOTE OF WHAT? [LAUGHTER] WE'LL HAVE A CLASS AFTER YOUR REVIEW.

MY ANNUAL REVIEW. I'LL GET.

COMMISSIONERS, THIS ITEM IS A ZONING REQUEST FOR FRISCO FLYERS ADDITION BLOCK A LOT FIVE.

AND IN 2013 THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY IN THIS PROPERTY WERE RE ZONED AS IT HAS BEEN LOTTED OUT.

THIS PROPERTY ENDED UP WITH INDUSTRIAL ZONING TO THE EAST AND COMMERCIAL ONE ZONING TO THE WEST.

THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AGAIN ARE CONSISTENT WITH THAT INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL ONE AND PER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THIS IS LOCATED IN AN INDUSTRIAL PARK AREA. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THE ENTIRE PROPERTY TO INDUSTRIAL AND STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THIS REQUEST.

I HAVE DETAILED OUT IN THE STAFF REPORT DIFFERENT ITEMS REGARDING THE VOLUNTARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHICH THE APPLICANT HAS SIGNED AND WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ABOUT THIS ITEM.

SO WE ARE IN FAVOR AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL.

AND IF YOU SHOULD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME, I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER THOSE.

COMMISSIONERS, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS? IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? OKAY. GO AHEAD. WE'LL TAKE A MOTION FOR.

MOVE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IT'S BEEN MOVED BY COMMISSIONER PETRAS TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. ATE.

WE'RE NOW IN PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE, I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IT'S BEEN MOVED BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SEOCND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PETRAS.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. AYE.

WE'RE NOW OUT OF PUBLIC HEARING.

COMMISSIONERS, ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS OR ANY DISCUSSION OR A MOTION? I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 26 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

BEEN MOVED BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

AYES. NAYS THE MOTION CARRIES FOUR ZERO.

[27. Public Hearing - Zoning: Planned Development-280 (Z22-0013)]

OKAY. ITEM NUMBER 27.

I'M ON PRESENT FROM UP HERE.

JONATHAN WENT HOME SICK EARLIER TODAY.

SO ON THIS PARTICULAR ZONING CASE, THIS IS KNOWN AS THE FIELD'S PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.

SO THIS WAS CREATED BACK IN APRIL OF 2020.

AND SO THERE ARE SEVERAL CHANGES BEING RECOMMENDED HERE.

AND JUST WANT TO REMIND THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CALLED A PUBLIC HEARING TO OPEN THE PD BACK IN APRIL.

[00:15:03]

THEY WANT TO BE ABLE TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 10 TO 5 FEET, PROVIDED THAT YOU CAN HAVE DRAINAGE GOING WITH FRONT AND BACK INSTEAD OF EVERYTHING GOING TO THE FRONT, IT'S SPLIT.

SO JUST THINK OF AN ALLEY SERVED LOT.

THAT'S TYPICAL, BUT THAT'S SOMETHING THEY'LL TAKE A LOOK AT AS THEY COME IN FOR DEVELOPMENT.

BUT THAT WOULD BE THE CONDITION THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO DO.

AND THIS IS SIMILAR TO SEVERAL OTHER RESIDENTIAL PRODUCT TYPES WITHIN THE PD.

THE OTHER ONE IS WITH PARKS.

THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED THE GATED COMMUNITY FOR THE PRESERVE IN THE ZONING EXHIBIT FOR THE PRESERVE, IT SHOWED A PUBLIC PARK IN THE MIDDLE OF IT, OBVIOUSLY, SINCE AS A GATED SUBDIVISION, IT'S EXCLUSIVE.

SO YOU CAN'T PUT A PUBLIC PARK.

AND SO ALLOWING THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVE THE [INAUDIBLE] AND THE [INAUDIBLE] WITHOUT A PARK.

SO THE CHANGE HERE RECOGNIZES THAT THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE A PARK IN THE PRESERVE.

SO THE EXHIBIT HAS BEEN UPDATED FOR THAT AND OTHER CHANGES ABOUT DISTANCES TO OPEN SPACE ALLOW PARK TO COUNT TOWARDS THE OPEN SPACE.

