>> GOOD EVENING AND WELCOME TO THE REGULAR MEETING.
[00:00:02]
THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,[CALL TO ORDER]
WE'RE GATHERED AT 6101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD AND THE TIME TO 6:30 PM.THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
TONIGHT, COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE COMMISSIONER CONE, COMMISSIONER KENDALL, COMMISSIONER COLBERG, OUR SECRETARY, COMMISSIONER KELLY, AND COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
I'M ROB COX AND YOU CHAIR THIS EVENING.
IN ABSENCE THIS EVENING IS COMMISSIONER BOX, THIS'S OUR VICE-CHAIR.
[NOISE] REPRESENTING STAFF THIS EVENING WE HAVE FROM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES JOHN LEATLER, JOHNKIN HABOUR, SUSAN POTTER, CINDY JACKSON, AND COUSTIN COUNCILLOR.
IN ENGINEERING WE HAVE JOUL FIX AND RICARDO DORNEZ.
IN FIRE: ELISSA VARSDOUGH, AND I DON'T SEE JOHN GILETTE.
FOR LEGAL COUNCIL WE HAVE RYAN PITLER.
AM I MISSING ANYONE THIS EVENING? EXCELLENT. FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA THIS EVENING IS CITIZEN INPUT.
IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME.
PLEASE COMPLETE THE BLUE SPEAKER CARD WHICH YOU CAN FIND UP HERE, AND APPROACH THE PODIUM, HAND IT OVER HERE TO THE LEFT SIDE OF THE DAIS.
PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.
FOR THE RECORD OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED, SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE.
PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR ANY APPLICANTS PRESENT THIS EVENING, TO ENSURE THERE IS ENOUGH TIME FOR ALL TO SPEAK, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH CASE YOU HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 10 MINUTES.
PLEASE NOTE, THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT, OR ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY OR TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA.
I ALSO HAVE SEVERAL PUBLIC HEARINGS IN LATER PART OF THE AGENDA THIS EVENING.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK DURING CITIZEN INPUT AT THIS TIME?
[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS APPROVAL OF ITEM 2: CONSIDER AN ACT UPON APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ON OCTOBER 12TH, 2021.COMMISSIONERS, DO I HAVE ANY COMMENTS ON THESE MINUTES, ANY QUESTIONS OR DO I HAVE A MOTION ON THIS ITEM?
>> LOOK TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ON OCTOBER 12.
>> A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5-0, AND MINUTES ARE APPROVED.
[CONSENT AGENDA]
NEXT ON OUR AGENDA IS CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS. ANY COMMISSION MEMBERS MAKING SUCH REQUEST PRIOR TO A MOTION AND VOTE ON CONSENT ITEMS MIGHT CONSIDER ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY.ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISH TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH THE MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION.
WE HAVE ITEMS 33 OR 14 THIS EVENING.
ARE THERE ANY THAT NEED TO BE PULLED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION?
>> I NEED TO PULL ITEM NUMBER 7 SO I CAN RECUSE MYSELF.
>> ITEM NUMBER 7. ARE THERE ANY OTHERS? I NEED TO RESERVE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS 326 AND 8 THROUGH 14.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 5-0.
[7. Open Space Plan & Preliminary Site Plan: Rock Creek Townhomes (OS21-0106 & PSP21-0055)]
COMMISSIONER CONE IS GOING TO RECUSE HIMSELF.ITEM 7, OPEN SPACE PLAN, WALL ANOMERIC SITE PLAN, ROCK CREEK TOWNHOMES, OS21- 0106, AND PSP 21-0055.
ACTUALLY, LET ME FINISH. OWNERS LIBERTY BANKERS INSURANCE GROUP.
COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM OR DO I HAVE A MOTION?
>> A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.
>> SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES A 4-0.
COMMISSIONER KENDALL IS GOING TO GET COMMISSIONER CONE.
COMMISSIONER CONE [INAUDIBLE] GET WITH ADMINISTRATION TO SIGN THE DOCUMENTS AT THE END OF THE MEETING.
