[00:00:02] READY? READY. GOOD EVENING, WELCOME TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND [CALL TO ORDER] ZONING COMMISSION. WE ARE GATHERED THIS EVENING AT 6101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD, AND THE TIME IS 6:31 P.M. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. TONIGHT, COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE. THANK YOU. I'M GOING TO DO IT DIFFERENTLY AND HAVE YOU SAY YOUR OWN NAME, JONATHAN TAYLOR, COMMISSIONER KENDALL, COMMISSIONER KELLY, OUR SECRETARY OF COMMISSIONER COLBERG AND COMMISSIONER MORGAN, COMMISSIONER CONE IS ABSENT TONIGHT, HE'S EXPECTED TO ARRIVE LATE. HE AND THEN COMMISSIONER COX, OUR CHAIR IS NOT HERE TONIGHT. MY NAME IS DAVID BOX, YOUR VICE CHAIR AND YOUR CHAIR FOR THIS EVENING. REPRESENTING STAFF FROM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ARE JOHN LETTELLEIR, ANTHONY SATARINO, JONATHAN POLLARD, CARRIE WHITE, CINDY JACKSON, KAYLA EQUIANO. I HAVE GOT TO FIX ME KIYONO KAYLA KIYONO, SORRY, KIRSTYN [INAUDIBLE] AND FROM ENGINEERING. JASON GRIMM AND JOEL FITTS AND FROM THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. ELISSA SANDERS. IS THERE ANY ONE THAT I MISSED? FOR THE RECORD, STEVE CONE ARRIVED JUST A MINUTE BEHIND AND IT'S UP ON THE DAIS. THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS CITIZEN INPUT, IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME. WE WILL ALSO HAVE A PUBLIC DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS, THOSE THAT ARE MARKED AS PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA. HAVE A TIME FOR YOU TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION AS WELL. PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM NOW DURING CITIZEN INPUT IF YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK. OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED, SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE. PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR ANY APPLICANTS PRESENT THIS EVENING TO ENSURE THERE'S ENOUGH TIME FOR YOU ALL TO SPEAK. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH CASE YOU HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 10 MINUTES. PLEASE NOTE THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTION DURING CITIZEN INPUT OR IN ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA, EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY OR TO INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA. IS THERE ANYONE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK DURING CITIZEN INPUT THIS EVENING? SEEING NONE, WE WILL MOVE FORWARD. [APPROVAL OF MINUTES] THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. IN YOUR PACKET THIS EVENING ARE THE MINUTES FROM THE JUNE 8TH, 2021 MEETING, ARE THERE ANY CHANGES OR REVISIONS THAT NEED TO BE MADE OR DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES, THE JUNE 8TH MEETING AS PRESENTED. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION PASSES 6-0. [CONSENT AGENDA] NEXT IS THE CONSENT AGENDA. THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ROUTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS, ANY COMMISSION MEMBER MAKING SUCH REQUESTS PRIOR TO A MOTION AND VOTE ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY. ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH A MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION. TONIGHT, WE HAVE ITEMS THREE THROUGH 11. ARE THERE ANY ITEMS THERE? I KNOW THERE'S ONE ITEM NEEDS TO BE PULLED. I MYSELF NEED TO PULL ITEM NUMBER SIX. ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONAL ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE PULLED? SEEING NONE. MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS THREE TO FIVE AND SEVEN THROUGH 11. I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER KENDALL. SECOND. SECOND COMMISSIONER COLBERG. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION PASSES 6-0. [6. Open Space Plan & Preliminary Site Plan: Frisco 45, Block B, Lots 2-40 (OS21-0026 & PSP21-0013)] I'LL BE RECUSING MYSELF AND COMMISSIONER KELLY WILL READ IN ONCE. OK? OK, ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM SIX, OPEN SPACE PLAN AND PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN FRISCO 45 BLOCK B LOTS 2-40, OS21-0026 AND PSP21-0013 [00:05:01] . WE HAVE A DISCUSSION ON THIS. OR CAN WE HAVE A MOTION. I HAVE A MOTION. MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM SIX. I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER MORGAN TO APPROVE. SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 