[00:00:01] GOOD EVENING, WELCOME TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. [CALL TO ORDER] WE ARE GATHERED HERE TODAY AT 6101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD AND THE TIME IS 6:31 P.M.. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. TONIGHT, COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE REPRESENTING STAFF--I'M GOING TO NEED GLASSES EVENTUALLY ON THIS ONE. REPRESENTING STAFF, DID I MISS ANYONE? GREAT. THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS CITIZEN INPUT. IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT ANY TIME. PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM. THE BLUE SPEAKER CARDS ARE THERE ON YOUR LEFT. PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED, SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE. PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR ANY APPLICANTS PRESENT THIS EVENING. TO ENSURE THERE'S ENOUGH TIME FOR ALL TO SPEAK, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF 5 MINUTES UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH CASE YOU HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 10 MINUTES. PLEASE NOTE THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT OR ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA, EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK DURING CITIZEN INPUT? FOR THE RECORD, I SEE NONE. SO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA, COMMISSIONERS, IS APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. [APPROVAL OF MINUTES] IN THE PACKET, I HAVE THE MINUTES FROM THE MAY 24TH REGULAR MEETING. ANY QUESTIONS OR CHANGES FOR THE MINUTES? IF NOT, CAN I HAVE A MOTION? MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE MAY 24TH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING? I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM MORGAN. SECOND. SECOND, FROM CONE. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. NEXT IS THE CONSENT AGENDA. [CONSENT AGENDA] THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS. ANY COMMISSION MEMBER MAKING SUCH REQUESTS PRIOR TO A MOTION AND VOTE ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER AN ITEM INDIVIDUALLY. ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH A MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION. TONIGHT, WE HAVE ITEMS TWO THROUGH 16. ARE THERE ANY THAT NEED TO BE PULLED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION? IF NOT, CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE? MOVE TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS TWO THROUGH 16 AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG. SECOND. SECOND, COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. YOU ALRIGHT THERE? I HAD A SMOOTHIE; IT'S STILL GOING DOWN. A LITTLE TOO MUCH INFORMATION. YES. TONIGHT WE HAVE FOUR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA AND ONE NON-PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REGULAR AGENDA. I'D LIKE TO REVIEW THE PROCESS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARINGS. EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PRECEDED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST. THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED 10 MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION. FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER'S CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT. IF THERE ARE ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITION. PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS. THE TIME LIMIT IS 5 MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK. THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME IF A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO SPEAK. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU HAVE ONLY ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED. [00:05:01] AFTER ALL, PERSONS HAVE GIVEN THE HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE, AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES, IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO A FUTURE MEETING. AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT. PLEASE NOTE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES. UNLESS THE COMMISSION DENIES THE CASE AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL THE DENIAL. FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AS TO WHEN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. SO TONIGHT, ITEM 17 OPEN SPACE PLAN AND PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN BEST BRAINS ADDITION BLOCK A LOTS ONE AND TWO OS [17. Open Space Plan & Preliminary Site Plan: Best Brains Addition, Block A, Lots 1 & 2 (OS22-0040 & PSP22-0025)] 22-0040 AND PSP 22-0025 OWNER RS COIT LEXINGTON FIVE LLC. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS. THESE PROJECTS WERE SUBMITTED ON APRIL 25TH AND THE APPLICANT HAD REQUESTED FOR AN EXTENSION WHICH WAS GRANTED ON MAY 24TH. IN REVIEWING THE REVISED PLANS, THEY STILL FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE ITEMS THAT ARE LISTED IN YOUR STAFF REPORT. THEREFORE, WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT YOU DISAPPROVE THESE CASES FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT. THANKS FOR THAT. IS THE APPLICANT STILL WORKING WITH STAFF ON THESE ITEMS? I HAVE NOT HEARD FROM THE APPLICANT IN A BIT, BUT WE'VE GONE THIS FAR, SO I'M SURE THAT I WILL BE IN TOUCH WITH THEM. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING. CAN I HAVE A MOTION? I MOVE TO DISAPPROVE ITEM 17 FOR THE REASONS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND DELEGATE TO THE STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT FOR THE REASONS FOR THE DISAPPROVAL OF A MOTION TO DISAPPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER KENDALL. SECOND. SECOND, COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. ITEM 17 IS DISAPPROVED AS STATED. ITEM 18 PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT LIBERTY CROSSING BLOCK A LOT 16 RP 22-0015 OWNER DINESH CHILAMAKURI AND SRI SOMESWARI KOLLI [18. Public Hearing - Replat: Liberty Crossing, Block A, Lot 16 (RP22-0015)] . THANK YOU. SORRY, IF I BUTCHERED THAT, IF YOU'RE LISTENING OR IN THE AUDIENCE. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT IS TO ABANDON THE FIVE FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT AND A PORTION OF THE TWO FOOT SIDEWALK EASEMENT ALONG KIPS BAY. ENGINEERING SERVICES HAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED THE PROPOSED CHANGES, AND THIS IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS EVENING. IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY LIKE TO SPEAK? I DON'T SEE THE APPLICANT. COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. MOVE TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FROM MORGAN. SECOND. SECOND FROM PETRAS. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. THAT WAS YOUR FIRST RESPONSE TO A MOTION. I WAS GOING TO TAKE THAT OPPORTUNITY TO WELCOME YOU TO THE COMMISSION. OH, THANK YOU. YES, THANK YOU. WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST AN ITEM? SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONER COLBERG SECOND COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF OR CAN I HAVE A MOTION? MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 18 AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF SESSION. COMMISSIONER MORGAN. SECOND, COMMISSIONER PETRAS. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. ITEM 18 IS APPROVED. ITEM 19, PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT, FRISCO CROSSING II ADDITION BLOCK A LOT 11A AND 11B RP22-0019 [19. Public Hearing - Replat: Frisco Crossing II Addition, Block A, Lot 11A & 11B (RP22-0019)] OWNER: FRISCO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT. THANK YOU. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT IS TO DEDICATE RIGHT OF WAY FOR [INAUDIBLE] LANE AND NEW EASEMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PUBLIC SCHOOL. ENGINEERING SERVICES HAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED THE PROPOSED CHANGES, AND THIS ITEM IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS EVENING. THE APPLICANT HERE, WOULD THEY LIKE TO SPEAK? STATED THAT HE'S JUST HERE FOR QUESTIONS, AND WOULD NOT LIKE TO SPEAK. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. CAN I HAVE A MOTION? MOVE TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONER MORGAN. SECOND. SECOND. COMMISSIONER CONE. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? [00:10:01] SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING, COMMISSIONER KENDALL. SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER COLBERG. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS OR ITEMS TO DISCUSS? IF NOT, CAN I HAVE A MOTION? MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 19 AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF. I HAVE A MOTION APPROVED FROM MORGEN SECOND FROM PETRAS. ALL IN FAVOR. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. ITEM 19 IS APPROVED. KENDALL, YOU ALWAYS SAY CONGRATULATIONS. CONGRATULATIONS. SCHOOL DISTRICT. THANK YOU. ITEM 20 PUBLIC HEARING ZONING, BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE HEALTH Z 20 20002 [20. Public Hearing - Zoning: Baylor Scott & White Health (Z22-0002)] OWNER BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE HEALTH. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY SHOWN HERE FROM RETAIL AND INDUSTRIAL TO OFFICE TWO. PER THE ZONING ORDINANCE OFFICE TWO, ZONING IS TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE VICINITY OF A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE SUCH AS STATE HIGHWAY 121 US 380 PRESTON ROAD, OR THE DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY. OFFICE TWO ZONING IS APPROPRIATE FOR THIS PROPERTY DUE TO ITS LOCATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY AND PGA PARKWAY. THIS REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE NON RESIDENTIAL ZONING TO THE EAST AND THE SOUTH, AS WELL AS THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION OF BUSINESS PARK ON THIS PROPERTY. THIS PROJECT IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS EVENING AS OFFICE TO AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. ANY QUESTIONS? IS THE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT THAT'S REQUIRED TO THE SOUTH HAS IT BEEN ACQUIRED. I MEAN, OFFSITE EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED AND I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT HAS BEEN ACQUIRED AT THIS TIME. NO. QUESTIONS? IS THE APPLICANT HERE, AND WOULD THEY LIKE TO SPEAK THIS EVENING? WE'RE HERE JUST TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. LET THE RECORD SHOW HERE. JUST ANSWER QUESTIONS. WHY ARE YOU LAUGHING? THERE'S SIX GUYS IN SUITS UP THERE. ANY QUESTIONS OR THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. MOVE TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. I'VE MENTIONED OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FROM MORGAN SECOND FROM PETRAS. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. WE CAN WAIT JUST A MOMENT BEFORE WE CALL THAT MOTION, GIVE PEOPLE A CHANCE TO WALK UP. OH, I SAW [CHUCKLING]. I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MAY I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. SECOND FROM PETRAS. THE MOTION WAS ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. ANY QUESTIONS ON ITEM 20? JUST A COMMENT, AND I KNOW CITY STAFF ARE WELL AWARE, I KNOW OF FOUR OR FIVE DIFFERENT PROJECTS HAVE BEEN PRESENTED ON THE SITE BEFORE AND IT'S GOOD TO SEE THE CITY HOLD OUT FOR SOMETHING LIKE A GREAT HOSPITAL THAT'S COMING HERE. SO I THINK THIS IS A GREAT USE FOR THIS LOCATION AND I APPRECIATE CITY STAFF HOLDING OUT. I KNOW THERE'S BEEN SOME LESSER POSSIBILITIES ON THIS SITE AND I THINK THIS IS A GREAT LOCATION AND GLAD TO HAVE THEM HERE. AGREE AND IT MATCHES THE AREAS AS STAFF WENT THROUGH AS WELL, WITH INDUSTRIAL TO THE EAST, COMMERCIAL TO THE SOUTH, ETC.. I HAD ONE COMMENT. JUST ADD ABOUT WHAT A GREAT SITE THIS IS THAT I WAS TALKING TO THE PEOPLE FROM BAYLOR, SCOTT AND WHITE EARLIER TONIGHT ABOUT HOW IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT THE TOLL ROAD. IT'S A GREAT AREA BECAUSE YOU GOT THE TOLL ROAD, YOU'VE GOT THE RAIL CORRIDOR AND THE TRAIL NEXT TO THE RAIL CORRIDOR. SO IT'S LIKE THREE SUPER TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS THROUGH FRISCO THAT WOULD BE ABLE TO GET YOU EASILY FROM DOWNTOWN FRISCO TO DOWNTOWN PROSPER USING HIKE AND BIKE TRAILS. SO I THINK HAVING A HOSPITAL MEDICAL COMPLEX THERE IS A GREAT USE FOR THAT GREAT AREA, AND I WOULD SAY THE LACK OF COMMENTS IS THE THOROUGHNESS OF THE STAFF REPORT AND VERY THOROUGH AND AS WELL AS GOOD USE OF THE LAND EXCITED FOR THIS TO COME HOPEFULLY TO OUR CITY. I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 20 AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF. MOTION TO APPROVE FROM MORGAN. SECOND FROM PETRAS. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. [00:15:01] CONGRATULATIONS. CONGRATULATIONS. ITEM 21 PUBLIC HEARING THE ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 272 Z22-0003 MULTIPLE OWNERS. [21. Public Hearing - Zoning: Planned Development-272 (Z22-0003)] THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. SO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO 72 WAS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED IN 2012 AND ALLOWED A MAXIMUM OF 4000 URBAN LIVING UNITS TO BE ALLOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF PGA PARKWAY. SO TO SET IT UP, JUST WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT IS ORIGINAL PD 272 WAS ALL OF THE PROPERTY YOU'RE SEEING HERE IN YELLOW, BUT THEN IT DID EXTEND SOUTH OF PGA PARKWAY. SO IN 2018, THE PROPERTY WAS RE-ZONED TO ESTABLISH TWO SEPARATE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS, ONE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PGA PARKWAY, ONE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PGA PARKWAY, AND TO ALLOCATE THE 4000 UNITS BETWEEN THE TWO SEPARATE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS. SO THE PROPERTY THAT YOU SEE IN YELLOW TODAY ALLOWS A MAXIMUM OF 2210 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, AND WE'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THAT IN A MINUTE. SO AS COMMON WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS OLDER THAN TEN YEARS AND MARKET CHANGES, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO AMEND THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ADOPT NEW DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO ACCOMMODATE A REDESIGNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, AND WHEN I TALK ABOUT A PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE AREA IN YELLOW, LEAVING OUT THE AREA IN RED. SO THE AREA IN RED, THE APPLICANT HAS ATTEMPTED TO WORK WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER FOR THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY SOUTH OF PARVIN BRANCH IN ORDER TO INCLUDE THAT PROPERTY WITHIN THE OVERALL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. HOWEVER, THAT PROPERTY OWNER REQUESTED RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON THIS RED PIECE HERE, WHICH WAS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE APPLICANT OR STAFF. THEREFORE, THAT PROPERTY OWNER DECLINED TO EXECUTE THE LANDOWNER AUTHORIZATION FORM. SO THE RED PIECE HERE WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND ZONED STRAIGHT OFFICE TWO. SO EVERYTHING IN YELLOW IS THE NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ASIDE FROM WHAT YOU SEE HERE IN RED GOING STRAIGHT OFFICE TWO. SO WITH ANY MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS, THERE'S A FEW THINGS WE TALK ABOUT. FIRST BEING RESIDENTIAL. SO THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A MIXTURE OF HIGH RISE, RESIDENTIAL, MID-RISE RESIDENTIAL, URBAN FLATS AND TOWNHOME UNITS, EACH OF THOSE BEING DEFINED IN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THE HIGH RISE, MID-RISE AND URBAN FLAT RESIDENTIAL WILL BE OF TYPE ONE OR TYPE TWO CONSTRUCTION THAT BEING CONCRETE AND STEEL AND THE TOWNHOMES WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE ON INDIVIDUALLY PLATTED LOTS. ALL OF THESE VARIOUS RESIDENTIAL PRODUCT TYPES ARE ALLOWED IN THE SUB-DISTRICTS, AS NOTED IN EXHIBIT D OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. ONE IMPORTANT THING TO NOTE, AND I HAVE AN EXHIBIT THAT I CAN PULL UP IN A LITTLE BIT THE FRISCO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DOES OWN PROPERTY WITHIN THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, SO ANY RESIDENTIAL ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE EDC WILL BE ALLOWED UPON APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT, NOT ALLOWED BY RIGHT. SO PER CITY COUNCIL'S POLICY FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS, THAT'S THE 55 UNITS TO THE ACRE BASED ON THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION. THIS PROPERTY BEING A SUBURBAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER, THAT BEING 25% RESIDENTIAL, 75% NON RESIDENTIAL. THE APPLICANT COULD HAVE ASKED FOR 3154 RESIDENTIAL UNITS. HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT IS HONORING THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS THAT ARE ALLOWED UNDER THE PD TODAY AND IS PROPOSING A MAXIMUM OF 2200 UNITS OF THOSE PRODUCT TYPES THAT I MENTIONED A SECOND AGO. SO MOVING ON TO PHASING THE APPLICANT OF THOSE 2200 UNITS, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING 1400 RESIDENTIAL UNITS BE PERMITTED IN PHASE ONE, SUBJECT TO 650,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS AND ALL OF THE OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS TO PARVIN BRANCH, THAT BEING ALL OF THE OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS IN THIS AREA. THERE ARE DETAILED EXHIBITS WITHIN THE PD THAT TIE DOWN WHAT ALL THAT ENTAILS. THE REMAINING RESIDENTIAL UNITS WILL BE EARNED THROUGH A SERIES OF EARN UPS, ONE RESIDENTIAL UNIT FOR EACH 1000 SQUARE FEET OF CLASS A OFFICE AND [00:20:02] ONE RESIDENTIAL UNIT FOR EACH 1000 SQUARE FEET OF UPSCALE RETAIL AND UPSCALE HOSPITALITY. ALL OF THOSE TERMS ARE DEFINED AND THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOOKING AT OPEN SPACE PARKS AND TRAILS, MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. CITY COUNCIL POLICY 10%. THE APPLICANT IS EXCEEDING THE MINIMUM 10% OPEN SPACE. LET'S TRY TO GET TO AN OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT HERE. SO THE APPLICANT IS EXCEEDING THE MINIMUM 10% OPEN SPACE AND IS PROPOSING TO DESIGNATE 32 AND A QUARTER ACRES, WHICH EQUATES TO 14.1% OF OPEN SPACE. IN ADDITION TO THE OPEN SPACE, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 29 AND A QUARTER EIGHT ACRES OF PARK SPACE. SO COMBINED OPEN SPACE AND PARKS TOGETHER ACCOUNT FOR 26.8% OF THE PROPERTY'S NET ACREAGE , AND AGAIN, ALL OF THAT SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXHIBITS THAT ARE TIED DOWN WITHIN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. SO AS I MENTIONED A SECOND AGO ABOUT PARVIN BRANCH, IT IS REFLECTED ON THE PARK'S MASTER PLAN AS A LINEAR PARK. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO INCORPORATE THIS SPACE INTO THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT AS OPEN SPACE AND PARK SPACE. SO THEY REALLY ARE LOOKING TO MAKE THE DEVELOPMENT PART OF THE OPEN SPACE AND KIND OF VICE VERSA. THERE ARE, AS YOU CAN SEE ON THIS EXHIBIT, A NUMBER OF TRAIL CONNECTIONS FROM DEVELOPMENT INTO THE PARKS AND OPEN SPACE AREA. THERE HAVE BEEN A NUMBER OF MEETINGS OVER THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS WITH CITY COUNCIL, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND AGAIN THE FRISCO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD TO DISCUSS THIS REQUEST. EACH OF THOSE INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS WERE LAID OUT WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT. AS I MENTIONED A SECOND AGO, THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DOES DESIGNATE THIS PROPERTY A SUBURBAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER, WHICH IS AGAIN 25% RESIDENTIAL, 75% NON RESIDENTIAL. SO WITH THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL OF 2200 UNITS, YOU COULD SAY THAT IS A REDUCTION OF 954 UNITS THAT THE APPLICANT COULD HAVE ASKED FOR. THEREFORE, THIS APPLICANT'S REQUEST DOES COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S FUTURE LAND USE PLAN. THIS REQUEST IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS EVENING AS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OFFICE TO RETAIL, RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE TO SUBJECT TO THE EXHIBIT B STANDARDS AND THE ASSOCIATED EXHIBITS, AND AT THIS TIME, I WANT TO TURN OVER THE PRESENTATION TO JOEL FITTS, WHO'S GOING TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THIS REQUEST AND HOW THE US 380 WIDENING AFFECTS IT. CAN I ASK ONE QUESTION JUST TO STATE WHAT YOU SAID? SURE. REGARDING THE EDC PROPERTY. YES. I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAID ABOUT RESIDENTIAL AND THE EDC PROPERTY. CAN YOU STATE THAT? YEAH, LET ME GET TO THIS EXHIBIT SINCE YOU ASKED THAT QUESTION. OKAY, SO FRISCO, EDC OWNS PROPERTY WITHIN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. THEY OWN TWO TRACKS, THIS ONE HERE AND THIS ONE HERE. SO RESIDENTIAL, IF YOU WERE TO LOOK AT EXHIBIT D, WHERE IT TALKS ABOUT THE VARIOUS RESIDENTIAL PRODUCT TYPES THAT ARE ALLOWED IF AN APPLICANT WANTED TO DO RESIDENTIAL IN ONE OF THESE TWO AREAS, IT WOULD REQUIRE APPROVAL OF AN SUP. IT WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED JUST BY RIGHT. EVEN IN THE PD? EVEN THE PD, YES, THAT'S ALL TIED DOWN IN EXHIBIT D OF THE PD. THANK YOU. SURE. SO YES, I'M HERE TO TALK ABOUT THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN, SPECIFICALLY US 380. TXDOT PLANS TO EXPAND 380 TO A FREEWAY IN AS LITTLE AS FIVE YEARS FROM NOW. WHEN THEY DO AS THEY LEAD UP TO THAT, THEY'LL BE ACQUIRING RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE FREEWAY ALONG THE CORRIDOR, AND SO WHAT WE'VE DONE IS BECAUSE THIS EXHIBIT DOESN'T SHOW WHAT THE FUTURE RIGHT OF WAY WOULD BE. I'VE TAKEN AN EXHIBIT. THERE'S AN OVERLAID WITH THE RIGHT OF WAY WOULD BE BASED ON WHAT TEXTILES INFORMATION IS. NOW, TEXTILE HAS CONDUCTED A FEASIBILITY STUDY WHERE THEY DETERMINE THE RIGHT OF WAY ENVELOPE. THEY'RE CURRENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF DESIGNING THE SCHEMATIC FOR THE FREEWAY. THEY'RE AT 60%. THEY HAVE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETINGS WITH THE CITIES ALONG THE CORRIDOR AND WE'VE MET WITH THEM SEVERAL TIMES. WE SEE THE DESIGN. WE'RE KIND OF WORKING WITH THEM ON THE LAYOUT OF THE FRONTAGE ROADS, BECAUSE WE'LL BE OPERATING THE ORANGE ROAD INTERSECTIONS, WE DO A LOT OF DISCUSSIONS WITH THEM ABOUT THAT. SO WE'VE SEEN THE DESIGN AS IT'S BEEN GOING AND CHANGING AND IT STILL USES UP ALL THE RIGHT OF WAY FROM THE FEASIBILITY STUDY. SO THAT'S THE RIGHT OF WAY THAT WE'RE SHOWING ON THIS EXHIBIT. FOR EXAMPLE, IN THIS AREA, THE FREEWAY, WHAT YOU SEE OUT THERE TODAY, THE LANES THAT GO UP AND OVER [00:25:05] BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THE DNT IS OUT THERE HAS OVER EVERYTHING, BUT THERE'S PRESTON THERE'S THE 380 THAT GOES OVER THE FRONTAGE ROADS AND THEN THERE'S DNT OVER THAT. THAT IS NOT ACTUALLY THE FREEWAY. THE FREEWAY ITSELF, WHAT'S BUILT OUT THERE DOES NOT REALLY ACCOMMODATE WHAT A FREEWAY WOULD NEED TO. SO IT'LL BE WIDENED AND FILL THE AREA THAT YOU SEE IN RED, AND FOR EXAMPLE, THERE'LL BE A DIRECT CONNECTOR BETWEEN THE HIGHWAYS THAT WILL GO THROUGH THE CINEMARK PROPERTY, AND IF YOU REMEMBER, WHEN THE CINEMARK PROPERTY WENT THROUGH, WE KIND OF HAD SIMILAR LANGUAGE IN THE STAFF REPORT THERE ABOUT THE RIGHT OF WAY, THAT TXDOT HAD GIVEN US ABOUT WHAT THEY WOULD NEED FOR THAT PROPERTY AS WELL. TXDOT, THEIR CURRENT TIMELINE IS THAT THEY PLAN TO HAVE THE PROJECT READY FOR LETTING IN 2026 WITH CONSTRUCTION DEPENDENT UPON FUNDING, BUT THEY DO HAVE FUNDING FOR RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION, WHICH THEY SAY THEY CAN START PROBABLY IN THE MIDDLE OF 2023 ONCE THEY GET ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THIS EXHIBIT, WHEN THE FREEWAY DOES COME THROUGH AND IF TXDOT DOES NEED ALL OF THAT AREA, THAT IT WOULD REMOVE THE 100 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER AS WELL AS SOME OF THE BUILDINGS SHOWN ON THE EXHIBIT. I THINK THAT IS EVERYTHING. YEAH, THAT'S EVERYTHING. OTHER THAN JUST SAYING WE DO IN THESE SITUATIONS, ASK THEM TO SHOW THE FUTURE RIGHT OF WAY ON EXHIBITS, AND THEY CHOSE NOT TO, BUT THEY'RE AWARE OF ALL THESE FACTS. THANKS, JOEL. I'D PREFER TO GO AHEAD AND HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT, AND SO IS THE APPLICANT HERE? WOULD THEY LIKE TO PRESENT? GOOD AFTERNOON, MY NAME IS KYLE WILKS. MY ADDRESS IS 1469 HIGHWAY 206 CISCO, TEXAS. I'D LIKE TO START OFF BY SAYING THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, COMMISSIONERS. MUCH APPRECIATED, AND I ALSO WANT TO THANK STAFF. WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH STAFF FOR GOING ON 12, 14 MONTHS NOW AND IT HAS BEEN BEEN JUST A GREAT EXPERIENCE. THEY'VE BEEN GREAT. WE VERY MUCH APPRECIATE IT. SO I'LL JUST KIND OF START OFF WITH TELLING YOU KIND OF WHERE WE CAME FROM AND WHAT OUR VISION IS. SO AS WE STARTED THINKING ABOUT THIS PROJECT BACK, I GUESS 12 MONTHS AGO NOW, IT'S KIND OF EVOLVED AND IT'S GOTTEN MORE AMBITIOUS AS WE'VE SEEN WHAT FRISCO IS AND CAN BECOME. SO WE'VE BEEN EXTREMELY PASSIONATE AND INVOLVED IN THAT. SO WHAT I DO FOR THE FAMILY IS, IS I RUN THE REAL ESTATE ARM FOR WILKS DEVELOPMENT, AND WE HAVE A FAMILY OFFICE, WHICH IS WILKS BROTHERS. WE PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY IN 2015, AND WE THINK THAT THE VISION THAT WE HAVE IS AMBITIOUS. WE THINK IT'S A LITTLE DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WHAT A LOT OF OTHER PEOPLE ARE DOING. WE SEE OURSELVES AS KIND OF THAT RECREATION ENTERTAINMENT AREA, AND WE BELIEVE THAT AS TIME GOES ON, THIS WILL BECOME THE PREMIER KIND OF DESTINATION. SO AS WE KIND OF PICK THROUGH OUR TEAM AND KIND OF LOOKED AT THIS PROPERTY, WE WANTED TO GO OUT AND GET THE BEST IN CLASS TEAM TO PUT TOGETHER TO DO THIS, AND IN THAT, YOU KNOW, WE REACHED OUT, WE HIRED [INAUDIBLE] STUDIOS, WE HIRED SASAKI, OF COURSE, OUR ENGINEER, KIMLEY-HORN. [INAUDIBLE] STUDIOS, THEY'RE AN ARCHITECTURAL MASTER PLAN DESIGN FIRM OUT OF AMSTERDAM, AND WE BELIEVE THEY HAVE A VERY WALKABLE PLAN. WE THINK THAT THEY UNDERSTAND WALKABILITY PROBABLY BETTER THAN ANYONE AND THEN ON BECAUSE ONE OF THE COMPONENTS IS OF THIS VISION THAT WE HAVE THAT'S SO IMPORTANT IS JUST THIS GREENBELT AND THIS WALKABILITY AND THIS CONNECTIVITY. SO WE REACHED OUT AND WE WAS ABLE TO GET SASAKI, WHO MR. ALAN WARD IS HERE TONIGHT. SO OUR FAMILY IS COMMITTED TO THIS PROJECT. [00:30:02] WE'RE COMMITTED TO DOING ALL THE THINGS THAT I THINK THE CITY OF FRISCO EXPECTS AND THE PEOPLE OF FRISCO EXPECT US TO DO, AND WE COULD NOT BE MORE EXCITED AND MORE HAPPY TO BE DOING A PROJECT ANYWHERE IN AMERICA THAN WE ARE TO DO THIS. SO I DON'T WANT TO JUST KEEP RAMBLING. I'M GOING TO ASK MR. SCOTT IF HE WANTS TO COME UP AND KIND OF WALK THROUGH THE PLAN, AND THEN ALAN [INAUDIBLE]. THANK YOU. SCOTT LOWE, 7010 OAK STREET, FRISCO, TEXAS, 75033. I'M WITH THE BFC GROUP. WE'RE AN EXTENSION OF THE WILKS DEVELOPMENT TEAM. BEFORE I START, I'D LIKE TO ASK CHAIRMAN BOX, WOULD YOU PREFER THAT WE ANSWER QUESTIONS AT THIS JUNCTURE, OR WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO GO THROUGH THE PRESENTATION? I'D PREFER YOU GO THROUGH SOME OF YOUR PRESENTATIONS SO THE PUBLIC CAN SEE WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT AS WELL. I'M HAPPY TO DO SO. THANK YOU. YEAH, BUT YOU DO HAVE 6 MINUTES ON THE TIMER. EVERYBODY THAT KNOWS ME KNOW THAT'S ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE, BUT I WILL DO MY BEST [CHUCKLING]. SO JUST SO WE'RE CLEAR ON WHERE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE OUTLINE PARCEL AT THE HARD CORNER OF 380 AND THE TOLLWAY. THIS IS A THREE DIMENSIONAL RENDERING OF WHAT WE IMAGINE THIS TO BE. LIKE KYLE SAID, THIS IS A VERY AMBITIOUS PLAN FROM A DENSITY STANDPOINT. WE BELIEVE THAT THE LAST 20% TO 25% OF FRISCO BUILDING OUT IS TO THE NORTH. WE VERY MUCH BELIEVE IN THIS DISTRICT. WHEN FRISCO ANNOUNCED THE PGA, WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT, IT BECAME AN INTERNATIONAL CITY OVERNIGHT, AND SO YOU'LL BRING PEOPLE FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD HERE AND THE EXPECTATION CHANGES A LITTLE BIT, WHICH IS WHICH IS WHY WE WENT TO THE DESIGN FIRMS THAT WE DID. WE WENT NOT ONLY ON A REGIONAL AND NATIONAL SEARCH, WE WENT ON AN INTERNATIONAL SEARCH, THE BEST OF THE BEST, AND I THINK THAT'S WHAT IS REPRESENTED HERE TODAY, OR WE'RE ATTEMPTING TO SHOW YOU OUR EFFORTS. PRETTY SIMPLE PLAN [INAUDIBLE] AROUND THE AROUND THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARES MAY HARD 380 TOLLWAY PGA PARKWAY TO THE SOUTH WE SORT OF RING OUR DEVELOPMENT AND OFFICE WE'VE GOT ABOUT 4.5 MILLION SQUARE FOOT OF OFFICE CARRY ON THIS SITE AND PROGRAM. WE'VE GOT 2200 UNITS OF MULTIFAMILY, ABOUT 1200 TO 1400 UNITS OF HOSPITALITY, AND ANYWHERE FROM 380 TO 430000 SQUARE FOOT OF RETAIL ENTERTAINMENTS AND SOFT GOODS, AND SO AROUND THE PERIMETER, WE RING THAT WITH THE OFFICE SOFT CHEWY CENTER IN THE MIDDLE IS RESIDENTIAL AND ACTIVITY OUR ACTIVITY HUB. WE HAVE A I DON'T KNOW IF I CAN USE THIS. IS THIS A POINTER OR DO I HAVE A WAY TO POINT ON HERE? SO THIS IS SORT OF THE LIFEBLOOD OF OUR PLANTS, ABOUT A HALF MILE STRIP OR STREET OF ACTIVITY THAT SORT OF OVERLOOKS THAT 40 ACRE PARK THAT JONATHAN MENTIONED EARLIER. THE CONTEMPLATION WAS IS THAT THE SOUTHERN THREAT OF GREEN BELT ALONG THE SOUTH EDGE OF OUR PROPERTY REALLY WAS SORT OF THE GOLD NUGGET IN THE SITE, SO TO SPEAK, AND SO WE SET UP A SYSTEM OF URBAN LOOPS AND NATURAL LOOPS. WE HAVE OVER SEVEN MILES OF HIKING BIKE TRAILS ON THIS PARTICULAR, APPROXIMATELY 230 ACRES OF SITE. THIS IS HELPFUL. IT'S A LOT EASIER TO READ PROBABLY IN YOUR PACKET, BUT THIS IS OUR LAND USE MAP IN TEXAS AND THE REASON WE WENT TO AN AMSTERDAM COMPANY WAS THAT WE DON'T DO MIXED USE VERY WELL OR WALKABLE COMMUNITIES VERY WELL, AND SO AMSTERDAM IS ARGUABLY ONE OF THE MOST WALKABLE CITIES ON THE PLANET EARTH, AND SO WHAT WE DID IS WE UTILIZED THEIR PRINCIPLES ALONG WITH THE TALENTS OF MR. ALAN WARD WITH SASAKI, AND AS YOU'LL SEE, OUR LAND USE MAP IS QUITE ILLUSTRATIVE WITH MIXED USE, MORE THAN TWO USES IN MOST TWO USES OR MORE AND MOST BUILDINGS THAT WE HAVE. THIS IS SIMPLY AN ILLUSTRATIVE DIAGRAM IN ATTEMPTING TO SHOW YOU THE DENSITIES THAT WE'RE DEALING WITH. [00:35:01] WE BELIEVE AS FRISCO GROWS, THAT LAST 20% PRETTY MUCH BEING TO THE NORTH, THAT IT'S SORT OF A WAVE CRASHING AGAINST THE 380 CORRIDOR, THAT IT'S GOING TO BECOME MORE AND MORE DENSE. SO THIS IS A LITTLE BIT OF A PLAN AHEAD. AGAIN, AN AMBITIOUS PLAN FOR AN AMBITIOUS CITY AND AN AMBITIOUS PLACE. ALAN. ALAN WARD 6307 THORNTON CIRCLE UNIVERSITY PARK, FLORIDA, AND I'M WITH SASAKI. WE'RE PLANNERS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, SO WE'VE BEEN FOCUSED ON THE PARK AS WELL AS THE CONNECTIONS OF THE PARK INTO