[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:03]
>> GOOD EVENING. WELCOME TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
WE'RE GATHERED AT 6101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD AND THE TIME IS 6:31 PM.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
TONIGHT, COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE COMMISSIONER COHEN, COMMISSIONER BOX, COMMISSIONER KENDALL, COMMISSIONER KELLY, COMMISSIONER MORGAN AND ABSENT THIS EVENING IS COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG.
I'M ROB COX, I'M YOUR CHAIR FOR THIS EVENING.
REPRESENTING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, WE HAVE JOHN LETTELLIER, JONATHAN HUBBARD, CINDY JACKSON, ROLANDREA RUSSELL, MATTHEW BARRERA, LORI CROSS, KIRSTEN [INAUDIBLE].
[OVERLAPPING] OH SORRY, THE CHECK MARK WENT ABOVE IT.
JENNIFER MORGAN, AND ENGINEERING, WE HAVE JOEL FITTS AND TOYIN FAWEHINMI.
IN FIRE, WE HAVE JOHN GILLETTE AND ALYSSA BARSTOW.
AM I MISSING ANYONE? [NOISE] FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA THIS EVENING IS CITIZEN INPUT.
IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME.
PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM.
PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED, SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE.
PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR ANY APPLICANTS PRESENT THIS EVENING.
TO ENSURE THERE'S ENOUGH TIME FOR ALL TO SPEAK, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH CASE YOU HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 10 MINUTES.
PLEASE NOTE, THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT OR ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA.
WE WILL ALSO HAVE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS LATER IN THE EVENING.
DO WE HAVE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME DURING CITIZEN INPUT? OKAY.
>> IS IT FOR A SPECIFIC ITEM OR IS IT [INAUDIBLE]
>> WHAT ITEM NUMBER IS IT? [INAUDIBLE].
>> OKAY. SO YOU'LL BE ABLE TO SPEAK DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING.
[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES.[NOISE] ITEM 2, CONSIDER AN ACT UPON APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ON MAY 10TH, 2022.
COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, CONCERNS OR A MOTION ON ITEM 2?
>> MOVE TO APPROVE THE MAY 10TH REGULAR MEETING MINUTES.
>> A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5-0.
[CONSENT AGENDA]
ITEM 2 IS APPROVED. NEXT ON OUR AGENDA IS THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS ANY COMMISSION MEMBER MAY REQUESTS PRIOR TO THE MOTION AND VOTE ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY.ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH THE MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION.
WE HAVE ITEMS 3-29 THIS EVENING.
ARE THERE ANY THAT NEED TO BE PULLED FOR AN [OVERLAPPING]
>> NUMBER 7, WE'RE GOING TO WANT TO HAVE IT PULLED.
>> WE'RE GOING TO PULL NUMBER 7. ARE THERE ANY OTHERS?
>> MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS 3-6 AND 8-29.
>> A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5-0.
ITEMS 3-6 AND 8-29 ARE APPROVED.
[7. Final Plat: Collinsbrook Farm, Phase 4 (FP22-0024)]
ITEM 7, [NOISE] FINAL PLAT COLLINSBROOK FARM PHASE 4 AT FP22-0024 OWNERS, FIRST TEXAS HOMES INCORPORATED.>> THANK YOU, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THE PROJECT THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD IS MOVING FORWARD THIS EVENING WITH AN AMENDED RECOMMENDATION WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE SUBMITTED HOA DOCUMENTS BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE.
THE DOCUMENTS ARE RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL PLAT.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
>> DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 7?
MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 7 AS RECOMMENDED AND REVISED BY STAFF SUBJECT TO AS READ IN A MOMENT AGO BY STAFF.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5-0, ITEM 7 IS APPROVED AS AMENDED.
[30. Preliminary Site Plan: Railhead Phase 1, Block A, Lot 4 (PSP22-0020)]
[NOISE] NOW WE GO TO OUR REGULAR AGENDA.WE HAVE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND TWO REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS ON THE AGENDA.
EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PRECEDED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST.
THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED 10 MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION.
FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF, THE APPLICANT, BY THE COMMISSION, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.
ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED COMPLETE A SPEAKER'S CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT.
[00:05:02]
IF THERE ARE ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITIONS.PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE WITH THE COMMENTS.
THE TIME LIMIT IS FIVE MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK.
PLEASE NOTE, YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED.
AFTER ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS A CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO A FUTURE MEETING.
AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF OR THE APPLICANT.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES UNLESS THE COMMISSION DENIES THE CASE, THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL TO DENIAL, OUR FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AS TO WHEN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
[NOISE] ITEM 30, PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN, RAILHEAD PHASE I, BLOCK A, LOT 4, ESP 22-0020.
OWNERS, JEFFERSON RAIL HEAD, PHASE 2, LLC.
>> THANK YOU, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THE ITEM THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY STAFF.
STAFF FINDS THAT THE PROJECT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH CITY ORDINANCE, CODES, POLICIES, AND STANDARDS, AND THEREFORE, IT'S BEING RECOMMENDED FOR DISAPPROVAL FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
>> COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF ON THIS ITEM? DO I HAVE A MOTION?
>> MOVE TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING.
>> THERE IS NO PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS PARTICULAR ONE.
>> IF THERE IS NOT THEN I APOLOGIZE.
>> THERE'S NO SECOND ON THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOVE TO DISAPPROVE ITEM 30 FOR THE REASONS STATED AND IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND DELEGATE THE STAFF TO THE AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT FOR THE REASONS FOR THE DISAPPROVAL.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COHEN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5-0.
[31. Site Plan: Hollyhock Commercial Addition, Block A, Lot 1 (SP22-0027)]
ITEM 31, SITE PLAN, [INAUDIBLE] COMMERCIAL ADDITION BLOCK A, LOT 1, SP22-0027.OWNERS, ELAN ENERGY INCORPORATED.
>> THANK YOU, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, SORRY.
STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PROJECT AND FINDS THAT IT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH CITY ORDINANCES, STANDARDS, POLICIES, AND CODES, AND IS RECOMMENDING DISAPPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT WITH THE REASONS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT.
>> ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS BY THE COMMISSION?
>> IS THE APPLICANT WORKING WITH STAFF TO RESOLVE THESE ITEMS AT THIS TIME OR?
>> I'LL MAKE ONE. I MOVE TO DISAPPROVE ITEM NUMBER 31 FOR THE REASONS [NOISE] IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND DELEGATE TO STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT OF THE REASONS FOR THE DISAPPROVAL.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CONEY.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOX. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5 - 0.
[32. Public Hearing - Replat: Hall Park, Phase C3, Block A, Lot 4R; Phase C4, Block A, Lot 1; Phase D, Block A, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 (RP22-0016)]
ITEM IS DISAPPROVED.REPLOT HALL PARK PHASE C3 BLOCK A LOT 4R, PHASE C4 BLOCK A LOT 1, PHASE D BLOCK A, LOTS OF 1, 2, 3, 4 AND 5.
RP22-0016, OWNERS, HALL 2801 NETWORK ASSOCIATION LIMITED AKA HALL 2801 NETWORK ASSOCIATES, LLC.
>> THANK YOU, CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS.
BEFORE I GET STARTED, THIS ITEM MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE.
>> WHO DO YOU REMOVE FROM THE TABLE?
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5-0, ITEM'S BEEN REMOVED.
>> DURING THE MEETING, ON MAY 10TH, THE COMMISSION APPROVED A 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR THIS PROJECT TO THE MEETING TONIGHT.
THE APPLICANT HAS SINCE DECIDED TO WITHDRAW THIS PROJECT.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE WITHDRAWAL.
