[00:00:01]
>> GOOD EVENING, AND WELCOME TO
[CALL TO ORDER]
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRISCO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.WE'RE GATHERED AT 6101 FRISCO SQUARE BOULEVARD AND THE TIME IS 6:33 PM.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSISTS OF FRISCO RESIDENTS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
TONIGHT'S COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ARE COMMISSIONER KENDALL, COMMISSIONER BOX OUR VICE-CHAIR, COMMISSIONER KELLY OUR SECRETARY, COMMISSIONER COLBERG.
I'M ROB COX, I'M YOUR CHAIR FOR THIS EVENING.
ABSENT THIS EVENING IS COMMISSIONER CONE AND COMMISSIONER MORGAN.
REPRESENTING STAFF THIS EVENING IN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, WE HAVE JOHN LETTELLEIR, JONATHAN HUBBARD, JONATHAN POLLARD, KARI WHITE, CINDY JACKSON, LORI CROSS AND KAYLA QUIJANO.
IN ENGINEERING SERVICES, WE HAVE JOEL FITTS AND RICARDO ORDONEZ.
REPRESENTING FIRE THIS EVENING, JOHN GILLETTE, IS THAT A THREE-PIECE SUIT OR TWO-PIECE SUIT? FULL SUITE. THEN, LEGAL COUNSEL, WE HAVE RYAN PITTMAN HERE THIS EVENING.
GLAD TO HAVE ALL OF YOU HERE THIS EVENING.
FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS CITIZEN INPUT.
WE WILL ALSO HAVE PUBLIC HEARINGS LATER IN THE PRESENTATION THIS EVENING, BUT IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ITEMS THAT ARE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME.
PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD AND APPROACH THE PODIUM.
PRIOR TO YOUR COMMENTS, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
OUR MEETINGS ARE RECORDED, SO PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE.
PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, NOT TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE OR ANY APPLICANTS PRESENT THIS EVENING.
TO ENSURE THERE'S ENOUGH TIME FOR ALL TO SPEAK, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES UNLESS YOU MUST ADDRESS THE COMMISSION THROUGH A TRANSLATOR, IN WHICH CASE YOU HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 10 MINUTES.
PLEASE NOTE THE COMMISSION CANNOT DISCUSS OR TAKE SPECIFIC ACTIONS DURING CITIZEN INPUT OR ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA EXCEPT TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY, OR INDICATE THAT THE MATTER MAY BE PLACED ON A LATER AGENDA.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD CARE TO SPEAK IN CITIZEN INPUT AT THIS TIME? OKAY. NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS ITEM 2,
[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES CONSIDERED AN ACT UPON APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ON MAY 11TH, 2021.COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS ON THESE MINUTES OR DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 2?
>> MOVE TO APPROVE MINUTES FROM OUR MEETING FOR MAY 11TH, 2021.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOX. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4-0, ITEM 2 IS APPROVED.
NEXT ON OUR AGENDA THIS EVENING IS THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS.
[CONSENT AGENDA]
THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS CONSIST OF ROUTINE AND NONCONTROVERSIAL ITEMS. ANY COMMISSION MEMBER MAKING SUCH REQUESTS PRIOR TO A MOTION AND VOTE ON THE CONSENT ITEMS MAY CONSIDER ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY.ANY MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MAY DO SO WITH A MAJORITY APPROVAL OF THE COMMISSION.
WE HAVE ITEMS 3 THROUGH 14 THIS EVENING.
ARE THERE ANY THAT NEED TO BE PULLED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION?
>> YES, I NEED TO REMOVE MYSELF FROM ITEM 13.
>> ITEM 13. ARE THERE ANY OTHERS? DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS 3 THROUGH 12 AND 14?
>> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEMS 3 THROUGH 12 AND 14.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4-0.
WE WILL DISCUSS ITEM 13 BUT COMMISSIONER KENDALL WILL BE RECUSING HIMSELF.
