Link


Social

Embed


Download

Download
Download Transcript

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:03]

ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING.

WELCOME TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

WE'RE GATHERED AT 3101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD AND THE TIME IS 6:31PM.

THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. TONIGHT COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE COMMISSIONER CONE, COMMISSIONER KENDALL COMMISSIONER BOX, OUR VICE CHAIR, COMMISSIONER COLBERG, OUR SECRETARY, COMMISSIONER KELLY AND COMMISSIONER MORGAN. I'M ROB COX, I'M YOUR CHAIR FOR THIS EVENING.

REPRESENTING STAFF THIS EVENING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WE HAVE JOHN LETTELLEIR, JONATHAN HUBBARD, SUZANNE PORTER, CINDY JACKSON, ROLANDREA RUSSELL AND MATTHEW BARRERA.

WE ALSO HAVE KIRSTEN KOWNSLAR.

FROM ENGINEERING WE HAVE JOEL FITTS, WILL JANNEY AND RICARDO ORDONEZ.

FROM FIRE WE HAVE ALYSSA BARSTOW.

IS, I GUESS, I DON'T SEE JOHN AND NO ONE FROM LEGAL HERE THIS EVENING? OH, OK, EXCELLENT.

FIRST THING ON OUR AGENDA TONIGHT IS CITIZEN INPUT, IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME.

PLEASE COMPLETE AT BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM.

PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED, SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE.

PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR ANY APPLICANTS PRESENT THIS EVENING.

TO ENSURE THERE'S ENOUGH TIME FOR ALL TO SPEAK, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO MAXIMUM FIVE MINUTES UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH CASE YOU HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 10 MINUTES.

PLEASE NOTE THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT OR ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POST AGENDA, EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA.

WE WILL ALSO HAVE PUBLIC HEARINGS AROUND THREE OF THE ITEMS HERE THIS EVENING.

IS THERE ANYONE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK DURING THE CITIZEN INPUT PORTION OF THE EVENING? OK. WE'LL MOVE ON ITEM TWO, APPROVAL IN THE MINUTES.

[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

CONSIDER AND ACT UPON THE APPROVAL [INAUDIBLE] THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ON JANUARY 25TH, 2022.

COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS, CORRECTIONS OR A MOTION ON ITEM TWO? MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0.

ITEM TWO IS APPROVED. EXCELLENT.

[CONSENT AGENDA]

THAT LEADS US TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.

THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSIST OF ROUTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS. ANY COMMISSION MEMBER MAKING SUCH REQUESTS PRIOR TO A MOTION AND VOTE ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY.

ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION.

TONIGHT WE HAVE ITEM THREE THROUGH [INAUDIBLE] TWENTY FOUR THIS EVENING.

COMMISSIONERS ARE THERE ANY THAT NEED TO BE POOLED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION? SEEING NONE, A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS 3-24 ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES SIX ZERO.

ITEMS 3-24 ARE APPROVED.

EXCELLENT.

CONGRATULATIONS. ALL RIGHT, TONIGHT WE HAVE THREE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA, AND I

[25. Preliminary Plat: Crown Ridge, Phase 5 (PP21-0015)]

WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARINGS.

EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PRECEDED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST.

THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED 10 MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION. FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.

ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER'S CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT.

IF THERE ARE ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITIONS.

PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS.

THE TIME LIMIT IS FIVE MINUTES PER SPEAKER.

TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK, THE COMMISSION CAN LIMIT-- CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME IF THE LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO REQUEST-- WISHING TO SPEAK.

PLEASE KNOW YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.

REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED.

AFTER ALL, PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING INTO A FUTURE MEETING.

AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF OR THE APPLICANT. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES.

UNLESS THE COMMISSION DENIES THE CASE AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL THE DENIAL, FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AS TO WHEN YOUR CASE MAY BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

ITEM 25, PRELIMINARY PLAT CROWN RIDGE PHASE FIVE, PP21-0015.

OWNERS NEC PRESTON/PANTHER CREEK LTD.

GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS.

THIS PLAT WAS SUBMITTED DECEMBER 13TH, 2021, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

[00:05:06]

APPROVED A 30 DAY EXTENSION ON JANUARY 11TH.