[15. Open Space Plan & Preliminary Site Plan: Best Brains Addition, Block A, Lots 1-5 (OS21-0098 & PSP21-0060)]
ON THE REGULAR AGENDA, WE HAVE THE LEGISLATOR ITEM AND SIX PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA, AND I WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS.EACH PUBLIC HEARING IS PRECEDED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST.
THE APPLICANT IS INCREMENTED 10 MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION.
FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF, AN APPLICANT, BY THE COMMISSIONERS WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.
ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER'S CARD AND PROVIDE AN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT.
IF THERE ORGANIZED GROUPS AND ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITIONS.
PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY THE PREVIOUS SPEAKER, OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS.
TIME LIMIT IS FIVE MINUTES PER SPEAKER, TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK.
THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME IF A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO SPEAK.
[00:05:03]
I DO NOT SEE A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE TOO.WE WILL NOT BE ELIMINATING MORE THAN FIVE MINUTES.
PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED.
AFTER ALL PERSONS HAVING GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS A CASE IS TABLE TO A FUTURE DAY, AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES INNER MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO A FUTURE MEETING.
AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF OR THE APPLICANT.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES.
UNLESS THE COMMISSION DENIES THE CASE AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL TO DENIAL, FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AS TO WHEN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
[NOISE] FIRST ITEM IS ITEM 15, OPEN SPACE PLAN, THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN, BEST BRAIN ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOTS 1-5, OS21-0098 AND PSP 21-0060.
OWNERS [INAUDIBLE] LEXINGTON 10, LLC, LEXINGTON 0.5 LP, OR AS [INAUDIBLE] LEXINGTON 5, LLC AND LEXINGTON STARS, LLC.
>>THANK YOU. THIS PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED ON SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2021.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED A 30-DAY EXTENSION DURING THE OCTOBER 12TH MEETING BY A VOTE OF 6-0, AND PLACE THE ITEM ON THE AGENDA FOR OCTOBER 26.
THE APPLICANT DO NOT RESUBMIT THE PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SCHEDULE.
STAFF HAS REVIEWED THIS PROJECT AND HAS FOUND THAT IT DOES NOT MEET ALL THE STANDARDS REQUIRED FOR THIS TYPE OF PROJECT PER THE ZONING CODE, AND IS RECOMMENDING DENIAL.
I LISTED THE STANDARDS THAT ARE NOT MET ARE IN THE STAFF REPORT, THAT WAS IN YOUR PACKET.
>> THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT [INAUDIBLE], WOULD THEY CARE TO SPEAK?
>> IF COULD IN FACT COULD JUST ADMIT, ITS DISAPPROVAL, NOT DENIAL.
>> THANK YOU. DISAPPROVAL. JOHN, ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM, I DON'T BELIEVE WE NEED A PUBLIC HEARING.
CORRECT? IT IS NOT SAFE FOR PUBLIC CARE.
>> YEAH IT'S NOT PUBLIC CARE AND SO IT'S AT YOUR DISCRETION.
IF ANYBODY THAT'S HERE WANTS TO SPEAK, TOTALLY UP TO YOUR DISCRETION.
IF YOU WANT TO HAVE THEM SPEAK.
ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS TAKE ACTION TONIGHT.
>> I DON'T SEE ANYONE HERE, MAKE A MOTION TO DISAPPROVE ITEM 15, FOR THE REASONS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND DELEGATE THE STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT, TO THE APPLICANT FOR THE REASONS THAT THIS DISAPPROVAL.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5 - 0 THIS ITEMS DISAPPROVED.
[16. Public Hearing - Replat: Willow Pond Phase II, Block G, Lot 13 (RP21-0028)]
ITEM 16, PUBLIC HEARING RE-PLAN WILLOW POND PHASE TWO, BLOCK G, LOT 13, RP21-0028.OWNERS JOSHUA AND STEPHANIE HALL.
>> COMMISSIONERS, THIS ITEM WAS BEFORE YOU ON SEPTEMBER 28TH, AT WHICH TIME YOU APPROVED A 30 DAY EXTENSION AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TABLING THIS ITEM TILL TODAY.