[13. Site Plan: Cobb Business Park, Block A, Lot 8 (SP21-0043)]
WE DO NOT HAVE A QUORUM ON THAT ITEM, DO WE?>> WE JUST HAVE TO HAVE A QUORUM TO START THE MEETING, SO THIS IS SUFFICIENT FOR A VOTE ON THIS ITEM.
>>EXCELLENT. LET ME READ ON ITEM 13 THEN.
ITEM 13, SITE PLAN COBB BUSINESS PARK, BLOCK A, LOT 8, SV21-0043.
OWNERS, LENTS REALTY PARTNERS, LLC.
>> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSION.
THE SITE PLAN IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS NOTED IN YOUR STAFF REPORT.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS.
>> ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME?
>> NO. THANK YOU FOR MAKING THE FENCE VERY CLEAR FOR MY LITTLE EYES.
>> I LIKE THAT. DO I HAVE A MOTION ON ITEM 13?
>> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 13 AS SUBMITTED.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOX. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? ITEM 13 IS APPROVED 3-0.
IF SOMEONE CAN GRAB MR. KENDALL AND LET HIM BACK IN THE BUILDING.
CONGRATULATIONS. ITEM 15, PUBLIC HEARING.
[15. Public Hearing - Zoning: Village on Main Street (Z20-0015)]
ZONING, VILLAGE ON MAIN STREET Z20-0015.>> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THIS ITEM WAS TABLED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED AT THE APRIL 27TH, 2021 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
THEREFORE, I WOULD LOOK FOR A MOTION TO REMOVE THIS ITEM FROM THE TABLE.
>> COMMISSIONERS DO I HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE THIS ITEM FROM THE TABLE?
[00:05:01]
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BOX.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 4-0.
ITEM IS REMOVED FROM THE TABLE.
>> THANK YOU. SINCE THE APRIL 27TH, 2021 MEETING, THE APPLICANT HAS REVISED THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO ACCOMMODATE AN ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE TRACK.
AS YOU WILL SEE HERE ON THE EXHIBIT C, THE THREE OPEN SPACE TRACKS EQUATE TO 6.2 ACRES OR 12 PERCENT.
THE PREVIOUS VERSION OF THIS PLAN THAT WAS BEFORE YOU ALL SHOWED THESE TWO OPEN SPACE TRACKS, WHICH ARE EQUATED TO 4.3 ACRES OR 8.3 PERCENT.
THE APPLICANT HAS UPPED THE OPEN SPACE PERCENTAGE BY ABOUT FOUR PERCENT.
THE COMMISSIONERS ALSO ASKED THAT THE APPLICANT LOOK AT THE TOWNHOME ELEVATIONS.
IF YOU WILL RECALL PREVIOUSLY, WHILE THE APPLICANT WAS PROPOSING TO INCORPORATE A PORCH MEETING THE FRONT PORCH STANDARDS OF THEIR ZONING ORDINATES INTO EACH OF THE UNITS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT WHICH INCLUDED ALL OF THE TOWNHOMES, THE COMMISSIONERS ASKED THAT ADDITIONAL OFFSETS OR ADDITIONAL VARIATIONS BE INCORPORATED INTO THE ELEVATIONS OF THE TOWNHOMES.
AS YOU WILL SEE HERE, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING AN INSET FOR ALL OF THE INTERIOR UNITS, AS NOTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, THERE WAS A COMPARISON BETWEEN WHAT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING HERE, VERSUS THE FLAT VERSION THAT CAME BEFORE YOU ALL ON APRIL 27TH.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING THAT ON THE CRAFTSMEN, THE GEORGIAN AND THE COLONIAL, THAT BEING ALL THREE TOWNHOME STYLES WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT.
LASTLY, THERE WAS THE PREVIOUS ISSUE REGARDING THIS STREET STUB TO THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO THE WEST.
SINCE THE PACKET WENT OUT THIS PAST FRIDAY, THERE HAVE BEEN ADDITIONAL DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN STAFF, THE APPLICANT, AND THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNER TO THE WEST REGARDING THE LOCATION OF THIS CONNECTION.
