>> GOOD EVENING. [CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:03] WELCOME TO THE REGULARS MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, WE'RE GATHERED AT 6101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD AND THE TIME IS 6:31 PM. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSIST OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. TONIGHT, COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE, COMMISSIONER CONE, COMMISSIONER KENDALL, COMMISSIONER KELLY OUR SECRETARY, AND COMMISSIONER MORGAN. I'M ROB COX, I'M YOUR CHAIR FOR THIS EVENING. ABSENT THIS EVENING IS COMMISSIONER COLBERG, AND COMMISSIONER BOX. REPRESENTING STAFF THIS EVENING, REPRESENTING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, WE HAVE JOHN LETTELIER, PHILIP CLIMER, JONATHAN HUBBARD, SUZANNE PORTER, CINDY JACKSON, JONATHAN POLLARD, KERRY WHITE, AND LORI CROSS. REPRESENTING ENGINEERING, WE HAVE JASON GRIMM, AND JOEL FITZ. REPRESENTING FIRE, WE HAVE JOHN GILLETTE AND MELISSA BARSTOW. REPRESENTING ILLEGAL, RYAN PITTMAN. DID I MISS ANYONE THIS EVENING? EXCELLENT. THE FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA THIS EVENING IS CITIZEN INPUT. [CITIZEN INPUT] IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME. WE WILL ALSO HAVE PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR THE LEGISLATIVE ITEMS AT THE END OF THE AGENDA. PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM. PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. ALL MEETINGS ARE RECORDED, SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE. PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO THE MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE, OR ANY APPLICANTS PRESENT THIS EVENING. TO ENSURE THERE'S ENOUGH TIME FOR ALL TO SPEAK PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES. UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH YOU WILL HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 10 MINUTES. PLEASE NOTE, THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT OR ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK DURING THE CITIZEN INPUT TIME, THIS EVENING? WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM. ITEM 2, APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. [APPROVAL OF MINUTES] CONSIDER AND ACT UPON APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AND THE WORK SESSION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, MEETING ON AUGUST 10, 2021. COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS, QUESTIONS ON THESE MINUTES OR DO I HAVE A MOTION? >> I MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF BOTH THE REGULAR AND THE WORK SESSIONS THAT WERE HELD ON AUGUST 10TH. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4/0, MINUTES ARE APPROVED. THE NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS, [CONSENT AGENDA] AND THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND NONCONTROVERSIAL ITEMS. ANY COMMISSION MEMBER MAKING SUCH REQUESTS PRIOR TO A MOTION AND VOTE ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY. ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH THE MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION. WE HAVE ITEMS 3-16 THIS EVENING. ARE THERE ANY THAT NEED TO BE PULLED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION? >> CHAIR, I NEED TO RECUSE MYSELF FROM ITEM 3. >> ARE THERE ANY OTHERS? DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEMS 4-16? >> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEMS 4-16 IS SUBMITTED. >> A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES ITEMS 4-16, ARE APPROVED. COMMISSIONER KENDALL WILL RECUSE HIMSELF ON ITEM 3. ITEM 3, REVISE INVADES FRISCO 45 ADDITION BLOCK. [3. Revised Conveyance Plat: Frisco 45 Addition, Block B, Lots 2-11 (CP21-0012)] B, LOTS2-11, CP 21-0012. OWNERS, 121 SPRING CREEK LLC. COMMISSIONERS DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS, OR DO I HAVE A MOTION? >> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 3 IS SUBMITTED. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN? >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 3/0, ITEM 3 IS APPROVED. WE MAY GET COMMISSIONER KENDALL BACK IN CHAMBER CHAIR. >> REMIND ME TO GRAB SUNSCREEN NEXT TIME YOU HAVE TO GO OUT THERE. >> TAKE AN AIR CONDITIONER WITH YOU. TONIGHT WE HAVE ABOUT 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA AND A COUPLE OTHER ITEMS, AND I WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS. EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS PRECEDED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION, OTHER REQUESTS. THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED 10 MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION. FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER CARD AND HAND IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WHO IS ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE [INAUDIBLE] THIS EVENING. IF THERE ANY ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR POSITIONS. PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE [NOISE] WITH THE COMMENTS. THE TIME LIMIT IS FIVE MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK. THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME IF A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO SPEAK. [00:05:01] PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED. FOR ALL PERSONS HAVE WHO HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE AND THE COMMISSION, INCLUDES IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO A FUTURE DATE. AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF OR THE APPLICANT. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES, UNLESS THE COMMISSION DENIES THE CASE AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL A DENIAL. FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE OF STAFF AS TO WHEN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. ITEM 17, ADOPTION OF THE 2022 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SCHEDULES. [17. Adoption of the 2022 Development Review Schedules: N/A] ANY OWNERS IN IT? >> THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. STAFF HAS PREPARED THE 2022 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SCHEDULES FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION TONIGHT. I WOULD ASK THAT AS A PART OF THIS ITEM, THAT YOU ALL DISCUSS MOVING THE SECOND MEETING OF NOVEMBER, THAT BEING THE WEEK OF THANKSGIVING FOR 2021 AND 2022, TO MONDAY EVENING INSTEAD OF THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED TUESDAY EVENING. IF THAT IS SOMETHING THAT YOU ALL WOULD LIKE TO DO, I WOULD ASK THAT YOU MAKE THAT PART OF YOUR MOTION TONIGHT, WHEN YOU APPROVE WITH THE CALENDARS. THESE CALENDARS ARE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL ESTIMATED, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS [INAUDIBLE] [NOISE] >> COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS ON THESE CALENDAR ITEMS? ANY COMMENTS ON MOVING THE MEETINGS TO MONDAY FOR THE NEXT TWO YEARS IN THE WEEK OF THANKSGIVING? >> THAT'LL BE THIS YEAR AND NEXT YEAR. >> I'M FOR THAT. ANYBODY AGAINST THAT, THAT WOULDN'T WANT THAT IN THE MOTION? DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE 2022 DEVELOPMENT RESCHEDULED WITH CHANGING THE SECOND MEETING OF NOVEMBER FOR 2021 AND 2022, TO BE ON MONDAY INSTEAD OF TUESDAY OF THAT WEEK? >> MOTION MOVE. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4/0. >> THANK YOU. >> WE HAVE ADOPTED THE 2022 DEVELOPMENT RESCHEDULE. >> CONGRATULATIONS. >> EIGHTEEN, PUBLIC HEARING, [18. Public Hearing - Replat & Revised Conveyance Plat: Hall Park, Phase D, Block A, Lots 1-5 (RP21-0029)] REPLAT AND REVISE CONVEYANCE PLAT. HALL PARK PHASE D BLOCK A LOTS1-5, RP21-00029. OWNERS HALL 3101 GAYLORD II LLC, AND HALL 3200 INTERNET LLC. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. GOOD EVENING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PREVIOUSLY TABLED THIS ITEM AND CONTINUED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THE JULY 27TH MEETING, EXCUSE ME. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ALSO APPROVED THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR A 30-DAY EXTINCTION AT THAT MEETING AS WELL. THEREFORE, A MOTION TO REMOVE THIS ITEM FROM THE TABLE IS NEEDED, AND THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO WITHDRAW THIS PLAT FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION TO BE MADE AND STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THAT REQUEST. >> DO YOU HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE THIS ITEM FROM THE TABLE? >> MOTION MOVE. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4/0, ITEM'S BEEN REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. WILL THE APPLICANT CARE TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME? NO. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING? >> MOTION MOVED. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CONE. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4/0. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WANTS TO SPEAK FOR, OR AGAINST THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME? >> SEEING NONE MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE MOTION CARRIES 4/0. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE WITHDRAWAL? >> MOTION MOVED. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4/0. WE ACCEPT THE WITHDRAWAL ON ITEM 18. BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD, THERE WAS ONE COMMENT ON [BACKGROUND] ITEM 14 WHICH WAS A NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. WOULD YOU CARE TO SPEAK STILL ON THAT? THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED. [BACKGROUND] WHAT WAS THAT ON THE ITEM? >> ITEM 14, CONSENT. >> IT WAS GRANTED THE 30-DAY. [BACKGROUND]. >> THANK YOU. I WOULD HAVE TO REOPEN A PUBLIC HEARING UNLIKE A CITIZEN INPUT. WHAT WE WOULD DO THAT FOR YOU? [BACKGROUND]. >> NEXT ONE ISN'T TIME FOR ONE. >> THANK YOU FOR THE CARD. [00:10:02] ITEM 19, PUBLIC HEARING REPLANT HALL PARK FACE C3 BLOCK A LOT [19. Public Hearing - Replat: Hall Park, Phase C3, Block A, Lot 4 (RP21-0030)] 4 RP 21-0030 OWNERS HALL OFFICE PORTFOLIO DB, LLC. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TABLE THIS ITEM AS WELL, AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THE JULY, 27TH MEETING. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, ALSO TO PROVE THAT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR A 30-DAY EXTINCTION AT THAT TIME AS WELL. THIS ITEM DOES NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE AND STEPH IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED. >> HEY, DO I HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE THIS FROM THE TIME? >> IF WE REMOVE IT FROM THE TABLE AND GO AHEAD AND MOVE THAT WE OPEN PUBLIC HEARING YOU'RE DOING. >> I DON'T NEED TO ASK THE APPLICANT NAME CARE TO SPEAK. WHY DON'T END THAT MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN? >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE FOR MOTION CARRIES 4-0. WE HAVE REMOVED THIS FROM THE TABLE, WITH THE APPLICANT CARE TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME. COMMISSIONER MORGAN. >> NOW CAN WE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING >> YOU CAN. >> TELL MOTION UP TO THE PUBLIC HEARING [NOISE]? >> [BACKGROUND] MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4-0, PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. ANYONE WHO CARE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING? >> SEEING ON MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. >> MOTION BY MR. KENDALL? >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COHEN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE MOTION CARRIES 4-0. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. ANY COMMENTS ON THIS? I DO HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE WITHDRAWAL. I MEAN, I'M SORRY TO APPROVAL [BACKGROUND]. I APOLOGIZE [BACKGROUND] ANY QUESTIONS ON IT? >> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 19 AS RECOMMENDED BY STEPH? >> MOTION BY MR. KELLY? >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4-0. ITEM 19 IS APPROVED. >> ITEM 20, PUBLIC HEARING REPLANT HALL PARK PHASE C1 BLOCK A, LOT 2R, [20. Public Hearing - Replat: Hall Park, Phase C1, Block A, Lot 2R (RP21-0031)] RP21.0031, OWNERS 15 PERCENT GUARANTEED PLUS LAND INCOME FUND LIMITED. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE FINDING IS ZONING COMMISSION AS WELL. TABLE THIS ITEM AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THE JULY, 27TH MEETING. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ALSO APPROVE THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR A 30-DAY EXTINCTION AT THAT TIME. THIS ITEM AS WELL, IT NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE AND STEPH IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL I SUBMITTED. >> I DO HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE THIS FROM THE TABLE. >>MOVED. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CALM. >> OKAY. >> SECOND, BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4-0. ADAM'S BEEN REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. THE APPLICANT CARE TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME. >> I HAVE A MOTION OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. >> MOVED. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE, MOTION CARRIES 4-0, PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. ANYONE CARE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING? >> SEEING NONE MOVED TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CALM. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE, MOTION CARRIES 4-0 PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSE. DO I HAVE A MOTION ON THIS ONE. >> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 20 IS SUBMITTED. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4-0. ITEM 20 IS APPROVED. CONGRATULATIONS. ITEM 21, PUBLIC HEARING AND REPLANTING FOR SCALE HANDED TO BLOCK D LOT 1, [21. Public Hearing - Replat: McFrisco Honda 2, Block D, Lot 1 (RP21-0032)] RP21.0032 OWNERS WITH DAVID BRISCOE ON, LLC. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT IS TO DEDICATE AN ABANDONED EASEMENTS THAT ARE NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION. STEPH IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REPLANT AND IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED. AT THIS TIME, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD THEY CARE TO SPEAK? >> HE TURNED INTO CARD JUST SAYS, HE DOESN'T WISH TO SPEAK, BUT HE'S HERE AVAILABLE IF QUESTIONS ARE NEEDED. >> THANK YOU. [OVERLAPPING]. >> TO HAVE A MOTION OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. >> SO MOVED. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4-0. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD CARE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST [NOISE]? >> SEEING I MOVED TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. >> SECOND. >> SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CONE, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4-0. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. DO I HAVE A MOTION ON THIS ITEM. ANY QUESTIONS OR A MOTION? >> MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 21 AS RECOMMENDED BY STEPH. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL? >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4-0. >> ITEM 21 IS APPROVED. >> CONGRATULATION. >> ITEM 22, PUBLIC HEARING REPLANT FRISCO ORIGINAL DONATION BLOCK 61, [22. Public Hearing - Replat: Frisco Original Donation, Block 61, Lots 4 & 5C (RP21-0033)] LOTS 4 AND 5, CRP21.0033, OWNERS PRICE AND TIFFANY HUBBARD. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR, PLANNING HIS OWN COMMISSION PREVIOUSLY TABLE THIS ITEM AND DID CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AS WELL ON THE AUGUST 10TH MEETING. [00:15:03] THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AT THAT TIME ALSO APPROVE THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR A 30-DAY EXTINCTION. THEREFORE, A MOTION TO REMOVE THIS ITEM FROM THE TABLE IS NEEDED. >> DO I HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE THIS ITEM FROM THE TABLE? >> SO MOVED. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY? >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COHEN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4-0. ITEM HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. IS THE APPLICANT HERE, WOULD THEY CARE TO SPEAK? I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING. >> SO MOVED. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL? >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COHEN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4-0. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. >> DOES ANYONE CARE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME? >> SEEING NONE MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CALM? >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4-0. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE DOING ON THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. IF YOU COULD BRING UP THE PICTURE ON IT. WHICH ARE THE TWO LOTS? I SEE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. >> ON OUR GIS MAPS, UNFORTUNATELY, THE LOT 5C IS JUST A 3.5 FOOT LOT. HERE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THIS LOT. IT'S A REMAINDER FROM THE ORIGINAL DONATION TO THE CITY. IT'S NOT SHOWN ON THE MAP JUST BECAUSE THE LINE RIGHT HERE IS [NOISE] >> YOU SAY 3.5 FEET? >> YES, SIR. >> WHY? >> CORRECT. >> OKAY. >> IT'S ALL I NEEDED TO KNOW. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? DONE A MOTION ON ITEM 22. >> MOVE TO ACCEPT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL. >> THIS WAS WITHDRAWN. >> YES, SIR. >> I'M SORRY, I MISUNDERSTOOD THAT. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES FOR, WITHDRAWAL WAS ACCEPTED. ITEM 23, PUBLIC HEARING REPLANT FRISCO ISD, [23. Public Hearing - Replat: Frisco I.S.D. Addition, Block A, Lot 1 (RP21-0034)] ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOT 1 RP21.0034. OWNER'S FIRST GO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE PURPOSE IS REPLY IS TO DEDICATE AND ABANDONED EASEMENTS THAT ARE NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION. STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REPLY, AND AS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED. AT THIS TIME, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. >> USE THE APPLICANT HERE [INAUDIBLE]. DONE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. >> MOVED. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COHEN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE MOTION CARRIES FOR, PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. YOU WOULD CARRY PHASE 4 OR AGAINST THIS ITEM AT THIS POINT. >> SEEING NONE MOVED TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CRANDELL. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COHEN ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES FOR, PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. ANY COMMENTS ON THIS OR DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 23. >> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 23 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COHEN. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES FOR, ITEM 23 IS APPROVED. ITEM 24, PUBLIC HEARING SIGN VARIANCE; [24. Public Hearing - Sign Variance: C. Rogers, Tract 1 (A1133A); Collin County School Land #10 Survey, Tract 10, 13 & 15 (A0148); C L Smith Survey, Tract 1 (A0807) (V21-0003)] C. ROGER'S TRUCK 1 A 1133A COLLIN COUNTY SCHOOL LAND NUMBER 10, SURVEY TRUCK 10, 13, AND 15. A0148 CL SMITH'S SURVEY TRUCK 1, A0807 B21.0003 OWNERS FHQ HOLDINGS, LP. >>THANK YOU, CHAIR AND COMMISSION. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING ASSIGNED VARIANCE TO SECTION 7, 7016 Q PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SIGN, PDS, DEFINED AS A TEMPORARY SIGN USED TO ADVERTISE, DISPLAY INFORMATION ABOUT DEVELOPMENT OR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING EIGHT PDS SIGNS IN EXCESS OF ALLOWED HEIGHT AND SIZE. ADDITIONALLY, THEY ARE REQUESTING SIGN PERMITS BE ISSUED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. THE SIGNS THAT'S PROPOSED IN HEIGHT WOULD BE 20 FEET AND 16 FOOT IS CURRENTLY ALLOWED. THE SIZE OF THE SIGN WOULD BE 400 SQUARE FEET. THAT'S THE FACE OF THE SIGN THAT YOU SEE IN THE PICTURE THERE. THE ALLOWED SIGN ALLOWED SIGN SIZE IS 96 SQUARE FEET. I WILL SAY THAT THE FIELDS LOGO THERE AND THE WORD FIELDS IS ONLY ABOUT A 130 SQUARE FEET, SO THE ENTIRE SIGN IS THE 400 SQUARE FEET. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE VARIANCE WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE ADJACENT PROPERTY, IS OF A UNIQUE DESIGN AND DOES NOT VIOLATE THE INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE AND STAFF. [00:20:02] THE VARIANCE DOES MEET THREE OF THE REQUIRED CRITERIA, REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS VARIANCE. I WILL SHOW YOU THE EIGHT LOCATIONS ON THIS SITEMAP. THEY'RE DEPICTED BY THESE SQUARES WITH LEADER ARROWS POINTING. THOSE ARE THE EIGHT LOCATIONS ALONG THE TOLLWAY. WITH PAIRED LOCATIONS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE TOLLWAY. THE SIGN APPEARS TO BE AS SOME TYPE OF SQUARE, HOLLOW STRUCTURE WITH THE SIGN IMPRINTED ON BOTH SIDES. I DO BELIEVE THEY'RE PROPOSING SOME LIGHTING. THIS IS A DEPICTION OF THE SIGNS AS VIEWED, IT LOOKS LIKE AN EXIT RAMP FROM THE NORTH DALLAS TOLLWAY. HERE'S THE DIMENSIONAL AND A REFERENCE TO THE SIGN IN REFERENCE TO A CAR HIKER PERSON HEIGHT AND THE SIGN IS 20 FEET IN HEIGHT. LIKE I SAID, THE VARIANCE REQUESTS MEETS THE THREE CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR THIS VARIANCE. I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. >> QUESTIONS OF STAFF AT THIS TIME. WE HAVE ONE REGISTER SPEAKER, FEME KIRAN. YOU WANT TO SPEAK? [NOISE] >> MR. CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS. I GUESS IT WAS ALMOST 16 MONTHS AGO, AND I WAS STANDING HERE THAT MONUMENTAL ZONE AND GREAT QUESTS AND THANKS TO YOUR SUPPORT, WE GOT THAT AND FIELDS OF THE GREAT START TELL LATTER WONDERFUL THINGS HAPPENING. >> YOU JUST STATE YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. >> I'M SORRY, SIR. 7901 WINDROSE AVENUE, PLANO, TEXAS. THE SIGN IS BOLD. SIGN IS UNUSUAL AND IT'S CERTAINLY LARGE. I'LL TELL YOU THE NUMBER OF REASONS THAT