[00:00:02]
[CALL TO ORDER]
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.WE'RE GATHERED HERE AT 6101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD AND THE TIME IS 6:31 PM.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
TONIGHT, I'LL GET THAT RIGHT IN A MINUTE.
TONIGHT COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE COMMISSIONER MORGAN, COMMISSIONER COLBERT, COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
MY MIND IS NOT WORKING [BACKGROUND].
THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER COUN, COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG, OUR SECRETARY.
I'LL BE YOUR CHAIR FOR THE EVENING.
COMMISSIONER BOX, COMMISSIONER COX AND KELLY ARE NOT HERE THIS EVENING.
REPRESENTING STAFF FROM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, JOHN LEATHER, PHILIP CLIMBER, JONATHAN HUBBARD, SUZANNE PORTER, CINDY JACKSON, ROLAUNDRY RUSTLE.
MATTHEW BARRERA, AND KIRSTEN COUNSELOR, DID I GET IT RIGHT? GOOD. THANK YOU.
YOU'RE LOOKING GOOD TONIGHT. REPRESENTING FIRE IS JOHN GILLETTE.
REPRESENTING ENGINEERING, JOEL FITS AND RICARDO ORDONES. DID I MISS ANYONE? GREAT.
THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS CITIZEN INPUT.
IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME.
ADDITIONALLY, ITEMS THAT HAVE, PARDON ME, HAVE PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL HAVE THEIR SEPARATE PUBLIC HEARING.
YOU CAN CHOOSE TO SPEAK DURING PUBLIC HEARING TIME AS WELL IN ADDITION OR OTHERWISE.
PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD.
LET'S LOCATE IT ON THE LEFT OF THE DYES AND APPROACH THE PODIUM.
IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN SPEAKING NOW, DURING CITIZEN INPUT.
OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED, SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE.
PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR ANY APPLICANTS PRESENT THIS EVENING.
TO ENSURE THERE'S ENOUGH TIME FOR ALL TO SPEAK, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH CASE YOU HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 10 MINUTES.
PLEASE NOTE, THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT OR ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF FACT, SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK DURING CITIZEN INPUT? WHAT THE RECORDS SHOW, I SEE NO ONE.
[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE APRIL 12TH, 2022 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS OR ITEMS FOR EDIT ON THE MINUTES? IF NOT CAN I HAVE A MOTION?
>> MOVE TO APPROVE MINUTES FROM THE APRIL 12TH, 2022 MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
>> I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER COLBERT CAN I HAVE A SECOND.
>> SECOND. COMMISSIONER COHEN, ALL IN FAVOR?
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES FIVE ZEROS. PARDON ME?
>> YOU GOT IT KNOWS. GO AHEAD.
[CONSENT AGENDA]
>> NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS THE CONSENT AGENDA.
THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND NONCONTROVERSIAL ITEMS, ANY COMMISSIONER MEMBER MAKING SUCH REQUEST PART OF EMOTION AND VOTE ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY.
ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH A MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION.
TONIGHT, WE HAVE ITEMS NUMBER [OVERLAPPING]
>> THANK YOU. NUMBERS THREE THROUGH NINE.
SORRY I DID NOT TRUST YOU THERE.
ON THE AGENDA, ARE THERE ANY ITEM THAT NEED TO BE PULLED FOR INDIVIDUAL'S CONSIDERATION? I THINK NONE, CAN I HAVE A MOTION?
>> MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS THREE THROUGH 19 ON CONSENT AGENDA.
>> I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
>> SECOND, COMMISSIONER MORGAN, ALL IN FAVOR?
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 5,0.
[20. Public Hearing - Replat: Lowes Frisco Addition, Block A, Lot 12 (RP22-0004)]
THANK YOU. NINE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA AND I WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS.
EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PRESENTED BY STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST.
THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED 10 MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION.
[00:05:01]
FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER'S CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HERE ON YOUR LEFT SIDE OF THE DAYES.
IF THERE ARE ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE THIS EVENING, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITIONS.
PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS.
THE TIME LIMIT IS FIVE MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK, THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME.
IF A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO SPEAK TONIGHT, THAT WILL NOT BE THE CASE.
PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
REQUEST APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED.
AFTER ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO A FUTURE MEETING.
AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE [NOISE] QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT.
