[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:03]
GOOD EVENING, WELCOME TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, WE'RE GATHERED AT 6101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD AND THE TIME IS 6:31 PM.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
TONIGHT COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE COMMISSIONER CONE, COMMISSIONER KENDALL COMMISSIONER BOX, OUR VICE CHAIR, COMMISSIONER COLBERG, OUR SECRETARY, AND COMMISSIONER KELLY.
I'M ROB COX, I'M YOUR CHAIR FOR THIS EVENING.
ABSENT TONIGHT IS BRYAN MORGAN.
REPRESENTING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, WE HAVE JOHN LETTELLEIR, SUZANNE PORTER, CINDY JACKSON, ROLANDREA RUSSELL, MATTHEW BARRERA AND LORI CROSS.
ENGINEERING, WE HAVE JASON GRIMM, EDUARDO TORRES AND GUICHE BATTEAU.
JOHN GILLETTE IS REPRESENTING FIRE THIS EVENING AND WE DO NOT HAVE LEGAL COUNSEL REPRESENTING US THIS EVENING.
DID I MISS ANYONE TODAY ? EXCELLENT. FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA TONIGHT IS CITIZEN INPUT, IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE CITIZEN, THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME. WE WILL ALSO HAVE SOME PUBLIC HEARINGS LATER.
BUT PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS.
PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, FOR THE RECORD.
OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED, SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE.
PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR ANY APPLICANTS PRESENT THIS EVENING TO ENSURE THERE'S ENOUGH TIME TO SPEAK FOR ALL TO SPEAK.
PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR IN WHICH YOU WILL HAVE A MAXIMUM 10 MINUTES.
PLEASE NOTE THE COMMISSION CANNOT TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION OR DISCUSS DURING THE CITIZEN INPUT ON OR ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA, EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO INQUIRY TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK HERE DURING CITIZEN INPUT THIS EVENING? ALL RIGHT. YOU HAVE SOME MORE TIME TO TALK DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS LATER.
[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
ITEM TWO APPROVAL MINUTES ITEM TWO CONSIDER AN ACT UPON APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ON FEBRUARY 22ND, 2022 COMMISSIONERS ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS ON THESE MINUTES.CHAIR, I HAVE ONE CLERICAL REVISION AT THE TOP OF PAGE SIX OF EIGHT ON THE FEBRUARY 22ND REGULAR MEETING, WHERE IT SAYS PAST VOTE FIVE TO ONE VIA AGAINST WAS ACTUALLY COMMISSIONER ED KELLY, NOT COMMISSIONER JOHN KENDALL JUST NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED.
I TAKE IT AS A COMPLIMENT THAT I LOOK LIKE ED KELLY.
I BELIEVE HE SHOULD. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES WITH THE CHANGES STATED BY DAVID BOX WITH THE COMMISSIONER BOX.
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.
AYE. ANY OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES A FIVE ZERO MINUTES ARE APPROVED WITH THE CHANGES.
ITEM THREE CONSIDER AND ACT UPON APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON FEBRUARY 22ND, 2022.
COMMISSIONERS. ARE THERE ANY THINGS THAT NEED TO BE CLARIFIED ON THIS PARTICULAR SET OF MEETINGS OR QUESTIONS? OR DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL WORK SESSION MEETING ON FEBRUARY 22ND.
SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOX, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.
[CONSENT AGENDA]
ITEM THREE IS APPROVED.ALL RIGHT. TONIGHT WE HAVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. SO WE HAVE ITEMS 4 THROUGH 18 THIS EVENING.
THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS. ANY COMMISSION MEMBER MAKING SUCH REQUESTS PRIOR TO A MOTION AND VOTE ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY.
ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH THE MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION.
WE HAVE ITEMS FOUR THROUGH 18 THIS EVENING.
ARE THERE ANY THAT NEED TO BE POOLED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION? CHAIR, I NEED TO PULL ITEM 14.
OK. IS THAT FOR A RECUSAL OR IS THAT FOR CLARIFICATION? IT'S FOR A CLARIFICATION.
OK. AND I'LL READ INTO THE MINUTE.
ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER ITEMS NEED TO BE PULLED THIS EVENING? MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS FOUR THROUGH 13 AND 15 THROUGH 18.
A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
SECOND. BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.
ITEMS 4 THROUGH 13 AND 15 THROUGH 18 ARE APPROVED.
[14. Preliminary Site Plan: Custer Bridges, Block A, Lot 8R (PSP22-0003)]
ITEM 14.PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN CUSTER BRIDGES BLOCK A LOT 8R PSP 22-0003.
OWNERS. CUSTER ROAD COMMONS LIMITED.
ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM, I SENT OUT THE STAFF REPORT ON IT.
WHAT HAPPENED IS WHEN CINDY WAS UPDATING AFTER THE PACKET WAS PUBLISHED, IT SOMEHOW DELETED THE STAFF REPORT, SO COMMISSIONER BOX DISCOVERED THE ERROR.