WHY WE ARE DOING. NUMBER 1 IS EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE. I HAVE ESTIMATES ANYWHERE FROM $45-75,000 EACH OF THEM WITHOUT ANY ELECTRONS. WE DON'T WANT TO PUT SOME CHEAP BANNER SIGN OR CONVERT SIGN AND ALL THAT. NUMBER 1, THE SIZE OF OUR PROPERTY ALLOWS THE TOPOGRAPHY OF OUR LAND. WHEN YOU DRIVE ON TOLLWAY, THERE ARE CERTAIN PARTS OF THE PROPERTY YOU CANNOT SEE, AND THIS PROPERTY OBVIOUSLY ITSELF IS 2,000 PLUS ACRES, BUT THE PARTICULAR AREA IS 800 ACRE. PUTTING A SMALL SIGNAGE IS DISAPPEARS. OUR IDEA IS TO PUT THAT IN STRATEGIC LOCATIONS AND THEN YOU CAN SEE FROM TOLLWAY. WHAT WE WANT TO ACHIEVE ON THAT, NUMBER 1, BUILDING A FIELDS BRAND. AS YOU KNOW, I WAS SUCCESSFUL ON DOING THAT LEGACY. PEOPLE TODAY SAY, WE'RE GONE LEGACY OR THEY SAY WE WORK AT LEGACY. THEY DON'T SAY I WORK AT TOYOTA OR CHASE, WHATEVER, THAT BECOME A BRAND. OUR GOAL AND DESIRE IN LONG-TERM FIELDS BECOME THAT, AND PEOPLE I WANT TO SAY, HEY, WE WANT TO BE AT FIELDS. WE ARE WORKING AT FIELDS, WE LIVE AT FIELDS. AS EVERYBODY DRIVES PROSPEROUS LINE BEHIND EVERY DAY, I LIKE THEM TO SEE THESE BEAUTIFULLY DESIGNED AND BUILT. ACTUALLY, THIS IS SOMEWHERE IN ITALY THAT WAS DESIGNED BY A VERY FAMOUS ARTISTS WITHOUT THE SCIENCE AND WE INCORPORATE THE IDEA TO A SIGNAGE. ALSO VERY IMPORTANT THING, AS YOU KNOW, OUR PROPERTY IS ZONED 70 PERCENT OF THESE LAND FOR COMMERCIAL. WE AGREED THAT FOR OFFICE USE COMPANIES, CORPORATIONS. WHEN YOU HAVE A CEO OF A COMPANY, THEY COME TO DALLAS, THEY TAKE THEM ALL DIFFERENT LOCATION LAST SCHOOL IN DOWNTOWN UPTOWN, DALLAS, WHATEVER. THEY HAVE VERY LIMITED AMOUNT OF TIME WHEN THEY DRIVE BY THE PROPERTY, I WANT THEM TO SEE AND SOMEBODY IS SHOWING THE BROKERS AND THIS IS FIELDS LINE, THIS IS THAT. BECAUSE WE'RE SO BIG, THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT. SOME OF THEM TAKE HELICOPTER RIDES AND SOMEBODY SHOWS IT FROM THE TOP, THAT'S FIELDS PROPERTY. THAT ACHIEVES THAT AN EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO OUR PARTNERS KDC, WHOM I DID, TOYOTA, JP MORGAN CHASE, THOSE BUILDINGS. KDC SAYING THEME, IF YOU NEED THIS SIGNS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THEN THE OTHER THING TO CONSIDERATION, ALTHOUGH WHILE I WANT TO BUILD THESE AS FAST AS I CAN, BUT MARKET CONDITIONS DEMAND ON. WE'RE GOING TO SEE HOW LONG IT'S GOING TO TAKE. WE CAN'T PUT SOME SIGNAGE THAT IS AGAINST IMPACTED WITH WHETHER THE ICE STORM, WINDSTORM, SUN AND ALL THAT. [00:25:02] I WANT SOMETHING A PERMANENT TYPE OF STRUCTURES THAT CAN BE THERE. WE ARE ALSO PLANNING TO BE ABLE TO MOVE IF WE FIND A USER FOR THAT PARTICULAR AREA WHERE THE SIGNS AND RELOCATE SOMEWHERE ELSE ON THE PROPERTY. ANYWAY, I DON'T WANT TO TAKE TOO MUCH OF TIME. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTION, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. >> DO I HAVE A MOTION OPEN PUBLIC HEARING? >> MOVED. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY? >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COHEN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES FOR, PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. IS ANYONE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING? >> SEE NO ONE MOVES TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COHEN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES FOR. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. ALL RIGHT, FOLKS. WE GET STAFF SUGGESTION ON HERE THAT THIS MEETS THREE OF THE FOUR CRITERIA, AND WE DON'T GET THAT TOO OFTEN. ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? >> I HAD ONE QUESTION FOR STAFF. >> YEAH. [NOISE] >> JUST FOR THE RECORD, CAN YOU JUST TELL US WHAT THE SIGNS WILL BE MADE OF? >> I DO NOT KNOW THE MATERIAL. THE MATERIAL IS NOT SOMETHING THAT I WOULD NEED TO APPROVE FOR THIS TYPE OF SIGN. >> OKAY. >> I THINK WE CAN HAVE [OVERLAPPING] >> DOESN'T [INAUDIBLE] IF YOU WANT [OVERLAPPING] I THINK DOING IT USING THE MICROPHONE WILL BE GREAT. >> NEXT. >> THIS SIGN WE HAVE TWO WAYS. WE LOOKED AT EVEN COLORED BOXES WHERE WE COULD BUY IT AND USE IT, BUT THEY DON'T MAKE THESE SIZE. WE COULD POUR IN PLACE CONCRETE. I HAVE PROPOSALS FROM [INAUDIBLE] TO PULL THIS CONCRETE THING. THEN IT WILL BE FINISHED WITH PLASTER IF IT'S ON THE COLOR. THEN INSIDE WILL BE PAINTED BLUE, OUTSIDE WILL BE WHITE. THEN WE'LL HAVE A SOLAR BECAUSE WE DO NOT HAVE POWER ON THE PROPERTY. SO WE'LL USE SOLAR PANELS HIDDEN BEHIND TO LIGHT THE SIDE. THAT ONE ALTERNATIVE. THE SECOND CAN BE STEEL STRUCTURE AND THEN FINISH IT WITH THE DRY LAKES MATERIAL. THIS LIKE GYPSUM, AND THEN DO PLASTER OVER. THAT'S ANOTHER METHOD THAT WE'RE LOOKING INTO IT. DEFINITELY VERY DURABLE, LONG-LASTING [NOISE] CONSTRUCTION ON THAT. >> THANK YOU. NO OTHER QUESTIONS. >> [FOREIGN] WINDOWS ABOVE. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> I GUESS IT'S JUST WORTH TO COMMENT THAT THESE ARE GOING TO BE HERE FOR QUITE A LONG TIME. I THINK I LIKE THE DESIGN. I THINK THE BRANDING IS FINE. I THINK IT'S NEEDED. BUT THEY ARE GOING TO BE THERE FOR A LONG TIME. I WOULD SAY MAYBE 10 YEARS. WHO KNOWS? [NOISE] BUT JUST UNDERSTAND THAT AS WE APPROVE THIS. >> SOUNDS LIKE CERTAINLY WITH THE SIZE AND THE WEIGHT THAT THEY'RE LOOKING AT CONCRETE OR STEEL, THEY'RE DEFINITELY DON'T WANT TO BLOW IT AROUND. >> THE COST. >> YEAH. [LAUGHTER] [OVERLAPPING] >> ABSOLUTELY. >> YEAH. >> THE GOAL IS TO MOVE THEM AND FILL THAT [INAUDIBLE] [OVERLAPPING] >> WE HOPE YOU HAVE TO MOVE THEM UP. >> ABSOLUTELY WE WILL HAVE TO. >> THAT REMINDS ME I DO HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT. >> YES. >> CAN YOU REPEAT THE POTENTIAL COST FOR EACH SIGN THAT YOU STATED EARLIER? I DIDN'T CAPTURE