AND AT THIS TIME, THE APPLICANT HAS SEVERAL ITEMS YET TO RESOLVE REGARDING THE PLAT, AND SO BECAUSE OF THOSE ITEMS, AS WE'VE LISTED IN THIS STAFF REPORT, WE ARE RECOMMENDING DISAPPROVAL AT THIS TIME.

AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME OR THE APPLICANT, WE'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER THOSE.

OKAY, THANK YOU. THIS IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY THEY CARE TO SPEAK ? THIS IS NOT AN OFFICIAL PUBLIC HEARING.

I WOULD LIKE TO-- A MOTION TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING.

SO MOVED.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0.

WE'RE NOW IN A PUBLIC HEARING, SO.

MY NAME'S DAVID SCHNURBUSCH, I'M THE PRESIDENT OF USA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GROUP, WE'RE THE ENGINEER AND PLANNER ON THE JOB.

AND I THINK IN GENERAL TERMS, WE AGREE WITH THE STAFF AS FAR AS MOVING THIS ON TO FUTURE APPROVAL. THERE WAS ONE ITEM THAT HAS COME UP THAT I JUST WANTED TO MAYBE GET A LITTLE BIT OF INPUT, PERHAPS FROM THE COMMISSION.

THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY HAS A DRAINAGE AREA THAT BASICALLY RUNS NORTH AND SOUTH TOWARDS PGA PARKWAY.

IT'S-- YOU CAN SEE IT UP THERE.

WHERE I GOT IT RIGHT HERE.

THERE'S A DETENTION BASIN THAT SITS AT THE TOP WITH SOME LARGE CULVERTS GOING ACROSS PGA PARKWAY, AND AS WE GOT INTO THIS PROJECT, THE AREA-- THERE'S A DISCHARGE PIPE COMING OUT OF PHASE FOUR OF CROWN RIDGE, AND WE'RE TRYING TO GET THE WATER BASICALLY FROM PHASE FOUR UP TO PGA PARKWAY OR THE DETENTION [INAUDIBLE].

THE CITY ALLOWS FOR A OPEN CHANNEL.

WE ARE PROPOSING-- WHAT WE'D PROPOSED IN THE BEGINNING IS AN OPEN CHANNEL THAT WOULD BE-- IT'S BASICALLY GOING TO BE IN A SEVENTY FIVE FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT, IT WOULD HAVE ACCESS ON BOTH SIDES, WOULD ONLY BE TWO FEET OF WATER IN IT DURING ONE HUNDRED YEAR RAINFALL EVENT. AND WHAT WE HAD PROPOSED TO DO IS KEEP FAIRLY FLAT SIDE SLOPE SIX TO ONE, SO IT COULD BE MAINTAINED TO COME IN AND GO AHEAD AND LANDSCAPE IT HEAVILY.

RIGHT NOW, IT'S A MAZE OF TREES, WOODS I'D SAY, AND IT'S BEEN FROM THE DRAINAGE AS IT SITS TODAY, MOST OF THE TREES ARE DEAD.

THEY'VE BEEN ROTTED THROUGH THE AMOUNT OF DRAINAGE COMING OUT OF PHASE FOUR.

I GUESS ALL I WANTED TO ASK HERE IS AND BECAUSE WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO GO BACK TO STAFF, STAFF'S BEEN VERY PLEASURABLE TO WORK WITH.

WE'RE TRYING TO GO AHEAD AND LOOK AT TRYING TO KEEP AN OPEN FIELD THROUGH THIS.

STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT WE PUT THIS ALL UNDERGROUND IN THE PIPE.

THE BIG REASONS FOR NOT DOING THAT FROM OUR STANDPOINT IS, AS WE GOT A LOT OF SUBSURFACE WATER OUT THERE, WE JUST RID THE AREA OF BEAVERS.

AND BECAUSE OF ALL THE MATERIAL AND SO FORTH IN THERE, IT JUST MADE SENSE TO US TO HAVE A HIGHLIGHTED, NICE OPEN CHANNEL THAT WE CAN LANDSCAPE HAVE ACCESS ON BOTH SIDES, AND I GUESS WITHOUT BELABORING IT ANY FURTHER, I WANTED TO GET A FEEL FROM THE COMMISSIONERS, IF I COULD, AS TO Y'ALL'S FEELING AS TO AN OPEN CHANNEL VERSUS AN UNDERGROUND PIPE.