THE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. SO IN THIS IMAGE HERE YOU SEE THE WESTERN END OF THE PARK, AND FIRST THERE'RE THESE SIGNIFICANT TRAILS THAT CONNECT TO THE PARCEL TO THE SOUTH UNDER THE PGA PARKWAY, WE SEPARATED THE BICYCLE TRAIL FROM THE HIKING TRAIL. SO IT DOESN'T HAVE THOSE KIND OF CONFLICTS. THOSE ARE SIGNIFICANT KIND OF REGIONAL CONNECTIONS. THEY GO ALL THE WAY THROUGH TO THE EAST AND UNDER THE TOLLWAY. THEN YOU SEE THIS NETWORK OF LIGHTER COLORED TRAILS, WHICH ARE IN A MORE NATURAL CONTEXT. WE'RE ENHANCING THE PARVIN CREEK CORRIDOR, REMOVING INVASIVES, RETURNING THAT TO A BETTER NATURAL STATE, AS WELL AS IMPROVING THE EDGES AND PLANTING AND CONNECTIONS TO THE FIVE PONDS ON THE SITE, AND THESE ARE SIGNIFICANT FEATURES WHICH BECOME FAR MORE USABLE AND ACCESSIBLE WITH THE CONNECTIONS TO THESE PONDS. THERE ARE SOME OTHER KEY PROGRAMED AREAS. THE CENTRAL GREEN THAT YOU SEE HERE, THOSE THAT ZONE HERE IS A FAIRLY SIGNIFICANT AMPHITHEATER, PERHAPS 2500 PEOPLE, WHICH IT WILL BE VISIBLE FROM THIS RETAIL STREET THAT SCOTT MENTIONED WITH VIEWS DOWN INTO THAT SLOPING GREEN SPACE BETWEEN THE PONDS, A SMALLER AMPHITHEATER TO THE NORTH, WHICH CONNECTS UP TO THE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, AND THEN WE HAVE DESIGNED SIGNIFICANT CONNECTIONS FROM THIS KEY RETAIL STREET INTO THE PARK. SO HERE IN THE CENTRAL PART OF THE PARK, THERE'S A CONNECTION TO A TRIBUTARY WHICH EXTENDS NORTHWARD LINKS ALL THOSE OFFICE PARCELS, RESIDENTIAL PARCELS DOWN TO THE PARK, AND IT ENDS IN THIS LANDMARK PLAY SPACE, AND AS AN EXAMPLE, ON THE LOWER LEFT IS A PHOTO OF A PLAY SPACE. WE DESIGNED ANOTHER PROJECT. THIS IS 21ST CENTURY PLAY, WHERE YOU INCORPORATE SCULPTURAL ELEMENTS AND YOU CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT THAT IS VISUALLY INTERESTING IN ITS OWN RIGHT, BUT A REAL MAGNET FOR CHILDREN AND FOR FAMILIES, AND FRISCO IS FAMILY ORIENTED. WE THINK THIS WILL BECOME A REGIONAL DESTINATION IN ITS OWN RIGHT, AND YOU ALSO SEE SOME OF THE KIND OF PRECEDENTS FOR THESE EDGE TREATMENTS AROUND THE PONDS TO MAKE IT FAR MORE ACCESSIBLE. TODAY, THOSE PONDS ARE KIND OF FRAMED IN VEGETATION. YOU CAN'T QUITE GET TO THE EDGE, BUT THERE'LL BE A COMBINATION OF STEPS INTO THE WATER BOARDWALK AREAS AND THEN IN THIS CENTRAL ZONE, WE'RE ALSO PROPOSING A SORT OF BOTANICAL-GARDEN-LIKE ZONE, WHICH IS KIND OF A FOCUS IN THE NATIVE TREES, SHRUBS, GROUND COVERS OF THE REGION, AND THAT'S A COMPLEMENT THEN TO THIS PLAY SPACE AT THE HEART OF THINGS. THEN ON THE EASTERN PORTION, THE TRAIL CONNECTS THROUGH. IT GOES AROUND THIS LAST POND. WE HAVE SIGNIFICANT EXISTING TREES HERE WHICH ARE BEING PRESERVED, SIGNIFICANT TOPOGRAPHY AS WELL. SO IT WRAPS AROUND THE POND AND EXTENDS UNDER THE TOLL ROAD. YOU SEE THE TWO PATHS SHOWN IN THE MAGENTA COLOR. PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT ACTUALLY PUSHES INTO THE PARK WITH FOOD AND BEVERAGE KIND OF ADJACENT TO THE LAKE AND PROVIDING GREAT VIEWS OVER THE PARK SPACE, AND THEN ALSO FURTHER DESIGNS WHICH TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE LAKE EDGE WITH THESE BOARDWALKS AND EDGE TREATMENT. THE PONDS THEMSELVES WILL REQUIRE AERATION. SO WE'RE SHOWING EXAMPLES AT THE LOWER LEFT OF KIND OF AN ARTISTIC SCULPTURAL APPROACH TO AERATING THESE PONDS THAT BECOME ILLUMINATED FEATURES THAT ARE INTERESTING IN THE EVENING , AND THE OTHER KEY ELEMENT TO KIND OF CONCLUDE IS IN THAT FIRST ZONE THAT I SHOWED, AND WE'RE WORKING WITH A GROUP THAT DOES INNOVATIVE DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY ALONG A NATURE WALK. SO THAT WILL BECOME A DESTINATION IN THE PARK THAT HAS PERIODIC PROGRAMING AND BECOME REALLY POTENTIALLY A REGIONAL OR NATIONAL LANDMARK AS A FOCUS OF THE PARK. SO I BELIEVE MY TIME IS UP. THANK YOU. YEAH, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. JONATHAN, I START OUT WITH A FEW QUESTIONS IF I CAN. CAN YOU DIVE IN A LITTLE DEEPER ON THE ENTITLEMENTS FOR HOUSING? SO YOU MENTIONED ENTITLE IT 2210. THEY'RE GOING TO DROP IT BY 10 THE 2200 WHAT THEY'RE ENTITLED TO WITHIN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, BUT BASED ON THE CITY COUNCIL CALCULATION, THEY COULD HAVE COME IN AND ASKED FOR APPROXIMATELY 3200-ISH FOR THAT NUMBER , BUT THEN YOU BEFORE THAT TALKED ABOUT THE PROPERTY WAS [00:40:08] ORIGINALLY ENTITLED ABOUT 4000. HOW DOES THAT NUMBER COME DOWN? CAN YOU JUST--SO LET ME I'LL JUST USE THIS AS AN EXAMPLE. SO THE 2012 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ENCOMPASSED ALL OF THE PROPERTY THAT YOU SEE HERE, BUT IT EXTENDED FURTHER SOUTH ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PGA PARKWAY. THAT WAS THE 4000 UNITS. IN 2018, THERE WAS A ZONING REQUEST THAT SPLIT IT INTO TWO PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS, ONE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PGA PARKWAY AND ONE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PGA PARKWAY. SO IN THE 2018 ZONING, THE NUMBER OF UNITS PERMITTED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PGA PARKWAY GOT WHITTLED DOWN TO 2210 UNITS. SO THAT'S WHAT'S ALLOWED UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING ON THE PROPERTY THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TODAY. SO WHEN A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT COMES IN, CITY COUNCIL HAS A POLICY 55 UNITS TO THE ACRE BASED ON NET ACREAGE AND FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION. SO IF YOU WERE TO DO AGAIN THIS THE SUBURBAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER, 25% RESIDENTIAL 75% NON RESIDENTIAL. SO IF YOU WERE TO DO ALL OF THE MATH, THE APPLICANT COULD HAVE COME IN AND ASK FOR 3154 UNITS, BUT THEY HAVE NOT. WHAT THEY ARE ASKING FOR IS 2200 UNITS. SO THEY'RE HONORING WHAT IS ALLOWED UNDER THE PD TODAY. SO IF THEY WOULD HAVE CHOSEN TO BUILD UNDER THE PD TODAY, THEY WOULD HAVE ENTITLEMENTS AT 2210. CORRECT. THANK YOU, AND IT'S NOT NECESSARILY THE QUESTION YOU ASKED, BUT I WANT TO POINT OUT THE RESIDENTIAL ENVISIONED UNDER THE PD TODAY IS ESSENTIALLY YOU HAVE A LOT OF YOUR TRADITIONAL URBAN WRAP. SO WHAT THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR TODAY? THE 2200 UNITS ARE HIGH RISE, MID-RISE AND URBAN FLATS MADE UP OF TYPE ONE TYPE TWO CONCRETE AND STEEL CONSTRUCTION AND TOWNHOMES ON INDIVIDUALLY PLATTED LOTS, AND MY PREVIOUS QUESTION TO YOU ON THE EDC LAND IF THERE WAS A DESIRE TO BUILD RESIDENTIAL THAT WOULD STILL BE CAPPED AT THE 2200 UNITS WITHIN THE. YEAH, THE 2200 UNITS IS THE CAP IS THE TOTAL MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS FOR THE PROPERTY, BUT IF THEY BUILD 2000 UNITS HERE AND HAD 200 UNITS LEFT AND THEY WANTED TO PUT THEM HERE OR HERE, THEY WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS AND GET AN SUP APPROVED IN ORDER TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL THERE. AND THEN THE PD IS WRITTEN IN A WAY. SO THAT'S TODAY THE EDC OWNS THE PROPERTY. IF THE EDC CHOOSES TO SELL THE PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE, THAT SUP REQUIREMENT REMAINS IN PLACE FOR THESE TWO TRACTS. ANY CLARIFYING QUESTIONS BEFORE WE GO TO PUBLIC HEARING? ONE CLARIFYING QUESTION ON THAT. DID YOU SAY, JONATHAN, THAT THE 2200 UNITS INCLUDES TOWNHOMES INSIDE OF THAT 2200? YES, 2200 TOTAL UNITS. OKAY, WOW, 2200 RESIDENTIAL, BUT THAT'S NOT JUST APARTMENTS. NO, IT'S JUST 2200 RESIDENTIAL UNITS TOTAL. 220 FRONT DOORS. YEAH. OKAY. WELL, THAT'S A GREAT CLARIFICATION. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER CLARIFICATIONS? ALL RIGHT. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED. COMMISSIONER CONE. SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL IN FAVOR AYE. OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER KENDALL. SECOND. SECOND FROM MORGAN ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. I HAVE SOME ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. ONE IS I WANT TO JUST START OUT AND I KNOW I SAID IT ON THE OTHER CASE, BUT I WANT TO COMPLIMENT A STAFF HEARING THE APPLICANT AT THE BEGINNING. THEY'VE OWNED THIS PROPERTY SINCE 2015. THEY'VE HAD TO GO IN AND REDESIGN A FEW TIMES. THEY GOT REALLY GOOD FEEDBACK AND SAID THEY'VE BEEN AT THIS TO CREATE THIS IN 10 TO 12 MONTHS. THAT'S REALLY FAST, AND THAT'S PARAMOUNT TO THE FEEDBACK THAT YOU ALL PROVIDE THEM THE GUIDANCE, AND I JUST WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THAT AND ALSO THANK THE APPLICANT FOR WORKING WITH THE CITY. WE EXPECT VERY HIGH QUALITY DEVELOPMENT IN OUR CITY. THE MAYOR MENTIONED THAT LAST WEEK IN THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING, AND THAT'S OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT OCCURS UNDER THE PLANNING AND ZONING [00:45:06] REQUIREMENTS THAT WE ARE ALLOWED TO AND HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO UPHOLD. SO I WANT TO START OUT WITH THAT. I THINK IT'S A REALLY GOOD DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS A HUGE IMPROVEMENT OVER WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY GOING TO BE BUILT HERE. I THINK THERE ARE SOME BIG CHALLENGES. CINEMARK IS A BIG CHALLENGE. CINEMARK IS ALMOST A CUTOUT ON THE TOP RIGHT CORNER THAT HAS SOME OPPORTUNITIES. I MET WITH THE APPLICANT, HAS SOME GREAT OPPORTUNITIES AND I MENTIONED THIS TO THEM TO BE ABLE TO WORK WITH CINEMARK AND INCORPORATE THAT EVEN MORE THAN WHAT'S IN THE CURRENT DESIGN. SO I HIGHLY ENCOURAGE THE APPLICANT TO DO SO. WE CANNOT REQUIRE THAT FROM THIS DAIS AS PART OF THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION, BUT I HIGHLY ENCOURAGE YOU TO DO THAT BECAUSE THAT'S GOING TO BE A DESTINATION FOR THOSE PEOPLE WHO LIVE HERE IF APPROVED, AND I'M SURE THE OWNER OF CINEMARK WOULD LOVE TO HAVE EVEN MORE PEOPLE IN THEIR PLACE OF BUSINESS. I THINK THE PHASING THAT HAS BEEN PUT TOGETHER AS PHENOMENAL REQUIRED TO BUILD OUT ALL OF THE PARK SPACE BEFORE YOU CAN DO MUCH ELSE. YOU CAN READ THE STAFF REPORT. THERE'S MORE THAN THAT, BUT THAT'S PHENOMENAL. THIS IS A HUGE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE CITY AND THIS IS NOT CLOSED. THIS WILL NOT BE GATED. THIS IS AN AREA WHERE ALL OF US CAN GO, AND AS IT GETS BUILT OUT, I'M SURE THE RETAILERS WOULD WANT US TO BE THERE AS WELL, AND SO RETAIL WILL BE BUILT AND ACCESSIBLE FOR THIS AREA AS WELL AS HOPEFULLY SOME OF THE ENTERTAINMENT OPTIONS. OBVIOUSLY, VERY SPLASHY, VERY PRETTY. I HOPE THAT IT GETS BUILT. I HOPE IT'S SOMETHING THAT GETS DONE. YOU CAN LOOK IN THE STAFF REPORT AND SEE SOME OF THOSE PICTURES. THOSE PICTURES ARE