5-0. THANK YOU. COME ON BACK, DAVID. CONGRATULATIONS. I WAS TRYING TO GET MORE STEPS IN BY WALKING TO THE PARK. WE WERE GOING TO ASK. HE'S COUNTING HIS STEPS. TONIGHT, WE HAVE THREE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA, AND I WANT TO REVIEW THE PROCESS. EACH PUBLIC HEARING IS PRECEDED BY A STAFF INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST THE APPLICANT IS THEN PERMITTED TEN MINUTES TO MAKE HIS OR HER PRESENTATION OF THE COMMISSION. FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF AND APPLICANT BY THE COMMISSION, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK ARE WELCOME TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. ALL SPEAKERS, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, NEED TO COMPLETE A SPEAKER'S CARD AND PROVIDE IT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO YOUR LEFT ON THE DAIS. IF THERE ARE ORGANIZED GROUPS IN ATTENDANCE, WE SUGGEST AND WE SUGGEST THAT YOU SELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO PRESENT YOUR TEAM POSITIONS. PLEASE AVOID REPEATING WHAT HAS BEEN STATED BY PREVIOUS SPEAKERS OTHER THAN STATING THAT YOU AGREE WITH THEIR COMMENTS. THE TIME LIMIT IS FIVE MINUTES PER SPEAKER TO ENSURE EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK. THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CAN VOTE TO LIMIT SPEAKING TIME IF A LARGE VOLUME OF PEOPLE ARE WISHING TO SPEAK. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. REPEAT APPEARANCES TO THE PODIUM ARE NOT PERMITTED. AFTER ALL, PERSONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE CASE IS TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE. AND THE COMMISSION INCLUDES IN THEIR MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT A FUTURE MEETING AFTER CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ONLY MAKES A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ZONING CASES UNLESS THE COMMISSION DENIES THE CASE AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT APPEAL THAT DENIAL. FINAL ACTION REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AS TO WHEN THE CASE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. FIRST ITEM ON THE REGULAR AGENDA, ITEM 12 PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT CASSIDY LIVING TRUST [12. Public Hearing - Replat: Casady Living Trust Addition, Block 23, Lots 1 & 2 (RP21-0020)] EDITION BLOCK 23, LOTS ONE AND TWO ARE RP2022-TWENTY ONE DASH ZERO ZERO TWO ZERO OWNERS CASSIDY LIVING TRUST. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THIS ITEM WAS TABLED AT THE JUNE 8TH, 2021 MEETING AND DOES NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL ALSO NEED TO BE CONTINUED. SO MOVED. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY, A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MORGAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION PASSES 6-0. PUBLIC HEARING IS BACK ON. ALL RIGHT, THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT IS TO DIVIDE ONE RESIDENTIAL LOT INTO TWO RESIDENTIAL LOTS. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, I HAVE SUBMITTED. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. COMMISSION, DO HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. I HAVE A MOTION THEN TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING. MOVE TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION, COMMISSIONER KELLY. SECOND. SECOND, COMMISSIONER COLBERG. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 6-0. WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST ITEM 12 ? SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER COLBERG. SECOND. SECOND, COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION PASSES 6-0. ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? OR IF NOT, IS THERE A MOTION? MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 12 WAS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER MORGAN. SECOND. SECOND, COMMISSIONER KELLY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 6-0. [13. Public Hearing - Replat: Old Donation to Frisco, Block 10, Lot 13 (RP21-0021)] ITEM 13, PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT, OLD DONATION TO FRISCO BLOCK 10, LOT 13, RP21-0021 OWNERS OLD TOWN, SIXTH STREET LLC. MR. BOX, I NEED TO RECUSE MYSELF FROM THIS ITEM. ALL RIGHT. I'M GOING TO GO THE SHORTCUT WAY, THOUGH. THANK YOU. I'M GOING TO TAKE A WALK AROUND. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS, RP21-0021 WAS TABLED AT [00:10:05] OUR LAST MEETING AND AN EXTENSION WAS GRANTED. THIS ITEM WILL HAVE TO BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING. CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE THE ITEM FROM THE TABLE AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED. MOTION, COMMISSIONER KELLY. SECOND. SECOND, COMMISSIONER CONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED. THE MOTION PASSES 5-0. FOR THE RECORD, COMMISSIONER COLBERG DID RECUSE HERSELF AND HAS EXITED THE DAIS. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL TO REPLAT THE PROPERTY TO REMOVE A UTILITY EASEMENT FROM THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE. THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HAS, IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED. I HAVE A QUESTION, WHAT'S THE OUTCOME OF THIS, BECAUSE IT'S REMOVING A UTILITY EASEMENT, IS THERE A UTILITY EASEMENT STILL THERE OR IS IT NOT NEEDED? THE UTILITY EASEMENT WILL BE REMOVED. WE ARE, WE'RE GETTING LETTERS FROM THE FRANCHISE UTILITIES THAT THEY ARE IN SUPPORT OF THIS AND THAT'S HOW WE TYPICALLY REMOVE A UTILITY EASEMENT FRANCHISE. UTILITIES HAVE TO SEND A LETTER SAYING THEY AGREE WITH THE THE REMOVAL OF THE EASEMENT OR THEY DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH THE, IN THIS CASE, THE EXTENSION OF A FENCE OVER THE EASEMENT. WELL, JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, WE'VE DONE THAT BEFORE WE BROUGHT THIS TO YOU. SO IT'S WHEN THEY SUBDIVIDE THIS PROPERTY INTO THREE LOTS. A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, THERE WAS AN OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE THAT DOES RUN ALONG PECAN STREET, BUT THAT SECTION ACROSS THIS LOT HAS BEEN REMOVED. EVERYTHING IS WORKING WITH THE UTILITY LINE IN FRONT. SO THIS EASEMENT NO LONGER NECESSARY. I DID ADVISE THE PROPERTY OWNER TO SINCE THAT UTILITY HAS BEEN REMOVED. GO AHEAD AND REPLAT THE PROPERTY, REMOVE THAT EASEMENT TO PREVENT SOME OTHER UTILITY COMPANY GOING IN THERE. AND TO YOUR POINT, ANOTHER UTILITY COMPANY COULDN'T USE IT. RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF? I DO WANT TO POINT OUT THAT I PUT A CORRECTED COPY OF THE PLAT AT EACH OF YOUR STATIONS. AND THAT'LL BE IN THERE FOR THE RECORD, JUST. SO THIS IS A PROACTIVE MOVE TO PROTECT THE PROPERTY OWNER? THAT'S RIGHT. JUST REMEMBER THAT THE EASEMENTS ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY. THAT'S A GREAT SERVICE FROM THE CITY. I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOVE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION, COMMISSIONER MORGAN. SECOND. SECOND, COMMISSIONER CONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 5-0. WE'RE IN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? GOOD EVENING, MR. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, DAVID KALLIFER, PELOTON LAND SOLUTIONS, 11000 FRISCO STREET, SUITE 400 REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT. WE HAVE NO ISSUES WITH STAFF'S REPORT OR THE RECOMMENDATIONS. I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. THANK YOU. GREAT, THANK YOU. THANKS FOR COMING DURING THIS PART OF THE MEETING. ANYONE ELSE THAT'D LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION TO CLOSE FROM COMMISSIONER KELLY. SECOND. SECOND, COMMISSIONER CONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION PASSES 5-0. WE ARE OUT OF PUBLIC HEARING. AND ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OR DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE? ITEM 13 AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF? MOTION COMMISSIONER MORGAN TO APPROVE. SECOND. SECOND, COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. PROPOSED MOTION PASSES 5-0. [14. Public Hearing - Plat Vacation: Proposed Hillcrest ROW (RP21-0026)] BOX, I'M GOING TO JOIN THE CROWD AND RECUSE MYSELF FROM THE NEXT ITEM, NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM 14, FOR THE RECORD, COMMISSIONER CONE HAS RECUSED HIMSELF AND DEPARTED THE DAIS. COMMISSIONER 14 EXCUSE ME, ITEM 14, PUBLIC HEARING PLAT VACATION JUST SOUNDS SO EXCITING, BUT IT'S NOT THAT. PUBLIC HEARING PLAT VACATION PROPOSED HILLCREST RIGHT-OF-WAY. [00:15:02] RP21-0026 OWNERS, CITY OF FRISCO. ALL RIGHT. ON AUGUST 4TH, 2006, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED A CONDITIONAL CONVEYANCE PLAN FOR A PROPOSED HILLCREST ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE CONDITIONS OF THAT APPROVAL WEREN'T MET. SO THE NEW PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE AGREED TO REALIGN THE FUTURE HILLCREST ROAD FURTHER WEST TO ALIGN WITH LA CIMA AND PROSPER. AS SUCH, THEY'VE ENTERED INTO A NEW DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHICH RESOLVES THE ORIGINAL 2006 AGREEMENT. BUT THAT MEANS THAT THE 2006 CONVEYANCE PLAT HAS TO BE VACATED TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR IN THIS AREA. THE PLAT VACATION IS IN THE FORM OF RESOLUTION, WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR APPROVAL BY CITY COUNCIL. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IS CHARGED WITH MAKING A RECOMMENDATION ON THE PLAT VACATION TO CITY COUNCIL. IF ADOPTED, THE RESOLUTION WILL BE FILED WITH COLLIN COUNTY AND ALL RECORDS OF THE PREVIOUSLY FILED PLAT WILL BE VACATED. WE DID HAVE SOME INQUIRIES FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER TO THE SOUTH, JUST SEEING WHAT WAS GOING ON AND SORT OF THE LOCATION OF IT. BUT OTHER THAN THAT, WE DIDN'T RECEIVE ANY FORMAL LETTERS OF SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION. AND WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION, VACATING THE CONVEYANCE PLAT. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS. SO YOU WANT TO START? I WOULD SAY MY UNDERSTAND THIS IS JUST ONE STEP HELPING US MOVE FORWARD OF HILLCREST CONNECTING ALL THE WAY FROM ELDORADO UP TO 380. I MEAN, IT'S VERY EARLY, BUT IT'S IT'S JUST ONE STEP OF US HAVING THIS CONNECTION. AND BEING A DIRECT CONNECTION TO LA CIMA. RIGHT. IT'S GOING TO CONNECT TO LA CIMA AND PROSPER. AND YOU MENTIONED THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE NEW RIGHT-OF-WAY. HAS THAT ALREADY BEEN EXECUTED AND APPROVED BY COUNCIL OR IS THAT PENDING? IT WAS EXECUTED AND APPROVED ON APRIL 21ST. OK. SO MOVED. COMMISSIONER COLBERG. SECOND. SECOND, COMMISSIONER MORGAN, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION PASSES 5-0. WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE, MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION, COMMISSIONER KELLY, TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND. SECOND, COMMISSIONER KENDALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION PASSES 5-0. ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF THERE? AND I DID NOT ASK FOR THE APPLICANT BECAUSE THIS IS CITY OF FRISCO. I ASSUME THIS HAS JOEL'S BLESSING? JOEL SHOOK HIS HEAD FOR THE RECORD, YOU KNOW, AFFIRMATIVE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE ITEM 14. ARE YOU RECOMMENDING OR ARE YOU MOVING? I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 14 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. SO, YES, THAT. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KENDALL TO APPROVE. SECOND. SECOND COMMISSIONER COLBERG, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 5-0. LET THE RECORD SHOW COMMISSIONER CONE HAS REJOINED THE DAIS. NEXT ON THE AGENDA, ITEM 15, THE RESULTS OF THE JUNE 15TH. [15. Results of the June 15, 2021 City Council meeting.] 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THANK YOU, MR. VICE CHAIR. THOSE RESULTS WERE PROVIDED FOR YOU IN THE PACKET. I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. [16. Schedule of future discussion items.] ITEM 16, SCHEDULE OF FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS. START OUT, JOHN. I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING BUT AS FAR AS FUTURE ITEMS, BUT FOR THE ONES THAT ARE UP, JUST REMEMBER THE MONTH OF JULY IS WHEN YOU PUT IN IF YOU WANT TO SERVE EXTRA, YOU KNOW, I SHOULD SAY EXTRA, BUT SERVE WHERE YOU DO HAVE THE TIME. YES. SO THE MONTH OF JULY FROM JULY 1ST OF JULY 31ST. WHICH POSITIONS ARE? I GOT TO GO BACK AND LOOK, I MEANT TO LOOK BEFORE I CAME DOWN HERE. KELLY AND MORGAN? REMEMBER IT'S THREE YEARS, THREE THREE-YEAR TERMS. THREE OF US? REALLY? YEAH, THE LEFT SIDE, BUT IT'S THE RIGHT SIDE IF YOU'RE WATCHING. THAT'S TRUE. ANY OTHER ITEMS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION? REMEMBER THAT WE'VE GOT ONE MEETING IN JULY. WHICH ONE IS THAT? LINING UP LAST MEETING? THE SECOND MEETING. IT'S THE ONE WE HAD. [00:20:03] WE DO NOT HAVE THE FIRST MEETING. WE DON'T HAVE THE FIRST MEETING. OK. AND THEN IN DECEMBER WE HAVE THE FIRST MEETING, BUT NOT THE SECOND SINCE THAT WAS FALLING CLOSE TO CHRISTMAS. WE MEET THE FOURTH TUESDAY OF JULY? THAT'S RIGHT, THAT'S THE 27TH, I BELIEVE. ANY OTHER ITEMS? IF NOT, THAT LEAVES US WITH ONE THING. MOTION TO ADJOURN. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY. SECOND. SECOND COMMISSIONER MORGAN, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES 6-0. WE ARE ADJOURNED AT 6:51. GOOD ONE. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.