ULTIMATELY WHAT HAS BEEN DETERMINED, RATHER THAN WHAT YOU SEE HERE ON THE SCREEN BEFORE YOU TONIGHT, IS THAT THIS STUB AND THIS FIRST LOT TO THE NORTH BE SWITCHED, SO THIS STUB WOULD BE ONE FURTHER LOT NORTH THAN WHAT IT IS HERE TODAY.
THE APPLICANT AND THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNER ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH THIS LOCATION THAT I JUST MENTIONED TONIGHT, SHOULD THAT BE THE COMMISSIONERS' WISH TO HAVE THE STREET STUB IN THAT LOCATION, I WOULD ASK THAT YOU MAKE THAT A PART OF YOUR MOTION SINCE THAT IS NOT INCORPORATED INTO THE EXHIBITS THAT WERE A PART OF THE PACKET.
THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION IN THE PAST REGARDING THE STREET STUBS, REGARDING OTHER INSTANCES AROUND THE CITY WHERE SIMILAR STREET STUB EXIST SO THERE WAS QUITE A BIT OF INFORMATION INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET AND I'D BE HAPPY TO DISCUSS TONIGHT, SHOULD YOU WISH.
BUT WITH THAT, THIS IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TONIGHT AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU ALL MAY HAVE.
>> THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? OR ACTUALLY, ANY QUESTIONS AT THE TIME?
>> [INAUDIBLE] RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE WITH THE CHANGE TO THE STUB?
>> RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CHANGE THAT I'VE JUST MENTIONED.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WILL THEY CARE TO SPEAK?
>> STEVE [INAUDIBLE] ON 8430 FAIR OAKS, FRISCO, TEXAS.
I THINK JONATHAN COVERED EVERYTHING.
THERE'S A COUPLE OF POINTS THAT I JUST WANTED TO ADD TO IT.
BASED ON THE FEEDBACK THAT WE GOT FROM THE 4-13 AND THE 4-21 MEETING, WE'VE OBVIOUSLY ADJUSTED THE OPEN SPACE.
THERE WAS A REDISTRIBUTION OF THE LOT TYPES WITHIN THE PROJECT.
THE OVERALL LOT COUNT INCREASED BY ONE.
WE REDUCED 1155S- 2440 FOR LOTS, AND WE ADDED 36 TOWN-HOME MARTS.
I JUST WANT TO CALL OUT THE ELEVATION ASSIGNMENT. I THINK IT'S IN HERE.
>> WE ADD TO THIS EXHIBIT 2 TO HELP FURTHER CLARIFY AND REALLY LOCK DOWN THE ELEVATION STYLES AND WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE COMMUNITY.
VERY SIMILAR TO GRAND PARK, GRAND CANALS, WHICH WAS A PROJECT THAT WE DID BACK IN 2014.
[00:10:05]
IT'S THE SAME LAYOUT.AS YOU GO DOWN THE STREETSCAPE, YOU HAVE VARYING ELEVATION.
IT FEELS MORE LIKE A SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD AS YOU DRIVE DOWN THAT STREET WITH ALL TUNNELS.
IT'S NOT JUST THE SAME ELEVATION, BUILDING AFTER BUILDING.
WE DID ADD THAT, THAT WASN'T IN THE INITIAL SUBMITTAL.
THEN I'M GOING TO JUMP BACK TO, HOPE I'M GOING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
THE ELEVATIONS HERE, JUST TO TALK ABOUT THE PORCHES A LITTLE BIT. ALSO, WITH THE GEORGIAN.
WHAT WE DID ON THE TWO END UNITS, YOU'LL NOTICE THOSE ARE SIGNIFICANTLY LARGER END UNIT PORCHES THAN WE HAD PREVIOUSLY HAD SUBMITTED.
WE ALSO ADDED RAILING ON THOSE.