BASED ON SOME OF THE THINGS THAT THEY SOME OF THE FOLKS THAT THEY'VE TALKED TO FOR OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENTERTAINMENT. I TOLD MY WIFE I NEEDED HER GLASSES, SO I THINK I'M GOING TO HAVE TO TAKE HER UP ON THAT. I THINK JOEL BROUGHT UP A REALLY GOOD ITEM HERE ON RIGHT OF WAY. SO I WANT TO ASK THE APPLICANT EITHER ANY OF YOU ON HOW ARE YOU VIEWING THE RIGHT OF WAY. WHAT'S IN YOUR PLAN THAT MAY GET COVERED UP BY THE RIGHT OF WAY IS VITALLY IMPORTANT TO THIS PROJECT AND VITALLY IMPORTANT TO OUR 380 PLANS THAT WE WANT THIS TO BE A GATEWAY TO OUR CITY TO OVERUSE THAT TERM AND WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE RIGHT OF WAY AND WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE TO YOU? YEAH, THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION, AND JOEL BROUGHT UP SOME GREAT POINTS. SO OF COURSE WE'RE AWARE THAT TXDOT HAS SOME PLANS TO TAKE THAT 380. SO I WENT PERSONALLY TO THE, THE MEETING THAT THEY HAD AT ROCK HILL HIGH SCHOOL AND WHEN TXDOT HAD THE PUBLIC MEETING AND THEY KIND OF WENT THROUGH EVERYTHING, I SPOKE WITH THE TXDOT ENGINEER AND WHEN I WAS TALKING TO HIM, HE KIND OF CONFIRMED WHAT JOEL'S SAYING IS THAT THEY DON'T HAVE THE FUNDING, THEY DON'T KNOW THE EXACT TIMING BECAUSE, OF COURSE, THEY'VE GOT TO GET FUNDING, BUT I THINK WE ALL THINK AT SOME POINT, OBVIOUSLY, 380 NEEDS NEEDS TO BE EXPANDED AND WILL BE EXPANDED. WHAT THAT ULTIMATELY LOOKS LIKE COULD BE KIND OF WHAT THEY'RE SHOWING NOW, BUT IT'S SUPER EARLY IN THEIR SCHEMATIC PLANS, ACCORDING TO THE ENGINEER, AND IN FACT, WHEN I ASKED HIM, HEY, I ASKED HIM THE SAME QUESTION YOU'RE ASKING ME. IT'S LIKE, WELL, WHAT SHOULD I DO? YOU KNOW, WE'RE WE'VE GOT PLANS FOR THIS PLACE RIGHT HERE. WHAT DO YOU SUGGEST? AND HE'S LIKE, I TELL ALL DEVELOPERS, PRETEND WE'RE NOT COMING AND JUST DO YOUR THING AND WHEN WE COME, WE COME. NOW, THAT'S A LOT EASIER SAID THAN DONE. SO IF YOU LOOK AT OUR PHASING PLAN, THAT 380 IS THE ONE OF THE LATTER PHASING. SO, LET'S SAY THEY'RE GOING DOWN 380 AND PURCHASING RIGHT OF WAY IN 23. WELL, OBVIOUSLY THERE'LL BE NOTHING UP THERE, AND WE HAVE TASKED OUR DESIGN TEAM TO KIND OF CONTEMPLATE THAT ULTIMATE BUILDOUT. SO WE DO HAVE A PLAN IN OUR POCKET THAT DOES CONTEMPLATE FOR THEIR ULTIMATE TAKING THAT JOEL SHOWED, BUT WE DIDN'T THINK THAT IT WAS PRUDENT TO SHOW IT UNTIL WE HAVE MORE. WE KNOW SOMETHING MORE DEFINITE FROM TIMING TXDOT AND THEN FUNDING OF COURSE, BUT YEAH, WE FULLY ANTICIPATE SOME FORM OF TAKING ON 380. RIGHT, AS EVERYBODY DOES, I THINK. THANK YOU, AND THEN IN YOUR ORIGINAL PRESENTATION AND YOU HAVE AN ICONIC BRIDGE BEING BUILT ACROSS PART OF THE PROPERTY, I DON'T SEE THAT AS A REQUIREMENT. OBVIOUSLY, THERE'S A COST TO THAT. ABSOLUTELY, BUT AN ICONIC BRIDGE LIKE THAT, I THINK, OF AUSTIN AND SO MANY ICONIC BRIDGES THERE. [00:50:06] I THINK OF AMSTERDAM IN PARTICULAR WITH THE DESIGNER THAT YOU'VE HIRED FOR THAT PART OF THE PROJECT. WHERE IS YOUR THOUGHTS ON THAT BRIDGE? WHERE WOULD THAT FIT INTO YOUR PHASING OF THE PROJECT? AND I DON'T WANT A REGULAR BRIDGE THERE. IT'S NOT GOING TO LOOK GOOD. IT'S NOT GOING TO MATCH WHAT'S WHAT'S IN YOUR PLAN? WHAT'RE YOUR THOUGHTS THERE? I'D LIKE TO UNDERSTAND THAT I DON'T NECESSARILY WANT TO TIE THAT DOWN BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE ACTUALLY GOING TO BUILD. RIGHT. SO GREAT QUESTION, AND THE BRIDGE FROM PGA INTO THE SITE IS, OF COURSE, EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. WE AGREE WITH YOU. IT NEEDS TO BE TO THE LEVEL OF EVERYTHING ELSE. IT NEEDS TO BE ICONIC. WHEN PEOPLE ARE GOING DOWN THE DNT, THEY NEED TO LOOK DOWN AND SEE THAT BRIDGE, AND IT NEEDS TO BE INTERESTING. IT NEEDS TO HAVE A HIGH DESIGN ESTHETIC TO IT. SO THAT'S OUR INTENTION. HAVING SAID THAT, IT OBVIOUSLY COSTS A LOT MORE MONEY TO KIND OF ADD THOSE KIND OF FEATURES IN THERE. SO WE'RE WORKING THROUGH THE ECONOMICS ON THAT AND WE'RE WORKING KIND OF THROUGH THE DESIGN EDC, YOU KNOW, WHERE THE BRIDGE KIND OF TAKES OFF FROM AND WHERE IT LANDS IS ACTUALLY EDC PROPERTY. SO WE WANT TO GO THROUGH THAT. SO WE'RE KIND OF WORKING THROUGH THAT PROCESS, BUT BY ALL MEANS, OUR INTENT IS TO NOT JUST HAVE A REGULAR TXDOT CONCRETE BRIDGE. WE THINK THAT WOULD BE A DISSERVICE TO THE PROJECT AS A WHOLE AND THE CITY, BUT KIND OF STILL WORKING THROUGH THOSE ECONOMICS FOR SURE. GET BACK TO THAT AND I'M GOING TO HAND OFF TO OTHER COMMISSIONERS IN A MOMENT, BUT, KYLE OR SCOTT, LAST QUESTION FOR YOU GUYS IS OVER THE PLANTING. IT'S HOT HERE. TRUE. IT'S REALLY HOT HERE, ESPECIALLY THE LAST FEW DAYS, AND WATER IS AT A PREMIUM, AND THAT'S PROBABLY NOT GOING TO CHANGE , AND YOUR PICTURES ARE BEAUTIFUL, AND THEY'RE VERY GREEN, BUT WHAT DOES IT ACTUALLY LOOK LIKE THROUGH THE SEASONS? BECAUSE YOUR PICTURES ARE REALLY GREEN, AND IF YOU HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT THE COMMISSION A YEAR AGO, WE SAID WE'RE REALLY VISUAL LEARNERS, AND SO I CAN SAY I AM AS WELL. I'M NOT GOING TO SPEAK FOR OTHERS, BUT SO THAT'S ATTRACTIVE, BUT CONCERNING THAT, THAT MAY HAVE ATTRACTED THE EYES. SO WHAT WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE IN THE FUTURE? SCOTT, IF THAT'S A QUESTION FOR YOU, HOW DO YOU THINK ABOUT THAT? I APPRECIATE THE QUESTION, CHAIRMAN BOX. I WOULD SAY THAT'S SOMETHING WE'VE SPENT A LOT OF TIME ON. IN TERMS OF THE HEAT, WE'VE STUDIED, GOSH, DOZENS UPON DOZENS OF DIFFERENT MIXED USE PROJECTS ALL OVER THE WORLD. YOU KNOW, WE JOKE INTERNALLY, YOU KNOW, DALLAS IS ON ABOUT THE SAME LATITUDE AS BAGHDAD, AND SO IT'S PRETTY HOT, SAME KIND OF HEAT INDEX HERE [CHUCKLING], YOU CAN USE THAT ACTUALLY, OR MAKE A T-SHIRT, WHATEVER YOU DO AND SO WHAT WE'VE EXPLORED AND STUDIED AND LEARNED IS THAT WE DON'T DEAL WITH SHADE VERY WELL. THEY DID A STUDY AT THE WINSPEAR OPERA HOUSE WAS REALLY QUITE INTERESTING WHERE THEY IN THE MIDDLE OF JULY, THEY PUT UP TEMPERATURE GAUGES UNDERNEATH THE LOUVER SYSTEM AND THEY WANTED TO SEE WHAT AN URBAN PLAZA THAT SHADED WOULD YIELD. IT YIELDED ABOUT 15 TO 16 DEGREES COOLER UNDERNEATH THAT SHADE STRUCTURE. SO IT TOOK 100 DEGREE DAY AND DOWN TO AN 85 DEGREE DAY, AND SO THAT'S WHY WE WE'VE GONE OUT AND HIRED MR. ALAN WARD. HE'S LITERALLY BEST IN THE BUSINESS AT THIS STUFF, AND SO LITERALLY LAST WEEK WE HAD AN ENTIRE DESIGN CHARRETTE SESSION FOCUSED AROUND SHADE DEVICES AND NATURAL LANDSCAPE MATURE TREE PLACEMENT. USING SOME OF THE EXISTING TREES THAT WE HAVE. WE ACTUALLY HAVE A LOT OF EXISTING MATURE TREES THAT WE'RE DESIGNING AROUND. A LOT OF THESE SHAPES THAT YOU SEE IN THE STREETS AND IN THE PARK. IT CAME FROM ACTUALLY WHERE MATURE LANDSCAPE IS PLACED ALREADY AND SO OR EXISTING, AND SO WE'RE PAYING A LOT OF ATTENTION TO THAT, AND SO I THINK WHAT YOU'LL FIND, AND EVEN THOUGH WE HAVEN'T SHOWN IT ACCURATELY, IT'S PURELY A CONCEPT IMAGE AT THIS JUNCTURE, BUT HOPEFULLY WHAT IT DOES IS IT COMMUNICATES OUR SINCERE DESIRE. [00:55:09] YOU PROBABLY ALL SEEN THAT STREETSCAPE ALONG THE RETAIL AND WE HAVE THESE SORT OF BIG SORT OF DEVICES, BIG SHADE DEVICES UP THROUGHOUT THE STREET. HOPEFULLY WHAT THAT COMMUNICATES, EVEN THOUGH IT'S PROBABLY NOT GOING TO BE ARTICULATED LIKE THAT ULTIMATELY BECAUSE WE'RE DOING SOME FURTHER STUDY ON IT, IT COMMUNICATES OUR SINCERE DESIRE TO ACCOMMODATE OUR USER AND TO PROVIDE THEM SOME RELIEF OF THE HEAT, AND SO THAT'S ALL I COULD REALLY SAY ABOUT THAT. IN TERMS OF THE LANDSCAPE ITSELF, THERE IS A PAINSTAKING EFFORT BY ALAN AND SASAKI PICKING THE RIGHT SPECIES OF PLANTS, MAKING SURE THAT IT'S GERMANE TO THE AREA AND THAT WE'RE PUTTING IT IN A SITUATION WHERE IT WILL THRIVE, AND SO WE'RE TRUSTING OUR TEAMMATES ON THAT BECAUSE OUR KNOWLEDGE IS OBVIOUSLY LIMITED COMPARATIVELY. I HOPE THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION, BUT THERE'S LITERALLY HUNDREDS OF MAN HOURS GOING INTO BOTH OF THOSE THINGS. MORGAN. I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS POINT. YOU GUYS HAVE ASKED A LOT OF GREAT QUESTIONS, AND I LOVE THE PRESENTATION THAT WE SAW FOR THE FIRST TIME OVER AT THE GROVE. VERY EXCITED ABOUT WHAT'S COMING HERE. IF IT'S DONE BASED ON WHAT WE'VE SEEN, IT'S GOING TO BE PHENOMENAL. THANK YOU, SIR. NAME IS MUCH BETTER THAN OXBOW. I ONLY HAVE A COUPLE OF COMMENTS. I'LL LET SOMEONE ELSE GO FIRST FOR JUST A MINUTE. SURE. SURE. SO, A FEW THINGS THAT STUCK OUT AT ME. FIRST OFF, I THINK THE VISION IS GREAT AND I THINK WITH ALL VISION, EXECUTION IS KEY, AND I WAS REALLY IMPRESSED WITH THE PHASING IN ALL OF THIS. I THINK IT'S VERY WELL THOUGHT OUT AND CAN CREATE THAT EXECUTION THAT IS KEY IN ALL OF THIS AND WHAT MAKES FRISCO SET APART AND DIFFERENT? MR. WILKS SAID THAT HE ENVISIONED THIS TO BE A DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENT, AND WHEN I LOOK AT THIS, IT IS DIFFERENT, AND I LOVE THAT. THINGS I WROTE DOWN, IT'S INNOVATIVE IN THE RETAIL PIECE, THE LIVING EXPERIENCE. IT'S A GREAT TIE-IN TO NATURE AND THE TERRAIN AROUND. I THINK IT WORKS WELL WITH EVEN HAVING A VISUAL ARTS COMPONENT SUPER UNIQUE, AND I THINK I REALLY SEE A PLACE FOR EVERYONE HERE. I THINK IT'S VERY SPECIAL. THANK YOU, MA'AM. COMMISSIONER CONE. I JUST WANT TO VERIFY SOMETHING FOR YOU, COMMISSIONER BOX. SO THE LATITUDE FOR DALLAS IS ABOUT 32-33 DEGREES, AND SO IS KANDAHAR, AFGHANISTAN, AND SO HAVING SPENT TIME IN BOTH OF THOSE PLACES, I CAN GUARANTEE THAT THIS IS A HOT PLACE, BUT THEY'VE DONE A GREAT JOB WITH IT. I'M DEFINITELY GETTING A SHIRT. [CHUCKLING] I'VE BEEN IN BOTH. I DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR JOEL THAT I FORGOT TO ASK EARLIER THAT KIND OF POPPED UP. MR. FITTS? YES. HAS THERE BEEN ANY DISCUSSION FROM TXDOT AT ALL ABOUT [INAUDIBLE] PARK EVER GOING OVER OR UNDER A FUTURE 380? LET ME THINK ABOUT THIS, BECAUSE THE SCHEMATIC IS ALREADY DONE IN THAT REGARD, AND I'M GOING TO PULL UP THE SCHEMATIC. I APOLOGIZE FOR NOT ASKING EARLIER. I JUST ASSUMED IT WASN'T, BUT THEN JUST LOOKING AT IT AGAIN A FEW MINUTES AGO, THERE IS THE [INAUDIBLE] PARKWAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 380. YEAH, I THINK IT DOES GO UNDER, BUT I'M JUST GOING TO NEED TO MAKE ABSOLUTELY SURE, BUT I DO THINK IT STILL WILL GO THROUGH BECAUSE IT IS STILL CONSIDERED AN ARTERIAL. IT'S NOT A REGIONAL ARTERIAL AND IT DOESN'T KEEP GOING SOUTH, BUT IT IS AN ARTERIAL IN BOTH CITIES. SO I THINK IT DOES GO THROUGH, BUT I'LL VERIFY. CAN YOU ELABORATE ON [INAUDIBLE]? HOW WIDE WILL IT BE? SIX LANES. SO SIMILAR TO LEGACY PARKWAY AND ARE OTHER SIX LANE THOROUGHFARE. TYPE A THOROUGHFARE. TYPE A THOROUGHFARE, EVEN THOUGH