[00:00:03] ALL RIGHT. WELCOME TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, [CALL TO ORDER] WE'RE GATHERED AT 6101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD AND THE TIME IS 7, 6:30 P.M. 7:30 P.M. DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME. BUT IT'S NOT DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME ANYMORE. ALL RIGHT. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL TONIGHT COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE: COMMISSIONER CONE, COMMISSIONER KENDALL, COMMISSIONER BOX OUR VICE CHAIR, COMMISSIONER COLBERG OUR SECRETARY, COMMISSIONER KELLY, COMMISSIONER MORGAN. I'M ROB COX. I'M THE CHAIR FOR THIS EVENING. REPRESENTING STAFF THIS EVENING WE HAVE IN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES JOHN LETTELLEIR, JONATHAN HUBBARD, SUZANNE PORTER. IN ENGINEERING JOEL FITTS AND [INAUDIBLE]. AND FROM FIRE, WE HAVE JOHN GILLETTE. IN LEGAL WE HAVE RYAN PITTMAN. DID I MISS ANYONE THIS EVENING? EXCELLENT. I THINK JOHN AND JOHN GILLETTE AND STEVE COHEN CAN START DISCUSSING TIES. I THINK IT'S A NEW TREND. IT'S A NEW TREND. YES. EXCELLENT. ALL RIGHT. THE FIRST AGENDA ON ITEM THIS EVENING IS CITIZEN INPUT. IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME. PLEASE COMPLETE THE BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED, SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE. PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR ANY APPLICANTS PRESENT THIS EVENING TO ENSURE THERE'S ENOUGH TIME FOR ALL TO SPEAK. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH CASE YOU HAVE A MAXIMUM 10 MINUTES. PLEASE NOTE THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT OR ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA, EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY OR TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLAYS ON A LATER AGENDA. WE WILL HAVE PUBLIC HEARINGS DURING THE LEGISLATIVE PART OF THE AGENDA AS WELL. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK DURING CITIZEN INPUT AT THIS TIME? ALL RIGHT. SEEING, NONE, WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA, WHICH IS [APPROVAL OF MINUTES] THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. ITEM 2 CONSIDER AND ACT UPON APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ON OCTOBER 26TH, 2021. I HAVE IT ON HERE TWICE FOR SOME REASON. THERE'S A WORD NONE THERE, BUT THEN CONSIDERING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES, THE REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ON OCTOBER 26, 2021. ANY COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, CONCERNS OR DO I HAVE A MOTION ON THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM OCTOBER 26, 2021? MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE OCTOBER 22ND 2021 MEETING. WHICH MEETING? OCTOBER 26 SORRY, 2021. OK MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG, SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0, THE OCTOBER 26, 2021 MEETING MINUTES ARE APPROVED. EXCELLENT. YOU WERE JUST TESTING ME, WEREN'T YOU? [CONSENT AGENDA] THAT'S WHAT IT WAS. NEXT IS THE CONSENT AGENDA. CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS. ANY COMMISSION MEMBER MAKING SUCH REQUESTS PRIOR TO A MOTION AND VOTE ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY. ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH A MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION. WE HAVE ITEMS 3 THROUGH 20 THIS EVENING. ARE THERE ANY THAT NEED TO BE PULLED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION? NEED TO PULL NUMBER 19. OK, SO WE'RE GOING TO PULL NUMBER 19. ARE THERE ANY OTHERS? NO, I'M PULLING IT DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST. OK, SO 3 THROUGH 18. SO DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS 3 THROUGH 18 AND ITEM 20. SO MOVED. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN, SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0, ITEMS 3 THROUGH 18 AND 20 ARE APPROVED. COMMISSIONER BOX IS GOING TO RECUSE HIMSELF AND WE'RE GOING TO READ IN ITEM 19. [19. Site Plan: Frisco 45 Addition, Block B, Lots 2R-40X (SP21-0115)] SITE PLAN FRISCO 45 ADDITION, BLOCK B, LOTS 2R-40X (SP21-0115). OWNERS: 121 SPRING CREEK, LLC. COMMISSIONERS ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM OR DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 19. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL, SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 5-0 ITEM IS APPROVED. IF WE COULD GET COMMISSIONER BOX BACK IN HERE. ALL RIGHT, COMMISSIONER BOX, YOU RECUSED YOURSELF ON ITEM 19, SO THEY'LL BE A FORM FOR YOU TO FILL OUT AT THE END OF THE EVENING. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. ALL RIGHT. [21. Final Plat: Custer Bridges, Block A, Lot 10R (FP21-0040)] LET'S MOVE INTO THE REGULAR AGENDA TONIGHT. WE HAVE ONE FINAL PLAT AND NINE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA AGENDA, AND I WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS. EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PRECEDED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST. THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED 10 MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION. THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. [00:05:02] ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER'S CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT. IF THERE ARE ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITIONS. PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS OTHER THAN STATING YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS. THE TIME LIMIT IS FIVE MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED PERMITTED. AFTER ALL, PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DAY. AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES IN THE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR A FUTURE DATE. AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES UNLESS THE COMMISSION DENIES THE CASE AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL THE DENIAL. FINAL ACTION DOES REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AS TO WHEN THE CASE WOULD BE CONSIDERED BY A CITY COUNCIL. ALL RIGHT. ITEM 21 FINAL PLAT: CUSTER BRIDGES, BLOCK A, LOT 10R (FP21-0040). OWNERS NESAZ CUSTER, LLC. THANK YOU! THIS PLAT WAS SUBMITTED ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED A 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR THE PLAT ON OCTOBER 12TH, 2021. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PROJECT AND FOUND THAT IT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND OR OTHER APPLICABLE CITY CODES, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, RULES, POLICIES OR STANDARDS, AS NOTED TO EACH OF THE REASONS FOR DENIAL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THEREFORE, THIS ITEM IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU ALL MAY HAVE. IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY CARE TO SPEAK? OK. COMMISSIONERS ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM OR DO I HAVE A MOTION? I MOVE TO DISAPPROVE ITEM 21 FOR THE REASONS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND DELEGATE THE STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT FOR THE REASONS OF THIS DISAPPROVAL. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL, SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOX ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ITEM IS DISAPPROVED BY A VOTE OF 6-0. [22. Public Hearing – Replat: The Grove Frisco Retail Addition, Block A, Lot 1 (RP21-0035)] ALL RIGHT. ITEM 22 PUBLIC HEARING – REPLAT: THE GROVE FRISCO RETAIL ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOT 1 (RP21-0035). OWNERS LAKE’S LITTLE SCHOLARS MONTESSORI FRISCO, LLC, THANK YOU. THIS PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED ON SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2021 AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED A 30 DAY EXTENSION REQUEST, CONTINUED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLED THE ITEM TO TONIGHT'S MEETING DURING THE OCTOBER 12, 2021 MEETING. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO WITHDRAW THIS CASE. THEREFORE, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THE CASE. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY CARE TO SPEAK? DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING OR TO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING? MOVE TO TAKE ITEM OFF THE TABLE AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX, SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD CARE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING. I WOULD MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ACCEPT THE APPLICANTS REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THE CASE. UM, SHOULD WE MAKE THAT IN TWO MOTIONS OR ONE MOTION, RIGHT? IT COULD BE THE SAME, OK. MOTION MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOX. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 ITEM 22 WITHDRAWAL IS ACCEPTED. VERY NICE MOTION, BY THE WAY. VERY SMOOTH. [23. Public Hearing - Replat: Enclave at Creekwood, Block B, Lots 1R & 2R (RP21-0038)] ITEM 23. I'M TELLING YOU. ITEM 23 PUBLIC HEARING - REPLAT: ENCLAVE AT CREEKWOOD, BLOCK B, LOTS 1R & 2R (RP21-0038) . OWNERS MATTAMY TEXAS, LLC. THANK YOU. THIS PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED A 30 DAY EXTENSION REQUEST, CONTINUED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLED THE ITEM TO TONIGHT'S MEETING DURING THE OCTOBER 12, 2021 MEETING. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO WITHDRAW THIS CASE. THEREFORE, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THE CASE. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY CARE TO SPEAK? ALL RIGHT. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO REMOVE THIS ITEM FROM THE TABLE, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THE CASE. I THINK I THINK WE NEED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FIRST AND HAVE IT. SO YOU HAVE A A MOTION OPEN CONTINUE. CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING. TAKE THIS OFF THE TABLE AND CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BOX. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS NOW OPEN. IS THERE ANYONE WHO CARES TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING? SEEING NONE I MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ACCEPT THE APPLICANTS REQUEST TO [00:10:03] WITHDRAW THE CASE. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 ITEM ITEM IS WITHDRAWAL IS ACCEPTED. COMMISSIONER CONE YOU ALMOST GOT HIM. [24. Public Hearing - Replat: Frisco Square, Block A, Lot 1R (RP21-0041)] ALL RIGHT. ITEM 24 PUBLIC HEARING - REPLAT: FRISCO SQUARE, BLOCK A, LOT 1R (RP21-0041). OWNER(S): COLUMBIA MEDICAL CENTER OF PLANO SUBSIDIARY, LP. YES COMMISSIONERS THIS PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 13TH AND YOU GRANTED A 30 DAY EXTENSION ON OCTOBER 12TH. THE APPLICANT IS CURRENTLY REQUESTING THAT YOU WITHDRAW THE CASE, APPROVE THE WITHDRAWAL, SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT YOU CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE APPLICANTS REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THE CASE. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY CARE TO SPEAK? ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION TAKE THIS OFF THE TABLE, OFF THE TABLE AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, SO MOVED. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS NOW OPEN. DOES ANYONE CARE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING? MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ACCEPT THE APPLICANTS REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THE CASE. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY, SECOND. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION 6-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS BEING CLOSED AND WITHDRAWAL HAS BEEN ACCEPTED. [25. Public Hearing - Replat: Teel Village, Block A, Lots 2 & 4 (RP21-0044)] ITEM 25 PUBLIC HEARING - REPLAT: TEEL VILLAGE, BLOCK A, LOTS 2 & 4 (RP21-0044). OWNER(S): N.V.E. II, LTD. COMMISSIONERS THIS REPLAT CONFORMS TO THE SITE PLAN, WHICH WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON JULY 23RD, 2019, AND WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED BECAUSE THE INFRASTRUCTURE HAS BEEN INSTALLED AND THE CONSTRUCTION SET IS NEARING COMPLETION AND IT COMPLIES WITH THE PLAT. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, LET ME KNOW. WHAT WAS SPECIFICALLY ON THE REPLAT? ITS DEDICATION OF THE EASEMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LOT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. IS THE APPLICANT HERE WOULD THEY CARE TO SPEAK? DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING? MOVE TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOX. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS NOW OPEN. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME? SEEING NONE MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONE, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE . ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0. DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 25. MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 25 AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 ITEM 25 IS APPROVED. [26. Public Hearing Specific Use Permit: Custer Bridges, Block A, Lot 8R (SUP21-0009)] 26 PUBLIC HEARING SPECIFIC USE PERMIT: CUSTER BRIDGES, BLOCK A, LOT 8R (SUP21-0009) COMMISSIONER IS THE APPLICANT IS. I'M SORRY, LET ME OWNER CUSTER ROAD COMMONS LIMITED. I FORGOT TO READ THAT PART. OK. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THAT THIS ITEM BE TABLED TO THE NOVEMBER 22ND PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING SO THAT THEY CAN HAVE ADDITIONAL TIME TO ADDRESS STAFF COMMENTS. WE ARE THEREFORE RECOMMENDING THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION TABLE THE REQUEST AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING INTO THE NOVEMBER 22ND MEETING, GRANTING A 30 DAY EXTENSION. IT IS NOT BECAUSE IT IS A PUBLIC ZONING CASE WHICH DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT. ALRIGHT, IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY CARE TO SPEAK? DO I HAVE MOTION OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING, SO MOVED. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS NOW OPEN IS THERE ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING. SO I GUESS THE ITEM TO THE NOVEMBER 22ND, 2021. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES 6-0 ITEMS BEEN TABLED TO THE NOVEMBER 22ND PLANNING ZONING MEETING. EXCELLENT. [27. Public Hearing Ordinance Amendment: Amendment to Ordinance No. 406 and Ordinance No. 82-01-01 – Preston Manor (Z21-0014)] ITEM 27 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 406 AND ORDINANCE NO. 82-01-01 – PRESTON MANOR (Z21-0014). OWNERS MULTIPLE OWNERS. COMMISSIONERS THIS ITEM WOULD NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE AS IT WAS TABLED ON OCTOBER 12TH. THE, DO I HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE THIS FROM THE TABLE? SO MOVED. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX, SECOND. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 ITEM HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. THANK YOU. WITH FURTHER RESEARCH, STAFF WAS ABLE WELL, THE INTENT OF THIS ZONING CASE WAS [00:15:01] IN ORDER TO FIX THE ZONING MAP OR TO FIX THE ZONING TO REMOVE THE MULTIFAMILY SINCE IT WASN'T DEVELOPED AS SUCH. IN RESEARCH, WE DISCOVERED THAT IT WAS ACTUALLY AN ERROR ON THE MAP, SO WE WERE ABLE TO CORRECT IT. YOU'VE SEEN THE CORRECT ZONING ORDINANCES AND HENCE THERE IS NO NEED FOR THIS CASE. WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT YOU ACCEPT OUR RECOMMENDATION THAT IT BE CLOSED. ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING? I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF. GO AHEAD. NO THANKS. IN THE DESCRIPTION IT TALKS ABOUT THE ORDINANCE REFERENCES MULTIFAMILY. IS THAT IS THAT INCORRECT IN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE? IT SAYS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, A SINGLE FAMILY TO FAMILY GARDEN, HOME PATIO, HOME MULTIFAMILY 15 RETAIL IS THAT AN ERROR WHERE IT SAYS MULTIFAMILY THERE IS AN ERROR AND WHEN THE GIS MAPS WERE CREATED, EVERYTHING THAT'S ON THE GIS MAP ZONING LAYER, THERE'S AN ORDINANCE FOR IT. SO SOMEWHERE ALONG THE LINES, IT WASN'T UNTIL STAFF STARTED LOOKING INTO IT. HE FOUND THESE OTHER ONES AND THEY TOOK THAT INFORMATION TO GIS, AND SO THEY CORRECTED. SO AS SUZANNE MENTIONED, THERE WAS AN ERROR ON OUR GIS LAYERS. SURE. BUT THERE'S NOT A CONFLICT NOW BETWEEN THE DESCRIPTION AND THE GIS THIS IS FIXED, THIS THIS CASE IS ONLY BEFORE YOU BECAUSE WE WERE LOOKING AT PROPERTIES THAT WERE ZONED MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPED AS SOMETHING IN A LOWER DENSITY. AND SO WE CORRECT THAT. BUT THIS ONE WAS PECULIAR BECAUSE IT SHOWED US MULTIFAMILY AND SO WE WERE MOVING FORWARD ON THAT. BUT THEN IT WAS DISCOVERED BY STAFF THAT THAT IT HAD BEEN REPLACED A LONG TIME AGO. OK, THANK YOU. [INAUDIBLE] ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CONE, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS NOW OPEN. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING? SEEING NONE MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS NOW CLOSED. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE CASE CLOSING? SO MOVED THAT WE ACCEPT THE CASE CLOSING AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOX, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 ITEM 27 IS CONSIDERED CLOSED. AND MR. CHAIR, IF I COULD INTERRUPT AND ASK THAT YOU READ IN ITEM NUMBER 29 AND ACT ON 29 [29. Public Hearing - Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance (ZA21-0007)] BEFORE WE GO BACK AND DO 28. GLAD TO. SO I'M GOING TO READ 29 IN BEFORE 28. THAT'S CORRECT. 29 PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE (ZA21-0007) OWNER CITY OF FRISCO. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. SO AS MANY OF YOU ALL MAY REMEMBER, CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ADOPT THE U.S. 380 OVERLAY DISTRICT DESIGN STRATEGY ON AUGUST 4TH OF LAST YEAR. SINCE THAT TIME SINCE THAT DESIGN STRATEGY HAS BEEN APPROVED, STAFF HAS FOCUSED ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THAT STUDY THAT ARE GOING TO HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT ON DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE U.S. 380 CORRIDOR. THOSE PRIMARILY FOCUS ON LAND USES, SITE DESIGN, LANDSCAPING, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND BUILDING MATERIALS. AND TONIGHT WE WILL CERTAINLY KIND OF DISCUSS THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STUDY AND WHAT ALL OF THOSE ENTAIL. SO THE U.S. 380 OVERLAY DISTRICT THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TONIGHT, YOU CAN SEE ON THE TOP HERE THE PROPOSED BOUNDARY. SO THE DISTRICT IS BOUNDED BY U.S. 380 TO THE NORTH. COIT ROAD TO THE EAST PGA PARKWAY AND USE BOUNDARIES TO THE SOUTH AND WEST. ONE IMPORTANT THING THAT I'D LIKE TO POINT OUT IS THAT THIS AREA HERE BETWEEN CHAMPIONSHIP DRIVE AND LEGACY DRIVE, THAT AREA IS EXCLUDED FROM THE STUDY. SO IT IS ONLY THE AREA IN RED ON THIS TOP DIAGRAM THAT YOU'RE SEEING THAT IS WITHIN THE U.S. 380 BOUNDARY. SO BEFORE I KIND OF DIVE INTO THE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DISTRICT, I WANT TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE IT CLEAR THAT WHERE THE DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS CONFLICT WITH BASE ZONING REQUIREMENTS, IT IS THE DISTRICT THAT SHALL APPLY UNLESS THE PROPERTY IS IN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, IN WHICH CASE THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARD SHALL APPLY. SO THE DISTRICT DOES NOT CHANGE THE BASE ZONING, BUT DOES AMEND THE STANDARDS AND THE [00:20:04] USES. SO KIND OF DIVING INTO THOSE FIVE CATEGORIES THAT I MENTIONED A SECOND AGO. FIRST PROHIBITED AND SPECIAL LAND USES. SO THE PROPOSED DISTRICT ESTABLISHES STANDARDS THAT PROHIBIT CERTAIN USES OR REQUIRE APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR USES THAT MAY BE PERMITTED BY THE BASE ZONING DISTRICT. SO IF A PROPERTY IS ZONED COMMERCIAL ONE THAT USE ITS COMMERCIAL ONE DISTRICT MAY ALLOW THAT USE. HOWEVER, BECAUSE IT'S IN THE OVERLAY DISTRICT, THAT USE MAY BE PROHIBITED VERY MUCH LIKE HOW IT WORKS IN THE PRESTON ROAD OVERLAY DISTRICT AND THE TOLLWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT ALSO IMPOSES CONDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, MEANING A USE IS PERMITTED WHEN DEFINED DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. AND WE'LL TALK ABOUT A FEW OF THOSE USES IN A SECOND. BUT BEFORE YOU ON THE SCREEN, THESE ARE THE PROHIBITED AND SPECIAL USES. SPECIFICALLY, I BELIEVE THIS LIST IS JUST THE PROHIBITED USES, YOU KNOW, SO WE CAN CERTAINLY DISCUSS ANY OF THESE USES LATER ON TONIGHT. BUT INSTEAD OF ME READING THEM ALL OUT, I JUST WANTED TO LET YOU ALL KNOW THAT THAT IS THAT IS WHAT THAT LIST IS. SO WHEN WE TALK MORE ABOUT CONDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC USES, ONE OF THOSE IS FOR DRIVE THROUGHS, SO DRIVE THROUGHS ARE PERMITTED ALONG THE CORRIDOR. I THINK THERE'S BEEN SOME CONFLICT OR SOME SOME CONFUSION, I GUESS I SHOULD SAY OUT IN THE COMMUNITY ON THE STANDARDS THAT THE CITY IS TRYING TO PROHIBIT DRIVE THROUGHS ALONG 380. THAT IS CERTAINLY NOT THE CASE. THEY ARE STILL PERMITTED JUST UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, AND THAT IS PROHIBITED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF TWO MAJOR THOROUGHFARES, WHERE BUILDINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE BUILD TO LINE. A DRIVE ALL MAY BE ALLOWED TO CIRCULATE BETWEEN A DRIVE THRU USE AND THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE. AND THEN NO TWO ADJACENT DRIVE THROUGHS YOU SHALL BOTH HAVE A DRIVE ALL CIRCULATE NEXT TO THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE. SO IN ESSENCE, WHAT THIS IS TRYING TO DO IS ENSURE THAT YOU KNOW, THE DRIVE THROUGH IS NOT LIKE THE DOMINANT USE ALONG 380. AND IF YOU LOOK AT THIS PICTURE ON THE SCREEN, THIS IS AN IN AND OUT JUST NORTH OF DOWNTOWN AUSTIN. AND YOU CAN SEE, LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE, YOU THINK OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD AS A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE. THIS IS JUST ONE WAY THAT YOU COULD ADHERE TO THE STANDARDS AND THAT IS HAVE THE DRIVE THROUGH INTERIOR TO THE SITE. GAS PUMPS, ANOTHER CONDITIONAL STANDARD PROPOSED BY THE DISTRICT. WHERE LOCATED IN INTERSECTING STREETS, GAS PUMPS AND CANOPY STRUCTURES SHALL BE SHIELDED FROM VIEW FROM AT LEAST ONE STREET BY THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING IN WHICH THE FACILITIES SERVE. SO YOU SEE, THE GRAPHIC HERE SHOWS HOW THAT STANDARD COULD BE IMPLEMENTED. SO IT DOESN'T SAY WHICH STREET. IT'S JUST ONE OF THE STREETS. IT HAS TO SHIELD THE GAS PUMPS. AND THEN LASTLY, BIG BOX RETAIL DEVELOPMENT, ENSURING THAT THE BIG BOX AGAIN IS NOT THE PROMINENT DOMINANT FORCE BUT BIG BOX RETAIL BUILDING SHALL ABUT TO THE BUILD TO LINE, MEANING THAT THEY SHOULD ESSENTIALLY BE PULLED BACK TOWARDS THE REAR OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE FRONT OF THE DEVELOPMENT, THE BIG BOX SHALL BE CONCEALED BEHIND OTHER BUILDINGS ON THE TRACT, WHICH CAN ADHERE TO THE BUILDING DESIGN REQUIREMENTS THAT WE'LL SPEAK TO MORE HERE IN JUST A BIT. SO IN ESSENCE, WHAT I WANT TO STRESS HERE IS WHAT THE DISTRICT IS TRYING TO RECOMMEND IS THAT THE BIG BOX IS KIND OF IN THE REAR AND YOU HAVE SMALLER, SINGLE OR MULTI TENANT BUILDINGS ARRANGED, YOU KNOW, TOWARDS THE FRONT TO FRAME THE DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNAL PARKING AREAS. HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF KIND OF WHAT THAT COULD LOOK LIKE. YOU HAVE THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE HERE, THE BIG BOX TO THE BACK AND THEN YOU FRAME THE DEVELOPMENT WITH SINGLE AND MULTI TENANT BUILDINGS, WHICH SHIELDS THE PARKING. AGAIN, ALL OF THESE SINGLE AND MULTI TENANT BUILDINGS WOULD BE DESIGNED SUCH THAT THEY HAVE ENTRANCES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BUILDINGS. AGAIN, HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OUTSIDE OF AUSTIN, THIS IS IN MUELLER, WHICH SEVERAL OF YOU ALL HAVE SEEN WHERE YOU KNOW IT COULD BE DEVELOPED AS SUCH TO TO CARRY OUT THOSE STANDARDS. SECOND THING OR SORRY, THIRD SECOND SITE DESIGN. [00:25:05] SO CURRENTLY, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT BUILDING SETBACKS, THE CURRENT STANDARDS REQUIRE THAT BUILDINGS BE CONSTRUCTED TO MEET THE MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK, AND THAT'S GOING TO RANGE ANYWHERE FROM 25 TO 60 FEET, DEPENDING ON WHICH ZONING DISTRICT THE PROPERTY IS ZONED. HOWEVER, THE 25 TO 60 OR THAT SET BACK, THAT IS A DEFINED MINIMUM. AND IN MANY CASES, AS WE KNOW, THOSE BUILDINGS ARE PUSHED MUCH FURTHER BACK WITH A LARGE SURFACE PARKING LOT OUT FRONT. AGAIN, THAT MIGHT NOT BE CASES FOR PROPERTIES ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, BUT AGAIN FOCUSING ON, YOU KNOW, STRAIGHT ZONED PROPERTIES. THAT'S A LOT OF TIMES WHAT WE SEE. SO THE WHOLE INTENT OF AN OVERLAY DISTRICT WOULD BE TO OR IS TO CREATE DIRECT RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BUILDINGS, THE PUBLIC STREET, PUBLIC GATHERING SPACES AND NATURAL FEATURES. THEREFORE, THE PROPOSED DISTRICT ESTABLISHES STANDARDS THAT REQUIRE BUILDINGS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE BUILD TO LINE FOR A MINIMUM OF TWO HUNDRED FEET AT THE INTERSECTION OF U.S. 380, A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE, A MINOR THOROUGHFARE OR A COMMERCIAL COLLECTOR, AND THEN BUILDINGS BEYOND THAT, THERE ARE THREE DIFFERENT SCENARIOS THAT WE CAN DISCUSS. SO LET'S JUST LOOK AT THIS AS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW THIS COULD WORK. SO YOU HAVE THE BUILDING THAT'S GOING TO ESSENTIALLY HOLD THE BUILD TO ON FOR A MINIMUM OF TWO HUNDRED FEET IN EACH DIRECTION AT THE INTERSECTION. AND THEN ONCE YOU GET BEYOND THE TWO HUNDRED FEET, THESE BUILDINGS. THERE ARE THREE DIFFERENT SCENARIOS. ONE, THE BUILDING IS BACK TO U.S. 380 OR THE APPROPRIATE