JUST FOR SOME NUMBERS, ANY OF THE PORCHES ARE APPROXIMATELY 116 SQUARE FEET VERSUS THE STANDARD 70 OR THE ORDINANCE THAT REQUIRES 70, WHICH IS 65 PERCENT LARGER THAN THE REQUIREMENT.
THE COLONIAL HERE, VERY SIMILAR.
THOSE ARE A LITTLE BIT BIGGER, 120 SQUARE FEET VERSUS THE 70.
THEN THE CRAFTSMEN, WE DID NOT CHANGE, THOSE WERE ALREADY LARGER.
THEY'RE ABOUT 55 PERCENT LARGER THAN THE REQUIREMENT.
THE INTERIOR UNITS ON THOSE, ONE OF THEM'S 10 PERCENT LARGER AND ONE'S 35 PERCENT.
JUST TO ADDRESS THE OTHER INTERIOR UNITS ON THESE; THOSE ARE SEVEN BY 10, THEY'RE 70 SQUARE FEET.
SO THEY MEET THE ORDINANCE FOR THE REQUIREMENT FOR A USABLE PORCH.
WE DID NOT MAKE THOSE LARGER LIKE WE DID ON END UNITS.
THAT'S REALLY FROM A FLOOR PLANNING STANDPOINT.
THE TOWN-HOMES ON THE FIRST FLOOR WOULD BE REALLY DARK WHEN YOU HAVE A WIDER PORCH BECAUSE THE GARAGE IS IN THE BACK.
THAT FRONT LIVING SPACE THAT YOU WALK RIGHT INTO PROVIDES A LOT OF CHALLENGES FOR THE NATURAL LIGHT TO GET IN THAT HOUSE WHEN WE PUT A FULL PORCH ALL THE WAY ACROSS THE FRONT.
REALLY, THE COLONIAL VERSION AND GRAND CANAL HAD IT.
WE GOT A LOT OF FEEDBACK FROM PEOPLE THAT ACTUALLY BROUGHT IT, THAT THEY DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH LIGHT, IT WAS ALL JUST NOT NATURAL LIGHT, SO WE KEPT THEM THERE.
I JUST WANTED TO JUST POINT OUT ANOTHER THING ON THE CANALS.
[NOISE] I KNOW THAT WAS MENTIONED BEFORE AND I REALLY WANT TO ADDRESS THAT.
I THINK IT WAS MENTIONED IN TWO DIFFERENT WAYS BECAUSE I THINK [INAUDIBLE] , YOU LIKED THE VARIATION IN THE FRONT.
VERY SIMILAR TO THIS, THESE ARE FOUR-PLEX ELEVATIONS.
I THINK WE HAVE 3-6 ON A SITE PLAN.
GENERALLY, THE END UNITS WILL BE SIX FOOT IN-FRONT OF THE INTERIOR UNITS, WHICH WAS SIMILAR.
THERE WAS A LITTLE MORE VARIATION IN THAT PRODUCTS A LITTLE DEEPER IN THE GRAND CANAL.
THEN THE PORCHES THERE ACTUALLY WEREN'T USABLE PORTIONS, THOSE WERE ONLY FOUR FEET DEEP.
THAT WAS ZONED AS A FIVE-FOOT FRONT SETBACK WITH A GIFT TO THE STREET TO GO ALL THE WAY TO ZERO IF YOU DECIDED TO BUILD A FIVE-FOOT STOOP.
WE WERE, OF COURSE, ARCADIA WHEN THAT GOT DONE TO DESIGN THAT.
THESE ARE ACTUALLY A LOT BIGGER THAN WHAT YOU SEE THERE WHEN YOU DRIVE DOWN THE CANAL.
BOTH IN THE FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD PHASE THAT WE DID.
IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS, I'D BE GLAD TO ANSWER.
>> THANK YOU. YOU ALREADY FILLED OUT THAT CARD.
I DON'T THINK I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING?
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CRANDELL.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PARKS.
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES 40.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME?
>> SEEING NONE. MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLPER. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES [INAUDIBLE].
I DO HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.
MS. [INAUDIBLE] , I KNOW YOU DIDN'T SPEAK TODAY.