I KNOW THIS IS A STAFF ISSUE AND WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO WORK WITH STAFF AND WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT A GOOD DECISION IS MADE EITHER WAY.

BUT ONE OF THE OTHER PROBLEMS WE GOT OUT THERE IS THIS IS SOLID ROCK.

THIS SITE, I MEAN, [INAUDIBLE] AND OUR BORES WERE HITTING BLUE SHALE AT TWO FEET DOWN.

THIS IS-- TO PUT THIS ALL UNDERGROUND WE'VE GOT TO FILL THIS WHOLE THING IN, WHICH IS GOING TO BE VERY DIFFICULT.

SO I GUESS MY MAIN REASON FOR MAKING THIS COMMENT WAS JUST TO GO AHEAD AND SEE IF THERE WAS ANY NEGATIVE COMMENTS ONE WAY OR THE OTHER AS WE CONTINUE TO WORK THROUGH STAFF.

THIS IS REALLY THE ONLY ISSUE ON THE ENTIRE PROJECT THAT WE STILL HAVE A QUESTION ON.

EVERYTHING ELSE IS GREAT.

THANK YOU. EXCELLENT [INAUDIBLE]. AND WE'RE GOING TO ASK YOU TO FILL OUT A BLUE SPEAKER

[00:10:01]

CARD AS WELL. [INAUDIBLE] YOU CAN.

HEY, ROB IF YOU DON'T MIND, SPEAK UP.

I DO NOT RECOMMEND THAT YOU COMMENT ON THIS.

WE DO HAVE SOME CONCERNS.

NUMBER ONE, PUTTING THIS RESPONSIBILITY ON HOMEOWNERS WHERE THEY DON'T HAVE THE EXPERTISE, AND SO IF THERE DOES BECOME A DRAINAGE ISSUE, YOU CAN'T USE PUBLIC FUNDS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. THAT'S ONE.

NUMBER TWO, REGARDING THE SLOPES, THIS IS A DISCUSSION WE HAVE WITH ENGINEERING.

YOU KNOW, WATER ATTRACTS SMALL CHILDREN, SO WE HAVE A SAFETY CONCERN REGARDING THIS PROPERTY, REGARDING THE SLOPES AND ESPECIALLY THERE'S NOTHING TO REQUIRE THAT THEY DO LIKE ANY OPEN FENCING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

SO WE HAVE MAINTENANCE AND PUBLIC SAFETY CONCERNS WITH THIS.

I DON'T RECOMMEND THAT Y'ALL OFFER ANY SUGGESTIONS ON THIS UNTIL WE CAN VET THIS OUT.

APPRECIATE THAT. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING? DO I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 6-0.

PUBLIC HEARINGS NOW CLOSED. SIR, APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS.

PER RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF, WE'LL DEFER TO COMMENT THIS TIME.

THESE THINGS WE TYPICALLY ARE DEFERRING TO STAFF ON TECHNICAL COMPONENTS LIKE THIS BECAUSE THAT'S THEIR EXPERTISE AND NOT OURS.

SO THANK YOU FOR THAT.

SO.

ALL RIGHT.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? DO I HAVE A MOTION? NO--. MOVE TO DISAPPROVE ITEM NUMBER 25 FOR THE REASONS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND DELEGATE THE STAFF TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT FOR THE REASONS FOR THE DISAPPROVAL.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. SECOND.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0.

ITEM 25 IS DISAPPROVE.

[26. Preliminary Site Plan: Hollyhock Comm. Addition, Block A, Lots 2, 5 & 8 (PSP21-0070)]

ITEM 26 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN HOLLYHOCK COMM ADDITION BLOCK A.

LOTS TWO, FIVE AND EIGHT.

PSP21-0070.

OWNERS NEW CORNERS LLC.

THIS REQUEST FOR A REVISED PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN FOR THREE LOTS.

IS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF FOR DISAPPROVAL FOR THE REASONS STATED IN YOUR STAFF REPORT.

BASICALLY, WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED A LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT REFLECTS THE CHANGES PROPOSED ON THE THE SITE PLAN.

STAFF THEREFORE RECOMMENDS DISAPPROVAL.

ALL RIGHT. IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY CARE TO SPEAK? ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON ITEM 26? QUESTION, IS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN ALWAYS REQUIRED AT THIS POINT TO BE SUBMITTED? YES, IT IS. THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION? HE JUST COULDN'T GET THE PLAN READY IN TIME.