>> EXCELLENT. IS THE APPLICANT HERE, WERE THEY HERE TO SPEAK? ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING?
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5-0, PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM HERE THIS EVENING?
>> SEEING NONE MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5-0, PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.
COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS OR DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE WITHDRAWAL?
>> MOVE TO ACCEPT [NOISE] THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THE APPLICATION.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
[00:10:02]
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5-0, WITHDRAWAL IS ACCEPTED.
[33. Public Hearing - Zoning: Rolater & Independence (Z22-0010)]
ITEM 33, PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING ROLATER AND INDEPENDENCE, Z22.0010.OWNERS, ROLATER AND INDEPENDENCE LLC.
>> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. BEFORE YOU ALL TONIGHT IS A REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPERTIES SHOWN HERE FROM RETAIL TO SINGLE-FAMILY 8.5.
THIS REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING OF THE PROPERTIES TO THE EAST AND THE SOUTH.
THE APPLICANT HAS REACHED OUT TO THE HUNTERS CREEK HOA, AS WELL AS THE LARSONS CHILDCARE CENTER, WHICH IS DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THIS REQUEST.
NEITHER OF THOSE GROUPS WERE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS PROPOSED ZONING REQUEST.
TODAY, STAFF HAS RECEIVED ONE PROJECT INPUT FORM, REQUESTING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
STAFF DID HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO VISIT WITH THAT INDIVIDUAL AND PROVIDE THEM WITH THE REQUESTED INFORMATION.
SINCE THE PACKET HAS BEEN PUBLISHED, STAFF HAS RECEIVED TWO ADDITIONAL PROJECT INPUT FORMS, BOTH IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST.
THOSE PROJECT INPUT FORMS WERE PROVIDED TO YOU ALL PRIOR TO TONIGHT'S MEETING.
THIS REQUEST DOES CONFORM WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS SINGLE-FAMILY 8.5 THIS EVENING.
THE APPLICANT IS IN ATTENDANCE SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS WITH THEM, FOR THEM AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AS WELL.
>> EXCELLENT. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? WOULD THEY CARE TO SPEAK? YOU HAVE TO COME UP SIR AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.
>> YEAH, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.
>> GREGG HANSON, 6 HAYWOOD COURT, FRISCO.
I'M ALL IN FAVOR OF THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES BEING PUT THERE.
I GUESS I HAVE SOME QUESTION AS TO-
>> YOU'RE NOT THE APPLICANT, YOU'RE A RESIDENT, RIGHT? YOU DIDN'T SUBMIT THE ZONING REQUEST?
>> YOU HAVE TO SPEAK DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING PART, WE'RE NOT-
>> YES. WE'RE NOT THERE YET. EXCELLENT.
>> THE APPLICANT IS IN ATTENDANCE TONIGHT, SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM, BUT DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK UNLESS YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THEM.
>> WE HAVE A QUESTION ACTUALLY FOR YOU AT THIS TIME. MR. KELLY.
>> THIS IS A REALLY [LAUGHTER] GOOD THING TO BE HAPPENING I THINK.
DO WE HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MANY 8.5 HOMES WILL FIT ON THIS PROPERTY?
AROUND 30. AGAIN, THIS IS A STRAY ZONING REQUEST.
>> ALL RIGHT. I WAS JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT-
>> SOME OF THEM HAVE SUBMITTED PLANS BUT.
>> -WHAT THE PLAN MIGHT BE FOR THE FUTURE? 30 HOMES WOULD MAKE VERY NICE NEIGHBORHOOD?
>> YEAH. JONATHAN, CAN YOU JUST ELABORATE, YOU GUYS DID A GREAT JOB EXPLAINING IN THE STAFF REPORT ABOUT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN?
>> CAN YOU JUST ELABORATE ON WHAT YOU EXPLAINED IN THERE, WHY IT MAKES SENSE TO GO FROM COMMERCIAL NODE TO RESIDENTIAL HERE?