PLEASE NOTE, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES UNLESS THE COMMISSION DENIES THE CASE AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL THE DENIAL.
FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF, AS TO WHEN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
ITEM 20, PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT LOWES FRISCO ADDITION BLOCK A, LOT 12 RP22-0004 OWNERS ON CORE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP.
>> THANK YOU. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT IS TO ADD PARKING EASEMENTS THAT WERE EXECUTED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT TO THE PLAT.
THE PARKING EASEMENT GRANT SEVEN PARKING SPACES TO THE ADJACENT LOT 13.
THESE SPACES ARE ADDITIONAL SPACES ON LOT 12 AND WILL NOT CREATE A NON-CONFORMING SITUATION IN BEING GRANTED TO LOT 13.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST AS PRESENTED.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
>> THANK YOU. I HAVE NO QUESTIONS.
ANY QUESTIONS FROM STAFF? I HAVE A EMOTION FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
>> DO YOU WANT TO MAKE THE MOTION THAT IS [OVERLAPPING].
>> THANK YOU. WE HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER COLBERT.
>> SECOND, COMMISSIONER MORGAN, ALL IN FAVOR?
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 5,0.
IN PUBLIC HEARING, IF THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK.
I'M SORRY DAN, ARE YOU THE APPLICANT?
>> HI. MY NAME IS ERIC COUGHLIN.
I RESIDE AT 1016 WOODBRIDGE PLACE, HEATH, TEXAS, AND I'M EMPLOYED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES.
I AGREE WITH MRS. JACKSON'S REMARKS, AND I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
>> GREAT. APPRECIATE IT. WE'LL ASK ANY QUESTIONS AFTER PUBLIC HEARING.
>> WOULD YOU MIND GRABBING A CARD AND FILLING IT OUT?
>> ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM?
>> SEEING NONE, WE MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
>> SECOND, COMMISSIONER COHEN. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 5-0.
COMMISSION, ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF OR THE APPLICANT? I HAVE A MOTION.
>> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 20 IS SUBMITTED BY STAFF.
>> MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
>> SECOND. COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG. ALL IN FAVOR?.
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 5-0. CONGRATS, THANK YOU.
[21. Public Hearing – Replat: Frisco Soccer and Entertainment Complex, Block D, Lot 1A (RP22-0006)]
FRISCO SOCCER AND ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEX BLOCK D, LOT 1A RP220006, OWNERS, WC PLAZA HOTEL, LP.
>> THANK YOU. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED A 30-DAY EXTENSION REQUEST, CONTINUED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLED THIS ITEM AT THEIR APRIL 12TH MEETING, SO I'D FIRST ASK THAT YOU ALL MOTION TO REMOVE THIS ITEM FROM THE TABLE.
>> MOVE TO REMOVE ITEM 20 FROM THE TABLE.
>> A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER MORGAN?
>> SECOND. COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG. ALL IN FAVOR?.
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 5-0.
>> THANK YOU. THE PURPOSE OF THIS RE-PLOT IS TO DEDICATE A SIGN OVERHANG EASEMENT.
THIS RE-PLOT CONFORMS TO THE SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMING SLOT PLAN THAT STAFF APPROVED ON APRIL 19TH, OF THIS YEAR.
THIS PLOT IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS EVENING.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
>> APPRECIATE IT, JONATHAN. WHAT IS A SIGN OVERHANG EASEMENT?
>> SO FC DALLAS IS WORKING WITH THE CITY TO REPLACE THE TOYOTA STADIUM THAT IS ON THE TOLL WAY.
[00:10:05]
THERE'S THE EXISTING SIGN THAT IS ON THE TOLL WAY OUT HERE IN THIS AREA.THE NEW SIGN OVERHANGS THE FIRE LINE.
WHEN THIS ORIGINALLY CAME IN, IT WAS A SIGN EASEMENT AND THERE WAS CONCERN THAT WE ARE PUTTING ICE ON EASEMENT IN OUR FIRE LINE, SO THERE WAS A LOT OF DISCUSSION BETWEEN STAFF AND THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO COME TO TERMS ON WHAT IS A SIGN OVERHANG EASEMENT, WHICH IS JUST THE LITTLE SQUARE HERE THAT OVERHANGS THE FIRE LINE.