THE APPLICANT HAS SINCE REQUESTED A WITHDRAWAL OF THIS CASE, BECAUSE THE ITEM YOU HAD CONTINUED THE PUBLIC CARRYING IT'S BEFORE YOU TODAY.
WITH A RECOMMENDATION THAT YOU APPROVED THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THE CASE AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> THANK YOU. I'VE BEEN HEARING WILL THEY CARE TO SPEAK? LET THE MOTION OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5 - 0.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD CARE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM IN THE STATEMENT?
>> SEEM NONE, NOW MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5 - 0.
DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 16 TO ACCEPT THEIR WITHDRAWAL?
>> LETS ACCEPT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THE CASE.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5 - 0.
[17. Public Hearing - Replat: Frisco Original Donation, Block 61, Lot 4R (RP21-0036)]
ITEM 17, PUBLIC HEARING RE-PLOT FRISCO ORIGINAL DONATION, BLOCK 61, LOT 4R, RP21 - 0036.OWNERS PRICE HOVER AND TIFFANY HOVER.
>> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT IS TO COMBINE TWO LOTS FOR DEVELOPMENT.
BOTH OF THOSE SLOTS DO COMPLY WITH THE ORIGINAL TOWN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS.
THIS ITEM IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS EVENING.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
>> THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE WILL A CARE TO SPEAK.
OKAY, DO I HAVE A MOTION OPEN TO PUBLIC HEARING?
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CULVER.
>> SECOND. BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 5 - 0.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING?
[00:10:04]
>> [OVERLAPPING] SEEING NONE MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5 - 0.
ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM, DO I HAVE A MOTION?
>> TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 17 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF,.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MR. KOHLBERG.
>> SECOND. BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5 - 0.
[18. Public Hearing - Replat: Casady Living Trust Addition, Block 23, Lot 1 (RP21-0042)]
CONGRATS. ITEM 18, PUBLIC HEARING RE-PLAN CASSADY LIVING TRUST ADDITION BLOCK 23, LOT ONE, RP21 - 0042, OWNERS OF CASSIDY LIVING TRUST.>> AS COMMISSIONERS, NOT LONG AGO, YOU APPROVED TO RE-PLAN TO CREATE TWO LOTS IN THIS LOCATION.
THE OWNER HAS SINCE FOUND SOMEONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO PURCHASE IT AS ONE LOT.
THUS, THEY'RE PROPOSING THIS REPLAT TO COMBINE IT AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR IT.
>> IS THE OWNER HERE AND WILL THEY CARE TO SPEAK OR THE APPLICANT HERE AND WILL THEY CARE TO SPEAK? DO I HAVE A MOTION FROM THE PUBLIC HEARING?
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5 - 0.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD CARE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING?
>> MOTION OF MY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5 - 0.
ALRIGHT, FOLKS. IT LOOKS LIKE WE GET TO ABANDON SOME PROPERTY LINE AND LOT LINE.
>> REDUCE DENSITY. [LAUGHTER] WHAT A GREAT IDEA [NOISE] ]ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM OR DO I HAVE A MOTION?
>> MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 18 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 5 - 0.
[19. Public Hearing-Replat: Frisco Bridges Addition, Block A, Lots 2R1 and 7 (RP21-0043)]
ITEM 19, PUBLIC HEARING TO REPLANT FRISCO BRIDGES ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOT 2R1 AND SEVEN, RP21 - 0043, OWNERS JBL PRESTON RIDGE, LLC.>> [NOISE] GOOD EVENING. THIS PROJECT IS REQUESTING A 30 DAY EXTENSION AS PERMITTED UNDER HOUSE BILL 3167.
THE APPLICANT SHOULD THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GRANT THE EXTENSION.
THIS ITEM WILL BE PLACED ON THE NOVEMBER 22ND PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS 30 DAY EXTENSION.
>> THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE WILL THEY CARE TO SPEAK? ALL RIGHT. ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM WILL PROBABLY NEED TO MAKE A MOTION.