ROAD AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE BUILD TO LINE ALL OF THE SURFACE PARKING IS INTERIOR TO THE DEVELOPMENT, WITH LIMITED DIRECT FRONTAGE ON PUBLIC STREETS. SO VERY MUCH JUST LIKE THE BUILDING AT THE HARD CORNER. SECOND BUILDINGS CAN AGAIN BACK TO US 380 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE, MINOR THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL COLLECTOR WITH AN ALLOWANCE FOR UP TO TWO ROWS OF PARKING TO BE PERMITTED BETWEEN THE BUILDING FAÇADE AND THE BUILD TO LINE SO THAT TWO ROWS OF PARKING ESSENTIALLY, WHAT YOU WOULD SEE IS LIKE A SLIP ROAD CONFIGURATION, MUCH LIKE WHAT YOU SEE ALONG PRESTON ROAD. IN MANY INSTANCES WITH THREE OR FOUR PARKING SPACES, A TREE, THREE OR FOUR PARKING SPACES, A TREE. THAT SCENARIO. LASTLY, A THIRD ALTERNATIVE WOULD BE BUILDING SHIFTED COMPLETELY INTO THE INTERIOR OF THE DEVELOPMENT, WITH AN ALLOWANCE FOR THE ENTIRETY OF THE BUILDING SURFACE PARKING TO BE PERMITTED BETWEEN THE BUILDING FAÇADE AND THE BUILD TO LINE. SO ESSENTIALLY ALL UP FRONT AS MANY OF THE BUILDINGS ARE BUILT TODAY. HOWEVER, THE CAVEAT TO THAT WOULD BE THAT IF YOU'RE GOING TO BUILD UNDER THIS STANDARD, IT WOULD BE FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALLOWING THAT BUILDING TO FRONT ONTO OPEN SPACE. SO THAT'S ALL ABOUT IF THERE'S A NATURAL FEATURE AND YOU WANT TO ENSURE THAT YOU'RE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THAT. WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE WAS A STANDARD THAT DID NOT PREVENT THAT FROM HAPPENING, SAYING ALL OF THIS. IT'S IMPORTANT TO SAY THAT STAFF RECOGNIZES THAT IF YOU WERE TO LOOK, IF YOU THINK BACK TO THE BOUNDARY OF THE DISTRICT, THAT SHOWED EARLY ON. IT VARIES VERY DIFFERENT FROM THE PRESTON ROAD AND THE TOLLWAY THAT ARE VERY DEFINED, LIKE JUST A CERTAIN DIMENSION OR DISTANCE FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY. HERE IT VARIES. SO ALL OF THESE PROPERTIES ARE GOING TO HAVE A DIFFERENT DEPTH. SO THE BUILDING ORIENTATION STANDARDS, THESE STANDARDS THAT I JUST WENT OVER IN THIS SECTION ONLY APPLY TO THOSE PROPERTIES BETWEEN CHAMPIONSHIP DRIVE AND [INAUDIBLE] BOULEVARD. SO IN ESSENCE, EVERYTHING TO THE FAR WEST AND TO THE FAR EAST THAT HAVE THOSE NARROWER, THE NARROWER PROPERTIES IN THE DISTRICT. THIS WOULD NOT APPLY TO BECAUSE THERE'S JUST NOT THE DEPTH TO MAKE THIS WORK. ONE KIND OF REAL-WORLD EXAMPLE, YOU KNOW, THAT WE POINT OUT IS, YOU KNOW, THIS IS THE STAR, THE BUILDINGS ALONG WARREN, THOSE BUILDINGS BACK TO WARREN PARKWAY WITH ALL OF THE ACTIVITY TURNED INTERIOR. SO THIS IS ESSENTIALLY WHAT THESE STANDARDS ARE ATTEMPTING TO PROMOTE. HOWEVER, THERE'S THERE'S A LITTLE BIT MORE FLEXIBILITY ONCE YOU GET AWAY FROM THE INTERSECTION. SHOULD YOU CHOOSE OR SHOULD A DEVELOPER CHOOSE TO TO GO THAT ROUTE. IT'S ALSO JUST JUST A FEW OTHER THINGS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SITE DESIGN. [00:30:02] IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE THE THEY STUDY, THE OVERLAY RECOMMENDATIONS SEE A LOT OF IMPORTANCE IN HIKING BIKE TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE OVERLOOKS TO BE PROVIDED AT VIEW SHARED POINTS SUCH AS ELEVATED CREEK BANKS, HIGH POINTS OR NATURAL VEGETATION IS PRESENT AGAIN, TRAILS SHALL PROVIDE CONNECTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT AT A MINIMUM OF ONE TRAIL ACCESS PER ONE THOUSAND LINEAR FEET OF A CREEK. SO IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT, YOU KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF NATURAL CREEK CORRIDORS AND SUCH LIKE THAT IN NORTH FRISCO WITHIN THE PROPOSED U.S. 380 OVERLAY. AND IT'S IMPORTANT THAT, YOU KNOW, IF THEY WERE GOING TO BE TRAILS THROUGH ALL OF THAT NATURAL AREA, THAT THOSE TRAILS CONNECT INTO THE DEVELOPMENT. AND THAT DEVELOPMENT DOESN'T JUST TURN ITS BACK ON THOSE TRAILS, BUT THAT THERE IS INTERACTION BETWEEN THE TWO. AGAIN, AS I SAID A SECOND AGO, OPEN SPACE NATURAL FEATURE SHALL BE PRESERVED AND INCORPORATED IN THE DEVELOPMENT, AND THEN OPEN SPACE SHALL BE CONFIGURED TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS ACROSS THE DEVELOPMENT, WITH AN EMPHASIS ON LINKING ON SITE GATHERING SPACES TO GATEWAY ZONES AND NATURAL FEATURES. AGAIN, THERE'S A HUGE EMPHASIS ON NATURAL SPACES AND OPEN SPACE IN THE 380 OVERLAY THE PROPOSED DISTRICT THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TONIGHT. AND THIS IS KIND OF JUST A CROSS-SECTION OF, YOU KNOW WHAT THAT COULD LOOK LIKE WITH THE NATURAL AREA, THE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL AND ENSURING THEIR CONNECTIONS MADE UP INTO DEVELOPMENT. LANDSCAPING. SO CURRENT LANDSCAPING DESIGNS OFFERS OPTIONS THAT ENCOURAGE ESSENTIALLY A UNIFORM ALLEY OF TREES AND EITHER A SINGLE OR DOUBLE ROW WITH A GRASS STRAIGHT GRASS STRIP BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND THE STRAIGHT. THE PROPOSED DISTRICT VERY MUCH FALLS BACK ON OUR STANDARDS THAT ARE IN PLACE TODAY WITH JUST A COUPLE OF CHANGES. ONE THE PROPOSED DISTRICT ESTABLISHES STANDARDS THAT REQUIRE LANDSCAPE TREATMENTS TO BE VERY, YOU KNOW, A LOT MORE FORMAL WITHIN THE GATEWAY ZONES. AND I'LL, YOU KNOW, I'LL SHOW A GRAPHIC JUST HERE IN A BIT OF WHAT THOSE GATEWAY ZONES ARE, BUT BECOMING LESS FORMAL ONCE YOU MOVE AWAY FROM THE GATEWAY ZONES. THE ONLY KIND OF CAVEAT TO THAT IS, YOU KNOW, COMMERCIAL COLLECTORS ARE GOING TO HAVE YOUR MORE URBAN DEVELOPMENTS WHERE THE SIDEWALKS GOING FROM BACK OF CURB TO BUILDING FACE. IN THOSE INSTANCES, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE STILL GOING TO HAVE TREES IN A TREE [INAUDIBLE] OR A TREE. WELL, JUST LIKE WE DO IN OUR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS TODAY. AND THEN LASTLY, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND BUILDING MATERIALS, SO THE PROPOSED DISTRICT ESTABLISHES STANDARDS THAT PROMOTE BUILDING ELEMENTS AND DETAILS THAT COLLECTIVELY GENERATE A PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED PUBLIC REALM. THE STANDARDS ARE NOT INTENDED TO DICTATE COMPATIBILITY THROUGH UNIFORMITY, BUT THEY'RE THE USE OF VARIATIONS AND BUILDING ELEMENTS. SO IT WAS VERY IMPORTANT WHEN THE STUDY WAS BEING DONE THAT DEVELOPERS STILL HAD AN OPPORTUNITY FOR CREATIVITY AND WE WERE NOT TRYING TO DICTATE, YOU KNOW, EXACTLY WHAT THEY HAD TO DO, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, ENSURING THAT THERE WERE STANDARDS IN PLACE THAT STILL PROMOTED HIGH QUALITY DEVELOPMENT. SO INSTEAD OF SAYING, HEY, IT'S GOT TO BE OF A CERTAIN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, THE STUDY OR SORRY THAT THE OVERLAY DISTRICT HAS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CERTAIN ELEMENTS, ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS TO BE APPLIED. SO FIRST OFF, ALL, BUILDING SHALL BE DESIGNED AND BUILT IN A TRIPARTITE ARCHITECTURE BASE METAL TOP AS SHOWN HERE. AND THEN A FEW THINGS TO TO POINT OUT BUILDING FACADES. SO ALL FACADES SHALL BE ARRANGED TO AVOID THE CREATION OF A MONOTONOUS WALL AND GREAT RHYTHM ALONG THE CORRIDOR CROSS STREETS. SO AGAIN, INSTEAD OF HAVING LARGE FLAT WALLS MAKING SURE THERE ARE BREAKS AND RECESSES, YOU KNOW, DIFFERENT ELEMENTS THAT ARE GOING TO CREATE SHADOWS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. BUILDING CORNERS SHALL BE EMPHASIZED THROUGH ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES SUCH AS GABLED PARAPETS, CORNICES, AWNINGS, ARCADES, COLONNADES AND BALCONIES. YOU KNOW, AGAIN, YOU HAVE PROMINENT CORNERS ON A BUILDING, YOU KNOW, JUST KIND OF BEEF THOSE UP A LITTLE BIT, GROUND FLOOR FACADES, INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF LIGHT GLAZING THAT IS ON THE GROUND FLOOR A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT AND THEN MINIMUM 18 INCH WATER COURSE AT THE BASE, WHICH WE DO HAVE IN OUR BASE ORDINANCE TODAY. FENESTRATION SO WINDOWS AND WINDOWS AND DOORS SHALL BE PROPORTIONAL AND APPROPRIATE TO THE BUILDING FORM. OPAQUE TINTED OR MIRRORED GLASS SHALL BE PROHIBITED ON THE GROUND FLOOR BUILDING [00:35:04] ENTRANCES. IT'S ALWAYS IMPORTANT, ESPECIALLY AS WE TALKED EARLIER ON ABOUT SOME OF THESE BUILDINGS THE SINGLE TENANT, THE MULTI TENANT BUILDINGS THAT MAY BE OUT IN FRONT OF A BIG BOX STORE. THEY ARE GOING TO POTENTIALLY HAVE ENTRANCES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BUILDING. IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT SOMEONE DRIVING SOMEONE WALKING BY KNOW WHERE ENTRANCES TO BUILDINGS ARE SO PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCES SHALL BE LOCATED ON ALL FACADES, FRONTING A PUBLIC STREET, OFF STREET PARKING AREA, TRAIL CORRIDOR, AN OPEN SPACE AND SHALL BE DEFINED AND ARCHITECT ARTICULATED BY ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS. SO THERE'S A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT THINGS THAT YOU COULD DO TO DEFINE THOSE. AND THEN LASTLY, ICONIC