IT DEAD ENDS THERE AT PGA PARKWAY, RIGHT? YES. OKAY, PERFECT. THANK YOU. NEXT QUESTION, JONATHAN, DO YOU HAVE ABILITY TO GO THROUGH THE SLIDES UP THERE? THERE WAS ONE THAT SHOWED ALL OF THE RING ROUTES THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT. THE TRAIL? THE TRAILS, YEAH, KIND OF SHOWED THE RINGS THEY HAD. LIKE HIKING? NOT JUST HIKING, BUT THEY HAD LOOPS, I GUESS. YEAH, I THINK THAT WAS IN THE APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION. OK. PERFECT. [01:00:03] YEAH, AND THIS IS JUST MORE TO THE APPLICANT. BEFORE I DO THAT, THOUGH, JUST A COUPLE OF COMMENTS ABOUT WE'VE ALREADY TALKED AND MET AND YOU GUYS HAVE ANSWERED ALMOST ALL THE QUESTIONS OR REALLY ALL THE QUESTIONS, AND SO I REALLY DO APPRECIATE THE FEEDBACK YOU GUYS HAVE GIVEN. THERE'S A LOT TO LIKE ABOUT THIS QUITE A BIT. MY ONLY COMMENT WAS ONE THING WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER TODAY, CAN YOU TALK ABOUT POSSIBLY IT'S GOING TO EXIST ANYWAY, BUT CALLING OUT ANOTHER LOOP, WE TALKED ABOUT LIKE AN EXTERIOR 360 LOOP ALL THE WAY AROUND THE PROJECT THAT YOU'RE GOING TO BUILD SIDEWALKS ALONG 380 AND SIDEWALKS ALONG THE DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY, EVEN IF THEY DON'T LOOK AS BEAUTIFUL HIGHWAYS NECESSARILY, BUT THE IDEA THAT THEY WOULD BE THERE AND THAT YOU STILL COULD HAVE A SOMEONE WHO WANTS TO BE A LITTLE BIT MORE AMBITIOUS, WALKING A LARGER LOOP WOULD BE ABLE TO WALK ALL THE WAY AROUND. YES, SIR. SO, COMMISSIONER CONE. YES? BEFORE HE ANSWERS, DO YOU THINK SOMEBODY WOULD DO THAT OR WOULD THEY GO SOUTH AND GO AROUND THE GOLF COURSE AND THE OMNI INSTEAD? WHAT'S THE PURPOSE? MY THOUGHT IS THEY WOULD DO ALL OF THE ABOVE, JUST HAVING AN ULTERIOR. HYPOTHETICALLY, SOME OF THESE TRAILS COULD GET KIND OF BUSY IF IT'S VERY SUCCESSFUL, AND IN OUR CONVERSATION WE JUST TALKED ABOUT HOW CHALLENGING IT IS, BUT THE EXAMPLE OF THE TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES DOWN TO THE SOUTH IS A GREAT TEMPLATE FOR BOTH BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE AND FOR THIS APPLICANT TO USE THAT, YOU CAN BUILD A REALLY NICE, WALKABLE AREA EVEN ON THE EXTERIOR OF YOUR PROPERTY THAT JUST GIVES YOU. I WAS BROUGHT UP WITH THE LOOP BECAUSE YOU GOT THE NATURE LOOP, YOU'VE GOT THE URBAN LOOP, THEY'VE GOT SOMETHING CALLED A LOOP EXTENSION, AND I COULD JUST AS EASILY SEE PEOPLE WALKING THE I DON'T WAN TO CALL IT THE OUTER LOOP TO STEAL THE NAME OF THE ROAD, BUT THE FREEWAY LOOP. CAN I ASK A CLARIFICATION FOR THE FOR THE APPLICANT ANSWERS? YES. THE CITY DOES REQUIRE SIDEWALKS ALREADY? CORRECT. WHAT ARE YOU ASKING SPECIFICALLY? BECAUSE THERE WILL BE SIDEWALKS THERE. I DON'T UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION. I'M SORRY, MY QUESTION IS JUST TO KEEP THAT IN MIND WHEN THEY PUT IN THOSE REQUIRED SIDEWALKS THAT THEY JUST KEEP THAT IN MIND THAT THEY TREAT IT AS ANOTHER AMENITY FOR THEIR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. SO YOU'RE SAYING NOT A SIDEWALK SIX INCHES FROM THE STREET? CORRECT. YES, AND WE HAD THAT CONVERSATION SPECIFICALLY ABOUT JUST DOING THIS STRAIGHT BACK OF CURB REAL CLOSE OR TREAT IT MORE LIKE AN AMENITY. THAT LEADS INTO MY NEXT QUESTION ABOUT [INAUDIBLE] PARKWAY AND HOW YOU'VE ALREADY DONE A GREAT JOB WITH THAT BECAUSE YOU'RE FORCED TO BECAUSE OF THE GAS EASEMENT. YES, SIR. BUT MY QUESTION ABOUT [INAUDIBLE] PARKWAY WOULD SIMPLY BE ABOUT THE BUILDINGS THEN. CAN YOU JUST ELABORATE A LITTLE BIT ON HOW TO MAKE THOSE BUILDINGS LOOK BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO BE FACING INTERIOR STREET. THAT'S GOING BE PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT, BUT THEY'LL ALSO BE FACING A GREENBELT ON THE WESTERN SIDE. YES, SIR. I THINK YOU BRING UP A LOT OF GOOD POINTS. YEAH. THERE WOULD BE A SIDEWALK REQUIREMENT AROUND THE SITE. I THINK 380 WILL REQUIRE SOME STUDY JUST SIMPLY BECAUSE WE DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT YET FULLY BECAUSE THE PICTURE IS STILL BLURRY. I THINK ALONG [INAUDIBLE] WE KIND OF LOOK LIKE DESIGN GENIUSES ON THAT BUT THAT'S A GAS EASEMENT THEY WERE HAVING TO RESPECT, [CHUCKLING] BUT WE ARE ADDRESSING THAT UP JUST LIKE WE'RE DRESSING UP THE THIS DRAINAGE HERE IN THE MIDDLE. WE DON'T HAVE TO DO SOME OF THE WEIRS THAT WE'RE DOING AND SOME OF THE WAY WE'RE DOING THE WALKWAYS AT ALL, BUT WE'RE DOING THAT BECAUSE WE BELIEVE IT'S A CREATIVE TO THE PROPERTY VALUES THAT SURROUND IT AND ARE DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO IT. SAME THING APPLIES WITH MEASURED IN TERMS OF THE BUILDINGS AND HOW THEY ORIENT. IT'S REALLY NO DIFFERENT THAN OUR ENTIRE PLAN. WE ACTUALLY JOKE INTERNALLY THAT OUR THAT OUR THAT ALL OF OUR BUILDINGS HAVE NO FRONT OR BACK. A LOT OF THEM ARE THREE AND FOUR SIDED. THAT'S NOT GOING TO BE ANY DIFFERENT, REALLY. WE'VE GOT TO HAVE A FACE TO [INAUDIBLE] AND WE'VE GOT TO HAVE A FACE INTERIOR, AND SO WE'VE GOT SOME IDEAS. WE THINK THEY'RE GOOD IDEAS, BUT WE'RE STILL DEVELOPING THOSE IDEAS, ESPECIALLY BECAUSE MOST OF THE THREE BLOCKS THAT HAPPEN TO THE NORTH OF THE PHASE ONE ARE IN A FUTURE PHASE, AND SO WE'RE REALLY FOCUSED ON THAT ON THIS. WHAT WE SEE IS A SIGNATURE BLOCK RIGHT THERE WHERE THE DREAM HOTEL WAS ANNOUNCED AND THE OFFICE BUILDING AND MIXED USE TOWER RIGHT NEXT TO IT. IT'LL BE ONE OF THE TALLEST TOWERS IN ALL AT FRISCO, IF NOT THE TALLEST TOWER IN FRISCO, MOST LIKELY, AND SO WE'RE EXCITED ABOUT THINGS LIKE THAT AND THE MOMENTS IN OUR PLAN WHERE WE GET TO EXPLORE. CAN YOU POINT OUT WHAT YOU WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT WITH SAYING POSSIBLY THE TALLEST TOWER IN YOUR COMPLEX? YEAH, I MEAN, THERE'S A LOT OF DENSITY THAT GOES IN THIS BLOCK IN TERMS OF PROGRAM. [01:05:01] THERE'LL BE AN OFFICE, RESIDENTIAL. THERE'LL BE THE DREAM HOTEL, OBVIOUSLY SOME RETAIL. IT IS QUITE A SIGNATURE BLOCK IN OUR PLAN. IT'S THE TERMINUS OF OUR MAIN STRIP. THANK YOU. ONE MORE QUESTION FOR YOU. JUST BEFORE I SAY THAT, YOU SHOULD TAKE CREDIT FOR THE NORTH SOUTH DRAINAGE DITCH AND THE GAS EASEMENT. THE FACT THAT YOU GUYS ARE DRESSING THOSE UP--I WILL PLEASE TELL MY TEAM THAT. OKAY, TELL HIS TEAM TO TAKE CREDIT FOR DRESSING THOSE UP. LAST QUESTION, THEN, THE SOUTHEAST CORNER. WE TALKED ABOUT THAT, ABOUT HOW THAT'S A GREAT FUTURE OFFICE, COMPLEX LOCATION, HIGH END , AND WE TALKED ABOUT THE DIFFICULT CONNECTION COMING FROM BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE AND COMING FROM ANY OTHER DEVELOPMENTS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE TOLL ROAD AND CAN YOU JUST ANSWER THE QUESTION ABOUT MAKING THAT CORNER LOOK INVITING AS PEOPLE COME UNDER THE TOLL ROAD AND THEY'RE TRYING TO GET INTO FIREFLY? WHAT YOU'RE DOING WITH THAT CORNER? WELL, I THINK THAT I THINK THE CORNER THAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO IS THAT CORNER THERE. WE BELIEVE THAT'S PROBABLY ONE OF THE MOST DESIRABLE OFFICE CORNERS IN THE ENTIRE METROPLEX, IF NOT NORTH TEXAS IN GENERAL. WE THINK THAT WILL PROBABLY BE A LATTER PHASE UNLESS THERE'S A COMPANIES THAT COME ALONG OR A COMPANY THAT COMES ALONG, AND [INAUDIBLE] IT'S ABOUT 19 ACRES, I THINK THERE'S GOING TO BE WE'RE VERY EXCITED WITH WHAT BAYLOR HAS ANNOUNCED AND PLAN TO DO. WE COULDN'T BE MORE THRILLED WITH THE NEIGHBOR THAT WE'RE GETTING, AND WE DISCUSSED INTERNALLY ABOUT HOW TO POSSIBLY CONNECT WITH THEM AND WITH THE USERS TO THE SOUTH, ALSO TO THE WEST OF US AND WE THINK THERE'S ALL KINDS OF INTERESTING POSSIBILITIES UNDERNEATH THE TOLL ROAD, POSSIBLY EVEN A COVERED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE OVER THE TOLL ROAD. A LITTLE BIT HARDER PATH TO TAKE, BUT IT IS POSSIBLE. THERE'S AN ARTICLE THAT WAS JUST RELEASED, I BELIEVE IT WAS THIS MORNING IN [INAUDIBLE] MAGAZINE ABOUT AUTONOMOUS TROLLEYS AND VEHICLES, AUTONOMOUS TAXIS. WE BELIEVE WE'RE FOUR YEARS OUT FROM WHERE WE SIT TODAY, PROBABLY FROM THE OPENING OF PHASE ONE. WE BELIEVE IN FOUR YEARS THE WORLD CHANGES A LOT IN TERMS OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES AND TROLLEYS, AND SO WE HOPE TO TAP INTO AND EXPLORE SOME OF THOSE TECHNOLOGIES AS WELL. THANK YOU. NO, I APPRECIATE THE ANSWER THERE. I THINK YOU GUYS ARE ON THE RIGHT TRACK WITH THAT. SO JUST TWO FINAL COMMENTS. THE NIGHTTIME, THE IDEA OF KEEPING THE TRAILS AVAILABLE, THE TRAILS AND PARKS AND STUFF, NOT SHUTTING THEM DOWN AT DUSK. CAN YOU JUST SPEAK ABOUT THAT VERY QUICKLY? SURE. OBVIOUSLY, IT'S A TREMENDOUS INVESTMENT THAT THE WILKS FAMILY IS MAKING IN THE 40 ACRES OF PARK AREA, AND SO THE CHALLENGE IS TO BE ABLE TO ENJOY THAT INVESTMENT AND MONETIZE THAT INVESTMENT INTO THE NIGHTTIME HOURS. TYPICALLY, A PARK IS A BIT INERT AND DEAD DURING THE EVENING AND NIGHTTIME HOURS, AND SO OUR JOB REALLY IS TO CREATE PROGRAMING AND INTEREST AND SAFETY WITHIN THAT PARK IN ORDER TO EXTEND THE LIFE OF THAT PARK INTO THE EVENING HOURS AND SO WE FULLY INTEND TO DO THAT. THANK YOU, APPRECIATE IT. THAT'S ALL I HAD. FINAL COMMENT. CHAIRMAN BOX, I GUESS THE NIGHTTIME TRAILS AND PARKS COULD HELP DEAL WITH THE HEAT THAT WE TALKED ABOUT AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS, HOPEFULLY SOME NICE CONNECTIVITY. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER PETRAS. I'M REALLY EXCITED ABOUT THE PROJECT. I THINK YOU GUYS HAVE DONE A PHENOMENAL JOB. I'M THRILLED AT HOW WELL YOU GUYS HAVE BEEN ABLE TO COLLABORATE WITH STAFF AND TO CREATE THIS VISION. I'LL BE DISAPPOINTED WHEN CONSTRUCTION STARTS BECAUSE [INAUDIBLE] ON THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR HAVE FOR THE LAST FIVE YEARS, BUT I DIDN'T KNOW THERE WAS A GAS LINE EASEMENT THERE EITHER. SO MAYBE I SHOULDN'T, [CHUCKLING] BUT NONETHELESS, I THINK THE BIGGEST CONCERN I HAD INITIALLY WAS WITH THE RIGHT OF WAY WHEN WE MET AND SPOKE. I THINK THE PHASING PLAN KIND OF SOLVED THAT FOR ME, AND THEN LOOKING AT LARGER DEVELOPMENTS LIKE THIS, I THINK OF LEGACY WEST. THE HARD CORNER HAS REMAINED UNDEVELOPED WITH SOME UNCERTAINTY AND WAITING FOR THE RIGHT USER TO COME IN, AND I THINK THAT CAN BE VERY SIMILAR WITH WHAT WE HAVE HERE. SO I DON'T HAVE AS MUCH HEARTBURN OVER THAT ANYMORE. SO HATS OFF TO YOU. I'M EXCITED AND I'LL CERTAINLY BE SUPPORTING THIS TONIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER, AND WELCOME TO BOARD. [01:10:03] THANK YOU FOR SERVING. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT, I THINK A QUESTION FOR JONATHAN AND IT MIGHT BE--I REALIZE THAT THE 380 EXPANSION IS OUT OF THEIR CONTROL AND THAT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT THEY BROUGHT ON OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, AND SO AS THAT LAY OUT CAME OUT THAT JOEL SHOWED IS POTENTIALLY MISSING SOME OR MAJORITY OF THOSE BUILDINGS, KIND OF EXPOSING THE TOWNHOMES, AND THAT'S FINE IF THAT'S WHAT THEY MOVE FORWARD WITH, BUT IF THEY DID, I MEAN, THERE'S PLENTY OF EXAMPLES OF SHOWING TOWNHOMES UP AGAINST A MAJOR HIGHWAY. WOULD YOU REQUIRE MORE OF AN INCREASED BUFFER OR WOULD YOU WANT TO RETAINING WALL? I DON'T WANT ONE. I'M JUST ASKING TRY TO UNDERSTAND IF THEY WERE TO UNFORTUNATELY NOT HAVE THE BUILDINGS BE THAT BUFFER, WHAT WOULD BE ASKED FROM A SCREENING STANDPOINT? WOULD IT BE A FENCE? WOULD IT BE A WALL, AN INCREASED BUFFER? SURE. I GOT AN ANSWER TO THAT. YEAH, THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION, JOHN. SO WE'VE ACTUALLY GOT TWO ALTERNATIVE SCHEMES THAT CONTEMPLATE THAT 380 EXPANSION SHOWING THAT EXACTLY THE RED ZONE THAT JOEL PRESENTED EARLIER. ONE OF THEM DOES INCLUDE A AN ELONGATED LANDSCAPE BUFFER THAT INCLUDES. IT BASICALLY IS A RETAINED EDGE PIECE THAT AGAIN BUT THERE'S STILL OFFICES THAT BUFFER THAT BUT WE WOULD BRING THE EARTH UP AND SORT OF HELP BUFFER. IT ACTUALLY CREATES SOME REALLY INTERESTING GATEWAYS, NORTHERN GATEWAYS INTO OUR SITE. SO THERE'S THAT SCHEME. THE OTHER SCHEME IS THEY'RE STILL PRETTY LARGE PAD SITES IN THEIR OWN RIGHT, EVEN SKINNY UP. EVEN WITH THAT TAKE--WE STILL WANT OFFICE UP THERE. WE THINK THAT OFFICE IS STRONG IT ALBEIT LOW RISE. IT WILL BE A LOW RISE OFFICE WITH SOME PARKING UNDERNEATH AND TUCKED UNDERNEATH. DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WE'RE SHOWING NOW, BUT IT STILL WORKS, AND SO WE HAVE THAT CONFIDENCE. YEAH, I JUST DIDN'T WANT TO SEE A WALL GO UP. I MEAN, WE WOULDN'T WANT TO SEE THAT EITHER FOR THE APPLICANT. WE TALKED ABOUT THIS CITY BEING FAMILY FRIENDLY, AND I THINK THAT'S NOT ONLY A MOTTO. I THINK THAT'S HOW FRISCO IS HOPING TO STAY FOR A LONG TIME. I THINK IT WAS ITEM 12 YOU SHOWED ABOUT CREATING THIS ART PIECE OR CENTERPIECE FOR PEOPLE TO COME VISIT. [INAUDIBLE] ONE MORE SLIDE. RIGHT THERE. IT WAS NUMBER 12 THAT OUR PIECE THIS IS JUST A REQUEST IS A STRONG WORD SOMETHING TO CONSIDER WHEN WE WHEN WE SAY THIS IS TRULY FAMILY FRIENDLY, YOU KNOW, I'M ALL FOR ART, BUT IF IT'S FAMILY FRIENDLY, IF IT'S A PIECE OF ART, A PIECE OF ART THAT KIDS CAN TOUCH AND PLAY AND WALK ON, IF THAT'S THE DIRECTION YOU GO, IF IT'S A WATER FEATURE, I'D SAY IT NEEDS TO BE, BUT NOT JUST SOMETHING TO LOOK AT, BUT KIDS CAN PLAY, TOUCH AND FEEL. SO I'M NOT TRYING TO TELL YOU HOW TO DO IT, BUT I WOULD HOPE YOU WOULD SAY IF WE TRULY ARE FAMILY FRIENDLY, MAKE IT FAMILY FRIENDLY TO BE AROUND RATHER THAN JUST SOMETHING TO LOOK AT. THAT'S JUST A THOUGHT I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU GUYS TO CONSIDER AS YOU'RE DOING YOUR PROGRAMMING,. KUDOS, I MEAN, I HOPE PEOPLE REALIZE 650,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE AND RETAIL COMING IN PHASE ONE. THAT'S A HUGE UNDERTAKING AND KUDOS TO YOU ALL. APPRECIATE IT. I HOPE PEOPLE REALIZE HOW AWESOME THAT IS. THAT'S COMING IN THE FIRST PHASE OF 650,000. ULTRA EXCITED ABOUT THAT. JUST MAKING A POINT OF REFERENCE. FOUR YEARS AGO I HAD MULTIPLE PEOPLE COME TO ME AND SAID, WHY DID THEY BUILD THAT BIG THEATER CLEAR OUT ON 380 AND TOLL? AND THAT WAS I WOULD HEAR IT WAS LIKE THEY JUST BUILT THIS MASSIVE MOVIE THEATER CLEAR UP THERE. I THINK IN TEN YEARS, PEOPLE ARE GOING TO SAY, WHY DID THEY BUILD THAT LITTLE TINY THEATER AT SUCH A GREAT CORNER AT 380 AND THE TOLL? RIGHT, AND IT JUST SHOWS YOU HOW DIFFICULT PLANNING IS BECAUSE EVERYONE PROBABLY IN THIS ROOM, TEN YEARS AGO, GO, MAN, HOW COOL WOULD IT BE TO HAVE THAT BIG THEATER? BUT NOW WE LOOK AT IT AND NOW IT'S GOING TO BE THE WEAKEST PART OF THIS. IT'S NOT YOUR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS AREA. I MEAN, YOU'RE BUILDING A GREAT PRODUCT AND WE HAVE THIS LITTLE THEATER. SO MORE JUST A COMMENT OF UNDERSTANDING PLANNING. I'M EXCITED FOR WHAT YOU'RE BRINGING HERE. I ASSUME A SIGN PACKAGE WILL COME LATER, I HOPE AS YOU'RE GETTING CLOSER TO THAT, I REALIZE THAT WE HAVE GREAT STRINGENCY ON SAME PACKAGES AND I REALIZE IT'S NOT PART OF THIS APPLICATION, BUT WHEN YOU'RE CREATING SOMETHING THAT HAS THIS POTENTIAL, BE CREATIVE WITH THAT SAME PACKAGE. I HOPE THAT YOU KIND OF PUSH THE ENVELOPE OF SOMETHING THAT'S VERY ATTRACTIVE. SCIENCE CAN REALLY CAN CHANGE A DEVELOPMENT FOR GOOD OR BAD. I HOPE THAT'S SOMETHING YOU CONSIDER. I WANT TO MENTION THIS ON THE SIGN ORDINANCE COUNCIL UPDATED THE SIGN ORDINANCE JUST IN THE PAST MONTH, SO THERE WERE SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES MADE. [01:15:06] WE HAD A BRIEFING BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, SO A LOT OF CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO THAT. THERE IS A SMALL SECTION IN THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT THAT DOES TALK ABOUT SIGNAGE, BUT I MEAN, THAT IS THE SAME PACKAGE FOR THIS PD. IT WOULD BE MORE. THEY'LL HAVE TO COME THROUGH AGAIN WITH A LITTLE MORE DETAIL. CORRECT? WHAT WE HAVE HAVING HERE IN HERE AND WHAT WE NOW AS ALLOW IS TO SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT THAN BEFORE. CLARIFICATION, BUT I KNOW THERE'S A COST COMPONENT WITH THAT SIGNAGE, BUT IT REALLY CAN TRANSFORM A PROJECT. SO JUST TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION. WE AGREE IT WAS ALREADY MENTIONED. THANK YOU FOR BEING PATIENT WITH REMOVING THE NAME OXBOW. OR MAYBE IT WAS JUST A BRILLIANT MARKETING STRATEGY THAT YOU CAME UP WITH ONE OF THE WORST NAMES AND SAYS ANYTHING IS GOING TO SOUND BETTER. [CHUCKLING] GREAT STRATEGY. SO FIREFLY, JUST SEEMS LIKE THIS AMAZING NAME NOW. IT WORKED! YES, SIR. ANYWAY, EXCITED ABOUT THE PROJECT. I MEAN, I THINK THIS WOULD BE A GREAT ASSET TO THE COMMUNITY. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU, JOHN. GREAT. THANKS. JUST TO ADDRESS ONE OF YOUR CONCERNS THAT IS AN ACTUAL BUILT PLAY AND KIDS CAN GO INSIDE IT AND CLIMB ALL AROUND IT IN A PROTECTED WAY. OUR WHOLE DEVELOPMENT IS ABOUT EXPERIENCE. THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE IT. SO I DON'T HAVE A VOTE TONIGHT. IT'S A LITTLE STRANGE, TO BE HONEST, JOHN. I DO HAVE A QUESTION. I BROUGHT UP THE ITEM AROUND THE BRIDGE AND I WOULD PUSH THAT. I ABSOLUTELY DON'T WANT TO TXDOT BRIDGE HERE. ARE THERE ANY RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WE COULD IN YOUR THAT YOU WOULD PUT OUT THAT WE COULD TALK TO THE APPLICANT ABOUT TO TIE THAT DOWN, SO IT'S NOT A TXDOT BRIDGE? WELL, THE ROAD IS IS NOT A TXDOT. IT'S UNDER THE CITY'S CONTROL, BUT AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, LIKE ANY TIME YOU'RE CONSIDERING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS AND YOU GET SHOWN A PRETTY PICTURE, IF IT'S NOT IN THE PD, THERE'S NO REQUIREMENT FOR IT. SO THAT COULD BE SOMETHING THAT BE PART OF YOUR MOTION IF YOU WANT TO INCLUDE THAT, BUT THEN WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO GET AN EXHIBIT OF WHAT THAT IS AND INCLUDE IT. WE'VE HAD PDS IN THE PAST WHERE THAT WAS DONE AND THAT TYPE OF BRIDGE DID GET BUILT. SO I'M JUST BRAINSTORMING HERE. I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM, AND I FEEL TOTALLY THE SAME WAY AS YOU. I KNOW THE BRIDGE YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. JUST THE STRAIGHT, UGLY THING. SOMETIMES WE HAVE TO PUT IT ON THE APPLICANT AS IF THEY'RE TRULY TRYING TO BUILD THIS AMAZING PROJECT, AND DREAMS CAN HOLD THEM TO A STANDARD OF THAT ARCHITECTURE. I FEEL THEY'RE GOING TO GIVE THE INPUT OF GOING, WE DON'T WANT A CRAPPY LOOKING BRIDGE THERE, BUT MY CONCERN IS, IS THEY MAY NOT BE THE DEVELOPER IN THE FUTURE. FAIR POINT. SOMETHING CAN HAPPEN, AND THEN WE HAVE THIS SITTING HERE FOR THE CITY AND SOMEONE COULD JUST DECIDE, YES, THEY STILL GOT TO BUILD A PARK AND 650,000, AS YOU MENTIONED. YEAH, BUT THAT'S MY CONCERN. IF I CAN JUST ASK THE APPLICANT, IS THERE ANYTHING YOU'D BE WILLING TO DO TO SATISFY THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BUILD A CONCRETE BRIDGE WITH CONCRETE SIDES. PROBABLY MORE OF A QUESTION FOR KYLE. I DO HAVE A RESPONSE THAT I MEAN, PART OF THE REASON WE HAVEN'T REALLY WE'VE GOT SEVERAL DIFFERENT DESIGNS AND RENDERINGS AND SOME OF THE DISCUSSION INTERNALLY TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT OF INSIGHT IS A LOT OF OUR ARCHITECTURE IS OF A SCALE THAT'S ICONIC IN NATURE, ESPECIALLY FOR FRISCO, AND SO WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO EXAMINE IS THE APPROPRIATE EXPRESSION OF THE BRIDGE, AND WE'RE JUST SIMPLY NOT THERE YET IN THE DESIGN PROCESS. THERE'S A SIGNATURE SITE RIGHT HERE THAT WILL HAVE SOME OF THE MOST SPECTACULAR VIEWS IN ALL OF THE CITY, AND SO WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO EXPLORE IS DOES A. SOME SORT OF [INAUDIBLE] TYPE EXPOSED STRUCTURE IN TERMS OF TRUSTING. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE OR DOES IT MAKE MORE SENSE LIKE SOMETHING YOU MIGHT SEE LIKE A BRIDGE IN BARCELONA WHERE IT'S HEAVILY LANDSCAPED, BEAUTIFUL LIGHT POLES, MORE PEDESTRIAN IN NATURE, AND THAT'S JUST SOMETHING WE DON'T UNDERSTAND YET, AND SO IT REQUIRES QUITE A BIT [01:20:04] OF STUDY, AS YOU CAN IMAGINE, AND SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT'S WHY WE'RE WE'RE KIND OF STILL IN EXPLORATION ON THAT. COMMISSIONER KENDALL, WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS JUST BEFORE YOU ANSWER? [INAUDIBLE] THIS QUESTION FOR YOU: IF YOU HAD TO, WOULD YOU WANT SOMETHING THAT GOES HAS A LIFT TO IT RATHER THAN STRAIGHT? IT JUST HAS A NATURAL UP THREE FEET. OR IS IT MORE BESIDES THAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR ARCHITECTURAL? EITHER AND THE APPLICANT MENTIONED IT COULD BE REALLY VERY PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY AND ACTIVATED WITH LANDSCAPING, ETC., OR IT COULD BE SOMETHING VERY ICONIC THAT IS VISUALLY ICONIC. I DON'T KNOW. I THINK THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE DEALING WITH. YEAH, WE DON'T WANT TOO MANY THINGS SCREAMING AT YOU, RIGHT? BECAUSE IF EVERYTHING SCREAMS NOTHINGS SPEAKING LOUDLY AND I SHARE, I THINK DURING THE PRESENTATION IT LOOKED PHENOMENAL, AND I UNDERSTAND YOUR PIECE OF IT OF NEEDING TO STUDY IT MORE TO MAKE SURE IT MAKES SENSE WITH THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT ARCHITECTURE AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE, PERHAPS. I MEAN, IF THE MOTION WAS PROPOSED TO COMMIT TO AN ENHANCED DECORATIVE THEMED STYLE