THERE'S STILL THE SIGN EASEMENT THAT HAS BEEN THERE FOR YEARS AND YEARS, AND THEN ASSIGN OVERHANG EASEMENT THAT SAYS A NEW PORTION OF THE SIGN WILL OVERHANG THE FIRE LINE.
ALL OF THIS SIGN OVERHANG, EASEMENT DEDICATION LANGUAGES ON THE PLOT, WAS PREPARED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
>> I APPRECIATE THAT. PER YOUR NORMAL PROCESS, FIRE HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY ARE OKAY WITH THIS?
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO SPEAK, IF THEY'RE HERE THIS EVENING? I DON'T SEE THE APPLICANT.
MOTION. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, CAN I HAVE A MOTION OPENED PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER COHEN.
>> COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL IN FAVOR?.
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 5-0. WE'RE IN PUBLIC HEARING.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING?
>> SEEING THAT MOVED TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG.
>> SECOND. COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL IN FAVOR??
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 5-0.
ANY QUESTIONS OR CAN I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 21?
>> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 21 IS SUBMITTED.
>> MOTION TO APPROVE COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
>> SECOND. COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG. ALL IN FAVOR??
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 5-0.
[22. Public Hearing - Replat: Dove Creek, Block B, Lots 7 & 8 (RP22-0010)]
MR. COHEN, YOU NEED TO RECUSE YOURSELF?>> [OVERLAPPING] RECUSE MYSELF FROM ITEMS 22 THROUGH 26, DOVE CREEK.
THE RECORD SHOW COMMISSIONER COHEN IS RECUSING HIMSELF AND EXITING THE DAIS.
WE WILL COME GET YOU WHEN WE'RE DONE.
>> ITEM 22, PUBLIC HEARING RE-PLOT DOVE CREEK, BLOCK B LOT 7 AND 8 RP22-0010, OWNERS 124 FRISCO PROPERTY LLC.
>> THANK YOU VICE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THIS WILL BE ONE OF MANY RE-PLOTS THIS EVENING.
THE ITEM THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD IS TO AMEND THE SIDE BUILDING LINES ON BOTH LOTS TO ALLOW FOR A 40-FOOT WIDE BUILDING PAD ON THE LOT THAT IS DESIGNATED AS A CENTER OPTION FOR PATIO HOMES.
THIS RE-PLOT DOES SATISFY ALL THE CITIES REQUIREMENTS AND THE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR THIS RE-PLOT.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS?
>> THE WAY I READ IT IS IT'S ALMOST JUST BEING MOVED OVER THREE FEET, BUT THE DISTANCES ARE REMAINING THE SAME; IS THAT CORRECT?
>> THAT IS CORRECT. THE RE-PLOT WILL MAINTAIN THAT 10-FEET SEPARATION BETWEEN STRUCTURES.
>> NO QUESTIONS. I'M GOING TO PROPOSE WE OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING.
>> I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
>> SECOND FOR COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG, ALL IN FAVOR??
WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM?
>> HI. GOOD EVENING. MARK PAQUETTE, PELOTON LAND SOLUTIONS, 11,000 FRISCO STREET, FRISCO, TEXAS.
HERE REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT ON THIS ONE AND THE NEXT FOR APPRECIATE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TONIGHT AND HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.
>> GREAT. THANK YOU. DID YOU FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD? THANK YOU.
>> LET ME ASK. ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? SORRY.
>> THAT'S ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, WE MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE HEARING?
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 4-0.
ITEM 22, ANY QUESTIONS OR CAN I HAVE A MOTION?
>> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 22 IS SUBMITTED.
>> I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
[00:15:01]
>> SECOND, COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 4-0.
[23. Public Hearing - Replat: Dove Creek, Block D, Lots 12 & 13 (RP22-0011)]
PUBLIC HEARING RE-PLOT DOVE CREEK BLOCK D LOTS 12 AND 13 RPE22-0011.
OWNER IS 124 FRISCO PROPERTY, LLC.
>> THANK YOU VICE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
MUCH LIKE THE ITEM PRIOR TO THIS ONE, THE ITEM THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD IS TO ADJUST THE BUILD LINES TO ACCOMMODATE THE 40-FOOT BUILDING PAD.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE RE-PLOT AS PRESENTED.
>> THANK YOU. I'M GUESSING WE MAY HEAR THE SAME COMMENT A FEW TIMES.
>> ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? I HAVE A MOTION FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOVE TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG?
>> SECOND, COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 4-0.
WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING. WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM?
>> SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG?
>> SECOND COME FROM COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL IN FAVOR??
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 4-0.
ANY QUESTIONS OR CAN I HAVE A MOTION?
>> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 23 IS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.
>> I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER KENDALL TO APPROVE.
>> SECOND COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 4-0.
[24. Public Hearing - Replat: Dove Creek, Block D, Lots 31 & 32 (RP22-0012)]
ITEM 24 PUBLIC HEARING. [OVERLAPPING].>> NEVER MIND. [LAUGHTER] YOU GOT IT RIGHT.
>> ITEM 24 RE-PLOT DOVE CREEK BLOCK D, LOTS 31 AND 32, RP22- 0012, OWNERS 124 FRISCO PROPERTY, LLC.
>> ITEM 24 THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD IS TO ADJUST THE SIDE BUILD LINES ON LOTS 31 AND 32 OF BLOCK D TO ACCOMMODATE THE 40-FOOT WIDE BUILDING PAD.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE RE-PLOT AS PRESENTED.
>> APPLICANT LIKE TO SPEAK. [NOISE] HAVE A MOTION OPEN FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
>> I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
>> SECOND COMMISSIONER COLBERT. ALL IN FAVOR. [NOISE]
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM?
>> SEEING TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
>> SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER COLBERT. ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF OR COULD I HAVE A MOTION?
>> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 24 SUBMITTED?
>> HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 24 FROM COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
>> SECOND. FROM COMMISSIONER COLBERT. ALL IN FAVOR.
I'M TRYING NOT TO GO SO FAST THAT YOU CAN GET TO THE RIGHT AND DOWN.
[25. Public Hearing - Replat: Dove Creek, Block M, Lots 16 & 17 (RP22-0013)]
>> ITEM 25, PUBLIC HEARING REPLANT DOVE [NOISE] CREEK BLOCK M LOT 16 AND 17, RP22-0013 OWNERS MAXIMUM TEXAS, LLC.
>> IN TERMS OF PRONUNCIATION? [BACKGROUND]
>> BECAUSE WE'RE JUST WORRYING BECAUSE THEY WERE THESE ARE ALL DOVE CREEK.
>> THE OTHERS ARE 124 FIRST CO PROMISE?
>> ENGINEERING CONVERT. [NOISE]
>> AGENDA ITEM 25 THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD [NOISE] IS ADJUSTING THE SIZE OF THE BID LINES TO ACCOMMODATE A 40 FOOT WIDE BUILDING PAD ON THESE TWO LOTS.
THE LOTS WILL MAINTAIN THE 10 FOOT SEPARATION BETWEEN STRUCTURES.
STAFF IS IN APPROVAL OF THIS REPORT.
>> QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT? [BACKGROUND]
>> MOVE TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING.
>> I HAVE A MOTION UP AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
>> COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL IN FAVOR.
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 40. WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING.
LET THE RECORD SHOW THE APPLICANT SAID THEY DID NOT WANT TO SPEAK PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARING BY WAVING HIS HEAD AT ME.
[BACKGROUND] ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM.
>> SEEING THEM MOVE CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER COLBERT.
>> SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 40.
WE ARE OUT OF PUBLIC HEARING ANY QUESTIONS OR CAN I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 25?
>> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 25 ESTIMATED BY STAFF.
>> HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER COLBERT. CAN ADD A SECOND.
>> SECOND COMMISSIONER, KENDALL. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> OPPOSED. [NOISE] MOTION PASSES 40 ITEM 25 IS APPROVED.
[26. Public Hearing - Replat: Dove Creek, Block D, Lots 20 & 21 (RP22-0014)]
[NOISE] ITEM 26 PUBLIC HEARING REPLY AND DOVE CREEK BLOCK D LOTS 20 AND 21 RP22-0014.OWNERS 124 FIRST CO PROPERTY LLC.
YES. THANK YOU VICE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
[00:20:02]
THE ITEM THAT WAS JUST READ INTO THE RECORD IS TO REVISE THE SIDE BUILD LINES TO ACCOMMODATE A 40 FOOT WIDE BUILDING PAD.STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REPLY AS PRESENTED.
>> NOW WE'VE GOT YOU TONGUE-TIED.
>> ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF ON THIS ITEM? [NOISE] APPLICANT? [NOISE] MOTION OPEN PUBLIC HEARING.
>> HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER COLBERT. A SECOND.
>> COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL IN FAVOR?
WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM?
>> IN UNMOVED CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
>> SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER COLBERT. ALL IN FAVOR?
WE ARE OUT OF PUBLIC HEARING ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF OR CAN HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 26.
>> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 26 IS SUBMITTED.
>> HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 26 FROM COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
>> SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL IN FAVOR?
THAT'S A LOT OF [LAUGHTER] [BACKGROUND] ITEMS THERE.
BUT WE DO WANT TO MAKE SURE WE FOLLOW THE RIGHT [NOISE] [OVERLAPPING] PROTOCOL AND GOVERNANCE TO THESE ITEMS GET INTO THE RECORD PROPERLY.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE AND EVERYONE CONGRATULATION.
>> LET THE RECORD SHOW THAT COMMISSIONER COHEN HAS REJOINED THE DAIS.
[27. Public Hearing - Sign Variance: Preston Ridge Addition Section One, Block A, Lot 1R (V22-0002)]
[NOISE]>> ITEM 27 PUBLIC HEARING SIGN VARIANCE, PRESTON RIDGE ADDITION SECTION ONE BLOCK [NOISE] A, LOT 1RV22-002 OWNER COLLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT.
>> THANK YOU VICE CHAIR AND COMMISSION.
I'M USUALLY NOT TOO BRIEF IN MY PRESENTATIONS, BUT I'M GOING TO TRY TO BE TONIGHT.
[NOISE] THE AFRICAN IS REQUESTING A SIGN VARIANCE FOR A MONUMENT INDIVIDUALS SIGN DEFINED AS A SOLID BASE.
SIGNS GENERALLY USED TO IDENTIFY TENANTS AND NAMES OF BUSINESSES [NOISE] ON THE SAME LINE.
THE ORDINATES PRESCRIBED A REQUIRED MASONRY ONE FOOT BORDER AROUND THE SIGN, AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE LEFT HERE.
I HAVE MADE A REPRESENTATION OF WHAT A COMPLIANT MASONRY BORDER WOULD APPEAR AS.
AS PROPOSED ASSIGNING MYTHS AND MISERY BORDER AROUND THE TOP AND PORTIONS OF THE SIDE.
THESE AREAS ARE BORDERED BY ALUMINUM PAINTED SIGN CABINET.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING MAY GRANT A VARIANCE WHEN IT MEETS THREE OF THE FOUR REQUIRED QUALIFICATIONS FOR POST-LAUNCH ADVERSELY AFFECT THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
THE SCIENTISTS IS SUFFICIENTLY SETBACK FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND [NOISE] THE PERIMETER AND WOULD NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PUBLIC RIGHT AWAY.
THE SIGN IS OF A UNIQUE DESIGNER CONFIGURATION.
DESIGNING MATERIALS AND FINISH ARE GENERALLY MADE SURE HE CONSTRUCTION AND MATCHES THOSE AS A PRIMARY BUILDING ELEMENTS ON THE SAME LOT.
[NOISE] THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS NEEDED DUE TO RESTRICTED SHAPE AREA TOPOGRAPHY.
THE PROPERTY IS 90 ACRE CAMPUS PROPERTY AND THE SIGNS ARE EXTERNAL TO THE PROPERTY OF A TYPICAL ELEVATION IN PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY.
THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS SUBSTANTIALLY IMPROVES THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND WELFARE AND DOES NOT VIOLATE THE INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE. IT JUST SO HAPPENS.
WE ARE INTENDING TO PROPOSE FOR CONSIDERATION BY COUNCIL AMENDMENTS TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE NEXT MONTH HOPEFULLY.
THEN THIS SIGN WOULD ACTUALLY BE CONFORMING.
I DID VISIT WITH THE APPLICANT TO SEE IF THEY WANTED TO WAIT TO SEE WHAT ACTION WILL TAKE POSSIBLY TAKEN ON THAT SIGN ORDINANCE, AND THEY WOULD PREFER HAVE JUST GONE THROUGH THIS PROCESS TO SEE IF THEY COULD GET THIS SIGN A LITTLE BIT QUICKER FOR THEIR CLIENT.