>> YES. THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES SUBURBAN NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMERCIAL NODE FOR THE PROPERTY.
THE COMMERCIAL NODE IS ESSENTIALLY RIGHT HERE AT THE INTERSECTION.
THEN THE SUBURBAN NEIGHBORHOOD IS BACK OFF THE INTERSECTION.
THERE'S A COUPLE OF THINGS I WANT TO POINT OUT.
FIRST, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOMMENDS RETAIL BE LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN 30 ACRES AT KEY MAJOR INTERSECTIONS AND NO MORE THAN TWO CORNERS.
YOU ALREADY HAVE RETAIL ZONING ON NOT ONLY THIS CORNER, BUT ON THE NORTH WEST CORNER AND SOUTH WEST CORNERS.
YOU ALREADY HAVE THE OTHER TWO INTERSECTIONS AND THEN RIGHT NOW THERE ARE JUST OVER 43 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL ZONING.
LIKE I SAID, 30 ACRES IS ESSENTIALLY THAT SWEET SPOT IN ACCORDANCE AS THE STATE ABOUT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THIS REQUEST LOOKS TO ELIMINATE 13.1 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL ZONING OF THIS INTERSECTION.
ALSO, IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE FACE OF RETAIL IS CHANGING.
PREVIOUSLY, WHERE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN EVERY MILE ALL THE INTERSECTIONS, NOW IT'S ESSENTIALLY SKIPPING INTERSECTION.
SO IT'S MORE LIKELY TO OCCUR AT CUSTER AND KUWAIT AND SKIP INDEPENDENCE.
FOR THOSE REASONS, IT IS STATED THAT THIS REQUEST COMPLIES WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
>> THANK YOU, JONATHAN. GREAT EXPLANATION.
>> DO I HAVE A MOTION OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING?
>> MOTION OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING?
>> MOTION BY MR. KELLY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5-0 PUBLIC HEARING'S NOW OPEN.
SIR, IF YOU WANT TO COME BACK UP AND LET'S START THIS AGAIN.
[LAUGHTER] WE DO APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE.
[00:15:04]
>> GREGG HANSON, 6 HAYWOOD COURT, FRISCO, TEXAS.
I'D JUST LIKE TO SAY THAT I'M ALL FOR SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES BEING IN THIS AREA AS OPPOSED TO RETAIL.
I GUESS MY ONLY CONCERN WOULD BE THAT THE HOMES ARE CONSISTENT WITH OTHER HOMES IN THE AREA AND NOT BE TOWN HOMES OR ANYTHING OTHER SUCH.
>> EXCELLENT, THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD CARE TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME?
>> SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONEY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5-0, PUBLIC HEARING'S NOW CLOSED.
SIR, I JUST WANT TO ADDRESS ONE COMMENT YOU MADE.
BECAUSE OF THE ZONING HERE, A SINGLE-FAMILY 8.5 IS 8500 SQUARE FEET ON THE LOT.
UNTIL YOU GET UP INTO WHAT I WOULD CALL SINGLE-FAMILY 12, WHICH ARE LIKE HALF-ACRE BIGGER, THEY'RE ABOUT THE BIGGEST BEING BUILT IN FRISCO, SO IT'S A REALLY A GOOD THING.
ON THIS TYPE OF LOT HERE, PROBABLY COULD SUPPORT A SINGLE-FAMILY 7 OR EVEN A 55 OR PATIO HOME.
BUT I THINK 8.5 IS A GREAT ADDITION AND IT MATCHES SOME OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS AROUND, SO THEY'LL BE A REALLY GOOD ADDITION TO THIS CORNER.
LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING THIS WHEN IT'S DONE.
DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR?
>> JUST TO STATE WHAT YOU DID, I THINK IT'S A GOOD THING TO MOVE THIS AND TWO, YOUR POINT IS, THEY CAN'T PUT PATIO HOMES OR OTHER HERE.