BUILDING. SO DEPENDING ON HOW A DEVELOPMENT IS LAID OUT, THERE IS LIKE A VIEW CORRIDOR, FOR EXAMPLE, OR A BUILDING AT THE END OF AN OPEN SPACE. A BUILDING THAT'S TRUE LIKE AN ICONIC BUILDING WITHIN A DEVELOPMENT. SPECIAL EMPHASIS SHALL BE LOCATED ON BUILDINGS LOCATED IN THESE AREAS [INAUDIBLE] THE GATEWAY ZONED INTERSECTIONS AND SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY UTILIZING UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS SUCH AS TOWER SPIRES OR CORNICES, ALONG WITH VARIED ROOF SHAPES AND BUILDING HEIGHTS. ALSO WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT BEFORE I MOVE ON. SO HERE ARE A FEW IMAGES THAT REALLY EMULATE ALL OF THE ELEMENTS THAT I JUST TALKED ABOUT AND WHY WE CHOSE SOME OF THE PICTURES THAT WE DID IS BECAUSE WHAT YOU'LL SEE IS, YOU KNOW, THE BUILDING ON THE LEFT ALL BRICK. MORE OF A SUBURBAN KROGER, THE BUILDING ON THE RIGHT. MORE OF A MODERN OFFICE BUILDING. YOU LOOK AT THIS THE UNION KIND OF COMPLEX IN DOWNTOWN DALLAS, ALL GLASS. BUT ALL THREE OF THESE VERY DIFFERENT PROJECTS STILL EMULATE THE ELEMENTS THAT I JUST WENT OVER. AND, YOU KNOW, WE'RE NOT REALLY PUTTING ANYONE IN A BOX SAYING IT HAS TO LOOK JUST LIKE THIS. BUILDING MATERIALS, SO OUR CURRENT STANDARDS REQUIRE BUILDINGS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ONE HUNDRED PERCENT MASONRY, WHICH IS DEFINED AS CLAY FIRED, CLAY FIRED, BRICK NATURAL AND MANUFACTURED STONE GRANITE, MARBLE, ARCHITECTURAL, CONCRETE BLOCK AND THREE STEPS STUCCO. AGAIN. THE PROPOSED DISTRICT WANTS TO ENSURE HIGH QUALITY DEVELOPMENT, BUT DEVELOPMENT, BUT ALLOWING A LITTLE BIT OF FLEXIBILITY FOR VARYING BUILDING MATERIALS. SO WE ARE SEEING, YOU KNOW, JUST IN GENERAL, YOU KNOW, WORKING WITH APPLICANTS TODAY. YOU KNOW, THERE'S THERE'S A LOT OF PRODUCTS OUT THERE. YOU KNOW, A LOT OF THOSE PRODUCTS HAVE, YOU KNOW, HAVE MERIT. WE WORK WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO KNOW, YOU KNOW WHAT? YOU KNOW, WHAT'S THE LONGEVITY OF THIS PROJECT? IS IT PRODUCT? IS IT NEW? YOU KNOW, THINGS LIKE THAT. SO WE WANT TO INSTEAD OF THAT JUST TRUE, 100 0, 100 PERCENT MASONRY JUST ALLOW A LITTLE BIT OF FLEXIBILITY HERE. AND THEN JUST A FEW OTHER THINGS THAT THAT DON'T NECESSARILY FIT IN ANY PERFECT BOX OF THE FIVE OUR SIX THINGS THAT I TALKED ABOUT. ONE STRUCTURE PARKING. SO EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS OF STRUCTURED PARKING VISIBLE FROM ANY PUBLIC STREET PUBLIC WAY PRINCIPAL PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE TRAIL CORRIDOR SOCIAL SPACE SHALL BE COMPATIBLE WITH ADJACENT OR ABUTTING BUILDINGS. SO, YOU KNOW, THE STANDARD KIND OF SPEAKS TO IN SITUATIONS WHEN THESE CAN BE COMPLETELY SHIELDED THAT THAT IS, YOU KNOW, THAT'S THE DIRECTION THAT THAT IT KIND OF GEARS IT TOWARDS. IN INSTANCES WHERE THAT THAT'S NOT FEASIBLE, SHALL BE SCREENED SO THAT ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PERMIT COMPONENTS ARTICULATE THE FAÇADE. HYDE PARK VEHICLES AND SHIELD LIGHTING FROM WITHIN THE STRUCTURE. AND AGAIN SPEAKS TO PARKING GRATES ON THE FIRST COUPLE OF FLOORS. SO HERE ARE THREE EXAMPLES THAT EMULATE THE STANDARDS. ALL THREE OF THESE ARE PARKING GARAGES, BUT THEY ARE ALL DESIGNED IN A WAY THAT THEY FIT WITH THE BUILDING THAT THEY ARE ATTACHED TO. YOU STILL HAVE A STRONG PEDESTRIAN REALM AT THE AT THE BOTTOM. I DID SPEAK BRIEFLY ABOUT DIFFERENT THINGS THAT HAD TO BE DONE IN GATEWAY ZONES AND THEN WHEN YOU MOVED AWAY FROM THE GATEWAY ZONES. SO HERE IS A FIGURE THAT IS IN THE STUDY THAT SPEAKS TO WHERE THOSE GATEWAY ZONES ARE. AND THEN LASTLY, THERE ARE A FEW STANDARDS THAT TALK ABOUT BRIDGES, SO IN AND ALL OF OUR [00:40:02] IT'S IN OUR ENGINEERING STANDARDS, IT IS AN OUR WE PUT IT IN ALL OF OUR PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS THAT I'M SURE SOME OF YOU REMEMBER ABOUT ENSURING THAT ALL INFRASTRUCTURE IS CLAD IN BRICK OR A STONE VENEER BECAUSE WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO IS GEAR, YOU KNOW, BRIDGES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIKE THIS TOWARDS THE BOTTOM PICTURE INSTEAD OF THE TOP PICTURE HERE. SO AGAIN, REINFORCING THAT THROUGH THE OVERLAY DISTRICT. I WANT TO GO AHEAD AND KNOW THAT IN JUNE OF THIS YEAR, STAFF DID INVITE ALL OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS TO A MEETING TO DISCUSS THE STANDARDS THAT ARE PRESENTED HERE THIS EVENING. YOU KNOW, WE DID HAVE A HANDFUL OF PEOPLE SHOW UP THAT WAS WELL RECEIVED. YOU KNOW, ASK ASK QUITE A FEW GOOD QUESTIONS THAT THE STAFF DID TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION BEFORE FINALIZING AND PRESENTING IT HERE TONIGHT. BUT AGAIN, THAT WAS WELL RECEIVED. NOTICES DID GO OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW FOR ALL THE PROPERTY OWNERS ALONG HERE, YOU KNOW, HAD HAD ONE QUESTION THAT SPOKE TO THE DRIVE THROUGHS THAT I MENTIONED HERE EARLIER TONIGHT. BUT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AMENDMENTS, AS I'VE DISCUSSED TONIGHT AND AS NOTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU ALL MAY HAVE. THANK YOU. UM, COMMISSIONERS, DO YOU WANT TO TAKE QUESTIONS NOW OR DO YOU WANT TO DO THE OPEN HEARING, PUBLIC HEARING FIRST AND THEN ASK QUESTIONS? [INAUDIBLE] DO I HAVE A MOTION TO MOVE TO PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. FOLKS, IS THERE ANYONE WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING. THIS IS THE TIME TO DO IT. SO WE WELCOME ANY INPUT ON THE 380 380 OVERLAY DISTRICT AND WHAT WAS LAID OUT HERE, SO ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR THIS. SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, EXCELLENT MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. SO FIRST OF ALL, THANKS FOR STAFF FOR ALL THE HARD WORK ON THIS. THIS HAS BEEN A SEVERAL YEAR PROJECT, BEEN IN A LOT OF MEETINGS ABOUT THIS. A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE. AND I THINK THERE WERE A LOT OF ADJUSTMENTS MADE ALONG THE WAY. THE ONLY QUESTION I HAD HERE, AND I THINK YOU ANSWERED IT. JONATHAN WAS ALONG PGA CHAMPIONSHIP BOULEVARD. THE THE LYNX PROPERTY THAT GOES ACROSS PGA CHAMPIONSHIP BOULEVARD RIGHT THERE CORRECT THAT THAT IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE 380 OVERLAY DISTRICT BECAUSE IT'S A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, CORRECT? THAT IS THAT IS CORRECT. THIS PIECE HERE DOES FALL WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES, BUT IT IS WITHIN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND ALL OF THOSE STANDARDS ARE ALREADY KIND OF TIED DOWN. I KNOW WE HAVE SOME SPECIALTY ENTERTAINMENT VENUES ON THAT SIDE OF THE ROAD THAT MAYBE OTHERWISE MIGHT REQUIRE SPECIAL USE CASE. BUT SINCE IT'S IN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, IT'S ALREADY BEEN TAKEN CARE OF. SO I'M GOOD WITH THAT. SO I'M JUST GOING TO OPEN IT UP TO MY COMMISSIONERS. I WANT TO START. LET'S JUST START INSIDE OUT TODAY. LET'S GO WITH COMMISSIONER BOX. YEAH, THANK YOU. GOOD PRESENT, NICE PRESENTATION. APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK AND APPRECIATE YOU. ALSO MENTIONING THAT YOU HAD THE MEETING IN JUNE WITH DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY OR OWNERSHIP COMMUNITY OF THIS AREA. PROBABLY BOTH A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. JONATHAN, NUMBER ONE, IS WERE THERE ANY SIGNIFICANT CHANGES THAT YOU MADE AS A RESULT OF THAT THAT MEETING IN JUNE, ANYTHING TO TO SPEAK OF? YOU KNOW, ONE THING TO TO POINT OUT IS THE STUDY ITSELF AND HOW IT WAS PRESENTED TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS BACK IN JUNE WAS THAT BIG BOX RETAIL REQUIRED A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. BUT THE STANDARDS THAT I WENT OVER TONIGHT IN THAT SCENARIO, THOSE STANDARDS WERE LIKE, THESE ARE ESSENTIALLY THE CRITERIA TO REVIEW THAT SPECIFIC USE PERMIT AND THEN, YOU KNOW, AFTER STAFF VISITED A LITTLE BIT FURTHER ON IT, IT WAS THE IDEA IF IF A DEVELOPER IS ABLE TO MEET THOSE STANDARDS REALLY WISE, THAT ADDED LAYER NEEDED OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. SO THE CRITERIA IN THIS CASE, CONDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE STILL IN PLACE SO THAT THE THE INTENT IS STILL THE SAME. IT'S JUST THAT ADDED LAYER OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT VERSUS CONDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. APPRECIATE THAT IF I CAN JUST FOLLOW ON YOU WITH THAT, I DO APPRECIATE REMOVING THAT LAYER OF BUREAUCRACY AND SIMPLIFYING THAT FOR FOR THE OWNERS AND [00:45:03] DEVELOPERS. I THINK IT'S SMART, ESPECIALLY IF THEY CAN MEET THE STANDARDS. I'M DEFINITELY IN AGREEMENT WITH NOT HAVING A SPECIAL SPECIFIC PERMIT. SURE. AND THEN THE PROPERTY IN BETWEEN [INAUDIBLE] AND LEGACY, WHICH IS NOT INCLUDED, IS THAT THE SAME CASE BECAUSE IT'S IN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT? THAT IS THAT IS THE FIELDS PROPERTY