THANK YOU. SO I'LL MOVE TO DISAPPROVE ITEM 26 FOR THE REASONS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF REPORT. DELEGATE THE STAFF, THE AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT FOR THE REASONS OF THE DISAPPROVAL.

MOTION OF COMMISSIONER MORGAN. SECOND.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 6-0.

ITEM 26 IS DISAPPROVED.

[27. Public Hearing - Replat: The Potter's House of North Dallas, Block A, Lot 1 (RP21-0048)]

ITEM 27 PUBLIC HEARING REPLAY AT THE POTTER'S HOUSE OF NORTH DALLAS BLOCK A, LOT ONE.

RP21-0048. OWNERS, THE POTTER'S HOUSE OF NORTH DALLAS INC.

COMMISSIONERS, THIS ITEM WAS DISAPPROVED ON JANUARY 11TH AND THE APPLICANT HAD BEEN CONSISTENTLY-- CONTINUALLY WORKING WITH STAFF TO GET THE PLAT UPDATED.

SO THAT HAS BEEN DONE AND WE ARE NOW RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS PLAT AS SUBMITTED, AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'D BE GLAD TO ANSWER THOSE.

JUST ONE QUESTION. SO, WHAT I UNDERSTAND NOW IS THEY OWN ALL THE LAND GOING OUT TO HERE? YES, THAT'S CORRECT. EXCELLENT, GOOD FOR THEM.

THAT'S TO HILLCREST? YES. YEAH. GOOD TO SEE THAT.

WE--. WHEN I USED TO GO TO CHURCH AT A PREVIOUS CHURCH, IT WAS AT THIS SITE AND WE COULD NEVER GET THAT LAND PURCHASED.

SO IT WAS NICE THAT NOW THAT'S ONE CONTINUAL PEACE AND THE PARKING CAN BE EVENTUALLY BE PAVED AND TAKEN CARE OF FOR THEIR MEMBERS.

IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY CARE TO SPEAK? DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES SIX ZERO.

PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN.

IS THERE ANYONE THAT CARES TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM HERE THIS EVENING? SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARINGS.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES SIX ZERO. PUBLIC HEARINGS NOW CLOSED.

[00:15:01]

ALL RIGHT, ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? COMMISSIONERS THIS IS--.

WAS EXCITED WHEN I SAW THIS JUST FOR THE LONGEVITY THAT WE HAD TO PARK IN MUD.

[LAUGHTER] OK, COMMISSIONER BOX KNOWS ABOUT THAT.

SO DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 27? MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 27 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES SIX ZERO.

ITEM 27 IS APPROVED.

JUST--. AND JUST FOR THE RECORD, I DON'T THINK COMMISSIONER BOX NOR MYSELF GO TO THAT CHURCH NOW, SO IT'S NOT NECESSARILY OUR ISSUE NOW, BUT--.

CORRECT. WE'RE HAPPY FOR THEIR PARISHIONERS.

ALL RIGHT. ITEM 28, RESULTS OF THE FEB.

[28. Results of the February 1, 2022 City Council meeting.]

1, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

COMMISSIONERS, YOU GOT ANY QUESTIONS ON THE RESULTS?

[29. Schedule of future discussion items.]

EXCELLENT. THAT LEADS US TO ITEM 29, SCHEDULE OF FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS. SO WE WERE GOING TO--.

WE TALKED ABOUT HAVING A WORK SESSION TO COVER THE ITEMS WE WERE NOT ABLE TO COVER LAST TIME, AND I KNOW THE WEATHER THAT EVERYONE DEALT WITH, I HOPE EVERYONE WAS SAFE.

PROBABLY--.

CHANGE THAT TIMING.

WHAT IS YOUR THOUGHT ON RESCHEDULING THAT, JOHN? I'LL BE EITHER LOOKING AT ONE OF THE NEXT THREE MEETINGS AND SEE IF WE HAVE A LIGHT ONE LIKE THIS. OKAY.

GREAT. AND--.

GO AHEAD. I'M JUST THROWING OUT, IT MAY OR MAY NOT BE WORTH IT.

WE'RE SEEING THE QSRS MOVE TO THESE DOUBLE AND EVEN POSSIBLY TRIPLE LANE, YOU KNOW, DRIVE THROUGHS. IS THAT WORTH JUST UNDERSTANDING AND LEARNING ABOUT IT, [INAUDIBLE] NOT A PRIORITY? I DON'T WANNA SAY NOT A PRIORITY.