I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU ARE GOOD WITH THE CHANGES TO MOVING THAT LOT ONE FURTHER NORTH IN THE [INAUDIBLE] OUT.
[OVERLAPPING] IF YOU COULD COME UP.
THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR FEEDBACK IN THE CONVERSATION WE HAD LAST WEEK. I APPRECIATE IT. [OVERLAPPING]
>> I THANK EVERYBODY FOR TRYING TO MAKE THINGS WORK OUT.
AS YOU KNOW, I'M NOT FOR THE CONNECTION.
[00:15:04]
I'VE NEVER THOUGHT IT WAS A GOOD IDEA.I KNOW THAT THE CITY HAS THEIR FAILING, BUT AS BEING PART OF THE CITY, I'D LIKE TO WORK WITH THE CITY.
THE CITY CAME UP WITH SUGGESTION TO MOVE IT AND I HOPE THAT THIS WILL BE GOOD IN THE LONG RUN, THAT IT WON'T HURT THE DEVELOPMENT ALTOGETHER.
>> WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE WORKS ON THE PLAN OR WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE THE CHANGE?
>> NO, I APPRECIATE THE CITY STAFF FOR HELPING OUT.
I HOPE IT'S THE LESSER [LAUGHTER] [OVERLAPPING] EVIL.
BUT I STILL DON'T THINK ESPECIALLY ON THIS BUSY INTERSECTION THAT WILL JUST GET BUSIER.
I JUST DIDN'T THINK IT WAS A GOOD IDEA TO DRAW IN RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC INTO PARKING LOT WITH NO [OVERLAPPING].
>> YOU KNOW I APPRECIATE THAT BUT IT'S AN ORDINANCE ISSUE.
>> EXACTLY. THAT WHY I DIDN'T ASK TO SPEAK.
>> I DO APPRECIATE YOUR FEEDBACK.
>> EXACTLY. I HOPE THAT THERE'S NO SUGGESTION THAT EVERYBODY WORKED HARD TO GET IT, THAT IT WON'T REALLY HURT THE DEVELOPMENT IN THE FUTURE.
>> EXCELLENT. I DON'T BELIEVE IT WILL, I THINK WE MADE THE RIGHT CONCESSIONS THERE. BUT WE'LL [OVERLAPPING].
>> ABSOLUTELY. WE LOOK FORWARD TO A PLAN COMING FORWARD ON THAT.
I WILL ASK YOU TO FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD JUST BECAUSE I ASKED YOU TO SPEAK [LAUGHTER] FOR THE OFFICIAL.
ACTUALLY, WOULD LIKE TO ASK THE APPLICANT A QUESTION AS WELL.
IT'S REALLY THE SAME QUESTION. ARE YOU GOOD WITH MOVING THAT STUB ONE LOT NORTH?
>> OKAY. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE ALL IN AGREEMENT WITH THAT.
I DO APPRECIATE THE CHANGES TO THE TOWN HOMES, I THINK IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE JUST IN THE QUALITY OF THE COMMUNITY.
LITTLE THINGS SOMETIMES CAN MAKE BIG DIFFERENCES, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU HAVE A STREET THAT HAS THE FOUR DIFFERENT TYPES ON, THAT'S A LONG RUN.
YOU NEED SOME VARIATION IN THERE TO BREAK IT UP, ESPECIALLY BECAUSE OF THE LANDMASS AND THE SHAPE OF THE PROJECT WE COULDN'T DO CURVILINEAR STREETS ON THAT PARTICULAR ROAD WITH THE TOWN HOME, SO BREAKING IT UP DOES MAKE A DIFFERENT SITE LINES AND SO FORTH, SO APPRECIATE THAT, APPRECIATE THE INCREASE IN OPEN SPACE AS WELL.
THAT'S ALL I HAD AT THIS TIME, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE HAD THAT.
GO DOWN THE LINE HERE AND START WITH MR. KENDALL, ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS.