IF WE WANT TO TAKE THIS AND ACCEPT IT IN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING.
SO I HAVE DONE A MOTION OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CONE.
>>SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KOHLBERG. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5 - 0.
PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN TO ANYONE.
WHO WOULD CARE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM TO SEE ME? ALL RIGHT.
DO I HAVE A MOTION TO GRANT THE EXTENSION AND TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THIS ITEM UNTIL THE NOVEMBER 22ND, 2021 PLANS ON ME.
>> SO TO EXTEND TO ACCEPT THE 30 DAY EXTENSION TABLE.
THE AGENDA ITEM, CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO NOVEMBER 22ND.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5 - 0.
ITEM OF 19 IS EXTENDED IN TABLE.
[20. Public Hearing - Zoning: Four Corners (Z21-0010)]
ITEM 20 PUBLIC HEARING ZONING FOUR CORNERS, Z210 - 0010.OWNERS FSWCLP, CVS PHARMACY INC.
SPECIFIED PROPERTIES, ELECTRICS IV, LP, AND HCP GROCERY COMPANY, LP. 64.
>> THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. THIS ITEM WAS BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON THE OCTOBER 12TH, P&Z AGENDA.
HOWEVER, DUE TO A NOTICING ERROR, THIS ITEM WAS REALLY NOTICED FOR TONIGHT'S MEETING AND PLACED ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
JUST A QUICK REMINDER OF WHAT IS GOING ON.
PLAN DEVELOPMENT 254, THAT IS THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT BEFORE YOU ALL TONIGHT WAS ADOPTED IN 2016 TO ACCOMMODATE A RETAIL DEVELOPMENT WITH A BIG-BOX USER AND ASSOCIATED RETAIL AS WELL AS A SINGLE-FAMILY COMPONENT.
HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A ZONING REQUEST TO ADOPT
[00:15:03]
REVISED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND EXHIBITS TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT.A FEW OF THOSE CHANGES IS THE INCORPORATION OF THE PROPERTY SOUTH OF GORDON HEIGHTS LINE AND THAT IS WHAT IS SHOWN BEFORE YOU ON THE SCREEN AS TRACT H. REVISED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE SINGLE-FAMILY PIECE, THAT BEING WHAT IS TRACK G. PREVIOUSLY, THIS PLAN DEVELOPMENT ALLOW THIS TRACK TO DEVELOP IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SINGLE-FAMILY SEVEN STANDARDS.
IT SHALL STILL DEVELOP TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY SEVEN LOT SIDES.
HOWEVER, THE STANDARDS HAVE BEEN AMENDED TO PROPOSE PULLING THE HOMES CLOSER TO THE STREET, REQUIRING FRONT PORCHES AND HAVING ENHANCED ELEMENTS ON HOME FACADES THAT ARE VISIBLY EXPOSED TO THE STREET AND, OR OPEN SPACE.
LASTLY, THE ANCHOR AND FOOD TRUCK.
PREVIOUSLY, THERE WAS AN ANCHOR STORE AND A FOOD TRUCK AREA, GENERALLY RIGHT IN HERE.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A SIT-DOWN RESTAURANT TO REPLACE THE FOOD TRUCK PARK.
THAT SIT-DOWN RESTAURANT IS POSITIONED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE CENTRAL OPEN SPACE, WHICH GENERALLY IS IN THIS AREA AND WILL BE CONTINUED SOUTH OF TRACK H PER THIS REQUEST.
ONE THING THAT WAS DISCUSSED AT LENGTH AT THE OCTOBER 12TH MEETING WAS THE IDEA THAT THE 2016 PD ORDINANCE DOES ALLOW A MAXIMUM OF 740 URBAN LIVING UNITS.
THE REQUESTS BEFORE YOU ALL TONIGHT IS NOT PROPOSING ANY ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT IS STATING THEY ARE WILLING TO REDUCE THAT 740 BY 80 UNITS, SO THAT WILL TAKE THAT 740 DOWN TO 660, AND THAT IS SOMETHING THAT THE APPLICANT AGREED TO AFTER THE STAFF REPORT WENT OUT.