[00:05:02]
SO FOR PULLING, IT IS JUST TO INCLUDE THE STAFF REPORT THAT WAS SENT TO YOU EARLIER TODAY, AND IT'S RECOMMENDED FOR YOUR APPROVAL.DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 14.
MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 14 AS SUBMITTED.
TO INCLUDE THE STAFF REPORT, DO WE NEED TO CLARIFY THAT? YEAH. JUST GO AHEAD.
SUBMIT IT AND INCLUDING THE STAFF REPORT.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.
[19. Public Hearing - Replat: Frisco Square Residential Addition, Block A, Lot 7 (RP22-0003)]
ALL RIGHT. TONIGHT WE HAVE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA AND I WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS. EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PRECEDED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST.THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED 10 MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION FOLLOWING THE QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND THE APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.
ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER'S CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT.
IF THERE ARE ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITIONS.
PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS.
TIME LIMIT IS FIVE MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK.
THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME FOR A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO SPEAK. WE DO NOT HAVE A LARGE VOLUME IN HERE TONIGHT, SO WE'RE GOOD.
PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED.
AFTER ALL, PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES IN THE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO A FUTURE MEETING.
AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING.
MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF OR THE APPLICANT.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES UNLESS THE COMMISSION DENIES THE CASE AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL THE DENIAL. FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AS TO WHEN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY CITY COUNCIL.
ALL RIGHT. ITEM 19 PUBLIC HEARING RE PLAT.
FRISCO SQUARE RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BLOCK A LOT SEVEN R.P.
22-0003 OWNERS FRISCO SQUARE APARTMENT INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.
THIS URBAN LIVING DEVELOPMENT IS NEARING COMPLETION, AND SO THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF THIS RE PLAT IN ORDER TO DEDICATE NECESSARY EASEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY.
STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.
EXCELLENT. IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY CARE TO SPEAK? DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED.
A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOX, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS REQUEST THIS EVENING? SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.
SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.
I WAS GETTING READY TO SAY COMMISSIONER KENDALL AND CONFUSE YOU AGAIN.
ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONERS, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM OR DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 19 AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF.
SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.
ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES FIVE ZERO.
[20. Public Hearing - Zoning: Crown Ridge, Phase 5 (Z21-0023)]
ITEM 20.Z 20-0023 OWNERS NEC PRESTON/PANTHER CREEK LTD.
COMMISSIONERS THIS PROPERTY CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY THIRTY EIGHT ACRES.
CAN YOU RAISE YOUR MIC JUST HAIR? SURE. THANK YOU. THIS PROPERTY CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY THIRTY EIGHT ACRES SOUTH OF PGA PARKWAY AND EAST OF PRESTON ROAD.
AND THE PROPERTY WAS ORIGINALLY ZONED IN 1985, AND YOU CAN SEE ON THIS EXHIBIT THE COLORED IS WHAT'S EXISTING, AND THE APPLICANT HAS PURCHASED PROPERTY AND INTENDS TO DEVELOP IT AS RESIDENTIAL.
AS SUCH, THEY'RE REQUESTING TO MODIFY THE ZONING AREAS TO HAVE SF 7 ZONING ON THE SOUTH, WHICH IS OUTLINED IN GREEN AND SF 8.5 TO THE NORTH, AND ALL OF THE COMMERCIAL AND PATIO HOME WOULD BE REMOVED AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.
AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ITEMS IN THE STAFF REPORT OR THE PROJECT, I WILL BE GLAD TO ANSWER THAT.
IS THIS IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY CARE TO SPEAK? ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.
SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOX.
AYE. OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES FIVE ZERO.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING?
[00:10:04]
SEEING NONE. MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
ANY OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES FIVE ZERO.
ALL RIGHT, SO JUST A COUPLE QUESTIONS HERE THAT I HAVE.
SO CURRENTLY WE HAVE C-1 IN THE TOP NORTH WEST CORNER.
NS IS WHAT? NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES IT'S NO LONGER.
ZONING COMPONENT. AND THEN WE HAVE PATIO HOMES DOWN IN THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THE TRIANGLE THERE. OR THE ARROW.
YES, LOOKS LIKE A PRETTY GOOD ARROW.
AND WE JUST WANT TO MAKE THIS STRAIGHT 8.5 FOR THE TOP EIGHTY FIVE PERCENT AND THEN S.F.
COMMISSIONERS, ANY ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS ON THIS? I'D LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT.
I WANT TO THANK STAFF FOR THIS GRAPHIC.
IT'S VERY HELPFUL IN UNDERSTANDING WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO HERE, AND I'M IN FAVOR OF THIS. SO THANK YOU FOR THAT.
YOU'RE WELCOME. I THOUGHT THAT WAS SUZANNE'S IDEA.
PLANNING AND ZONING FOR DUMMIES IS WHAT WE NEED THAT.
WE LIKE BIG COLORS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
AND IT'S REALLY GOOD. AND ARROWS.