>> I JUST APPRECIATE ALL PARTIES WORKING SO DILIGENTLY AND THANKS, I REALIZED THIS IS A COSTLY PROCESS OF MAKING SOME OF THOSE CHANGES SO NOW I'M SUPPORT STAFF HERE.
>> JUST DITTO THAT AND I WOULD SAY I WAS A LITTLE TORN WITH THE INCREASE IN THE TOWN HOME UNITS BY 36, BUT THIS IS A PRODUCT THAT I BELIEVE THE CITY NEEDS AND THE MARKET IS SPEAKING SO I WISH YOU LUCK ON THE PROJECT IF APPROVED HERE AND THEN FURTHER APPROVED AT THE CITY COUNCIL LEVEL.
>> I'M GOING DOWN THIS WAY. COMMISSIONER KELLY.
>> YEAH, I APPRECIATE YOU INCREASING THE OPEN SPACE.
I THINK THIS IS A MUCH BETTER DESIGN.
IT'S ACTUALLY VERY MUCH WHAT WE ASKED FOR AND SO I'M IN FAVOR OF THIS. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
I FEEL THAT OUR FEEDBACK WAS LISTENED TO VERY WELL AND THIS WAS SUCH AN EXCELLENT FINAL DESIGN.
YOU'VE CHECKED ALL THE BOXES, YOU HAVE INCREASED SPACE ON THE PORCHES, THE REVISIONS AS FAR AS THE OPEN SPACE AREA, THE OFFSET AND THE VARIATION AND LOVE HOW YOU EVEN SAID AS YOU'RE DRIVING DOWN THE STREET, THE VARYING AND ELEVATIONS AS WELL JUST TO MAKE IT FEEL MORE SINGLE FAMILY.
I THINK THIS IS A MODEL EXAMPLE OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT PARTIES.
I WANT TO THANK ALL PARTIES INVOLVED FOR JUST MAKING THIS SO PEACEABLE AND FINDING COMPROMISES AND CONCESSIONS THAT WORK WELL.
I THINK IT WAS EXCELLENT COMMUNICATION AND IT WAS A GREAT FINAL PROJECT SO I THOROUGHLY SUPPORT THIS.
>> EXCELLENT. MY FINAL WORDS, THE ONLY FRUSTRATION I HAVE HERE IS WE DON'T HAVE 15 PERCENT OPEN SPACE THAT WE REQUIRED, AND WE'VE HAD OTHER DEVELOPMENTS IN FRONT OF US THAT WE REQUIRED THEM TO DO IT, TO MAKE CHANGES TO A PLAN AND I KNOW THAT'S FRUSTRATING FOR SOME, BUT WHAT I DO THINK HE DID WELL IS AMMENETIZE THIS PROPERTY, THE OPEN SPACES AND ABOVE AND BEYOND.
I THINK THE TRADE OFFS THERE ARE WORTH IT.
BUT I THINK WE NEED TO BE AS CONSISTENT AS POSSIBLE, ADHERING TO OUR STANDARDS.
WHEN WE CAN'T BECAUSE OF SHAPE AND TYPOGRAPHY AND THOSE THINGS THAT WE DO HAVE THE ABILITY TO COMPROMISE AND MAKE THE BEST OF THIS.
[00:20:02]
IN THE FUTURE HERE IN FRISCO, THESE ARE THE TYPES OF PROJECTS WE'RE GOING TO HAVE.A LOT OF THE BIG PROJECTS ARE DONE.
WE'RE GOING TO HAVE INFILL PROJECTS, WHAT I CALL INFILL IS NOT THAT SMALL OF A PROJECT, BUT IT'S NOT GOING TO BE TWO OR 3,000 ACRES OR 800 ACRES.
SO IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE WORK TOGETHER TO MAKE THESE THINGS THE BEST THEY CAN BE AND I THINK WE'VE DONE THAT HERE, AND I APPRECIATE ALL THE PARTIES THAT CAME TOGETHER, THE COMPROMISE, GETTING THE RIGHT PEOPLE IN FRONT OF EACH OTHER AT THE RIGHT TIME.