AND THAT IS IN A PLAN, IN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE THAT CLEAR ALSO TO THE PUBLIC. YES, IT IS FAVORITISM THERE. IT'S THAT IT'S ALREADY IN A PLAN. YES, IT IS IN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. SO ALL OF THEIR STANDARDS ARE DEFINED IN THEIR PD, RIGHT. AND THEN THEN LASTLY, IS ONE OF THE REQUIREMENTS YOU MENTIONED FOR GROUND FLOOR FACADES IS THE 18 INCH WATER COURSE. YES, ALMOST ALL THE PICTURES IN YOUR PRESENTATION DID NOT HAVE A WATER COURSE IN THEM. QUESTION WHAT IS THE. IS THERE ANY FLEXIBILITY TO THE WATER COURSE REQUIREMENT, IN YOUR OPINION, FROM A FROM A CITY STANDING PERSPECTIVE, FROM A BUILDING CODE PERSPECTIVE, THINGS LIKE THAT THAT I'M NOT PRIVY TO. I JUST A LOT OF THOSE PICTURES DID NOT HAVE IT, AND THEY LOOK REALLY NICE BECAUSE IT'S GROUND. SURE, GROUND TO FLOOR SEAL. SORRY, GROUND OF FLOOR GLASS. YEAH, ABSOLUTELY, ABSOLUTELY. SO WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH, YOU KNOW, DEVELOPERS BECAUSE, AS I SAID A SECOND AGO, THE WATER COURSE REQUIREMENT IS IN OUR ORDINANCE TODAY, YOU KNOW, BUT IT'S 2021. THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE PROPOSING, YOU KNOW, A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT THINGS AND AND AT THE END OF THE DAY, THAT WATER COURSE REQUIREMENT, YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, IT ACCENTUATES THE TRIPARTITE ARCHITECTURE THAT BASE METAL TOP. BUT A LOT OF IT, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT, IS FROM A DURABILITY STANDPOINT AND HAVING, YOU KNOW, GLASS GO ALL THE WAY TO THE GROUND. SO WE HAVE WORKED WITH PEOPLE TO PROVIDE A, YOU KNOW, A THICKER GLASS, YOU KNOW, NOT JUST THE BASE AND STUFF, BUT YOU KNOW, THE REALLY, REALLY THICK GLASS. WE DEFINE REALLY THICK GLASS IS AT LEAST A MINIMUM OF ONE INCH TO ALLOW THEM TO TO DO THAT IN CERTAIN INSTANCES. BUT ESSENTIALLY, IT'S KIND OF A CASE BY CASE BASIS. I APPRECIATE THAT. DO YOU THINK IT WOULD MAKE SENSE TO CALL THAT OUT AS AN OPTION AND THERE'S MAYBE A QUESTION FOR YOU, JOHN, TO CALL THAT AS AN OPTION. I WOULD NOT CALL IT OUT AS AN OPTION. THAT'S JUST SOMETHING WE WORK WITH, PEOPLE WE JUST WANT. AS JONATHAN EXPLAINED, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS DOESN'T DO THE STANDARD WINDOW. SO IF THEY DO THE THICK GLASS, BUT THE OTHER THING THE WATER COURSE DOES. AND WE JUST HAD, I THINK, JUST TWO ACCIDENTS. OUR FORMER CHAIR, BOBBY ROBERTA, SENT ME TWO PICTURES WHERE PEOPLE PROVIDED A DRIVE THRU IN THE BUSINESS THEY WANT TO GO TO BY GOING THROUGH THE GLASS, AND THERE WAS NO WATER COURSE, SO IT SERVES AS A PUBLIC PURPOSE. BUT JUST LET THAT GET WORKED OUT BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE COME WELL. HERE'S AN ALTERNATIVE I WANT TO START WITH 18 INCHES AND THEN WE CAN WORK FROM THAT. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU HAVE DISCRETION ON. YES, OK. WE WORK ON THAT DURING THE FAÇADE PLAN. AND YOU JUST AS A MEMBER, AS A COMMISSIONER, THAT'S SOMETHING I WOULD ENCOURAGE CONTINUE TO WORK WITH DEVELOPERS ON FROM AN ESTHETIC PERSPECTIVE. IF WE CAN ENSURE THE SAFETY PIECE THAT THAT'S A NICE ESTHETIC TO ADD. AND AS I SAID, MOST OF THE PICTURES YOU SHOWED DID NOT EVER WATER COURSE, AND IT'S VERY APPEALING. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. CAN I JUST ASK CLARIFY WHAT'S VERY APPEALING TO HAVE THE WATER COURSE OR NOT HAVE THE WATER? VERY APPEALING NOT TO HAVE THE WATER COURSE BECAUSE IT'S ESTHETICALLY NICE TO THE EYE. AND I MEAN, YOU CAN SEE IT IN A LOT OF THE PICTURES OF BUILDINGS ALL THE WAY FROM AUSTIN TO FORT WORTH TO DENVER THAT WE SAW. YEAH, YOU KNOW, AND AND I DO WANT TO POINT OUT AND AS JOHN MENTIONED, YOU KNOW, CERTAINLY HE HAS THE DISCRETION. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE WORK THROUGH ON THE FAÇADE PLAN. AND YOU KNOW, AND AND I'M GLAD YOU POINTED THAT OUT TO ME TONIGHT THAT IT'S NOT IN THESE PICTURES. YOU KNOW, I THINK MY RECOMMENDATION, YOU KNOW, MY MY OPINION WHEN WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT PICTURES LIKE THIS, IT IS VERY MUCH APPEALING ON LARGE BUILDINGS LIKE THIS. AND THEN, YOU KNOW, YOU THINK ABOUT THESE BUILDINGS, THE UNION BUILDING THAT I SHOWED, THERE'S JUST SO MANY OTHER ELEMENTS THOSE BUILDING ELEMENTS, THE SHADE, THE RECESSES, THERE'S PROJECTIONS. THERE'S SO MANY OTHER THINGS. BUT JUST LOOKING AT IT COLLECTIVELY, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE GOING TO BE A HANDFUL OF SINGLE TENANT ONE STORY KIND OF PAD SITE BUILDINGS WITH MAYBE, YOU KNOW, A DRY CLEANERS AND A COUPLE OF OTHER USES AND. [00:50:03] IT'S IN THOSE BUILDINGS, YOU KNOW, THE THE GLASS ALL THE WAY, THE GROUND DOESN'T NECESSARILY COME OFF AS AS APPEALING AS YOU, AS YOU AS AN EXAMPLE, YOU USE THE TERM. THE ICONIC BUILDINGS ARE PROBABLY DIFFERENT THAN THE EXAMPLE YOU JUST GAVE. SURE. ABSOLUTELY. OK. AND THAT WAS GOING TO BE MY POINT BECAUSE I AGREE THAT WHEN DONE RIGHT, IT CAN BE, YOU KNOW, THE THE GLASS FLOOR TO CEILING GLASS IS AWESOME WHEN DONE POORLY. IT IS BAD. YES. AND AND WHEN YOU GO LOOK AT SOME NEIGHBOR NEIGHBORING CITIES THAT DON'T HAVE A WATER COURSE REQUIREMENT ON THOSE EXACTLY THE TYPE OF RETAIL THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT AND IT GETS TRASHY. IT DOESN'T HOLD UP WELL. AND HAVING A WATER COURSE, YOU KNOW, IN THOSE PAD SITES AROUND THE WAL-MART, FOR EXAMPLE, OVER HERE OFF OF MAIN STREET AND PRESTON, THERE'S HAVING A WATER COURSE. THERE ARE DEFINITELY DRESSES THAT UP. ABSOLUTELY. THERE'S A LITTLE BUILDING, BUT WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT BUILDINGS SUCH AS THE ONE ON THE RIGHT, ON THE SCREEN? ABSOLUTELY. THAT'S DIFFERENT. THAT'S AN ICONIC BUILDING THAT IS, YOU KNOW, I THINK OF WHAT'S THE AREA IN FORT WORTH CLEAR FORK [INAUDIBLE]. YEAH, BECAUSE IT'S DONE RIGHT. CORRECT. AND IT'S AN INVESTMENT. YEAH. AND THE OTHER THING TO MENTION ABOUT THE UNION, YOU HAVE STEPS THAT LEAD UP TO IT. SO YOU JUST DON'T HAVE THAT GLASS COMING DOWN TO THE SIDEWALK. SO THERE'S OTHER THINGS WE'D TAKE IN CONSIDERATION, BUT YOU'VE GOT TO START AT SOME POINT. I AGREE. I JUST HOPE THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY HEARS THAT AS WELL, SO THEY DON'T COME IN WITH WATERCOURSE ON AN ICONIC BUILDING. SURE. SURE. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER COLBERG, WE'RE GOING TO WE'RE GOING INSIDE OUT. I'M SO SORRY. I NO COMMENTS UNDER OTHER THAN THINKING AGAIN HOW GREAT FRISCO IS TO LIVE IN, TO HAVE ALL OF THESE DETAILS PUT INTO JUST SO MUCH EFFORT AND TIME AND AGAIN, JUST MAKING THE CITY SO EXCELLENT. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER KENDALL NOTHING TO ADD. GREAT JOB. THANKS, KELLY. YEAH, I JUST ECHO THAT. A LOT OF WORK IN THIS PROJECT. I KNOW IT'S BEEN A LONG TIME COMING, BUT I REALLY LIKE SOME OF THE THINGS IN THE BUILDING MATERIALS HERE. AND I TALK ABOUT, ESPECIALLY I WAS JUST READING HERE, COPPER ROOFS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. THIS IS REALLY GOING TO HIGH TO CORRIDOR, AND I'M REALLY PROUD TO BE PART OF THIS. I'M GLAD YOU GUYS GOT THIS DONE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. YES. I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR ALL THOSE WHO WORKED ON THIS 380 CORRIDOR OVERLAY BECAUSE WAY BACK WHEN DURING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMITTEE DISCUSSIONS, ABOUT 380 380 WAS KIND OF THE BACKSIDE OF FRISCO AND THE WE WEREN'T SURE WHAT TO DO WITH IT. AND THE CONSENSUS AT THE TIME WAS THAT WAS JUST GOING TO END UP LOOKING LIKE LOOP 12, AND THERE WAS NOTHING WE COULD DO ABOUT THAT. AND THE CONSULTANTS AT THE TIME CHALLENGED THE COMMITTEE TO THINK MORE BOLDLY ABOUT 380, AND I THINK THIS IS THE WORK OF WHAT THE CITY HAS DONE SINCE THEN. SO THIS LOOKS REALLY GOOD. JONATHAN, I APPRECIATE YOUR WORK AND EVERYONE ELSE'S WORK. I DO HAVE TWO TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR YOU. CAN YOU PULL UP THE SLIDE ON THE STRUCTURED PARKING? WHAT KIND OF LANGUAGE DO WE HAVE IN THERE THAT DOES REQUIRE THE STRUCTURE PARKING TO LOOK MORE LIKE THIS AND LESS LIKE SOME OF THE STRUCTURED PARKING WE SEE IN NEIGHBORING CITIES ALONG THEIR HIGHWAYS? SO WE TALK ABOUT THE THE STRUCTURED PARKING NOT DOMINATING THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT. AND YOU KNOW, AS I SAID, AS I SAID A SECOND AGO, NOT NECESSARILY FORCING IT, BUT TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE SHALL BE WRAPPED BY THE PRINCIPLE BUILDING, WHICH THE STRUCTURE SERVES TO LIMIT THE VIEW OF THE STRUCTURE FROM TRAIL CORRIDORS, OPEN SPACE, ADJACENT ROADS. SO FIRST AND FOREMOST, YOU KNOW, THAT'S THE BIG PUSH IN INSTANCES WHERE WE CAN WRAP THE THE PARKING STRUCTURE WITH THE PRIMARY BUILDING, THAT'S THE GOAL. HOWEVER, REALIZING THAT THAT MAY NOT ALWAYS BE POSSIBLE, WE TALK ABOUT THE EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS OF STRUCTURED PARKING VISIBLE