BUT I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR, IT'S NOT REDUCING OPEN SPACE AND IT'S NOT REDUCING THE PARK LANE.

IT JUST SAID LIKE IF YOU HAD A PARK WITHIN THAT 2600 FEET, THAT'S MEETING THE INTENT OF PROVIDING SOME TYPE OF OPEN SPACE WITHIN THAT DISTANCE.

BUT IT'S NOT CHANGING OR REDUCING THE OPEN SPACE OR THE PARK.

THE OTHER THING IS ON ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, YOU'LL RECALL THAT WE HAD A DISTANCE REQUIREMENT THAT WAS IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE.

AND WHAT WE'VE DONE WITHIN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS IS RECOGNIZE THAT THERE WOULD BE AN EXCEPTION.

BUT NOW, SINCE COUNCIL AMENDED THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO REALLY STRIP ALL THE DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS AWAY FROM THIS, IS ADJUSTING THAT AND MAKING ANOTHER A COUPLE OF CHANGES IN IT AS IT RELATES TO ALCOHOL.

THE OTHER THING IS SIGNAGE.

THEY'RE REQUESTING THREE OTHER TYPE OF SIGNS OF BEING INCLUDED IN PD.

THAT IS NOT IN THE SIGNED ORDINANCE THAT COUNCIL RECENTLY APPROVED [INAUDIBLE] SIGNS, ELECTRONIC CHANGEABLE WALL SIGNS AND SUPER GRAPHIC WALL SIGNS.

THERE'S EXAMPLES WITHIN THE PACKET TO SHOW WHAT THEY'RE REFERRING TO.

STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE.

SUPPORTIVE OF THAT.

THE LAST CHANGE HAS TO DO WITH VERBAL CROSS-SECTIONS FOR THE STREET.

IT'S ALREADY STATED IN THERE THAT CAN VARY, BUT THEY WOULD LIKE TO INCLUDE EXHIBITS THAT TALKS ABOUT IT'S ONLY THE PAVEMENT OF THE STREET THAT BEARS EVERYTHING ELSE STAYS THE SAME. THE DISTANCE FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB TO THE BUILDING REMAINS UNCHANGED.

THE THING IN SOME CASES THEY MIGHT HAVE A WIDER STREET THAN ORIGINALLY ANTICIPATED AND LORI HAD PASSED OUT.

EXAMPLES. THIS WAS ALL RESOLVED TODAY.

JONATHAN WORKING WITH TODD WATSON.

SO WITH THAT SAID, THOSE ARE THE CHANGES BEING RECOMMENDED IN THE PD.

AND AS WE DO WITH ANY PD AMENDMENT, IT'S REPEAL AND REPLACE.

SO STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL OF THOSE CHANGES.

EVERYTHING ELSE REMAINS THE SAME.

MY COMMENT WAS THAT THE PD THIS SIZE YOU WOULD EXPECT THAT THERE WOULD BE CHANGES AS TIME GOES AND THIS IS TWO YEARS.

SO THESE ARE REVISIONS THAT ARE NECESSARY AND IN LINE WITH WHAT WE APPROVED BEFORE.

AND ONE THING I WOULD COMMENT ON THE SIGNS WHEN WE STARTED WORKING ON THE SIGN ORDINANCE, THEY PROVIDED US A LIST OF WHAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO DO.

WE TOOK THAT UNDER ADVISEMENT WHILE ALSO SORT OF SEVERAL OF THEIR DEVELOPMENTS TO GET IDEAS THAT WE USE TO INCORPORATE IN THE SIGN ORDINANCE.

BUT THERE WAS ADDITIONAL SIGNS THAT, LIKE THE THREE THAT'S IN HERE, BE SPECIFIC TO THE FIELDS.

IS THE APPLICANT HERE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS, TODD WATSON.

I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY OTHER THAN I'LL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE FROM ANY OF THE SIX ITEMS THAT ARE BEING AMENDED.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? IF WE HAVE YOU HERE, MIGHT AS WELL ASK.

AND SPEAKING OF SIGNS, HOW HAVE YOUR SIGNS BEEN RECEIVED GOING UP AND DOWN THE TOLL INTERNALLY? VERY WELL, COMMISSIONER KENDALL.