THEY'RE GETTING IT APPROVED, THEY'RE GETTING ZONING FOR SINGLE-FAMILY 8.5.
>> ABSOLUTELY. COMMISSIONER CONEY?
>> YES. CAN WE JUST STATE FOR THE RECORD THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE THAT GOES ALONG WITH THE SFA, 0.5.
>> I JUST WANTED TO GET THAT ON THE RECORD. [OVERLAPPING]
>> THAT'S WHY IT'S 8.5, SO THE AVERAGE PERSON MAY NOT KNOW, BUT THAT'S WHERE THE 8.5 COMES FROM.
IT'S THE 8500S SQUARE FEET FOR A LOT. [OVERLAPPING].
>> SINGLE-FAMILY 0.7 WOULD BE?
>> THAT'S NOW ON THE RECORD TWICE FOR THIS STATEMENT.
>> I'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM [OVERLAPPING].
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CONEY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE. MOTION CARRIES 5-0.
CONGRATULATIONS. ITEM'S APPROVED.
[34. Results of the May 17, 2022, City Council meeting.]
>> NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA 34, RESULTS OF THE MAY 17TH 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
>> YEAH. IT WAS AN ORDINANCE CHANGE THAT WAS APPROVED BY COUNSEL THAT YOU ALL SIGNED OFF ON.
THEN THE ZONING CASE THAT YOU HAD ABOUT A MONTH AGO ON THE ROUND COURT IN MAINE FOR SINGLE-FAMILY 7 THAT WAS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL, SO THE NEXT STEP WILL BE THE ORDNANCE.
THE OTHER ONE WAS THE TOWN HOME REQUEST OVER AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF 4TH ARMY IN STONEBROOK.
CITY COUNCIL TABLED THAT FOR A MONTH IN ORDER FOR THE APPLICANT AND HOMEOWNERS TO GET TOGETHER.
CITY COUNCIL ENDED UP DENYING THAT REQUEST.
>> [OVERLAPPING] EXCELLENT. QUESTIONS?
[35. Schedule of future discussion items.]
LISA'S ITEM 35, SCHEDULED FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS. ANY ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE ON THE FUTURE AGENDA?>> NO ALBERT, BRING SOMETHING FORWARD, BUT LATER THIS PROBABLY TOWARDS THE LATER IN THE SUMMER, GET YOUR INPUT ON A FEW THINGS, BUT WE'VE GOT A NEW DEVELOPMENT MANAGER STARTING ON JUNE 20TH.
>> THEY'LL BE LOCKED AUGUST SECOND OR SOMETHING. THEY'LL START.
>> ALRIGHT. THAT LEAVES US WITH ONE MORE THING.
[36. Consider and act upon election of the Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, and Secretary of the Planning & Zoning Commission.]
BEFORE WE GO TO ITEM 36, IS CONSIDERED NOW THE FINAL LECTURE IN A CHAIRPERSON, VICE CHAIRPERSON, AND SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.JUST BEFORE WE GET INTO THAT TO MAKE A STATEMENT, THIS WILL BE MY LAST PLANNING ZONING MEETING.
I'M RESIGNING AND AS I WON'T BE LIVING IN FRISCO AS INTO THE END OF THE MONTH.
WE DOWNSIZED OUR HOME AND IN THE MARKET HERE, WE WERE ABLE TO GET SOMETHING ON THE LAKE AND GOLF COURSE THAT WE'VE BEEN WANTING TO LOOK AT FOR A LONG TIME.
BUT WHAT WE WANTED TO DO TONIGHT, IS GO AHEAD AND RE-ELECT OFFICERS SO THAT THE NEXT THING WILL BE SMOOTH.
I REALLY APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK OUR CITY EMPLOYEES, FELLOW COMMISSIONERS UNDER JOHN'S LEADERSHIP, HAVE DONE OVER THE LAST SEVEN YEARS.