FROM ANY PUBLIC STREET PUBLIC WAY. PRINCIPAL PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE TRAIL CORRIDOR OR SOCIAL SPACE SHALL BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT OR ABUTTING BUILDINGS. SO TODAY SOMEONE COMES IN WITH A BUILDING, IT MEETS OUR MASONRY REQUIREMENTS. SOMEONE COMES IN WITH A PARKING STRUCTURE. IT MEETS OUR MASONRY REQUIREMENTS. SO A LOT OF TIMES WHAT WE'RE GOING TO SAY IS PEOPLE ARE GOING TO PUT A LOT OF PEOPLE THEY'RE GOING TO PUT ALL THE MONEY IN THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. SO IT'S GOING TO BE ALL BRICK. AND THEN YOU HAVE A PARKING STRUCTURE, YOU KNOW, CONCRETE STUCCO, WHATEVER IT MAY BE. BUT HERE IT TALKS ABOUT THE PARKING STRUCTURE BEING ESSENTIALLY THE SAME BUILDING MATERIALS AND BEING COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT BUILDING. SO IF YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A PRIMARY STRUCTURE OF BRICK. [00:55:03] YOU KNOW, WE EXPECT THAT OR, YOU KNOW, THE DISTRICT SPEAKS TO STANDARDS THAT THAT PARKING STRUCTURE CARRIES THAT BRICK THROUGH. AGAIN, THAT'S NOT SAYING, YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE TO ONE HUNDRED PERCENT BRICK YOUR PARKING STRUCTURE. IT'S IT'S GOING TO BE A CASE BY CASE BASIS. IT'S GOING TO BE IS ANY PORTION OF YOUR BUILDING SHIELDED BY THE PRIMARY BUILDING? YOU KNOW, WHERE DOES THE PARKING STRUCTURE SIT ON THE SITE? MAYBE TWO OF THE FOUR WALLS FACE OPEN SPACE. THE OTHER TWO ARE KIND OF BACK OF HOUSE, SO WE'RE GOING TO WORK WITH THEM TO PUT THOSE PRIMARY MATERIALS ON THE TWO OF THE FOUR FACADES. AND THEN AGAIN, YOU KNOW, ALL OF THOSE THINGS ASIDE, PARKING STRUCTURE SHALL BE SCREENED SO THAT ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE COMPONENTS ARTICULATE. THE FAÇADE PAD PARKED VEHICLES, SHIELD LIGHTING FROM WITHIN THE STRUCTURES. AND THEN ONE THING THAT WE WORK OFTEN WITH DEVELOPERS IN OUR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS ENSURING THAT IF YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A PARKING STRUCTURE, THAT'S ALL THE WAY AT GRADE IS THAT YOU HAVE GRATES ON THE FIRST TWO LEVELS. AND THAT THAT THAT'S A SAFETY REASON IS ALSO, AS YOU KNOW, ARCHITECTURALLY FOR ARCHITECTURAL REASONS. SO IT HAS THAT LANGUAGE IN THERE. SO, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A LOT OF, YOU KNOW, KIND OF, I GUESS WHAT I WOULD SAY ULTIMATELY WHAT WE WANT. BUT YOU KNOW, WE GOT A LITTLE BACK UP HERE AND A LITTLE BACK HERE. THERE'S A LOT OF MEAT IN THE LANGUAGE TO GET THE PARKING STRUCTURES THAT YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN HERE IF THAT ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION. YES. YEAH, THANK YOU FOR THAT. SO WHEN YOU SAY THERE'S A LOT OF MEAT IN THERE, THERE IS THERE IS MEAT IN THE LANGUAGE, IS WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. YEAH, THERE'S THERE'S A WHOLE, THERE'S A WHOLE SECTION, YOU KNOW, AND I KNOW I TOUCHED ON IT BRIEFLY TONIGHT, BUT THERE'S YOU KNOW, THERE'S A WHOLE SECTION SIX OF FOUR POINTS OF LANGUAGE THAT REITERATE WHAT I JUST SAID THAT'S INTENDED TO BE ADOPTED IN THE OVERLAY WITH THIS. OK, THANK YOU. THE SECOND QUESTION IS UNDER THE I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S DO YOU HAVE PAGE NUMBERS ON THE BOTTOM OF YOUR? REPORT, I'M LOOKING AT THE THING THAT'S CALLED ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION, AND IT'S UNDER. THAT'S ON OUR PACKET PAGE. WAS IT, SAY, 132-133? IT'S AFTER THE BIG BOX RETAIL DEVELOPMENTS UNDER U.S. 380 OVERLAY SITE DEVELOPMENT. IT'S REAL SHORT, IF YOU DON'T, YOU DON'T FIND I CAN JUST ASK YOU THE QUESTION ABOUT IT. NO, YOU CAN GO AHEAD. OK, SECTION TWO LETTER B YEAH, I HAVE IT RIGHT HERE. THANK YOU. I HAVE TO FIND IT AGAIN. THIS IS THE PART WHERE IT SAYS ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT SHALL PROVIDE A SYSTEM OF PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS FOR INTERCONNECTIVITY BETWEEN ON SITE FEATURES AND ADJACENT STREETS AND PARCELS. CAN YOU JUST EXPLAIN TO US BECAUSE THAT IS DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WE CURRENTLY REQUIRE, IF YOU WERE SOMEONE WAS BUILDING A SHOPPING CENTER IN TOWN OR SOME OTHER COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT? CAN YOU EXPLAIN HOW THIS IS DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO. YEAH. SO SO WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO ACHIEVE IS ENSURE THAT WE ARE SETTING UP DEVELOPMENTS, MEANING A DEVELOPMENT KIND OF INTERNAL TO ITSELF AND. AND THE ADJACENT MAYBE THERE'S ANOTHER DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO IT THAT THERE'S INTERCONNECTIVITY, YOU KNOW, PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION BETWEEN ALL OF THOSE. AND SO THAT'S THAT'S THROUGH LIKELY THROUGH A SERIES OF SIDEWALKS. SO A LOT OF TIMES TODAY WE GET A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN FOR A DEVELOPMENT AND YOU MAY HAVE A BIG BOX USER IN THE REAR AND YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE, YOU KNOW, MAYBE A CENTRAL OPEN SPACE FEATURE OUT FRONT WITH SOME, YOU KNOW, SINGLE OR MULTI TENANT BUILDINGS, YOU KNOW, OUT FRONT OF THE DEVELOPMENT. A LOT OF TIMES THERE'S REALLY NO COMFORTABLE WAY TO GET FROM THE, YOU KNOW, THE BIG BOX STORE. LET'S SAY YOU'RE AT THE BIG BOX STORE AND YOU WANT TO WALK TO THAT OPEN SPACE OR YOU WANT TO, YOU KNOW, YOU WANT TO WALK TO THE FAST FOOD RESTAURANT THAT'S OUT FRONT. ASIDE FROM JUST WALKING OUT IN THE PARKING LOT. SO THIS REALLY IS A STANDARD THAT MAKES IT TO WHERE WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL OF THESE DIFFERENT ELEMENTS, THE OPEN SPACE, THE VARIOUS BUILDINGS ARE ALL CONNECTED TO ONE ONE ANOTHER THROUGH A PEDESTRIAN LINKAGES. SO, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, PROBABLY A SERIES OF SHADED SIDEWALKS AND THEN NOT ONLY AND THEN [01:00:02] MAKING SURE THAT STAFF AND THE DEVELOPER ARE LOOKING BIG PICTURE WHEN THIS DEVELOPMENT IS APPROVED. THIS DEVELOPMENT COMES IN, HOW DO WE CONNECT THE TWO, WHERE DO WHERE DO THESE LINKAGES LINKAGES YOU KNOW, WE STUB OUT VEHICULAR ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. IT'S ALSO ENSURING THAT THESE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS ARE STUBBED OUT TO TO CONTINUE AS WELL. OK, THANK YOU FOR THAT. SURE. AS YOU ALL KNOW HOW EXCITED I AM TO HEAR THAT THAT THAT'S INCLUDED IN THE STANDARD. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH, JONATHAN. SURE, IT'S DEFINITELY BEEN SOMETHING THAT YOU'VE BEEN CONCERNED WITH, LIKE ON THE MEDICAL PARK UP THERE BY YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE SOUTH. HOW CAN WE MAKE SURE IT'S CONNECTED AND SO FORTH. THIS DOES SEEMS TO BE THAT RIGHT? IT REALLY DOES, AND I THINK IT WILL MAKE A HUGE DIFFERENCE ON ALL THOSE DEVELOPMENTS ALONG 380 ALONG THAT LONG STRETCH. SO IT'S GOING TO BE GREAT. THANKS. GOT IT. ALL RIGHT, COMMISSIONER MORGAN. OUTSTANDING JOB. IF I REMEMBER, I THINK I SAT ON WITH SOME OF THE FIRST MEETINGS OF THIS LONG TIME AGO, SO CERTAINLY NICE TO SEE THIS COMING THROUGH. THERE WERE ONLY TWO PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS IN THIS AREA, RIGHT? THE FIELDS PROPERTY IN THE LYNX PROPERTY? NO. OKAY. SO, YOU KNOW, WE CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE TO TO GO THROUGH ALL THIS, BUT WE CAN, YOU KNOW, IF WE WERE GOING TO GO WEST TO TO EAST, YOU KNOW, THIS IS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF STRAIGHT RETAIL AND THIS IS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT THAT'S PRETTY MUCH STRAIGHT ZONING. HERE YOU HAVE THE LINK. YOU HAVE LESS SO BOTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS. THIS IS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AS WELL. AGAIN, ANOTHER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT HERE. THEN KIND OF ONCE YOU GET INTO THIS AREA, YOU KNOW YOU HAVE MORE STRAIGHT ZONING, HIGHWAY, INDUSTRIAL, A LITTLE BIT OF COMMERCIAL TOO IN THESE AREAS. BUT YEAH, THERE'S QUITE A FEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS ALREADY UP ALONG THE CORRIDOR. ASIDE FROM JUST FIELDS IN THE LINK. OR, FOR EXAMPLE, IF IF SOMEONE CAME IN AND WANTED TO CHANGE ONE OF THESE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS AND AT THAT TIME, WE COULD USE THIS AS A GUIDELINE IN TERMS OF WHERE WE MAKE ANY CHANGES. FOR EXAMPLE, LESS SO, IF LESS SO NEVER HAPPENED. THAT WOULD BE AN EXAMPLE. I LIKE THE PLAN, I LIKE ALL THE THINGS YOU GUYS PUT INTO IT. I APPRECIATE ALL THE EFFORT, THE YEARS OF YEARS OF EFFORT. SO THANK YOU. I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING ELSE. MR. KENNEDY, DO YOU HAVE ANOTHER COMMENT? NO, THE SAME BRYAN. OH, EXCELLENT. MR. KELLY, I WHY DON'T YOU? YEAH. JUST IN TERMS OF PROCESS HERE. WE SKIPPED OVER 28 I KNOW THEY'RE LINKED. CAN YOU EXPLAIN HOW THIS WAS GOING TO? SURE. SO WE'RE GOING TO GO FORWARD HERE. SO THIS CASE, THE CASE THAT WE'RE ACTING ON NOW IS 29. THIS IS A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT. THIS IS OPENING UP THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ADOPTING THE OVERLAY DISTRICT INTO THE ZONING ORDINANCE. THE NEXT CASE, THE CASE THAT WE SKIPPED OVER THAT IS A ZONING CASE THAT ACTUALLY APPLIES THE OVERLAY TO THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE BOUND IN RED. I THOUGHT, THANK YOU FOR THAT. I. DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 29 OR ANY OTHER COMMENTS? FIRST OF ALL, ANY OTHER COMMENTS [INAUDIBLE] MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 29, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONE, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 ITEM 29 IS APPROVED. CONGRATULATIONS FOR ALL THEIR HARD WORK. [28. Public Hearing - Zoning: Amendment to Zoning of Certain Tracts (Z21-0019)] ITEM 29 PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE (ZA21-0007) OWNERS CITY OF FRISCO. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. AGAIN, AS WE JUST STATED, THIS IS THE REQUEST TO APPLY THE U.S. 380 OVERLAY DISTRICT THAT YOU ALL JUST ACTED ON IN ITEM 29. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. DO I HAVE A MOTION OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS NOW OPEN. ANYONE IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM HERE THIS EVENING? SEEING NONE MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONE, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE . ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS NOW CLOSED. ALL RIGHT. I THINK WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME ON THE ORDINANCE. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS IN TERMS OF APPLYING THE ORDINANCE TO THIS LAND? JONATHAN, JUST A PROPERTY RIGHTS QUESTION FOR FOR THE RESIDENTS AND OTHERS. LIKE WE TALKED ABOUT WHERE THERE ARE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS WE'RE APPLYING. IF THIS GETS APPROVED, WE'RE WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT THIS GETS APPLIED TO THESE AREAS. BUT IF THERE'S ALREADY A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN PLACE, THIS WOULD NOT SIT ON TOP OF THAT. [01:05:02] THEY ALREADY HAVE AN AGREEMENT AND HAVE ENTITLEMENTS IN PLACES PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITS ON TOP OF THIS, I THINK EVEN MORE IMPORTANT. WE DON'T HAVE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND YOU HAVE PRODUCT UNDER ZONING THAT'S ALREADY ON THE GROUND. THIS IS NOT RETROACTIVELY IMPACTING THAT. SO ONE THING TO ADD, THOUGH, IF THERE'S A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE, LET'S SAY, THE PD DOESN'T MENTION SOMETHING THAT'S IN THERE IN THE OVERLAY, THEN THE OVERLAY DISTRICT WOULD APPLY. AND THAT SAME QUESTION CAME UP WHEN WE DID THE PRESS ROAD OVERLAY AND THE TOLL ROAD OVERLAY. WE ARE CONSISTENT WITH OUR OTHER. YES, WE ARE. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 28, AS PRESENTED BY STAFF. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 ITEM 28 IS APPROVED BEFORE WE JUMP TO THE NEXT ONE. I APPRECIATE YOU RECOGNIZING JONATHAN'S HARD WORK ON THIS. IT WAS STALLED UNDER A PREVIOUS PERSON, BUT FOR JONATHAN'S EFFORTS ON THIS, THIS IS WHY IT'S BEFORE YOU TONIGHT. SO HE WORKED REALLY HARD ON THIS. WELL DONE. THANK YOU. HE WORKS HARD ON A LOT OF THINGS, AS AS DOES ALL OUR STAFF. SO THANK YOU, ALL OF YOU. ITEM PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: AMENDMENT TO [30. Public Hearing - Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance (ZA21-0008)] THE ZONING ORDINANCE (ZA21-0008) OWNER CITY OF FRISCO. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. SO SOME OF YOU MAY REMEMBER THAT CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED AN ORDINANCE IN MARCH OF 2021 THAT REPEALED REGULATIONS PROHIBITING THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN A CERTAIN DISTANCE OF A CHURCH, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCHOOL, PUBLIC HOSPITAL OR CERTAIN OTHER USES DURING THE TIME OF THAT ORDINANCES ORDINANCE. IN THAT ORDINANCE INADVERTENTLY REMOVED CONDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, WHICH PERMITTED RESTAURANTS WITH DRIVE THROUGHS AND ANY ZONING DISTRICT WHERE A RESTAURANT IS PERMITTED. SO JUST AS A SIDE NOTE, RESTAURANTS WITH DRIVE THROUGHS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN THE OFFICE TO DISTRICT AND ARE ONLY PERMITTED IN THE PRESTON ROAD OVERLAY DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS. SO ESSENTIALLY, STAFF IS PROPOSING TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADOPT THE CONDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT WERE REMOVED IN ERROR. THERE ARE NO CHANGES PROPOSED TO THE STANDARDS WE ARE JUST THEY WERE REMOVED IN ERROR AND WE'RE ASKING TO PUT THEM BACK. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS IS NOW OPEN. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM HERE THIS EVENING? SEEING NONE MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. I APOLOGIZE. WERE YOU HERE TO SPEAK DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING? PLEASE COME DOWN AND PLEASE COME DOWN TO THE PODIUM. [INAUDIBLE] I'D LIKE TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AS WE HAVE AN INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS]. MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING HEARING? MOVED. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX SECOND, SECOND, BY COMMISSIONER CONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS NOW REOPENED AND WE'LL JUST ASK THAT YOU FILL OUT A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AFTER YOU SPEAK. I JUST NEED YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS INTO THE MIC. AND THEN. I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE ZONING AND STUFF. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FIRST, PLEASE. OK. IT'S HUNTER SMITH. I LIVE AT 8628 4TH STREET. UM, I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE ZONING, AND BECAUSE I NOTICE A LOT OF CBD AND THE DELTA EIGHT THC IN CERTAIN ZONES AND FRISCO THEY'RE BY RESTAURANTS AND LIKE A WALMART THAT I KNOW OF. I WAS WONDERING IF THAT'S LIKE WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT BY ZONING. LIKE, WAS IT A CERTAIN COMMISSION TO LIKE, DID SOMETHING GET COMMISSION TO? SO YEAH, I'D LIKE TO TAKE THAT AND TALK TO YOU AFTER THE WE'RE WE'RE ON A SPECIFIC PUBLIC HEARING EVENT WE CAN ONLY DISCUSS THE ITEM NUMBER 30. AND SO YOU CAN THAT IS A QUESTION THAT YOU CAN ASK DURING CITIZEN INPUT, WHICH WE DID EARLIER, BUT WE CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION ONE ON ONE AFTERWARDS, IF YOU'D LIKE. OK. OK. AND BE GLAD TO DO THAT AND EXPLAIN THAT TO YOU. ALL RIGHT. IT'S NOT THAT WE DON'T WANT TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION THE CERTAIN LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS WE HAVE TO FOLLOW. WE CAN ONLY ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ITEM THAT'S ON ON HERE. AND ITEM 30 IS ONLY ABOUT DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANTS. OK. SO IF YOU LIKE WE CAN, WE CAN. UNLESS YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANTS OR COMMENT, I NOTICED SOMEONE SMELLS LIKE TACO SHACK. ANY ANY OTHER COMMENTS? NO, IT'S NOT ZONED FOR THAT. OKAY, WELL, WE'LL GRAB YOU AND SPEAK TO YOU ABOUT THE ZONING ON OTHER ITEMS. OK, THANK YOU. [01:10:02] THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL ,SECOND, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS NOW CLOSED. ALL RIGHT. ANY ITEM ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 30 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES 6-0 ITEM 30 IS APPROVED. THANKS FOR ALL THE HARD WORK ON ALL THESE 30 ITEMS HERE THIS EVENING. I APPRECIATE IT FROM ALL THE TEAM. 30 ITEM 31 RESULTS IN THE NOVEMBER 2ND 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. [31. Results of the November 2, 2021 City Council meeting.] ANY QUESTIONS? ANY QUESTIONS STAFF BY ANY COMMISSIONERS? ALL RIGHT ITEM 32 SCHEDULE FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS. [32. Schedule of future discussion items.] WE DON'T HAVE ANY. SO WE JUST HAVE A WORK SESSION FOLLOWING THIS MEETING. AND WHERE THAT WOULD BE LOCATED? UP IN THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, THIRD FLOOR. OK, EXCELLENT. NEXT MEETING'S ON MONDAY INSTEAD OF TUESDAY. ALL RIGHT, THAT'S RIGHT. WE'RE MOVING IT UP SINCE IT'S THANKSGIVING WEEK. AND SO WE'RE TRYING TO, WE'LL MAKE THAT A TRADITION. EXCELLENT TURKEY TRADITION. ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? SO MOVED. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY, SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 6-0. WE ARE ADJOURNED, IT IS WHAT TIME? 7:41 [INAUDIBLE] * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.