BRIDGE, WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO COMMIT TO THAT? SO I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, AND OUR THOUGHT PROCESS IS, YEAH, THIS BRIDGE HAS TO BE IT CAN'T JUST BE A REGULAR OLD CONCRETE BRIDGE STRAIGHT ACROSS. WE UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT WHAT I WANT TO STAY AWAY FROM IS TYING THIS ARCHITECTURALLY DOWN IN SOME WAY, KNOWING THAT THE COST OF SOMETHING LIKE THIS OR WHAT MAKES PROJECTS DIFFICULT IS GETTING SO TIED DOWN WHERE ECONOMICS REALLY START TO BE A BURDEN, AND WE FEEL LIKE WE'VE MADE A VERY LARGE COMMITMENT IN THIS PD AND IN THIS PLAN FROM WHERE WE ARE TODAY. I MEAN, WE WERE AT 630,000 WORTH OF COMMERCIAL RETAIL HOSPITALITY. WE HAVE TO FINISH THE PARK BEFORE WE CAN PULL CO FOR THE MULTIFAMILY OR THE URBAN UNITS. I MEAN, THESE ARE VERY BIG, YOU KNOW, THINGS THAT WE'RE DOING AND OBVIOUSLY YOU'VE KIND OF SEEN FROM WHAT WE'VE PROPOSED, IT'S AN EXTREMELY HIGH END PRODUCT. IT'D BE VERY DIFFICULT TO TRY TO TIE DOWN IN THIS FORMAT SOMETHING THAT'S THIS SIGNIFICANT FOR US BECAUSE INTERNALLY WE HAVEN'T EVEN LIKE MAYBE IT'S ONE OF THOSE OLD ENGLISH BRIDGES LIKE YOU SEE AT ST ANDREW'S, YOU KNOW, THAT'S COMING ACROSS THERE AND IT'S SUPER COOL. OR MAYBE IT'S MORE OF--BUT, YOUR ANSWER IS YOU WOULD REQUEST THAT THE COMMISSION DOES NOT TIE DOWN ANYTHING WITH THE BRIDGE. THAT'S RIGHT. OKAY. JUST TO CLARIFY, MY INTENTION WASN'T TO TIE ANYTHING SPECIFIC, WHICH IS JUST GENERICALLY SOME SORT OF ENHANCEMENT, AND WE WOULD GIVE YOU THE DISCRETION TO MAKE THAT DECISION. BEFORE YOU RESPOND TO THAT, I'M GOING TO SAY BACK AWAY FROM THAT BECAUSE--SORRY, I'M THE NEW GUY. YEAH. HOW DO WE KNOW IF THEY'RE MEETING IT. IT'S NOT FAIR TO THEM. IT'S NOT FAIR TO STAFF. THAT'S VERY IN THAT POSITION. I LOVE THE THOUGHT COMMISSIONER COX, BUT I THINK THERE IS SOMETIMES THERE IS AN EXERCISE OF FAITH AND I REALIZE WHY, BUT THERE'S A SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL COMMITMENT THAT THEY'RE ALREADY PUTTING UP. I WOULDN'T WANT THAT TO STOP IT, BUT I TOTALLY RESPECT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, BUT I WOULD STILL SUPPORT THIS WITH AS IT STANDS. CHAIR BOX CAN I GET YOU TO REITERATE, YOU SAID EITHER AN ICONIC LIKE ARCHITECTURALLY ICONIC OR DO YOU REMEMBER THE LANGUAGE YOU USED TO DESCRIBE ACTIVATED OR SOME SORT OF YOU SAID PEDESTRIAN, PEDESTRIAN ACTIVATED. BUT I MEAN, THEY HAVE TO GET PEOPLE TO AND FRO EITHER WAY. SO CAN I ASK ONE QUESTION OF THE APPLICANT, THE RESTAURANT AREA THAT YOU MENTIONED TO ME THAT'S NEXT TO THE BRIDGE. YES. ON THIS MAP THAT'S UP THERE, CAN YOU KIND OF JUST POINT OUT TO THE COMMISSIONERS WHERE YOU'RE LOOKING AT MAYBE DOING SOME ADDITIONAL RESTAURANTS THAT SIT ADJACENT TO THE BRIDGE? THERE'S A REASON WHY I'M ASKING THAT. I THINK IT HELPS. YEAH, THERE IT IS RIGHT THERE. CAN YOU ELABORATE WHAT YOU WERE THINKING FOR THAT AREA? YES, SIR. WE'VE LOOKED AT TRAVEL DISTANCES AND WE THINK IF THERE'S A SIGNATURE OR OFFICE DEVELOPMENT THAT GOES ON THAT 19 ACRE CORNER, THAT WE'RE GOING TO NEED SOME DESTINATION TYPE RESTAURANT FOR THEM. [01:25:05] WE ALSO SEE THIS PIECE HERE AS BEING SOME SORT OF SIGNATURE HOSPITALITY MOVE IN THE FUTURE WITH MAYBE SOME RESI ASSOCIATED WITH IT, SERVICE CONDOS, THOSE KIND OF THINGS, OR BRANDED RESIDENCES, AND SO WE THINK THAT THIS AREA IS GOING TO BE QUITE BEAUTIFUL. THERE'S A LOT OF THOUGHT THAT'S GONE INTO IT ALREADY, AND SO IT'S A GREAT SPOT FOR IT. THANK YOU FOR ELABORATING. CHAIRMAN BOX THAT'S KIND OF WHAT MADE ME FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE ABOUT THE BRIDGE WHEN I WAS TALKING WITH THEM WAS WHEN THEY DESCRIBED WHAT THEY'RE THINKING ABOUT PUTTING THERE. THEY WANT TO GET THOSE RENTS. YES, THAT IS IT'S ALMOST THEY'RE FORCING THEIR OWN HAND TO DO SOMETHING NICE LOOKING IN THERE WITHOUT PUTTING IT DOWN. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSION? I'D LIKE TO MAKE MOTION. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 21 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL SECOND SECOND FROM COLBERG. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. CONGRATULATIONS AND LOOK FORWARD TO THIS BEING BUILT AND COMING UP AND WALKING YOUR PARK. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IN THE DAY AND THE NIGHT. HOT OR COOL? YEAH, EXACTLY. CONGRATULATIONS. YOU GOT APPLAUSE FROM [INAUDIBLE] IF YOU'RE WONDERING. CHAIRMAN BOX, CAN YOU REAL QUICK JUST REITERATE HOW MUCH WORK STAFF HAS PUT INTO THIS MAJOR PROJECT? YEAH, I MEAN, I THINK WE DID, BUT ABSOLUTELY A LOT OF WORK THERE. APPRECIATE IT, AND STILL, UNFORTUNATELY, FORTUNATELY, A LOT OF WORK TO DO BECAUSE YOU GUYS MAKE SURE THIS IS DONE TO PLAN, AND THAT WAS ONE OF JOHN'S COMMENTS IS HOW DO YOU LOCK DOWN THIS BRIDGE SO WE CAN DO WHAT YOUR VISION IS? AND IT'S HARD TO LOCK DOWN VISION. IF I CAN MAKE A COMMENT. SORRY. SORRY. SO, ITEM 22 PUBLIC HEARING ZONING CHAMPIONSHIP EDITION Z22-0007 OWNERS 380 AND CHAMPION [22. Public Hearing - Zoning: Championship Addition (Z22-0007)] LLC. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY SHOWN HERE FROM AGRICULTURAL TO RETAIL. THIS REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN THAT WE'LL TALK ABOUT IN A MOMENT, AS WELL AS THE ZONING ENTITLEMENTS THAT ARE PERMITTED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THIS INTERSECTION. ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION, YOU HAVE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO 80. THAT IS THE FIELDS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH. THAT PROPERTY IS ZONED SINGLE FAMILY 8.5. HOWEVER, THAT TRACK IS OWNED BY FRISCO ISD FOR A MIDDLE SCHOOL. THIS INTERSECTION IS VERY IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT IS GOING DOWN INTO THE PGA DEVELOPMENT. SO WHILE THIS IS STRAIGHT ZONING, THIS REQUEST WILL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE CITY'S RECENTLY ADOPTED US 380 OVERLAY DISTRICT. SO THAT MEANS THERE ARE THIS. THIS PARTICULAR CORNER IS A MAJOR GATEWAY. SO THERE ARE CERTAIN ENHANCED LANDSCAPE TREATMENTS THAT ARE GOING TO BE REQUIRED, BUILDING ELEVATIONS OR ELEVATED FROM OUR BASE CODE, A LITTLE BIT MORE OPEN SPACE CONNECTIVITY REQUIREMENTS. SO THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION, I'M SURE, THAT YOU'VE HEARD ABOUT DEPENDING ON WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN ON 380, HOW DO WE ENSURE THAT IT'S ICONIC AND YOU KNOW, THAT FIRST FRISCO IMPRESSION AS YOU'RE GOING DOWN INTO THE PGA? SO AGAIN STRAIGHT ZONING, BUT IT WILL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE US 380 OVERLAY DISTRICT. TO DATE, STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY PROJECT INPUT FORMS ON THIS REQUEST. SO TALKING ABOUT THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN, IT IS THIS PROPERTY IS DESIGNATED AS COMMERCIAL NOTE AND BUSINESS PARK, SO 100% NON RESIDENTIAL USES. SO WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT RETAIL ZONING, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LIMITS IT OR HAS A RECOMMENDATION TO LIMIT IT TO NO MORE THAN 30 ACRES AT KEY MAJOR INTERSECTIONS AND NO MORE THAN TWO CORNERS. THE EXCEPTION TO THAT RULE IS TO ALLOW RETAIL ON ALL FOUR CORNERS WHEN THE RETAIL IS INTEGRATED INTO A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. SO WHILE THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO ADD ABOUT 17 ACRES OF RETAIL ON THIS CORNER, IF YOU WERE TO LOOK AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER, WHICH IS IN FRISCO, THAT'S THE FIELDS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, WHICH DOES ALLOW RETAIL AND A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. THE TWO NORTHERN CORNERS ARE IN PROSPER, BUT IF YOU WERE TO LOOK AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER, THERE IS CURRENTLY AGAIN THAT'S IN PROSPER, BUT THERE IS CURRENTLY A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ON THAT PROPERTY THAT SPEAKS TO A MIXED USE COMPONENT, AND THEN THE NORTHEAST CORNER IS ZONED AG AGAIN IN THE TOWN OF PROSPER. [01:30:10] SO THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST DOES COMPLY WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN. THIS REQUEST IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS RETAIL THIS EVENING AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. GREAT. QUICK QUESTION. WHAT'S THE ROUGH OUT ON THE PICTURE THERE ON THE PROPERTY? YOU KNOW WHAT THAT IS? THERE WAS SOME TYPE OF STORAGE WAY BACK WHEN. YES, GOT IT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? IS THE APPLICANT HERE? WOULD THEY LIKE TO SPEAK? JUST FOR QUESTIONS. OKAY. FOR THE RECORD, JUST AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. MOVE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER CONE SECOND FROM MORGAN. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM. SEEING NONE MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER COLBERG SECOND COMMISSIONER PETRAS. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. ITEM 22. ANY QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? IT'S PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. ONCE AGAIN, JONATHAN. NICE JOB. THANK YOU, AND BEING ABLE TO SEE HOW IT FITS IN TO THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND EVERYTHING AROUND IT THAT'S THERE. SO WITH THAT CAN I HAVE A MOTION? MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 22 AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF. MOTION TO APPROVE COMMISSIONER MORGAN. SECOND COMMISSIONER PETRAS. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. CONGRATULATIONS. THANKS FOR STAYING. ITEM 23 RESULTS OF THE JUNE 7TH, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. [23. Results of the June 7, 2022, City Council meeting.] IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. ITEMS IN THE PACKET? NO. ANY ITEM. NEXT ITEM, SCHEDULE A FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS. [24. Schedule of future discussion items.] WE'RE JUST ONE MEETING IN JULY. THAT'S RIGHT. SO THAT'LL BE THE YOUR SECOND MEETING IN JULY, THE 26TH. SO WE WILL NOT HAVE A P AND Z ON THE 12TH OF JULY. THAT'S RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER THING THAT LEAVES US WITH ONE THING. MOVE TO ADJOURN. MAY I HAVE A SECOND. SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER COLBERG SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL IN FAVOR: AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. WE ARE ADJOURNED AT 8:04. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.