I'M GOING TO BE MISSING BEING A PART OF THIS, BUT I THINK THE LEGACY THAT COLLECTIVELY WE HAVE ALL LEFT FOR THIS CITY IS OUTSTANDING.
PROJECTS THAT WE WORKED ON IN THE LAST SEVEN YEARS, I WAS LUCKY ENOUGH TO BE PART OF THAT WILL SET THIS CITY UP FOR THE NEXT FOUR YEARS.
[00:20:01]
IT'D BE A GREAT CITY. I'M EXCITED. JOHN?>> BEFORE I FINISH, I WANT TO SAY I APPRECIATE YOUR LEADERSHIP ON THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
JUST SOMETHING TO MENTION IN THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS, I'VE RECEIVED A LOT OF COMPLIMENTS ON THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ABOUT HOW WELL IT'S RUN AND COMPARED TO OTHER CITIES, AND YOU ALL STAND OUT.
I APPRECIATE THAT, WHEN IT COMES WITH PEOPLE BEING COMMITTED TO BE ON THE COMMISSION.
I JUST WANT TO PASS THAT ALONG.
>> I APPRECIATE IT. IT'S A COLLECTIVE EFFORT AND ALL THE CHAIRS THAT WE'VE HAD AND FEATURES WE'VE HAD IN THE SEVEN YEARS THAT I'VE BEEN PART OF IT AND IN DIFFERENT ROLES WERE IN GOOD HANDS WITH THE COMMISSIONERS THAT WE HAVE IN THIS COMMISSION.
I'M VERY PROUD OF EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM.
>> FIRST, I'D LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE. YOU'VE DONE A GREAT JOB.
YOU'VE BEEN A GREAT LEADER FOR THIS COMMISSION, AND I'M GOING TO MISS YOU.
BUT I WISH YOU THE BEST AND I UNDERSTAND WHY YOU'RE LEAVING.
BUT WE SURE DID LIKE WORKING WITH ROB COX. THANK YOU.
>> APPRECIATE THAT. I WILL BE DRIVING THROUGH FRISCO EVERY DAY BECAUSE THE ONLY WAY TO GET OUT OF THE [LAUGHTER] IS THROUGH FRISCO.
JOE WE GOT TO TALKING ABOUT TRAFFIC LIGHT THERE FOR 23.
>> WE WOULD HAVE TO PUT UP A GATE.
>> ROB, I WOULD JUST LIKE TO ECHO THE COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE.
YOU HAVE SERVED THE CITY VERY WELL, THERE'S A LOT OF MARK OF YOU ALONG THE CITY.
WHY? BECAUSE YOU PUT IN A LOT OF WORK, AND WORKING WITH DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS, WORKING WITH THE STAFF, WORKING WITH ALL OF US UP HERE.
I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMITMENT YOU'VE MADE NOT ONLY HERE, BUT YOUR LICENSE PLATES AT FRISCO.
YOU INVESTED YOUR OWN MONEY INTO SAYING, HEY, FRESCO IS MY HOME.
WHILE YOU MAY NOT BE LIVING IN FRISCO, YOU'RE ONLY A STONE'S THROW AWAY.
IF YOU'RE GOING TO BE ON THE GOLF COURSE, LET'S ALL MARK WHAT HOLE THAT IS, BECAUSE I DON'T HIT BALLS VERY STRAIGHT.
I MIGHT END UP HITTING A BALL, AND YOU MAY FIND ONE.
IF YOU FIND ONE, CALL ME, IT'LL BE MINE, DON'T WORRY.
>> CONGRATS AND APPRECIATE ALL YOUR COMMITMENTS YOU'VE PUT IN FOR THE CITY.
>> APPRECIATE IT. THIS IN MY HOMETOWN, AND WHEN FIELDS GETS DEVELOPED, AND IF THEY HAD A HOUSE UP THERE ON THE PGA WOULD NOW, I'D PROBABLY WOULD BE THERE.