IF THAT IS SOMETHING THAT YOU ALL WISH TO CONSIDER TONIGHT, YOU NEED TO MAKE THAT PART OF YOUR MOTION.
THIS IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TONIGHT.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU ALL MAY HAVE.
>> EXCELLENT. IT'S LIKE DEJA VU ALL OVER AGAIN.
>> APPRECIATE THE APPLICANT COMING BACK AND WORKING WITH US AND GETTING THIS FIXED.
ALSO, APPRECIATE THE REDUCTION OF 80 UNITS.
I THINK THAT SEEMS TO BE A GOOD COMPROMISE BUT IT'LL GIVE THEM A LITTLE BIT OF LEEWAY THAT THEY NEEDED.
ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF BEFORE WE BRING UP THE APPLICANT?
>> JOHN, CAN YOU REMIND US HOW MANY MULTIFAMILY UNITS ARE BEING BUILT?
>> I DO NOT HAVE THAT NUMBER IN FRONT OF ME TONIGHT.
I'M SURE THE APPLICANT CAN PROVIDE THAT.
>> THEY WERE NOT USING THE MAX OF COURSE?
>> YEAH, THEY WEREN'T USING THE MAX AND I CAN CERTAINLY LOOK IT UP REALLY QUICK.
I HAD A POST OUT IN OCTOBER 12TH.
I SHOULD HAVE THAT WITH [INAUDIBLE].
>> IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WILL THEY CARE TO SPEAK? CHARLES HODGES SUBMITTED A BLUE SPEAKER FORM.
[LAUGHTER] COMMISSIONERS, MY NAME IS CHARLES HODGES, 13642 OMEGA IN DALLAS WITH HODGES & ASSOCIATES.
I DON'T HAVE ANY FORMAL PRESENTATION.
WE DID HAVE A LOT OF CONVERSATION WITH STAFF AND WITH THE OWNER OF THE MULTIFAMILY, AND HE WAS RELUCTANT BUT FINE GRANTING THE REDUCTION AND WE DID NEED TO LEAVE SOME MARGIN OF SAFETY IN THERE UNTIL IT'S FULLY DEVELOPED.
WHILE WE'RE ON THE THEME OF REDUCING DENSITY, WE'RE CERTAINLY HAPPY TO BRING THAT FORWARD.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
>> I THINK IT WAS 112 UNITS THAT THEY HAD LEFT.
I'M TRYING TO LOOK FOR THE EMAIL THAT I HAD DONE A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO.
>> THE BUILDING ON 628 IN LIEU OF 750.
>> SIX HUNDRED AND TWENTY EIGHT IN LIEU OF 750 OR 740?
>>RIGHT. WE WERE TRYING TO HOLD A LITTLE BIT OF MARGIN IN THERE I THINK.
>> I THINK IT MAKES SENSE WITH THE FACT THAT THE SECOND DEVELOPMENT HASN'T BEEN DONE YET.
YOU MIGHT ADD MORE MUCH BASED OFF THE MARKET DEMAND YOU MIGHT NEED MORE ONE-BEDROOMS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
I THINK THAT MAKES SENSE, TOO.
BUT I DO APPRECIATE THE CONCESSION MYSELF. WE'LL SKIP THAT.
WELL GO THROUGH ANY QUESTIONS NOW OR DO YOU WANT TO GO TO PUBLIC HEARING? NOW MOTION OPEN TO PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5, 0.
[00:20:01]
PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN.DOES ANYONE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING?
>> SEEING NONE MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.
>> ANY OPPOSE? THE MOTION CARRIES 5, 0.
I THINK THE CONCESSION OF THE 80 LOTS IS GOOD.
I THINK COMMISSIONER BOX IS NOT HERE THIS EVENING.
THAT WAS A STICKING POINT FOR HIM.
I THINK HE'LL APPRECIATE THE CONCESSION.
I SHOULDN'T SPEAK FOR HIM, BUT HE'S NOT HERE SO I CAN TELL YOU WHAT I THINK HE'S GOING TO SAY, BUT HE DOESN'T GET THE VOTE.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS HERE?