I'M GOING TO TAKE A MOTION AT THIS TIME.
>> MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 15 IS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF WITH ONE MINOR CHANGE ON THE WEST SIDE, MOVING THE STUB ONE LOT NORTH AND MOVING THAT LOT THAT'S NORTH WHERE THE STUB IS TODAY.
>> MOTION COMBINED BY COMMISSIONER BOX.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLBERG. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES FOR ITEM 15 IS APPROVED. CONGRATULATIONS.
[16. Results of the May 18, 2021 City Council meeting.]
>> ITEM 16 RESULTS OF A MAY 18, 2021, CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
>> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THE RESULTS OF THE MAY 18TH, 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ARE IN YOUR PACKET AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
>> ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS ONE? ALL RIGHT THANK YOU.
ITEM 17, SCHEDULE OF FUTURE DISCUSSION ITEMS.
[17. Schedule of future discussion items.]
ANYTHING FOR STAFF THIS EVENING?>> I LET STAFF KNOW I WAS GOING TO BE GONE NEXT MEETING, BUT I PUT THE CITY OVER MY FAMILY, SO I'LL BE HERE JUNE 8TH.
>> EXCELLENT. WE'RE GLAD TO HEAR THAT.
>> DOES THAT MEAN WE DON'T HAVE A MEETING JUNE 8TH?
>> I KNOW I'M MISSING SOMETHING.
>> MY TRIP GOT CANCELED. I WAS GOING TO BE GONE NEXT P&Z MEETING.
>> JON, THE ONE THING I THINK JUST IN TERMS OF DISCUSSION IS JUST CONVERSATION ABOUT IMPROVING OR WHEN WE HAVE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, WE DO REALLY GOOD JOB WITH HOAS, BUT SOMETIMES IT'S REALLY DIFFICULT WITH COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES BUDDING PROJECT LIKE ITEM 15 AND I CAN GET COMMUNICATION OUT EARLY AS POSSIBLE.
THAT MIGHT BE A GOOD DISCUSSION CONVERSATION [OVERLAPPING] WE'RE HAVING.
>> JUST TO LET YOU KNOW THAT JONATHAN AND I DISCUSSED IT BASED ON THE ASSESS WHAT WE'RE DOING ON FUTURE ONES DOES INCLUDE THEM.
>> I THINK THERE MIGHT BE SOME GOOD LEARNING FROM THAT PROCESS.
>> REAL QUICK. AS YOU MENTIONED, WHAT WE'LL HAVE FORTHCOMING AS INFILL PROJECTS OR SMALLER PROJECTS, A FUTURE OPPORTUNITY MAYBE TO GO LOOK AT IN THE GREATER DALLAS AREA, SOME PROPERTY OR SOME PIECES OF PROPERTY THAT HAVE DEVELOPED, IN THE RIGHT WAY THAT WE WANT TO SEE IN FRISCO, AND THEN SOME CHALLENGES OR LESSONS LEARNED THAT WE COULD HAVE.
>> I KNOW THERE'S A FEW GOOD BAD PROJECTS TO TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT NOT TO DO SO, MAYBE THIS SHIP FOR SOMETHING MAYBE IN SEPTEMBER.
>> I THINK THAT WILL BE GREAT.
>> WHENEVER IT'S NICE AND COOL, LATE SEPTEMBER.
>> [OVERLAPPING] MAKING SURE WE HAVE A VAN THAT HAS AIR CONDITIONING FOR SOME OF YOU THAT MAY HAVE BEEN ON A COUPLE, THOSE AIR CONDITIONER WENT OUT.
>>FOR US, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING FOR US THIS EVENING?
>> EXCELLENT. WELL, APPRECIATE IT.
THAT JUST LEAVES US WITH ONE ITEM.
DO YOU HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN?
>> MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KELLY.
>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BOX. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
>> ANY OPPOSE? MOTION CARRIES FOR WE ARE ADJOURNED.
>> 6:56. THANK YOU-ALL.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.