IT MAY NOT BE FOR THIS, BUT WE'RE SEEING PEOPLE START TO CONE IT OFF AND--.

YOU SAY QSR? QUICK SERVICE RESTAURANT. OK.

I THOUGHT THAT WAS A NEW NAME FOR CHICK-FIL-A.

[LAUGHTER] WELL, WE CAN PUT THAT ON IF YOU DIDN'T FEEL IT'S A NEED, BUT YOU'RE SEEING EVERY-- MAJORITY OF THE QUICK SERVICE RESTAURANTS CREATED THEIR OWN CONE, SECOND LANE OR THIRD LANE.

AND SO I DIDN'T KNOW IF IT'S WORTH US-- I ASSUME WE'RE GOING TO START SEEING THOSE A LOT MORE. WE'RE SEEING A FEW.

I'LL VISIT WITH JOEL AND SEE WHAT HE THINKS.

[INAUDIUBLE], SAY IF IT'S NOT NEEDED, JUST IT'S AN IDEA.

WELL, JUST A QUICK MEETING ON THAT? DOESN'T EVEN HAVE TO BE A MEETING. I'M JUST--. [LAUGHTER] NEVER MIND.

YEAH. NICE. [INAUDIBLE]. HEY JOHN, AND JUST FOR THE RECORD, I JUST NOTICED THE CERTIFICATION ON THE AGENDA FOR TONIGHT.

THE DATE AND TIME OF POSTING JUST WASN'T FILLED OUT, AND I KNOW YOU CERTIFIED IT THAT IT WAS POSTED IN TIME.

JUST FOR THE RECORD, IF YOU ALL CAN REVISE THAT.

OK. THANK YOU.

I DON'T WANT IT TO COME BACK FOR ANY REASON.

OH, IT WAS DONE IN TIME, I WILL TELL YOU THAT.

I KNOW YOU GUYS WERE WORKING HARD ON FRIDAY WITH ALL THE FUN.

THANK YOU FOR DOING THAT. JOHN, WHAT DO YOU HAVE FOR US? ANYTHING THAT YOU WANT TO TALK TO US ABOUT? FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS? OH, NOTHING.

BUT I DO WANT TO INTRODUCE MATT, YOU WANT TO COME ON UP? YEAH. COME TO THE HOT SEAT.

SO THIS IS MATTHEW BARRERA, BUT GOES BY MATT, SO HE'S OUR NEW PLANNER, AND IT COMES FROM CALIFORNIA, JUST NORTH OF SAN FRANCISCO.

SO. SOUTH OF SAN FRANCISCO, A--.

LITTLE SOUTH OF SAN FRANCISCO.

OH, SOUTH A LITTLE SAN JOSE.

SO ABOUT 40 MINUTES OUT.

WE WENT THERE. YEAH.

[INAUDIBLE].

WE DID? YES. I KNOW IN SAN FRANCISCO--.

WE WENT TO SAN JOSE AND LOOKED AT THAT, [INAUDUIBLE] THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.

OH, IS THAT WHERE WE WERE? I JUST ROW IS IN WHERE? SAN JOSE. THAT'S THE SAN JOSE.

OK, GREAT. YEAH, SEVEN DAYS.

SO GLAD TO BE HERE WITH YOU GUYS.

WE'RE GLAD TO HAVE YOU. WELCOME.

IT SOUNDS LIKE, I APPRECIATE--.

I KNOW JONATHAN HAD A LOT OF REQUIREMENTS.

IT LOOKS LIKE YOU MET THOSE? MM HMM. [LAUGHTER] HOPEFULLY.

EVERYONE'S GOT TO HAVE A STRONG BEARD GAME, SO IT LOOKS LIKE [LAUGHTER].

ALL RIGHT. BEEN NICE TO MEET YOU.

[LAUGHTER] NICE JOB TO PUSH JON OFF.

SO WELL DONE. YOU'LL GET USED TO THAT.

MAYBE. MAYBE. ALL RIGHT.

THAT LEAVES US WITH ONE ITEM HERE THIS EVENING.

DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? SO MOVED.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CONE.

SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOX.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES SIX ZERO.

WE ARE ADJOURNED.

THANK YOU ALL FOR BEING OUT HERE TONIGHT.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.