AND ARROWS AND COMMISSIONER CONE.
I THINK YOU HAD A QUESTION OR COMMENT.
YEAH. CHAIRMAN COX, CAN WE JUST CLARIFY FOR THE AUDIENCE THE PATIO HOMES WOULD BE MORE DENSE THAN THE PROPOSED SF SEVEN THAT WE ARE CHANGING IT TO.
THAT IS CORRECT. SO WE HAVE REDUCED DENSITY ON THIS PARTICULAR SITE OVERALL.
OK. JUST IN CASE ANYONE DIDN'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE IN SIZES OF PATIO HOMES IN SF 7.
YEAH, AND THE SAME THING THEN FOR THE MIDDLE PART WHERE SF SEVEN WOULD BE MORE DENSE LOTS THAN THE PROPOSED SF 8.5.
I APPRECIATE YOU CALLING IT OUT BECAUSE I WAS GOING TO MAKE THAT DISTINCTION MYSELF, SO THIS REALLY HELPS WHAT WE TRY TO DO HERE IN FRISCO WHEN WE CAN, WHICH IS TO HAVE NICE NEIGHBORHOODS AND NICE LOTS, LOT SIZES, EVEN THOUGH THE COST OF LAND RIGHT NOW, I'M I'M THANKFUL THAT THEY'RE GETTING RID OF THE PATIO HOMES IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA, BUT UNDERSTAND THEY'RE PROBABLY COULD HAVE MADE MORE MONEY WITH THE PATIO HOMES ON THERE.
BUT THIS IS SOMETHING I WOULD DEFINITELY SUPPORT.
ANY OTHER COMMENTS? I WOULD AGREE. I'M NOT GOING TO REPEAT IT.
JUST A DUMB QUESTION. YOU SAID NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES DID NOT DOES NOT EXIST ANYMORE.
WHAT WAS THAT ZONING? AND THAT MIGHT BE A QUESTION FOR JOHN, AND THAT'S OK.
IT WAS LIKE A LIGHT COMMERCIAL.
SO IT WAS SOMETHING LESS INTENSE THAN RETAIL AND SOMETHING THAT YOU WOULD FIND IF IT WAS NEXT TO LIKE MULTIFAMILY OR A PATIO HOME TYPE DEVELOPMENT.
DO I HAVE A MOTION ON THIS ITEM? MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 20 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED. THE MOTION CARRIES FIVE ZERO ITEM 20 IS APPROVED.
CONGRATULATIONS. ITEM 21 RESULTS OF THE MARCH 1ST 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING COMMISSIONER
[21. Results of the March 1, 2022, City Council meeting.]
BOX. HAVE YOU FOUND ANY CLARIFICATIONS ON THIS ONE TODAY AND WE'RE GOING FOR THE HAT TRICK. YOU GOOD.I'M GOOD. ANY QUESTIONS? I'M GOOD. NO I MEAN, I'M IMPRESSED.
JUST WAIT FOR THE NEXT MEETING, MAN.
HEY, HAT TRICK IS A REALLY GOOD THING.
NO OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF OF THIS.
THIS ITEM. NO. JUST ONE THING TO POINT OUT REGARDING THE [INAUDIBLE] DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR THE BREWERY DOWNTOWN.
I MEAN, THERE WAS NO DISCUSSION.
YOU KNOW, YOU HAD PEOPLE IN OPPOSITION THAT CAME TO P&Z.
THERE WAS NONE WHEN IT CAME BEFORE COUNCIL.
EXCELLENT. IT'S A REALLY GOOD DEVELOPMENT.
[22. Schedule of future discussion items.]
ITEM 22 SCHEDULE OF FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS. ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING THAT COMMISSION HAS FOR STAFF THIS EVENING.CONTINUE TO ASK TO STREAMLINE THE PLAT SIGNATURE PROCESS.
WE'RE HAVING A MEETING EITHER, I THINK, LORD TOMORROW OR THURSDAY.
HAVING THE DISCUSSION, SO WE'RE WORKING ON THAT.
I JUST WANT TO BE ABLE TO HIT, APPROVE OR DENY, BUT THAT'S A LITTLE SELFISH TIME MANAGEMENT THING FOR ME. BUT NO.
ANYTHING ELSE FOR STAFF FROM THE COMMISSIONER? YOU NEED A COMPUTER LESSON.
I DON'T THINK SO. OK. JUST CHECKING.
I WOULD NEED IT BEFORE ROB DOES.
I MEAN, I CAN. I GOT MY CLICKS DOWN PAT NOW.
I USED TO WRITE A SIMILAR CODE, SO I PROBABLY WRITE A BOT TO FIX IT.
JOHN DOES STAFF HAVE ANYTHING FOR US? NO, I DON'T. OK, THAT JUST LEAVES ONE THING THIS EVENING.
MOVE TO ADJOURN. A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.
SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOX.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. AYE. ANY OPPOSED.
[00:15:01]
MOTION CARRIES FIVE ZERO.WE'RE ADJOURNED. 6:46.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.