>> I JUST WANT TO SAY I APPRECIATE COMMISSIONER BOX EVEN IF HE'S NOT HERE FOR BRINGING UP THE ISSUE.
IT DID END UP PRODUCING THE DENSITY ON THE PROJECT.
WE APPRECIATE THAT FROM THE APPLICANT AND THE OWNER.
>> WE APPRECIATE THE FLEXIBILITY IN WORKING WITH US WITH THE NOTICING ERROR BECAUSE IT DOES TAKE YOUR TIME TO BE HERE AGAIN SO WE APPRECIATE THAT AND WE REALLY DO.
DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 20? ACTUALLY, IF WE MAKE A MOTION, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO STATE THAT WE'RE GOING TO REDUCE THE DENSITY.
>> I'VE TRIED TO ACCEPT THAT, THIS REQUEST TO REDUCE THE OVERALL DENSITY BY 80 UNITS.
>> EXCELLENT. WHO'S GOING TO MAKE THAT MOTION FOR ME? COMMISSIONER MORGAN, YOU WANT TO MAKE IT?
>> A MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 20 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF WITH THE ADDITION OF REDUCING THE OVERALL DENSITY BY 80 UNITS.
>> MOTION BY A COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.
>> ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 5, 0 AND 20 IS APPROVED WITH THE STATE OF CHANGE. THANK YOU ALL.
[21. Results of the October 19, 2021 City Council meeting.]
RESULTS OF THE OCTOBER 19TH 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.THERE WAS TWO ITEMS ON IT [OVERLAPPING] 6, 0. ANY QUESTIONS GUYS?
[22. Schedule of future discussion items.]
>> ALL RIGHT. ITEM 22, SCHEDULE A FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS.
>> I JUST WANT TO MENTION ABOUT POSSIBLY ON NOVEMBER 8TH AFTER THAT MEETING OR PER THE WORK SESSION ON A COUPLE OF ITEMS. ONE IS HAZEL WARD, THAT'S THE ZONING CASE THAT WAS TABLED AND THEN TALK ABOUT ANOTHER PROJECT AS WELL.
>> ALL RIGHT. THERE IS A STATED WORK SESSION ON THE 15TH AS WELL.
>> THAT'S RIGHT, 15TH. THANKS FOR THE REMINDER.
THIS WILL BE ON WHATEVER THEY END UP CALLING IT THERE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DNT AND LEBANON ROAD.
>> IT WAS PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS WADE PARK.
>> YOU'RE SAYING THERE'S A WORK SECTION ON THE 9TH?
>> THE 8TH. [OVERLAPPING] NO THE15TH.
>> BUT THE WEEK BEFORE THAT [OVERLAPPING].
>> THE 15TH. IT'S GOING TO BE A SEPARATE SECTION TRAINING [OVERLAPPING].
>> YEAH, THAT'S FOR THE SECTION.
>> I KNOW THAT. DID YOU ALSO SAY IT WAS ALSO [OVERLAPPING].
>> NO, IN THE 8TH. THAT'S THE 9TH I MEAN RIGHT AFTER THE P&Z MEETING.
>> BECAUSE THE 15TH IS A MONDAY AS A JOINT WORK SESSION WITH CITY COUNCIL.
THE 9TH IS OUR REGULAR SCHEDULED PLANNING ZONING MEETING, WHICH WILL FOLLOW THAT WITH A WORK SESSION.
>> REMEMBER, THE SECOND MEETING IN NOVEMBER IS ON A MONDAY NOT A TUESDAY.
>> I'LL JUST PUT AN ITEM ON THAT AGENDA TODAY.
>> YES. [OVERLAPPING] NO PROBLEM
>> ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS?
>> WE CAN TALK ABOUT COMMISSIONER KELLY'S TIE, IT LOOKS SHARP.
>> THAT'S WHY ATTORNEYS HAVE [OVERLAPPING].
>> LEGAL ALWAYS LOOKS SHARP. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5, 0.
>> GREAT JOB.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.