THAT. >> ANYWAY LETS PUT IT FROM 45,000 EACH TO 75,000 DEPENDS HOW IT'S BUILT. I EVEN HAVE A PROPOSAL FROM SOME SIGN COMPANY. RIDICULOUS AMOUNTS BUT MOST LIKELY WE WILL GO LOTS OF POURING IN PLACE BY [INAUDIBLE] AND FINISH IT WITH THE PAINTERS PLASTERING AND DESIGN COMPANY PUTS THE FIELDS LOGO AND THE ELECTRICITY FOR THAT. >> JUST TO REPEAT, YOU SAID SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 45000 AND 75000. >> FOR EACH PIECE. >> FOR EACH PIECE. >> YES, SIR. [NOISE] >> THANK YOU. JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE. THAT'S CLEAR. >> IT ALLOWS HIM TO REPOSSESS HIS BOX CULVERTS LATER. [LAUGHTER] >> IT'S GOT TO BE LOTS OF USES FOR THOSE WHO KNOW ARE [LAUGHTER] NO LONGER NEED IT. >> YEAH. >> OKAY. >> ALL RIGHT. >> THANK YOU, SIR. >> DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 24? >>MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 24, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> >> ANY OPPOSE MOTION CARRIES FORWARD AND ITEM 24 IS APPROVED. [NOISE] >> HEARD A FEW ENGINEERS LAUGH AT THAT LAST COMMENT. >> JUST A FEW. >> VERY FEW. >> VERY FEW. >> ITEM 25 PUBLIC HEARINGS SPECIFICALLY USE PERMIT GEORGE MAKES AN [25. Public Hearing - Specific Use Permit: George Mixon Addition, Block A, Lot 16R (SUP21-0005)] ADDITION BLOCK A LOT 16R STP 21.00005. [00:30:09] >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS A REQUEST TO AMEND THE SPECIFIC USE PERMANENT FOR OUR USE/NEW CAR DEALERSHIP TO INCREASE BOTH THE SIZE OF THE DEALERSHIP. AS NOTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY PUBLIC INPUT EITHER FOR OR AGAINST THIS REQUEST. THEREFORE, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST. AT THIS TIME, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. >> COULD YOU JUST POINT OUT ON THE MAP OR DIAGRAM WHAT, YOU KNOW THIS IS FOR ADDITIONAL LAW, RIGHT? >> NOT FOR AN ADDITIONAL LAW. NO, SIR. IT'S FOR, LET'S SEE. >> WE HAVE 4000 ADDITIONAL SQUARE FEET, RIGHT? >> CORRECT. >> DOES THIS ADDITIONAL BUILDING. >> YES. >> I'M SORRY. I SAID THIS IN ADDITION TO THE BUILDING. I'M SORRY. I MISREAD THAT. >> YES, SIR. >> WHERE'S THAT GOING? >> IT IS GOING TO KEY DRAWN HERE. >> I'M SORRY. [OVERLAPPING] >> SO POORLY DRAWN. WAS THAT YOU? >> I DID IT. [OVERLAPPING]. >> THE LASER IS FINE. >> YOU JUST DID THE LASER. WOULD TRY TO KIND OF WATCH. >> THERE'S GOING TO BE LIKE STORAGE CLOSET KIND OF A THING RIGHT HERE. IT'S JUST ADDITIONAL STORAGE FOR TIRES AND OTHER ITEMS. THEN RIGHT HERE, THERE'S GOING TO BE AN ADDITION OF A NEW BAY FOR THE SERVICE CENTER LOCATED ON THE OR WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. >> THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS SIR? >> THANK YOU. IS THERE APPLICANT WHO WOULD CARE TO SPEAK? >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS, MY NAME IS ARLENE SAMUELSON I AM WITH WESTWARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH CIVIL ENGINEERS FOR THE POTENTIAL PROJECT. I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF THE HONORS TONIGHT. >> STATE YOUR ADDRESS. [NOISE] >> YEAH. SORRY ABOUT THAT. 2901 DALLAS PARKWAY, PLANO, TEXAS. >> THANK YOU. >> I DON'T HAVE BIG PRESENTATION FOR YOU TONIGHT JUST WANTED TO STATE FOR THE HONOR THAT THIS IS GOOD IN FRESCO. THEY'RE JUST NEEDING SOME ADDITIONAL SERVICE BAYES FOR THIS FACILITY. JUST HERE TO REQUEST YOUR FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION OF THIS REQUEST. I WILL POINT OUT [INAUDIBLE], THE SERVICE ADDITION RIGHT FOR THE SHADED PORTION RIGHT HERE. THERE'S THE LITTLE CLOSET AREA, THIS SHADED PORTION RIGHT THERE IS THE SERVICE BAY ADDITION. THEN THERE'S A LITTLE PIECE UP HERE. I THINK THAT WAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH THEIR CAR WASH OR SOMETHING WITH SMALL CONDITIONER. >> THANK YOU. >> HERE TO ANSWERING QUESTIONS, IF YOU MIGHT HAVE. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. THE MOTION IS OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING. >> SO MOVED. >> MOTION BY MR. [INAUDIBLE]. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES FOR PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. TO ANYONE CARE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM TO SEE ME. >> SEEING NONE MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. >> MOTION BY MR. KELLY. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES FOR OUR PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS SGP? >> MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 26 AS RECOMMENDED. >> ITEM 25. >> MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 25 AS RECOMBINED STAFF. >> MOTION LIKE MR. KENDALL. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MCCONNELL AND ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> >> ANY OPPOSE MOTION CARRIES FOR ITEM 25 IS APPROVED. CONGRATULATIONS. ITEM 26, [26. Public Hearing: Amendment to Ordinance No. 83-06-03 (Z21-0013)] PUBLIC HEARING AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 83-06-03Z21-0013 1000 OWNERS OR MULTIPLE OWNERS. >> THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS. THIS ITEM WAS TABLED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CONTINUED DURING THE JULY 27TH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. THIS ITEM NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. >> DO I HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE THIS FROM THE TABLE? >> MOTION MOVED. >> MOTION MOVED BY MR. KELLY,. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES FOR AND ITEM IS REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. >> DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, AS YOU KNOW, HAS BEEN INITIATED A PROCESS TO IDENTIFY PROPERTIES THAT ARE ZONE MULTIFAMILY, BUT WE'RE NOT ACTUALLY DEVELOPED AS MULTIFAMILY. YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU HERE TONIGHT IS ANOTHER SEARCH PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY WAS INITIALLY ZONED MULTIFAMILY, [00:35:02] AND IT HAS DEVELOPED AS DUPLEX. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE DISPLAY, THIS IS THE AREA TO BE REZONED. ITS ACTUALLY OUTLINED IN RED, IS CURRENTLY ZONE MULTIFAMILY 15 AND THIS SURFACE IS PROPOSING TO REZONE IT TO FAMILY DUPLEX. STEPH RECEIVED A LOT OF PHONE CALLS AND EMAILS ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT AND ONCE THE PROPERTY OWNERS FOUND OUT THAT WE ARE REMOVING THE MULTIFAMILY ZONING AND PROPOSING TWO-FAMILY ZONING SUCH AS THEY ARE ALREADY DEVELOPED, THEY APPEAR TO FEEL MUCH BETTER ABOUT THE REZONING. STEPH RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST AS PRESENTED. >> THANK YOU. THE TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING THAT WE'RE PUTTING IN PLACE, IF SOMETHING WERE TO HAPPEN TO THESE RESIDENTS, WHAT IS ALLOWED TO BE BUILT ON THAT? DOES IT HAVE TO BE DUPLEXES OR COULD YOU PUT SINGLE-FAMILY SEVEN, OR [OVERLAPPING] >> YOU CAN PUT WHATEVER IS PERMITTED IN THE TWO-FAMILY DISTRICT. >> I GUESS THAT'S WHAT I'M ASKING. >> YES. YOU COULD DO TOWN HOMES, YOU CAN DO SINGLE-FAMILY WITHIN MULTIFAMILY. IF YOU ZONE IT DUPLEX THEN YOU COULD DO ANYTHING LARGER THAN DUPLEXES. IN THAT CASE, YOU COULD DO SINGLE-FAMILY SEVEN IF YOU WANTED [NOISE] AND THEN WE WOULD TO COME BACK LATER OR ACTUALLY HAVE THE DEVELOPER SUBMIT A ZONING REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPERTY. >> OKAY. >> BUT YOU COULDN'T DO MULTIFAMILY. >> IF THIS CASE IS APPROVED TONIGHT FOR TWO-FAMILY IS RECOMMENDED AND APPROVED BY COUNCIL, THEN NO, YOU CANNOT DO MULTIFAMILY? >> THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING. OKAY. >> THAT'S THE GOAL OF THE REZONING. >> I WAS JUST WONDERING WHAT OTHER USES WERE AVAILABLE IF SAY THE [OVERLAPPING] DUPLEX IS BURNED DOWN OR SOMETHING AND YOU WANTED TO REPLACE IT. COULD YOU REPLACE IT WITH SINGLE-FAMILY OR A TOWN HOME. [OVERLAPPING] IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU CAN. THAT'S GOOD. DO I HAVE A MOTION OPEN TO PUBLIC HEARING? >> SO MOVED. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COHEN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? >> MOTION CARRIES 4,0. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING? >> GO AHEAD. >> PROCEED ON MOVE CLOSE TO PUBLIC HEARING. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4,0. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. THIS ONE MAKES A LOT OF SENSE. ANY QUESTIONS ON IT? >> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 26 AS RECOMMENDED BY STEPH. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COHEN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE. >> MOTION CARRIES4,0. ITEM 26 IS APPROVED AND WE REMOVE MULTIFAMILY FROM OUR MASTER PLAN. [27. Public Hearing: Ordinance Number 406, Ordinance Number 82-01-01, & Ordinance Number 83-05-05 (Z21-0014)] ITEM 27 PUBLIC HEARING, ORDINANCE NUMBER 406, ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-01-01 AND ORDINANCE [NOISE] NUMBER 83-05-05 AS E21-0014 OWNERS, MULTIPLE OWNERS. >> THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER. THIS WAS ALSO CONTINUED AND THE AGENDA ITEM TABLED TO THE AUGUST 24TH, 2021 MEETING AND SO THIS ITEM NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. >> COMMISSIONER, SHOULD I HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE THIS FROM THE TABLE. >> SO MOVED. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? THE MOTION CARRIES 4,0. ITEM HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. >> THANK YOU. THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED ON JULY 27TH TO GIVE STEPH AN OPPORTUNITY TO CONTINUE RESEARCHING THE SITE AND WORK ON APPROPRIATE STANDARDS FOR THE SITE. STEPH IS AGAIN ASKING FOR THIS TO BE CONTINUED TO THE SEPTEMBER 28TH, 2021 PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL TIME FOR STEPH TO CONTINUE WORKING ON THIS PROJECT. >> THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE A MOTION OPEN TO PUBLIC HEARING? >> SO MOVED. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COHEN >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4,0. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM THIS EVENING? DO I HAVE MOTION TO CLOSE UP HERE? >> CAN CONTINUE. >> CAN I MAKE A MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING? >> NO. WE HAVE TO JUST COME OUT OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FIRST, HANG ON A SECOND. >> YOU WANT TO CONTINUE [OVERLAPPING]. >> WHAT YOU WILL HAVE IF YOU CLOSE IT AND THEN YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO REOPEN IT TO TABLE IT. >> RIGHT. IF THERE'S NO DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM AND IF SOMEONE DOES WANT TO [00:40:02] MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE THIS AND CONTINUE TO PUBLIC HEARING THEY CAN DO SO NOW. YOU'RE STARTING TO DO THAT COMMISSION MORGAN [LAUGHTER]. >> I MOVE THAT WE CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THIS ITEM TO SEPTEMBER 28TH, [NOISE] 2021 MEETING. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COHEN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4,0. ITEM HAS BEEN TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 28TH AND PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CONTINUED. I DIDN'T KNOW IF WE WANTED TO DISCUSS THE ITEM FIRST OR NOT, SO DIDN'T THINK WE NEED TO GET IT RIGHT. ITEM 28, OPEN SPACE PLAN, [28. Open Space Plan & Preliminary Site Plan: Frisco La Cima, Block A, Lot 1 (OS21-0063 & PSP21-0031)] PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN FOR SCALARS SIMA, BLOCK A, LOT 1 OS 21-0063 AND PSP 21-0031, OWNERS SAGANI PROPERTIES 2LP. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PREVIOUSLY APPROVED A 30-DAY EXTENSION FOR THIS PROJECT AT THE JULY 27TH MEETING. STEPH HAS REVIEWED THE PROJECT AND FOUND THAT IT FAILS TO MEET CITY ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE CODES. THEREFORE, STEPH IS RECOMMENDING DENIAL/DISAPPROVAL FOR THE REASONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, AND AT THIS TIME I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> JOHN THIS DOESN'T HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ASSOCIATED WITH IT, CORRECT? >> NO. >> OKAY. >> IT'S ALL ON THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA BECAUSE IT'S RECOMMENDED FOR DISAPPROVAL. >> OKAY. >> COMMISSIONERS, TO ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? HOW FAR AWAY? I MEAN, ARE THEY CLOSE ON SOME OF THE ITEMS OR IS IT STILL A LONG LIST? >> THEY ARE CLOSE. >> OKAY. >> YEAH. I BELIEVE [OVERLAPPING]. >> UNFORTUNATELY, WE CAN'T GIVE THEM ANOTHER 30 DAYS PER STATE LAW. >> CORRECT. >> BUT OKAY. DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 28? >>MOTION TO DISAPPROVE ITEM 28, AND AS RECOMMENDED BY STEPH WITH THE [INAUDIBLE]. NOW, FOR THE REASONS IDENTIFIED IN THE STEPH REPORT AND DELEGATE THE STEPH AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE APPLICANT FOR THE REASONS OF THE DISAPPROVAL. >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL? >> I SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4,0. ITEM 28 HAS BEEN DISAPPROVED. ITEM 29, RESULTS OF THE AUGUST 17TH, [29. Results of the August 17, 2021 City Council meeting.] 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. >> FOR OUR OCCASION, WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY ITEMS THAT APPEAR BEFORE PNZ THAT WAS ON THE COUNCIL, BUT WE DID HAVE THE SHORT-TERM RENTAL ORDINANCE. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT PHILIP PENNY CURTIS DURING STATEMENTS FROM POLICE DEPARTMENT HAD BEEN WORKING ON. WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON THAT FOR ABOUT FIVE YEARS. THE REASON IT TOOK A LITTLE BIT LONGER, THE STATE LEGISLATURE IN '17 AND '19 HAD INTRODUCED LEGISLATION THAT WOULD PREEMPT CITIES FROM ADOPTING ANY TYPE OF REGULATIONS REGARDING SHORT-TERM RENTALS. IN THE 2021 LEGISLATION THAT DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THAT AND SO STEPH PRESSED FORWARD WITH COUNCIL'S BLESSING TO HAVE THAT APPROVED. SHORT-TERM RENTALS, THEY CAN OPERATE, THERE'LL BE A PERMITTING PROCESS, AND THEN THEY'LL HAVE TO PAY A MOTEL AND HOTEL TAX JUST LIKE A HOTEL DOES. THEN THEY'RE HAVING A CONTACT THAT STEPH EITHER PLACE OR CODE CAN CONTACT ON A SHORT NOTICE IF THERE'S AN ISSUE. THAT'S IT IN A NUTSHELL. >> JOHN, CAN YOU EXPAND ON WHAT YOU JUST SAID ABOUT WHAT THE STATE LEGISLATURE DID IN '17 AND '19. >> THEY DID NOT APPROVE ANY LEGISLATION THAT WILL PREEMPT CITIES FROM REGULATING SHORT-TERM RENTALS. BUT THEY HAD CONSIDERED, JUST LIKE THE FOOD COTTAGE INDUSTRY, WHERE FRISCO WAS ONE OF THE FEW COMMUNITIES THAT ADOPTED REGULATIONS. BUT THEIR NEXT LEGISLATIVE SESSION THEY PREEMPTED CITIES, SO IT JUST WIPED OUT. THAT'S WHAT THE STATE WAS CONSIDERING IN THE '17 AND '19. IF THEY HAD APPROVED THAT, THEN WE DIDN'T NEED TO DO ANYTHING BECAUSE WE COULDN'T >> OKAY. THANK YOU. >> IT'S A COMMON [INAUDIBLE] REALLY TO BE ADDRESSED. I GREATLY APPRECIATE OUR STAFF AND CITY CLEANING UP A LOT OF THE ZONING WITH STUFF THAT HAS MULTIFAMILY BASE ZONING, THAT HAS SINGLE-FAMILY OR TOWN HOMES. I REALIZED WHEN THEY GET THESE POSTCARDS, I THINK IT'S SAFE TO SAY, IT'S VERY COMMON FOR THEM ALL. I DON'T MISUNDERSTAND IT. TO US, IT MIGHT SEEM SIMPLE. I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S A WAY WE CAN LOOK AT THE VERBIAGE SO THAT WE DON'T GET SO MANY CALLS OR MAYBE IT IS WHAT IT IS. >> I WILL TELL YOU, THIS IS SOMETHING THAT'S HAS BEEN LOST OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS, BUT BE MORE DEFINITIVE ON THE LINK THAT'S PROVIDED ON THE POSTCARD TO EXPLAIN THE ZONING CHANGE. [OVERLAPPING] THE STAFF TO DO THAT. [00:45:01] GRANTED. YES. >> I'M NOT ACCUSING THAT IT'S BAD. I MEAN, IF UNLESS YOU'RE IN THIS WORLD, YOU MAY NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT'S HAPPENING. >> BUT IT IS A POSITIVE THING THAT WE ARE GETTING CALLS. THAT MEANS WE'RE REACHING OUR AUDIENCE AND THEY'RE ASKING FOR CLARIFICATION AND WE'RE NOT GETTING A LOT OF FOLKS COMING IN STILL CONFUSED. >> OH YEAH. >> THE PROCESS IS WORKING BUT CERTAINLY CAN CONTINUE TO BE ENHANCED. [OVERLAPPING] >> YEAH. SOME OF IT HAS BEEN LOST IN THE LAST FEW YEARS AND GRANTED IT WAS A BETTER JOB BEFORE, WE JUST NEED TO GET BACK TO THAT. >> APPRECIATE IT. >> AWESOME. >> ITEM 30, SCHEDULE OF FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS. [30. Schedule of future discussion items.] THAT WAS ONE OF THE DISCUSSION ITEMS RIGHT THERE. >> I [INAUDIBLE] THAT WE WERE. >> ANY OTHER ITEMS? ALL RIGHT. THAT JUST LEAVES US WITH ONE THING THIS EVENING. FIRST OF ALL, THANKS FOR ALL THE PEOPLE THAT CAME TONIGHT. BUSY AGENDAS. I KNOW OUR STAFF HAS BEEN REALLY BUSY WORKING HARD AND WE APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU ALL. GREAT JOB. BUT THAT JUST LEAVES US WITH ONE MOTION, THE MOTION TO ADJOURN. >> [OVERLAPPING] TO ADJOURN >> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COHEN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4,P0. WE ARE ADJOURNED. EXCELLENT. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.