THE VARIANCE DOES MEET THREE TO FOUR CRITERIA AS THE OPINION OF STAFF AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS VARIANT REQUESTS.
I'M NOT AWARE OF THIS. IF THE APPLICANT IS HERE TONIGHT OR NOT.
ONE IS THE REPRESENTATION ON THE SCREEN.
THE ONE WITHOUT THE BORDER, IS THAT A CURRENT SIGN THAT THEY HAVE AT THEIR WILDLY CAMPUS?
>> THEY'RE LOOKING TO JUST KEEP THEIR BRAND.
>> YES. I THINK SO. THEY'RE TAKING THIS THROUGHOUT THEIR CAMPUSES.
>> GREAT. THANK YOU. THEN IF THIS IS APPROVED, DOES THIS REQUIRE COUNCIL APPROVAL?
>> IT DOES NOT. I DIDN'T REMEMBER.
>> IF YOU DENY IT, THEY'LL PROBABLY END UP BEFORE COUNCIL.
COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF?
>> IT'S PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. MY NAME IS GREY.
>> GREY, YOU DIDN'T SEE THE APPLICANT BUT I'LL ASK, IS THE APPLICANT HERE? WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK THIS EVENING? [BACKGROUND] LET THE RECORD SHOW HE
[00:25:01]
CHOSE NOT TO SPEAK AND AGREED WITH THE COMMENTS FROM STAFF.WITH THAT, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.
CAN I HAVE A MOTION OPENED PUBLIC HEARING? THOUGH MOVED, I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER COHEN.
>> SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL IN FAVOR?
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM?
>> SEEING NONE MOVED CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG.
>> SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL IN FAVOR?
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR CAN I HAVE A MOTION ON THIS?
>> I JUST SAY THAT I LIKE THE WAY THE SIGN LOOKS AS RECOMMENDED.
I THINK IT MAKES SENSE THIS IS THE BRAND THEY'RE LOOKING TO PUSH AS WELL.
>> I MAKE A MOTION TO [OVERLAPPING].
I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 27 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.
>> [LAUGHTER] I'M GOING TO [LAUGHTER].
>> YOU WILL AND YOU ARE [NOISE].
OKAY. HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER KENDALL. SECOND?
>> [LAUGHTER] SECOND COMMISSIONER COHEN.
>> AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 50. THANK YOU.
WE LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING THOSE MORE MODERN LOOKING SIGNS AT THE FRISCO CAMPUS.
[28. Public Hearing - Zoning: Sevenhills at Pakawoods (Z22-0004)]
ITEM 28, PUBLIC HEARING ZONING, SEVENHILLS AT PAK.>> RIGHT BEHIND THE NEW STARBUCKS.
>> DID NOT KNOW THAT. Z22-0004 OWNER RESIDENCIES AT FRISCO LLC.
>> THANK YOU. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY SHOWN HERE TO SINGLE FAMILY SEVEN.
THIS REQUEST IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SINGLE FAMILY ZONING THAT IS TO THE SOUTH AND WEST.
PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THIS ZONING REQUEST TO THE CITY, [NOISE], THE APPLICANT DID HAVE A VIRTUAL HOA MEETING WHERE ONE INDIVIDUAL DID ATTEND, THAT INDIVIDUAL POSED GENERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT AND ULTIMATELY EXPRESSED GENERAL SUPPORT FOR THE PROJECT.
SINCE THEN, STAFF HAS RECEIVED ONE PROJECT INPUT FORM AND SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST.
THAT FORM WAS PART OF THE PACKET FOR YOUR REVIEW.
THIS REQUEST THIS EVENING IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS SINGLE FAMILY SEVEN, AND WITH THAT, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.
>> I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, ANY QUESTIONS AT STAFF? IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY LIKE TO SPEAK? [NOISE]
>> GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS ELLIE BOGART.
I'M WITH TRIANGLE ENGINEERING, ADDRESS 1724 WEST MCDERMOTT DRIVE, IN ALLEN, TEXAS.
HERE REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT AND TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE.
>> ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF FOR THE APPLICANT?
>> WE FILL OUT A FORM IF YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY.
>> DID YOU FILL OUT A BLUE SPEAKER CARD?
>> ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF FOR THE APPLICANT, COMMISSIONERS? THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN?
>> HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG.
SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER COHEN. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES 50. WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE THIS EVENING WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? [BACKGROUND]
>> LET'S CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FROM COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
>> SECOND. FROM COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL IN FAVOR?
>> I DID HAVE ONE QUESTION OF STAFF.
JONATHAN, JUST TO CONFIRM FOR THE RECORD HERE THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE WEST IS A PD THAT'S BASED ON SINGLE-FAMILY SEVEN?
>> ESSENTIALLY THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE WEST.
IT'S ALL ONE PLAN DEVELOPMENT WITH BASE PATIO HOME AND SINGLE FAMILY SEVEN, [NOISE] PRETTY MUCH ALL OF THE PATIO HOMES DEVELOPED TO THE SOUTH.
THE SINGLE FAMILY SEVEN HAS DEVELOPED TO THE WEST.
>> OKAY. THAT'S WHAT I WANT TO JUST CONFIRM.
THIS SINGLE FAMILY SEVEN ZONING WOULD BE EQUAL TO THE HOMES TO THE WEST?
>> WOULD BE LESS DENSE THAN THE HOMES IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE SOUTH?
>> CONGRUENT WITH THE WEST THAT'S ACROSS THE STREET AND THEN SLIGHTLY LESS DENSE THAN THE ONES THEY'RE BACKING UP TO ON THE SOUTH IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO?
>> I WOULD JUST ECHO THE COMMENTS FROM THE ONES ON SPEAKER CARDS.
[00:30:01]
PARDON ME, THE ONE INPUT CARD THAT WE RECEIVED THAT HAPPY THIS IS SINGLE FAMILY RATHER THAN RETAIL OR SOME OTHER OPTION.WITH THAT ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS?
>> I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 28, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.
>> HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 28.
I HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG. ALL IN FAVOR?
[29. Results of the April 19, 2022, City Council meeting.]
THAT LEAVES ITEM 29, RESULTS OF THE APRIL 19TH, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.>> I JUST WANT ITEM 2 MENTIONED AND THAT'S THE ZONING CASE THAT WAS FOR ED STONE.
COUNCIL TABLE THAT, UNTIL THE MAY 17TH MEETING.
HOPES THAT THE OUTCOME AND THE HOMEOWNERS CAN HAVE FURTHER DISCUSSION REGARDING THE CASE.
COUNCIL WILL MAKE A DECISION ON MAY 17TH.
>> THANK YOU, WHAT I READ IS THEY'D MET WITH THE HOMEOWNERS BEFORE IN-BETWEEN THE P&Z MEETING AND THE COUNCIL MEETINGS, THE COUNCIL INSTRUCTED TO TRY TO MEET WITH THEM AGAIN TO WORK OUT SOME DIFFERENCES.
>> YES. THEY HAD A MEETING BACK ON APRIL 12TH.
JONATHAN WAS AT THAT MEETING THE SAME NIGHT AS THE P&Z MEETING.
THERE'LL BE ANOTHER ONE, JOHN PALMER, WHO'S WITH THE DEVELOPER, WILL BE COORDINATING THE PUBLIC OUTREACH WITH THAT.
>> JOHN, CAN WE ASK YOU A QUESTION ABOUT THAT OR IS THAT BETTER TO DO OFFLINE?
>> HAS THE APPLICANT CHANGED THE NATURE OF THE REQUEST?
>> IT'S THE SAME REQUEST THAT YOU ALL HAVE RECOMMENDED.
NOW, THAT'S SOMETHING THEY COULD DO AS LONG AS IT DOESN'T BECOME MORE DENSE.
LET'S SAY THEY HAD 6-3 UNITS, AND THEN THEY DECIDE, HEY, WE'RE GOING TO MAKE CHANGES.
TAKE IT 6-5, THAT'S INCREASING THE INTENSITY.
THAT CHANGES THINGS WHERE WE HAVE TO COME BACK BEFORE P&Z, BUT AS OF NOW, JUST STICKING WITH THE SAME PLAN.
>> OKAY. THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS? ANY ITEMS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION.
[30. Schedule of future discussion items.]
>> THEY HAVE ANYTHING TO BRING UP?
>> WELL, THAT LEAVES US WITH ONE ITEM [NOISE].
MOVE TO ADJOURN. I HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN FROM COMMISSIONER COHEN.
>> SECOND. COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG. ALL IN FAVOR?
[BACKGROUND]
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.