BUT WHO KNOWS WHAT HAPPENS IN THE FUTURE? I REALLY DO APPRECIATE IT, GUYS.
>> WE VERY MUCH APPRECIATE ROB, YOU'VE DONE AN AWESOME JOB LEADING US AS CHAIR.
>> YEAH, WE APPRECIATE IT THAT.
IS THIS THE TIME TO TALK ABOUT DRIVE THROUGH TRAFFIC PROBLEMS WE HAVE WITH NON-RESIDENTS?
>> EXACTLY. [LAUGHTER] WE WILL SAVE THAT FOR A FUTURE AGENDA.
>> GOOD NEWS IS, I CAN'T HELP US SPEND MY MONEY ON FIRST DAY.
>> THERE HE GOES. HEY, ROB WOULD DO APPRECIATE YOU REALLY JUMPING INTO THIS WHEN YOU FIRST JOINED, AND REALLY DIVE INTO WITH TWO FEET.
GETTING UP TO SEE YOU DOING REALLY GREAT JOB THESE LAST FEW YEARS.
>> I WANT TO SAY ONE MORE THING, ROB TOO.
WE WORKED TOGETHER WELL AS A COMMISSION, BUT I THINK THE TONE AND THE ENERGY OF THE COMMISSION IS REALLY SET BY THE LEADERSHIP.
THANK YOU'VE DONE A FABULOUS JOB LEADING US AS A GROUP, AND APPRECIATE YOUR WORK AND YOUR SERVICE.
SORRY TO SEE YOU GO, BUT I DO UNDERSTAND AND WISH YOU ALL THE BEST.
>> APPRECIATE IT. IT WAS VERY BITTERSWEET FOR ME.
I LOVE DOING THIS, AND LOVE BEING PART OF THE FUTURE, BUT NOW I CAN SIT BACK AND WATCH EVERYTHING COME INTO FRUITION.
THAT LEAVES US WITH SOME THINGS THAT WE NEED TO DO.
CONSIDER ITEM 36, CONSIDERED AN ACT UPON ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON, VICE CHAIR, AND SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
DO WE HAVE ANY NOMINATION FOR CHAIR.
>> MR. CHAIRMAN, I WOULD LIKE TO NOMINATE DAVID BOX FOR CHAIR.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CONE.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.
DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS?
>> I'D LIKE TO NOMINATE ED KELLY FOR VICE.
>> WELL HANG ON, LET'S DO THIS ONE FIRST.
>> ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR? ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF DAVID BOX AS A CHAIR.
I GUESS I GET TO VOTE ON THIS ONE? I DON'T. CARRIES 5,0.
>> DO WE HAVE NOMINATIONS FOR VICE CHAIR? [LAUGHTER] YOU RESTATE IT.
>> I WOULD LOVE TO NOMINATE ED KELLY AS VICE-CHAIR.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOX. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.
>> OH, YES. AYE [LAUGHTER] MOTION CARRIES 6, 0.
>> I ACTUALLY, IT HAS FIVE UP BECAUSE COMMISSIONER BOX CAN'T VOTE.
[LAUGHTER] THEN FINALLY MOTION, FIRST SECRETARY.
>> I WOULD TO NOMINATE BRITTANY KOHLBERG.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS FOR SECRETARY? OKAY. DO WE HAVE A VOTE ON BRITTANY?
[00:25:03]
>> ALL IN FAVOR OF BRITTANY FOR SECRETARY.
>> PASSES 5, 0. CONGRATULATIONS. THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR TRUST.
LOOK FORWARD TO CONTINUING WITH EVERYBODY, EXCEPT MR. COX.
>> ALRIGHT. WELL, THAT LEAVES US WITH ONE ITEM. I HAVE A MOTION?
>> HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN FROM MR. COX.
>> SECOND FROM MR. CONE. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 5, 0.
WE'RE ADJOURNED AT 6:56. THANK YOU.
>> EXCELLENT. THANK YOU ALL.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.