WE GET A LOT OF COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS AS THEY WERE UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND NOW EVEN MORE OBVIOUSLY AS THEY'RE FINISHED.

SO THEY'VE BEEN VERY WELL RECEIVED BY THE COMMUNITY AND SURROUNDING CITIZENS.

[00:20:06]

MOVE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

MOVED BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PETRAS.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

AYE. WE'RE NOW IN PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYONE HERE SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? AND THEN WE'LL MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IT'S BEEN MOVED BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN TO CLOSE.

COMMISSIONER PETRAS TO SECOND.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. AYE.

THAT MOTION CARRIES FOUR ZERO.

WE'RE NOW OUT OF PUBLIC HEARING.

COMMISSIONERS, IF THERE'S ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS OR A MOTION.

I THINK IT WAS PRETTY DETAILED, LAID OUT AND APPRECIATE STAFF'S TIME AND THE APPLICANT.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION FOR ITEM 27 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS BY STAFF.

IT'S BEEN MOVED BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL FOR APPROVAL.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PETRAS.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

AYE. THOSE AGAINST.

THE MOTION CARRIES FOUR ZERO.

CONGRATULATIONS. THANK YOU.

AND I WOULD JUST SAY AGAIN THAT I WOULD EXPECT THAT A PD OF THIS SIZE WOULD REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS NOW AND AGAIN AS WE MOVE FORWARD WITH A MULTIPLE YEAR PROJECT, PROBABLY TEN OR 15 YEAR PROJECT.

SO. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM 28, THE RESULTS OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

[28. Results of the June 21, 2022, City Council meeting.]

BUT THAT WAS ON AND THE CITY COUNCIL WAS PLEASED WITH THE OUTCOME P&Z DID A GOOD JOB VETTING THAT.

AND SO THE ORDINANCE WILL BE ON THE AUGUST 2ND CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

SO IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ON ANYTHING ELSE.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO.

[29. Schedule of future discussion items.]

I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING AT THIS POINT.

BUT I PROBABLY WILL IN AUGUST IF YOU DON'T HAVE ANY.

I'LL JUST WAIT AND SEE IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE.

OTHERWISE WANT TO MAKE AN INTRODUCTION.

WELL, WE ONLY HAVE ONE OTHER ITEM.

IT'S NOT ON HERE, BUT I KNOW WHAT IT IS.

SO GO AHEAD. YOU WANT TO STEP UP? SO STEPHANIE SCOTT SIMMS SHE STARTED WITH US MONDAY OF JUNE 20TH.

SO SHE COMES FROM MICHIGAN AND GRADUATED FROM MICHIGAN STATE.

DEEP BLUE, OR ARE YOU A SPARTAN? THAT'S GREEN. SHE MOVED HERE FROM MICHIGAN IN THE WEEK WE HAD 105 DEGREE TEMPERATURE.

A LARRY BIRD. WELCOME TO TEXAS.

IT'S LUCK, GOD, IT GETS BETTER AFTER THIS.

IT DOES COME MID-SEPTEMBER.

BUT SO SHE IS THE PLANNING MANAGER AND SO DIVIDED THE PLANNING DIVISION BACK INTO TWO.

I HAD THEM TWO ORIGINALLY.

SO STEPHANIE IS HEADING UP THE CURRENT PLANNING SO PLAN REVIEW.

SO SHE'S THE PLANNING MANAGER AND THEN JONATHAN'S IS OVER LONG RANGE PLANNING AND ZONING CASES.

SO WELCOME, WELCOME, WELCOME, WELCOME.

WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU.

YOU GOT ANY QUESTIONS FOR HER? SHE'LL PROBABLY HATE ME IN THE MORNING.

MY QUESTION WOULD BE IF YOU HATE MICHIGAN OR OHIO STATE MORE? BLUE DOESN'T LIKE THE MOM.

ALL RIGHT. WELL, COMMISSIONERS, ONE OTHER ITEM ON THE AGENDA.

I HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN.

MOVE TO ADJOURN SECOND.

IT'S BEEN MOVED BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN AND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PETRAS TO ADJOURN.

WE ARE ADJOURNED.

WELL, LET'S VOTE ON IT.

IN FAVOR. AYE.

PASSES FOUR ZERO.

WE ARE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.